Noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring in critically ill pediatric patients at risk of bleeding

Management of severe peri-operative bleeding: Guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care: Second update 2022

BACKGROUND

Management of peri-operative bleeding is complex and involves multiple assessment tools and strategies to ensure optimal patient care with the goal of reducing morbidity and mortality. These updated guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) aim to provide an evidence-based set of recommendations for healthcare professionals to help ensure improved clinical management.

DESIGN

A systematic literature search from 2015 to 2021 of several electronic databases was performed without language restrictions. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies and to formulate recommendations. A Delphi methodology was used to prepare a clinical practice guideline.

RESULTS

These searches identified 137 999 articles. All articles were assessed, and the existing 2017 guidelines were revised to incorporate new evidence. Sixteen recommendations derived from the systematic literature search, and four clinical guidances retained from previous ESAIC guidelines were formulated. Using the Delphi process on 253 sentences of guidance, strong consensus (>90% agreement) was achieved in 97% and consensus (75 to 90% agreement) in 3%.

DISCUSSION

Peri-operative bleeding management encompasses the patient's journey from the pre-operative state through the postoperative period. Along this journey, many features of the patient's pre-operative coagulation status, underlying comorbidities, general health and the procedures that they are undergoing need to be taken into account. Due to the many important aspects in peri-operative nontrauma bleeding management, guidance as to how best approach and treat each individual patient are key. Understanding which therapeutic approaches are most valuable at each timepoint can only enhance patient care, ensuring the best outcomes by reducing blood loss and, therefore, overall morbidity and mortality.

CONCLUSION

All healthcare professionals involved in the management of patients at risk for surgical bleeding should be aware of the current therapeutic options and approaches that are available to them. These guidelines aim to provide specific guidance for bleeding management in a variety of clinical situations.

Evaluation of the use of non-invasive hemoglobin measurement in early childhood

BACKGROUND

Iron deficiency anemia in children affects psychomotor development. We compared the accuracy and trend of a non-invasive transcutaneous spectrophotometric estimation of arterial hemoglobin (Hb) concentration (SpHb) by rainbow pulse CO-oximetry technology to the invasive blood Hb concentration measured by an automated clinical analyzer (Hb-Lab).

METHODS

We measured the SpHb and Hb-Lab in 109 patients aged 1-5 years. Regression analysis was used to evaluate differences between the two methods. The bias, accuracy, precision, and limits of agreement of SpHb compared with Hb-Lab were calculated using the Bland-Altman method.

RESULTS

Of the 109 enrolled subjects, 102 pairs of the SpHb and Hb-Lab datasets were collected. The average value of measured Hb was 12.9 ± 1.03 (standard deviation [SD]) g/dL for Hb-Lab. A significant correlation was observed between SpHb and Hb-Lab measurements (SpHb = 7.002 + 0.4722 Hb-Lab, correlation coefficient r = 0.548, 95% confidence interval = 0.329-0.615). Bland-Altman analysis showed good visual agreement, with a mean bias between SpHb and Hb-Lab of 0.188 ± 0.919 g/dL (mean ± SD).

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that non-invasive Hb measurement is useful for Hb estimation in children and provides new insights as a screening tool for anemia.

IMPACT

Our results indicated a good correlation between non-invasive transcutaneous spectrophotometric estimation of arterial hemoglobin (Hb) concentration using a finger probe sensor by rainbow pulse CO-oximetry technology and invasive blood Hb concentration. Although previous studies have indicated that in patients with a worse condition, the bias between the two methods was large, this study, which was conducted on children with stable disease, showed a relatively small bias. Further studies using this non-invasive device might help to understand the current status of anemia in Japan and promote iron intake and nutritional management in children.

