Spontaneous first trimester posterior uterine rupture in a multiparous woman with scarred uterus: A case report

A rare case of uterine rupture in the first trimester of pregnancy: Case report and review of literature

Uterine rupture is a serious and potentially life-threatening complication. It is commonly a complication that happens in the third trimester of pregnancy. Its occurrence in early pregnancy is very rare. We report a case of a patient who presented with uterine rupture on a scarred uterus during the termination of pregnancy with misoprostol at 10 weeks' amenorrhea. In this case, we discuss the clinical warning signs, risk factors, and diagnostic methodology, and compare our approach with the literature.

A cesarean section scar dehiscence during the first trimester of an intrauterine pregnancy: a rare case report and literature review

Uterine rupture is specified as a complete laceration of the uterine wall, including its serosa, leading to a connection between the endometrial and peritoneal chambers. It can occur in any stage of pregnancy and is considered a severe and perhaps fatal complication. A 35-year-old woman at 9 weeks of gestation with a medical history of five prior cesarean sections presented with lower abdominal pain that had lasted for 5 hr. We detected small amounts of free fluid in the Douglas pouch using ultrasound. Subsequently, a laparotomy revealed a cesarean scar dehiscence from a non-cesarean scar pregnancy. Patients who experience a uterine rupture may have vague symptoms, severe abdominal discomfort, abnormal uterine bleeding, and severe hemorrhagic shock, depending on their gestational age. Ultrasound imaging can be used to diagnose this fatal condition in addition to laparoscopy to immediately identify and treat the issue in urgent cases.

Uterine rupture in the first trimester: a case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Uterine rupture is a rare complication that can occur in the first trimester of pregnancy. It can lead to serious maternal morbidity or mortality, which is mostly due to catastrophic bleeding. First trimester uterine rupture is rare; hence, diagnosis can be challenging as it may be confused with other causes of early pregnancy bleeding such as an ectopic pregnancy. We present a case of first trimester scar dehiscence and conduct a literature review of this rare condition.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 39-year-old African patient with four previous hysterotomy scars presented with severe lower abdominal pain at 11 weeks of gestation. She had two previous histories of third trimester uterine rupture in previous pregnancies with subsequent hysterotomies and repair. She underwent a diagnostic laparoscopy that confirmed the diagnosis of a 10 cm anterior wall uterine rupture. A laparotomy and repair of the rupture was subsequently done.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the case presented adds to the body of evidence of uterine scar dehiscence in the first trimester. The risk factors, clinical presentation, diagnostic imaging, and management outlined may help in early identification and management of this rare but life threatening condition.

First-trimester uterine rupture: a case report and systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to present a case of first-trimester uterine rupture and perform a systematic review to identify common presentations, risk factors, and management strategies.

DATA SOURCES

Searches were performed in PubMed, Ovid, and Scopus using a combination of key words related to "uterine rupture," "first trimester," and "early pregnancy" from database inception to September 30, 2020.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

English language descriptions of uterine rupture at ≤14 weeks of gestation were included, and cases involving pregnancy termination and ectopic pregnancy were excluded.

METHODS

Outcomes for the systematic review included maternal demographics, description of uterine rupture, and specifics of uterine rupture diagnosis and management. Data were extracted to custom-made reporting forms. Median values were calculated for continuous variables, and percentages were calculated for categorical variables. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for case reports and case series.

RESULTS

Overall, 61 cases of first-trimester uterine rupture were identified, including our novel case. First-trimester uterine ruptures occurred at a median gestation of 11 weeks. Most patients (59/61 [97%]) had abdominal pain as a presenting symptom, and previous uterine surgery was prevalent (44/61 [62%]), usually low transverse cesarean delivery (32/61 [52%]). The diagnosis of uterine rupture was generally made after surgical exploration (37/61 [61%]), with rupture noted in the fundus in 26 of 61 cases (43%) and in the lower segment in 27 of 61 cases (44%). Primary repair of the defect was possible in 40 of 61 cases (66%), whereas hysterectomy was performed in 18 of 61 cases (30%). Continuing pregnancy was possible in 4 of 61 cases (7%).

CONCLUSION

Uterine rupture is an uncommon occurrence but should be considered in patients with an acute abdomen in early pregnancy, especially in women with previous uterine surgery. Surgical exploration is typically needed to confirm the diagnosis and for management. Hysterectomy is not always necessary; primary uterine repair is sufficient in more than two-thirds of the cases to achieve hemostasis. Continuing pregnancy, although uncommon, is also possible.

