Three-dimensional kinematic stress magnetic resonance image analysis shows promise for detecting altered anatomical relationships of tissues in the cervical spine associated with painful radiculopathy

Kinetic magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine: a review of the literature

Study Design Literature review. Objective The purpose of this study is to compile and review the body of literature related to kinetic magnetic resonance imaging (kMRI) of the cervical spine. Methods A review of literature related to kMRI was performed using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Results We included 16 prospective and retrospective studies of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients who underwent kMRI of the cervical spine. Conclusions Data suggest that kMRI is able to provide meaningful information regarding changes in the cervical spine in both normal and pathologic segments. A prospective study comparing magnetic resonance imaging and kMRI is needed to confirm clinically utility of this technology.

Kinematic magnetic resonance imaging to define the cervical facet joint space for the spine in neutral and torsion

STUDY DESIGN

Prospectively acquire magnetic resonance images of the neck in normal subjects and patients with radiculopathy to measure and compare measures of the facet joint space thickness and volume.

OBJECTIVE

The goal was to determine whether there is any difference in facet joint architecture between the 2 populations with the head in each of neutral and pain-eliciting rotation.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Degeneration and altered mechanics of the facet joint can result in pathological nerve root compression and pain. Although lumbar facet joint space thinning has been reported in the context of low back pain, few studies have quantified the cervical facet joint space, especially in the context of pain.

METHODS

The cervical spine of 8 symptomatic and 10 asymptomatic subjects was imaged in the sagittal plane in a 3T magnetic resonance scanner, using a T2-pulse sequence optimized for bone imaging. The facet joint space was identified and segmented in the acquired images. The thickness and volume of the facet joint space, and their changes between positions, were computed from the 3-dimensional representation for all cervical levels on both sides.

RESULTS

Generally, the facet joint space thickness and volume were smaller in the symptomatic subjects than in the asymptomatic subjects. The differences were more robust on the left, especially in neutral and left torsion. The changes in both volume and thickness from neutral to torsion were also different in sign and magnitude at isolated joint levels between the 2 populations.

CONCLUSION

Quantification of the facet joint space architecture in the cervical spine of patients with radiculopathy is feasible using standard magnetic resonance imaging sequences. Measurements of the facet space thickness and volume, and their changes, from both pain-free and painful positions, can provide context for localizing potential sources of painful tissue loading.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.