Cardiac radiation improves ventricular function in mice and humans with cardiomyopathy

STAR Locally Prolongs Effective Refractory Period and Increases Ventricular Tachycardia Cycle Length Without Short-Term Scar Formation or Functional Decline: Insights From a Translational Porcine Model Study

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic arrhythmia radiotherapy (STAR) has emerged as a potential therapy for treatment-refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, the mechanisms underlying STAR efficacy, such as scar or other electromechanical changes, are still unclear. The goal of this study was to develop a translational porcine model of ischemic monomorphic VT treated with STAR to examine the physiological changes after a typical clinical STAR treatment.

METHODS

We treated a previously validated porcine model of monomorphic VT after myocardial infarction with a clinically derived STAR protocol. A dose of 25 Gy was prescribed to the planning target volume and 35 Gy to the clinical target volume (regions of scar), while controls underwent a sham STAR treatment. All investigators in the study were blinded except the treating investigator. The primary study outcome was VT inducibility at 6 weeks post-STAR. Animals underwent pre- and post-STAR cardiac magnetic resonance imaging to quantify myocardial scar and function, as well as body surface mapping. Six weeks post-STAR, animals underwent a VT induction study, and tissue was harvested for optical mapping and histological analysis.

RESULTS

Six animals completed the study, which ended before finishing enrollment because all animals had inducible VT. We found a significantly longer local effective refractory period in the left ventricular apex and longer VT cycle lengths in STAR-treated animals compared with controls (P<0.05). We found no difference in myocardial scar burden, mechanical function, or body surface recordings when comparing pre- and post-STAR.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest a novel therapeutic mechanism of STAR driven by increasing the effective refractory period in locally treated areas, corresponding to increased tissue wavelength. Our results corroborate clinical case reports and anecdotal evidence that STAR increases VT cycle length. Importantly, these effects were not mediated by an increase in myocardial scar burden. However, our studies do not examine the long-term effects of STAR.

Implementing stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation with STOPSTORM.eu consortium support: intermediate results of a prospective Israeli single-institutional trial

BACKGROUND

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a life-threatening arrhythmia originating from the heart's ventricles. Traditional treatments include antiarrhythmic medications, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), and catheter ablation. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) targeting the arrhythmogenic focus in the left ventricle-stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR)-is an emerging treatment and may offer a potential solution for patients with refractory VT.

OBJECTIVE

We designed an interventional prospective clinical trial in Israel aligned with the STOPSTORM.eu consortium's benchmarks, recommendations, and directives to assess the safety and efficacy of STAR in patients with refractory VT.

METHODS

Our phase I/II single-institutional trial was approved by the Ministry of Health of Israel for 10 patients, initially assessing safety in the first 3 patients. We included patients with ICDs experiencing symptomatic monomorphic VT after an inadequate response to previous therapies. The primary endpoints were treatment-related serious adverse events and a reduction in VT burden as assessed by ICD interrogation. Secondary outcomes included a reduction in antiarrhythmic medications and changes in quality of life.

RESULTS

From August 2023 to August 2024, 3 patients underwent STAR treatment. The prescription dose was a single fraction of 25 Gy. Planning target volumes were 47.8, 49.7, and 91.8 cc, and treatment was successfully delivered with no grade 3 or higher adverse events reported. Over a follow-up period of 12 months for the first patient and 8 months for the second one, no VT events were recorded after treatment. The third patient died from progressive heart failure 3 months after treatment. Left ventricular ejection fraction remained stable, and no significant radiation-induced inflammatory changes were noted.

CONCLUSION

The initial results of this trial suggest that STAR can reduce VT episodes in patients with refractory VT without severe adverse effects. The study highlights the importance of international collaboration and standardization in pioneering new treatments. Further follow-up and additional patient data will be necessary to confirm these findings and evaluate long-term outcomes, including potential adjustments to antiarrhythmic medication regimens.