Posterior uterine rupture in early first trimester

Uterine rupture can be associated with severe maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. It should be considered as a differential diagnosis in all pregnant women who present with acute abdomen, haemoperitoneum and have specific risk factors, even during the first trimester. This is a case report of a 25-year-old woman who presented to emergency department with abdominal pain and vaginal bleeding at approximately 6-8 weeks gestation. She developed an acute surgical abdomen and required urgent surgical management. Despite intervention, she had massive haemorrhage, disseminate intravascular coagulation, admission to intensive care unit and prolonged hospital stay as complications. Posterior uterine wall rupture while rare, must be considered as a differential diagnosis as early intervention is crucial to prevent bad outcomes.

Spontaneous uterine rupture during the first trimester of a partial molar pregnancy in a scar uterus: A rare case report

Introduction

Spontaneous uterine rupture in the first trimester is a redoubtable obstetric emergency that carries a high risk for both mother and fetus.

Cases presentation

We present the case of a spontaneous uterine rupture in a patient with a scarred uterus at 9 weeks' gestation treated by laparotomy in emergency obstetrical department of Ibn Rochd University Hospital of Casablanca; whose histological examination of the removed material found a partial mole.

Clinical discussion

Spontaneous uterine rupture in the first trimester is rare and usually occurs in a scarred or malformed uterus. Clinicians should consider this diagnosis in the presence of an acute abdominal pain in early pregnancy with or without first trimester metrorrhagia.

Conclusion

Since the rate of uterine surgeries is increasing, it is necessary to highlight the risk of uterine rupture occurring early in order to improve their management. Molar pregnancy is a factor of fragility of the uterine wall and uterine rupture must be suspected in any molar pregnancy associated with a hemoperitoneum.

•

Spontaneous uterine rupture in the first trimester is rare.

•

Diagnosis suspected in the presence of any acute abdominal pain in early pregnancy.

•

Uterine scarring is the main factor promoting early uterine rupture

[Spontaneous open book uterine rupture at 15 weeks' gestation in a pauciparous woman with scarred uterus: a case study]

Despite all the health policies implemented in our developing countries, uterine rupture (RU) remains common. They are severe and involve maternal and fetal prognosis. Among the multiple risk factors, the most common cited in the literature is C-section scar. Most occurs during labor or at the end of pregnancy. Uterine rupture during the first or second trimester is exceptional and its clinical manifestation is variable. We here report a case of spontaneous uterine rupture at 15 weeks' gestation in a pauciparous woman with scarred uterus. Exacerbation of clinical symptoms was manifested by peritoneal irritation. Surgical exploration revealed complete vertical rupture from the bottom to the lower segment of the uterus with open book opening of the uterus. This study highlights that uterine rupture should be considered in patients with scarred uterus presenting with abdominal pain associated with signs of hemoperitoneum, regardless of whether their pregnancies are at term or in the first two trimesters, and regardless of age (young patients) and parity.

First Trimester Uterine Rupture: A Case Report and Literature Review

The aim is to report a case of spontaneous uterine rupture in the first trimester of pregnancy and to review the literature on the topic.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using PubMed and Scopus. Relevant English articles were identified without any time or study limitations. The data were aggregated, and a summary statistic was calculated.

RESULTS

A 35-year-old gravida 5, para 2 was admitted at our department because of fainting and abdominal pain. The woman had a first-trimester twin pregnancy and a history of two previous cesarean sections (CSs). Suspecting a uterine rupture, an emergency laparotomy was performed. The two sacs were completely removed, and the uterine rupture site was closed with a double-layer suture. The patient was discharged from hospital four days later in good condition. On the basis of this experience, a total of 76 case reports were extracted from PubMed and included in the review. Fifty-three patients out of 76 (69.74%) underwent previous surgery on the uterus. Most women (67.92%) had a CS, and in this group a cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) or a placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorder was found to be the etiology in 77.78% of cases. Furthermore, 35.85% of the women had hysterectomy after uterine rupture. Twenty-three patients out of 76 (30.26%) had an unscarred uterus. Of this group, most women presented a uterine anomaly (43.48%). Moreover, 17.39% of these women had a hysterectomy.

CONCLUSION

According to the literature, the current pandemic use of CS explains most cases of first-trimester uterine rupture.