Experiencia de un programa de donación en asistolia Maastricht II en una ciudad de pequeño tamaño: resultados preliminares

Kidney Transplantation Outcomes From Uncontrolled Donation After Circulatory Death: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Uncontrolled donation after circulatory death (uDCD) is a potential additional source of donor kidneys. This study reviewed uDCD kidney transplant outcomes to determine if these are comparable to controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD).

METHODS

MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched. Data on demographic information and transplant outcomes were extracted from included studies. Meta-analyses were performed, and risk ratios (RR) were estimated to compare transplant outcomes from uDCD to cDCD.

RESULTS

Nine cohort studies were included, from 2178 uDCD kidney transplants. There was a moderate degree of bias, as 4 studies did not account for potential confounding factors. The median incidence of primary nonfunction in uDCD was 12.3% versus 5.7% for cDCD (RR, 1.85; 95% confidence intervals, 1.06-3.23; P  = 0.03, I 2  = 75). The median rate of delayed graft function was 65.1% for uDCD and 52.0% for cDCD. The median 1-y graft survival for uDCD was 82.7% compared with 87.5% for cDCD (RR, 1.43; 95% confidence intervals, 1.02-2.01; P  = 0.04; I 2  = 71%). The median 5-y graft survival for uDCD and cDCD was 70% each. Notably, the use of normothermic regional perfusion improved primary nonfunction rates in uDCD grafts.

CONCLUSIONS

Although uDCD outcomes may be inferior in the short-term, the long-term outcomes are comparable to cDCD.

Lung transplantation from controlled donation after circulatory death using simultaneous abdominal normothermic regional perfusion: A single center experience

Despite the benefits of abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (A-NRP) for abdominal grafts in controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD), there is limited information on the effect of A-NRP on the quality of the cDCD lungs. We aimed to study the effect of A-NRP in lungs obtained from cDCD and its impact on recipients´ outcomes. This is a study comparing outcomes of lung transplants (LT) from cDCD donors (September 2014 to December 2021) obtained using A-NRP as the abdominal preservation method. As controls, all lung recipients transplanted from donors after brain death (DBD) were considered. The primary outcomes were lung recipient 3-month, 1-year, and 5-year survival. A total of 269 LT were performed (60 cDCD and 209 DBD). There was no difference in survival at 3 months (98.3% cDCD vs. 93.7% DBD), 1 year (90.9% vs. 87.2%), and 5 years (68.7% vs. 69%). LT from the cDCD group had a higher rate of primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at 72 h (10% vs. 3.4%; p <  .001). This is the largest experience ever reported with the use of A-NRP combined with lung retrieval in cDCD donors. This combined method is safe for lung grafts presenting short-term survival outcomes equivalent to those transplanted through DBD.

Potential of Donation After Unexpected Circulatory Death Programs Defined by Their Demographic Characteristics

Background.

Donation after unexpected circulatory death (uDCD) donors are often suggested to increase the number of donor organs. In 2014, a uDCD protocol was implemented in three transplant centers in the Netherlands which unfortunately did not result in additional transplantations. This study was initiated to identify demographic factors influencing the potential success of uDCD programs.

Methods.

Dutch resuscitation databases covering various demographic regions were analyzed for potential donors. The databases were compared with the uDCD implementation project and successful uDCD programs in Spain, France, and Russia.

Results.

The resuscitation databases showed that 61% of all resuscitated patients were transferred to an emergency department. Age selection reduced this uDCD potential to 46% with only patients aged 18–65 years deemed eligible. Of these patients, 27% died in the emergency department. The urban region of Amsterdam showed the largest potential in absolute numbers (52 patients/y). Comparison with the uDCD implementation project showed large similarities in the percentage of potential donors; however, in absolute numbers, it showed a much smaller potential. Calculation of the potential per million persons and the extrapolation of the potential based on the international experience revealed the largest potential in urban regions.

Conclusions.

Implementation of a uDCD program should not only be based on the number of potential donors calculated from resuscitation databases. They show promising potential uDCD percentages for large rural regions and small urban regions; however, actual numbers per hospital are low, leading to insufficient exposure rates. It is, therefore, recommendable to limit uDCD programs to large urban regions.

Estimating the potential pool of uncontrolled DCD donors in the United States

Organs from uncontrolled DCD donors (uDCDs) have expanded donation in Europe since the 1980s, but are seldom used in the United States. Cited barriers include lack of knowledge about the potential donor pool, lack of robust outcomes data, lack of standard donor eligibility criteria and preservation methods, and logistical and ethical challenges. To determine whether it would be appropriate to invest in addressing these barriers and building this practice, we sought to enumerate the potential pool of uDCD donors. Using data from the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, the largest all-payer emergency department (ED) database, between 2013 and 2016, we identified patients who had refractory cardiac arrest in the ED. We excluded patients with contraindications to both deceased donation (including infection, malignancy, cardiopulmonary disease) and uDCD (including hemorrhage, major polytrauma, burns, and poisoning). We identified 9828 (range: 9454-10 202) potential uDCDs/y; average age was 32 years, and all were free of major comorbidity. Of these, 91.1% had traumatic deaths, with major causes including nonhead blunt injuries (43.2%) and head injuries (40.1%). In the current era, uDCD donors represent a significant potential source of unused organs. Efforts to address barriers to uDCD in the United States should be encouraged.