Cardiac Complications of Radiation Therapy

Radiation therapy is a critical component in managing many malignancies by improving local control and survival. The benefits of radiation may come at the expense of unintended radiation injury to the surrounding normal tissues, with the heart being one of the most affected organs in thoracic radiation treatments. As cancer survivors live longer, radiation-induced cardiotoxicity (RICT) is now increasingly recognized. In this review, we highlight the spectrum and pathophysiology of RICT. We summarize contemporary recommendations for risk stratification, screening, prevention, and management of RICT. We briefly highlight novel applications for radiation to treat some cardiac conditions such as resistant arrhythmias.

Pulmonary artery denervation by noninvasive stereotactic radiotherapy: a pilot study in swine models of pulmonary hypertension

Catheter-based pulmonary artery denervation (PADN) has achieved promising outcomes to treat pulmonary hypertension (PH). We herein present stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as a novel noninvasive approach for PADN. A single fraction of 15 Gy, 20 Gy or 25 Gy was delivered for PADN in a thromboxane A2 (TxA2) - induced acute PH swine model. We demonstrated that PADN by 20-Gy SBRT reduced mean pulmonary artery (PA) pressure during the TxA2 challenge. All SBRT dosages led to a deeper denervation area compared with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and reduced sympathetic neural norepinephrine synthesis in the ablation zone. Probable radiation related side effects were mostly found in animals treated with 25-Gy. In subsequent monocrotaline-induced chronic PH animals, PADN by 20-Gy SBRT resulted in more significant improvement in pulmonary hemodynamics and PA remodeling in comparison to RFA. In summary, our findings suggest that appropriate SBRT scheme could balance the efficacy and safety for PADN, potentiating to be a novel strategy to treat PH.

Refining Treatment Planning in STereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation: Benchmark Results and Consensus Statement From the STOPSTORM.eu Consortium

PURPOSE

STereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation (STAR) showed promising results in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia. However, clinical data are scarce and heterogeneous. The STOPSTORM.eu consortium was established to investigate and harmonize STAR in Europe. The primary goal of this benchmark study was to investigate current treatment planning practice within the STOPSTORM project as a baseline for future harmonization.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Planning target volumes (PTVs) overlapping extracardiac organs-at-risk and/or cardiac substructures were generated for 3 STAR cases. Participating centers were asked to create single-fraction treatment plans with 25 Gy dose prescriptions based on in-house clinical practice. All treatment plans were reviewed by an expert panel and quantitative crowd knowledge-based analysis was performed with independent software using descriptive statistics for International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements report 91 relevant parameters and crowd dose-volume histograms. Thereafter, treatment planning consensus statements were established using a dual-stage voting process.

RESULTS

Twenty centers submitted 67 treatment plans for this study. In most plans (75%) intensity modulated arc therapy with 6 MV flattening filter free beams was used. Dose prescription was mainly based on PTV D95% (49%) or D96%-100% (19%). Many participants preferred to spare close extracardiac organs-at-risk (75%) and cardiac substructures (50%) by PTV coverage reduction. PTV D0.035cm3 ranged from 25.5 to 34.6 Gy, demonstrating a large variety of dose inhomogeneity. Estimated treatment times without motion compensation or setup ranged from 2 to 80 minutes. For the consensus statements, a strong agreement was reached for beam technique planning, dose calculation, prescription methods, and trade-offs between target and extracardiac critical structures. No agreement was reached on cardiac substructure dose limitations and on desired dose inhomogeneity in the target.

CONCLUSIONS

This STOPSTORM multicenter treatment planning benchmark study not only showed strong agreement on several aspects of STAR treatment planning, but also revealed disagreement on others. To standardize and harmonize STAR in the future, consensus statements were established; however, clinical data are urgently needed for actionable guidelines for treatment planning.