Noninvasive Hemoglobin Measurement Reduce Invasive Procedures in Thalassemia Patients

This study was conducted to investigate the agreement between laboratory hemoglobin (LabHb) measured in venous blood and noninvasive, spectrophotometric hemoglobin (SpHb) measurement and the usability of SpHb measurement in the transfusion decision-making in patients with thalassemia whose hemoglobin (Hb) was monitored by taking blood samples at frequent intervals and who were transfused. Cardiac pulse, oxygen saturation, Pleth variability index (PVI), and SpHb values were measured in patients who came to the hematology outpatient clinic for a control visit and whose Hb levels were planned to be measured. Venous blood samples were taken for LabHb measurement, which we accept as the gold standard. Cohen's kappa value was calculated for the agreement between SpHb measurements and LabHb values. The relationship and predictability between both measurement methods were evaluated by Pearson correlation analysis, a modified Bland-Altman plot and the linear regression model. In the study conducted with a total of 110 children with thalassemia, a moderate level of agreement between the two measurement methods (kappa = 0.370, p < 0.0001) and a significantly high correlation between the two tests (r = 0.675) were found. The mean bias between the differences was found to be 0.3 g/dL (-1.27 to 1.86 g/dL). The sensitivity and the specificity of SpHb in identifying patients who needed transfusions (Hb <10.0 g/dL) were calculated as 92.2 and 57.1%, respectively. Our results suggest SpHb measurement may be used to screen anemia in hemodynamically stable hemoglobinopathy patients and even for transfusion decision-making with combination clinical findings.

The Comparison of Hemoglobin Values Measured by Blood and Continuous Non-Invasive Monitoring (SpHb) in Newborn Infants

OBJECTIVE

Hemoglobin (Hb) measurement is one of the most commonly used laboratory tests in medical practice. Unnecessary blood sampling, especially in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), contributes to iatrogenic anemia. Continuous non-invasive monitoring of total Hb (SpHb) was compared with invasive venous blood samples (tHb) in NICU patients.

METHODS

Three hundred and ten patients were identified in NICU. Non-invasive Hb measurement was performed immediately before venous blood sampling and comparison of invasive with non-invasive values was undertaken.

RESULTS

There was a strongly positive correlation between SpHb and tHb (r = 0.965, p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis was performed in 95% limits of agreement for Hb values measured by both methods. The mean bias between tHb and SpHb measurements was 0.05 g/dl (-1.85 to 1.96). In Passing-Bablok regression analysis, the CUSUM test p value was found to be 0.98 for Hb levels measured by SpHb and tHb; and the difference between the methods was not significant.

CONCLUSION

In newborns, SpHb method offers reliable Hb values, which are comparable with the more traditional tHb method. Continuous non-invasive monitoring of total Hb may help prevent unnecessary blood sampling and iatrogenic anemia. Further clinical studies are required for the effectiveness of the method in critically ill patients with circulatory disorders.

Intraoperative continuous noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring in patients with placenta previa undergoing cesarean section: a prospective observational study

Background

Obstetric patients with placenta previa are at risk for sever peripartum hemorrhage. Early detection of anemia and proper transfusion strategy are important for the management of obstetric hemorrhage. In this study, we assessed the utility and accuracy of noninvasive hemoglobin (SpHb) monitoring in patients with placenta previa during cesarean section.

Methods

Parturients diagnosed with placenta previa and scheduled for cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were enrolled. SpHb and laboratory Hb (Lab-Hb) were measured during surgery as primary outcomes.

Results

Seventy-four pairs of SpHb and Lab-Hb were collected from 39 patients. The correlation coefficient was 0.877 between SpHb and Lab-Hb (P < 0.001). The Bland–Altman plot showed a mean difference ± SD of 0.3 ± 0.8 g/dl between noninvasive Hb and Lab-Hb, and the limits of agreement were −1.2 to 1.8 g/dl. The magnitude of the difference between SpHb and Lab-Hb was < 0.5 g/dl in 64.9%; however, it was > 1.5 g/dl in 10.8%.

Conclusions

SpHb monitoring had a good correlation with Lab-Hb. A small mean difference between SpHb and lab-Hb might not be clinically significant; however, the limits of agreements were not narrow. In particular, SpHb could be overestimated in the anemic population. Based on our results, further studies investigating the accuracy and precision of SpHb monitoring should be performed in parturients presenting Hb below 10 g/dl.