The effect of intensive glucose lowering therapy among major racial/ethnic groups in the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial

Haptoglobin phenotype and intensive glycemic control for coronary artery disease risk reduction in people with type two diabetes: The Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial

Background

Intensive glycemic control reduced the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) events among White ACCORD study participants with the haptoglobin (Hp)2-2 phenotype, and not among participants without the Hp2-2 phenotype. It is unknown whether these results persist in a population with more severe diabetes.

Methods

Haptoglobin phenotype was measured in 1746 (97 %) samples from the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial (VADT) randomized controlled trial. Multivariable-adjusted Cox regression models assessed the effect of intensive therapy on CAD risk among participants with and without the Hp2-2 phenotype separately and when stratified within pre-specified race/ethnicity-based subgroups. Time-varying (achieved) HbA1c data (<7.0 % or ≥8.0 % compared to 7.0-7.9, updated every 3 months) were also analyzed in relation to CAD risk within each phenotype.

Results

567 (32.5 %) participants had the Hp2-2 phenotype. Compared to standard therapy, intensive glycemic control was not associated with risk of CAD among participants with the non-Hp2-2 or the Hp2-2 phenotype or for any race/ethnicity-based group. Compared to HbA1c of 7.0-7.9 %, having HbA1c <7.0 % was not associated with CAD risk for either phenotype or among any race/ethnicity-based group. Having HbA1c ≥8.0 % was associated with an increased risk of CAD among Hispanic participants without the Hp2-2 phenotype (HR= 3.61, 95 % CI: 1.54-8.41, p-interaction=0.53).

Conclusion

The effect of intensive glycemic therapy on CAD events was not dependent on Hp phenotype in the VADT study of veterans with severe diabetes who may represent a population where Hp phenotype information would not be useful for personalizing diabetes management. However, further research is needed to determine if these results are conclusive.

Pharmacogenetics of type 2 diabetes mellitus, the route toward tailored medicine

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic disease that has reached the levels of a global epidemic. In order to achieve optimal glucose control, it is often necessary to rely on combination therapy of multiple drugs or insulin because uncontrolled glucose levels result in T2DM progression and enhanced risk of complications and mortality. Several antihyperglycemic agents have been developed over time, and T2DM pharmacotherapy should be prescribed based on suitability for the individual patient's characteristics. Pharmacogenetics is the branch of genetics that investigates how our genome influences individual responses to drugs, therapeutic outcomes, and incidence of adverse effects. In this review, we evaluated the pharmacogenetic evidences currently available in the literature, and we identified the top informative genetic variants associated with response to the most common anti-diabetic drugs: metformin, DPP-4 inhibitors/GLP1R agonists, thiazolidinediones, and sulfonylureas/meglitinides. Overall, we found 40 polymorphisms for each drug class in a total of 71 loci, and we examined the possibility of encouraging genetic screening of these variants/loci in order to critically implement decision-making about the therapeutic approach through precision medicine strategies. It is possible then to anticipate that when the clinical practice will take advantage of the genetic information of the diabetic patients, this will provide a useful resource for the prevention of T2DM progression, enabling the identification of the precise drug that is most likely to be effective and safe for each patient and the reduction of the economic impact on a global scale.

Glucose targets for preventing diabetic kidney disease and its progression

BACKGROUND

Diabetes is the leading cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) around the world. Blood pressure lowering and glucose control are used to reduce diabetes-associated disability including kidney failure. However there is a lack of an overall evidence summary of the optimal target range for blood glucose control to prevent kidney failure.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of intensive (HbA1c < 7% or fasting glucose levels < 120 mg/dL versus standard glycaemic control (HbA1c ≥ 7% or fasting glucose levels ≥ 120 mg/dL for preventing the onset and progression of kidney disease among adults with diabetes.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialised Register up to 31 March 2017 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies contained in the Specialised Register are identified through search strategies specifically designed for CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE; handsearching conference proceedings; and searching the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials evaluating glucose-lowering interventions in which people (aged 14 year or older) with type 1 or 2 diabetes with and without kidney disease were randomly allocated to tight glucose control or less stringent blood glucose targets.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed studies for eligibility and risks of bias, extracted data and checked the processes for accuracy. Outcomes were mortality, cardiovascular complications, doubling of serum creatinine (SCr), ESKD and proteinuria. Confidence in the evidence was assessing using GRADE. Summary estimates of effect were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes, and mean difference (MD) and 95% CI for continuous outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