Mechanistic Insights and Knowledge Gaps in the Effects of Radiation Therapy on Cardiac Arrhythmias

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an innovative modality for the treatment of refractory ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). Phase 1/2 clinical trials have demonstrated the remarkable efficacy of SBRT at reducing VA burden (by >85%) in patients with good short-term safety. SBRT as an option for VA treatment delivered in an ambulatory nonsedated patient in a single fraction during an outpatient session of 15 to 30 minutes, without added risks of anesthetic or surgery, is clinically relevant. However, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Currently, the clinical dosing of SBRT has been derived from preclinical studies aimed at inducing transmural fibrosis in the atria. The propitious clinical effects of SBRT appear earlier than the time course for fibrosis. This review addresses the plausible mechanisms by which radiation alters the electrophysiological properties of myocytes and myocardial conduction to impart an antiarrhythmic effect, elucidate clinical observations, and point the direction for further research in this promising area.

Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR)-A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective trials on behalf of the STOPSTORM.eu consortium

Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) is a noninvasive treatment of refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT). In this study, we aimed to systematically review prospective trials on STAR and pool harmonized outcome measures in a meta-analysis. After registration in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42023439666), we searched OVID Medline, OVID Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar on November 9, 2023, to identify reports describing results of prospective trials evaluating STAR for VT. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool. Meta-analysis was performed using generalized linear mixed models. We identified 10 prospective trials in which 82 patients were treated with STAR between 2016 and 2022. The 90-day rate of treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events was 0.10 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-0.2). The proportions of patients achieving given VT burden reductions were 0.61 (95% CI 0.45-0.74) for ≥95%, 0.80 (95% CI 0.62-0.91) for ≥75%, and 0.9 (95% CI 0.77-0.96) for ≥50% in 63 evaluable patients. The 1-year overall survival rate was 0.73 (95% CI 0.61-0.83) in 81 patients, 1-year freedom from recurrence was 0.30 (95% CI 0.16-0.49) in 61 patients, and 1-year recurrence-free survival was 0.21 in 60 patients (95% CI 0.08-0.46). Limitations include methodological heterogeneity across studies and moderate to significant risk of bias. In conclusion, STAR is a promising treatment method, characterized by moderate toxicity. We observed 1-year mortality of ≈27% in this population of critically ill patients suffering from refractory VT. Most patients experience a significant reduction in VT burden; however, 1-year recurrence rates are high. STAR should still be considered an investigational approach and recommended to patients primarily within the context of prospective trials.

Radiation therapy for ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) can be life-threatening arrhythmias that result in significant morbidity and mortality. Catheter ablation (CA) is an invasive treatment modality that can be effective in the treatment of VA where medications fail. Recurrence occurs commonly following CA due to an inability to deliver lesions of adequate depth to cauterise the electrical circuits that drive VA or reach areas of scar responsible for VA. Stereotactic body radiotherapy is a non-invasive treatment modality that allows volumetric delivery of energy to treat circuits that cannot be reached by CA. It overcomes the weaknesses of CA and has been successfully utilised in small clinical trials to treat refractory VA. This article summarises the current evidence for this novel treatment modality and the steps that will be required to bring it to the forefront of VA treatment.

Case of Successful Sympathetic Nerve Modulation by Targeted Heavy Ion Radiotherapy for Idiopathic Ventricular Tachycardia

Non-invasive radioablation using stereotactic body radiation therapy with X-ray has been proposed as a rescue treatment for refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, there are concerns about the occurrence of late valvular or coronary disease. We treated VT originating from the aortic sinus cusp using the Bragg peak principle of a heavy ion beam, minimizing the dose to the aortic valve and coronary artery and providing an anti-arrhythmic effect and cardiac function recovery due to improved sympathetic nerve heterogeneity. We present a method for targeting sympathetic nerve distribution using 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy.

