Bueno TM, Diz AI, Cervera PQ, Pérez-Rodríguez J, Quero J. Peripheral insertion of double-lumen central venous catheter using the Seldinger technique in newborns.
J Perinatol 2008;
28:282-6. [PMID:
18200023 DOI:
10.1038/sj.jp.7211923]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To report the experience of peripheral insertion of double-lumen central catheters (PIDLCC) in preterm and term newborn infants and to analyze the technical characteristics of the procedure and any observed complications.
STUDY DESIGN
Retrospective review of 61 newborns that had a PIDLCC between 2003 and 2006. The study comprised clinical data analysis, anthropometrics, indications, duration, complications and reasons for withdrawal of the catheters.
RESULT
Weight of the patients was <1 kg in 10%, and >2 kg in 75%. Catheters tip placement was as aimed, mostly superior cava vein (SCV), in 65.5%, and subclavian vein in remaining 34.5% and average duration of catheterization was 13.5+/-9.6 and 8.9+/-5.8 days, respectively. Blood sampling through both lumens was possible especially when the tip was at SCV. Reasons for catheter withdrawal were end of indication (45.9%), phlebitis/edema (21.3%), suspected infection (3.2%), accidental withdrawal (3.2%) and rupture of proximal end (3.2%). In three (4.9%) patients, withdrawal was due to serious complications (two cases of pleural leakage of infusion fluid and one breakage of the metallic guide). About 16.3% of the patients died with the catheter still in situ. Infection findings were positive tip culture (14.7%) and catheter-related sepsis (3.2%).
CONCLUSION
Insertion of PIDLCC is possible in neonates. The incidence of complications, mostly mechanical, requires careful evaluation of indications, and strict adherence to the procedure of insertion and manipulation.
Collapse