Uncontrolled Donation After Circulatory Death: A Unique Opportunity

Uncontrolled donation after circulatory death (uDCD) refers to donation from persons who die following an unexpected and unsuccessfully resuscitated cardiac arrest. Despite the large potential for uDCD, programs of this kind only exist in a reduced number of countries with a limited activity. Barriers to uDCD are of a logistical and ethical-legal nature, as well as arising from the lack of confidence in the results of transplants from uDCD donors. The procedure needs to be designed to reduce and limit the impact of the prolonged warm ischemia inherent to the uDCD process, and to deal with the ethical issues that this practice poses: termination of advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation, extension of advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation beyond futility for organ preservation, moment to approach families to discuss donation opportunities, criteria for the determination of death, or the use of normothermic regional perfusion for the in situ preservation of organs. Although the incidence of primary nonfunction and delayed graft function is higher with organs obtained from uDCD donors, overall patient and graft survival is acceptable in kidney, liver, and lung transplantation, with a proper selection and management of both donors and recipients. Normothermic regional perfusion has shown to be critical to achieve optimal outcomes in uDCD kidney and liver transplantation. However, the role of ex situ preservation with machine perfusion is still to be elucidated. uDCD is a unique opportunity to improve patient access to transplantation therapies and to offer more patients the chance to donate organs after death, if this is consistent with their wishes and values.

Strict selection criteria in uncontrolled donation after circulatory death provide excellent long-term kidney graft survival

BACKGROUND

We aimed to report our experience in uncontrolled donation after circulatory death (uDCD) kidney transplantation applying a strict donor selection and preservation criteria.

METHODS

All kidney recipients received a graft from a local uDCD. As controls, we included all renal transplants from local standard criteria donation after brain death (SDBD) donors. Normothermic regional perfusion was the preservation method in all cases.

RESULTS

A total of 19 kidneys from uDCD donors were included and 67 controls. Delayed graft function (DGF) was higher in the uDCD group (42.1% vs 17.9%; P = .033), whereas no differences were observed in primary nonfunction (0% cases vs 3% controls; P = .605). The estimated glomerular filtration rate was identical in both groups. No differences were observed in graft survival censored for death between the uDCD and the SDBD groups at 1-year (100% vs 95%) or 5-year follow-up (92% vs 91%). uDCD kidney recipients did not have higher risk of graft loss in the multivariate analysis adjusted by recipient age, cold ischemic time, presence of DGF, and second kidney transplant (HR: 0.4; 95% CI 0.02-6; P = .509).

CONCLUSIONS

Obtaining renal grafts from uDCD is feasible in a small city and provides similar outcomes compared to standard DBD donors.

Criteria to Identify a Potential Deceased Organ Donor: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the global published literature defining a potential deceased organ donor and identifying clinical triggers for deceased organ donation identification and referral.

DATA SOURCES

Medline and Embase databases from January 2006 to September 2017.

STUDY SELECTION

All published studies containing a definition of a potential deceased organ donor and/or clinical triggers for referring a potential deceased organ donor were eligible for inclusion. Dual, independent screening was conducted of 3,857 citations.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data extraction was completed by one team member and verified by a second team member. Thematic content analysis was used to identify clinical criteria for potential deceased organ donation identification from the published definitions and clinical triggers.

DATA SYNTHESIS

One hundred twenty-four articles were included in the review. Criteria fell into four categories: Neurological, Medical Decision, Cardiorespiratory, and Administrative. Distinct and globally consistent sets of clinical criteria by type of deceased organ donation (neurologic death determination, controlled donation after circulatory determination of death, and uncontrolled donation after circulatory determination of death) are reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the clinical criteria sets reported will reduce ambiguity associated with the deceased organ donor identification and the subsequent referral process, potentially reducing the number of missed donors and saving lives globally through increased transplantation.

Excellent long-term outcome with lungs obtained from uncontrolled donation after circulatory death

We aimed to propose a simple and effective preservation method in lungs procured for transplantation from uncontrolled donation after circulatory death (uDCD) associated with excellent long-term results. Outcome measures for lung recipients were survival and primary graft dysfunction (PGD) grade 3. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A total of 9 lung uDCDs were evaluated and 8 lung transplants were performed. Mean no-flow time was 9.8 minutes (standard deviation [SD] 8.6). Mean time from cardiac arrest to topical cooling was 96.8 minutes (SD 16.8). Preservation time was 159 minutes (SD 31). Ex vivo lung perfusion was used to assess lung function prior to transplantation in 2 cases. Mean recipient age was 60.8 years (SD 3.1), and mean total ischemic time was 678 minutes (SD 132). PGD grade 3 was observed in 2 cases (25%). The 1-month, 1-year, and 5-year survival rates were 100%, 87.5%, and 87.5%, respectively. Mean follow-up was 52 months. The logistic complexity of procuring lungs from uDCDs for transplantation requires the development of new strategies designed to facilitate this type of donation. A program based on strict selection criteria, using a simple and effective preservation technique, may recover lung grafts with excellent long-term posttransplant outcomes.