Role of ferroptosis in radiation-induced soft tissue injury

Ionizing radiation has been pivotal in cancer therapy since its discovery. Despite its therapeutic benefits, IR causes significant acute and chronic complications due to DNA damage and the generation of reactive oxygen species, which harm nucleic acids, lipids, and proteins. While cancer cells are more vulnerable to ionizing radiation due to their inefficiency in repairing damage, healthy cells in the irradiated area also suffer. Various types of cell death occur, including apoptosis, necrosis, pyroptosis, autophagy-dependent cell death, immunogenic cell death, and ferroptosis. Ferroptosis, driven by iron-dependent lipid peroxide accumulation, has been recognized as crucial in radiation therapy's therapeutic effects and complications, with extensive research across various tissues. This review aims to summarize the pathways involved in radiation-related ferroptosis, findings in different organs, and drugs targeting ferroptosis to mitigate its harmful effects.

Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation and its implications for modern cardiac electrophysiology: results of an EHRA survey

Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) is a treatment option for recurrent ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) in patients with structural heart disease (SHD). The current and future role of STAR as viewed by cardiologists is unknown. The study aimed to assess the current role, barriers to application, and expected future role of STAR. An online survey consisting of 20 questions on baseline demographics, awareness/access, current use, and the future role of STAR was conducted. A total of 129 international participants completed the survey [mean age 43 ± 11 years, 25 (16.4%) female]. Ninety-one (59.9%) participants were electrophysiologists. Nine participants (7%) were unaware of STAR as a therapeutic option. Sixty-four (49.6%) had access to STAR, while 62 (48.1%) had treated/referred a patient for treatment. Common primary indications for STAR were recurrent VT/VF in SHD (45%), recurrent VT/VF without SHD (7.8%), or premature ventricular contraction (3.9%). Reported main advantages of STAR were efficacy in the treatment of arrhythmias not amenable to conventional treatment (49%) and non-invasive treatment approach with overall low expected acute and short-term procedural risk (23%). Most respondents have foreseen a future clinical role of STAR in the treatment of VT/VF with or without underlying SHD (72% and 75%, respectively), although only a minority expected a first-line indication for it (7% and 5%, respectively). Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation as a novel treatment option of recurrent VT appears to gain acceptance within the cardiology community. Further trials are critical to further define efficacy, patient populations, as well as the appropriate clinical use for the treatment of VT.

Radiotherapy for non-cancer diseases: benefits and long-term risks

PURPOSE

The discovery of X-rays was followed by a variety of attempts to treat infectious diseases and various other non-cancer diseases with ionizing radiation, in addition to cancer. There has been a recent resurgence of interest in the use of such radiotherapy for non-cancer diseases. Non-cancer diseases for which use of radiotherapy has currently been proposed include refractory ventricular tachycardia, neurodegenerative diseases (e.g. Alzheimer's disease and dementia), and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia, all with ongoing clinical studies that deliver radiation doses of 0.5-25 Gy in a single fraction or in multiple daily fractions. In addition to such non-cancer effects, historical indications predominantly used in some countries (e.g. Germany) include osteoarthritis and degenerative diseases of the bones and joints. This narrative review gives an overview of the biological rationale and ongoing preclinical and clinical studies for radiotherapy proposed for various non-cancer diseases, discusses the plausibility of the proposed biological rationale, and considers the long-term radiation risks of cancer and non-cancer diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

A growing body of evidence has suggested that radiation represents a double-edged sword, not only for cancer, but also for non-cancer diseases. At present, clinical evidence has shown some beneficial effects of radiotherapy for ventricular tachycardia, but there is little or no such evidence of radiotherapy for other newly proposed non-cancer diseases (e.g. Alzheimer's disease, COVID-19 pneumonia). Patients with ventricular tachycardia and COVID-19 pneumonia have thus far been treated with radiotherapy when they are an urgent life threat with no efficient alternative treatment, but some survivors may encounter a paradoxical situation where patients were rescued by radiotherapy but then get harmed by radiotherapy. Further studies are needed to justify the clinical use of radiotherapy for non-cancer diseases, and optimize dose to diseased tissue while minimizing dose to healthy tissue.