Benchmarking common uncertainty estimation methods with histopathological images under domain shift and label noise

MERIT: Multi-view evidential learning for reliable and interpretable liver fibrosis staging

Accurate staging of liver fibrosis from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is crucial in clinical practice. While conventional methods often focus on a specific sub-region, multi-view learning captures more information by analyzing multiple patches simultaneously. However, previous multi-view approaches could not typically calculate uncertainty by nature, and they generally integrate features from different views in a black-box fashion, hence compromising reliability as well as interpretability of the resulting models. In this work, we propose a new multi-view method based on evidential learning, referred to as MERIT, which tackles the two challenges in a unified framework. MERIT enables uncertainty quantification of the predictions to enhance reliability, and employs a logic-based combination rule to improve interpretability. Specifically, MERIT models the prediction from each sub-view as an opinion with quantified uncertainty under the guidance of the subjective logic theory. Furthermore, a distribution-aware base rate is introduced to enhance performance, particularly in scenarios involving class distribution shifts. Finally, MERIT adopts a feature-specific combination rule to explicitly fuse multi-view predictions, thereby enhancing interpretability. Results have showcased the effectiveness of the proposed MERIT, highlighting the reliability and offering both ad-hoc and post-hoc interpretability. They also illustrate that MERIT can elucidate the significance of each view in the decision-making process for liver fibrosis staging. Our code will be released via https://github.com/HenryLau7/MERIT.

Trustworthy clinical AI solutions: A unified review of uncertainty quantification in Deep Learning models for medical image analysis

The full acceptance of Deep Learning (DL) models in the clinical field is rather low with respect to the quantity of high-performing solutions reported in the literature. End users are particularly reluctant to rely on the opaque predictions of DL models. Uncertainty quantification methods have been proposed in the literature as a potential solution, to reduce the black-box effect of DL models and increase the interpretability and the acceptability of the result by the final user. In this review, we propose an overview of the existing methods to quantify uncertainty associated with DL predictions. We focus on applications to medical image analysis, which present specific challenges due to the high dimensionality of images and their variable quality, as well as constraints associated with real-world clinical routine. Moreover, we discuss the concept of structural uncertainty, a corpus of methods to facilitate the alignment of segmentation uncertainty estimates with clinical attention. We then discuss the evaluation protocols to validate the relevance of uncertainty estimates. Finally, we highlight the open challenges for uncertainty quantification in the medical field.