Donation after circulatory death and its expansion in Spain

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) is still performed in a limited number of countries. This article summarizes the development of DCD in Spain and presents recent Spanish contributions to gain knowledge on the potential benefits and the practical use of normothermic regional perfusion (nRP).

RECENT FINDINGS

DCD now contributes to 24% of deceased donors in Spain. The development of DCD has been based on an assessment of practices in the treatment of cardiac arrest and end-of-life care to accommodate the option of DCD; the creation of an adequate regulatory framework; and institutional support, professional training and public education. Appropriate posttransplant outcomes have been obtained with organs from both uncontrolled and controlled DCD donors. nRP is increasingly used, with preliminary data supporting improved results compared with other in-situ preservation/recovery approaches. Mobile teams with portable extracorporeal membrane oxygenation devices are making nRP possible in hospitals without these resources. To avoid the possibility of reestablishing brain circulation after the determination of death, a specific methodology has been validated.

SUMMARY

DCD has been successfully developed in Spain following a streamlined process. nRP may become a standard in DCD, although further evidence on the benefits of this technology is eagerly awaited.

Kidney transplantation from donors after uncontrolled circulatory death: the Spanish experience

Donation after uncontrolled circulatory death (uDCD) refers to donation from persons who have died following cardiac arrest and unsuccessful attempt at resuscitation. We report the Spanish experience of uDCD kidney transplantation, and identify factors related to short-term post-transplant outcomes. The Spanish CORE system compiles data on all donation and transplant procedures in the country. Between 2012-2015, 517 kidney transplants from 288 uDCD donors were performed. The incidence of primary non-function was 10%, and the incidence of delayed graft function was 76%. One-year death-censored graft survival was 87%. In a Cox-Model, donor age ≥ 60 years (odds ratio [OR] 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-6.1), in situ cooling of kidneys versus normothermic regional perfusion (OR 5.6; 95% CI 2.7-11.5) or hypothermic regional perfusion based on the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation devices (OR 4.3; 95% CI 2.1-8.6), and a recipient history of prior kidney transplant (OR 3.5; 95% CI 1.5-8.3) all significantly increased the risk of graft loss during the first year after transplantation. Kidney transplantation from uDCD donors provides acceptable 1-year outcomes, although there is room for improvement. Hypothermic and normothermic regional perfusion strategies are preferable to in situ cooling of kidneys from uDCD donors.

Short-term Results From a Training Program to Improve Organ Donation in Uncontrolled Donation After Circulatory Death

BACKGROUND

In all organ transplantation programs, election of the proper protocol relies primarily on the professionals involved in the detection of potential donors. The objective of our study was to assess the impact of a series of prehospital training sessions, as well as to develop several positive feedback strategies within the uncontrolled organ donation after circulatory death (uDCD) program in our city.

METHODS

A before-after intervention study was carried out in 3 steps. First, professionals enrolled in the Emergency Health Services Agency-061 (EPES-061) program underwent specific training to identify potential donors. Second, a specific logotype was designed to alert emergency health care professionals that in cases where cardiopulmonary resuscitation was ineffective and after treatment of all potentially reversible causes, the "chain of survival" should be considered a "chain of opportunities." Third, a positive feedback strategy was put in place, whereby each time a donation was procured, the EPES-061 personnel that had identified the potential donor were notified by phone and in a personal letter.

RESULTS

The mean age for donors was 50.5 years of age (interquartile range 37-52.5), and 89.5% of all donations came from male subjects. Positive feedback letters and phone calls, including information on final outcome, were provided to the appropriate personnel in 100% of the cases. Postintervention information showed an increase in both eligible and utilized donors.

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions outside the hospital setting that facilitate optimal implementation of the uDCD program are an essential part of this strategy to increase the donor pool and make the wait shorter for transplant patients.

Improving the Outcomes of Organs Obtained From Controlled Donation After Circulatory Death Donors Using Abdominal Normothermic Regional Perfusion

The use of donation after circulatory death (DCD) has increased significantly during the past decade. However, warm ischemia results in a greater risk for transplantation. Indeed, controlled DCD (cDCD) was associated with inferior outcomes compared with donation after brain death. The use of abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (nRP) to restore blood flow before organ recovery in cDCD has been proposed as better than rapid recovery to reverse the effect of ischemia and improve recipients' outcome. Here, the first Spanish series using abdominal nRP as an in situ conditioning method is reported. A specific methodology to avoid restoring circulation to the brain after death determination is described. Twenty-seven cDCD donors underwent abdominal nRP during at least 60 min. Thirty-seven kidneys, 11 livers, six bilateral lungs, and one pancreas were transplanted. The 1-year death-censored kidney survival was 91%, and delayed graft function rate was 27%. The 1-year liver survival rate was 90.1% with no cases of ischemic cholangiopathy. Transplanted lungs and pancreas exhibited primary function. The use of nRP may represent an advance to increase the number and quality of grafts in cDCD. Poor results in cDCD livers could be reversed with nRP. Concerns about restoring brain circulation after death are easily solved.