Fourteen studies involving 29,319 people with diabetes were included and 11 studies involving 29,141 people were included in our meta-analyses. Treatment duration was 56.7 months on average (range 6 months to 10 years). Studies included people with a range of kidney function. Incomplete reporting of key methodological details resulted in uncertain risks of bias in many studies. Using GRADE assessment, we had moderate confidence in the effects of glucose lowering strategies on ESKD, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and progressive protein leakage by kidney disease and low or very low confidence in effects of treatment on death related to cardiovascular complications and doubling of serum creatinine (SCr).For the primary outcomes, tight glycaemic control may make little or no difference to doubling of SCr compared with standard control (4 studies, 26,874 participants: RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.11; I2= 73%, low certainty evidence), development of ESKD (4 studies, 23,332 participants: RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.12; I2= 52%; low certainty evidence), all-cause mortality (9 studies, 29,094 participants: RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.13; I2= 50%; moderate certainty evidence), cardiovascular mortality (6 studies, 23,673 participants: RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.92; I2= 85%; low certainty evidence), or sudden death (4 studies, 5913 participants: RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.26 to 2.57; I2= 85%; very low certainty evidence). People who received treatment to achieve tighter glycaemic control probably experienced lower risks of non-fatal myocardial infarction (5 studies, 25,596 participants: RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.99; I2= 46%, moderate certainty evidence), onset of microalbuminuria (4 studies, 19,846 participants: RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.93; I2= 61%, moderate certainty evidence), and progression of microalbuminuria (5 studies, 13,266 participants: RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.93; I2= 75%, moderate certainty evidence). In absolute terms, tight versus standard glucose control treatment in 1,000 adults would lead to between zero and two people avoiding non-fatal myocardial infarction, while seven adults would avoid experiencing new-onset albuminuria and two would avoid worsening albuminuria.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review suggests that people who receive intensive glycaemic control for treatment of diabetes had comparable risks of kidney failure, death and major cardiovascular events as people who received less stringent blood glucose control, while experiencing small clinical benefits on the onset and progression of microalbuminuria and myocardial infarction. The adverse effects of glycaemic management are uncertain. Based on absolute treatment effects, the clinical impact of targeting an HbA1c < 7% or blood glucose < 6.6 mmol/L is unclear and the potential harms of this treatment approach are largely unmeasured.

The Risk of Coronary Heart Disease Associated With Glycosylated Hemoglobin of 6.5% or Greater Is Pronounced in the Haptoglobin 2-2 Genotype

BACKGROUND

Research targeting glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) to <6.5% to prevent coronary heart disease (CHD) events has conflicting results. We previously observed the haptoglobin (Hp) Hp2-2 genotype is associated with a ∼10-fold increased CHD risk among individuals with HbA1c ≥6.5%, and thus might be useful in identifying those at high risk of CHD who would benefit from maintaining HbA1c <6.5%.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to model whether HbA1c ≥ 6.5% in the Hp2-2 genotype is associated with CHD in a prospective case-control study nested within the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (HPFS).

METHODS

HbA1c concentration and Hp genotype were determined for 695 incident cases of CHD from 1994 to 2010 and matched control participants. Logistic regression models calculated relative risk (RR) and 95% CI, for the first and second halves of follow-up, adjusting for confounding variables. A dataset from the Nurses' Health Study served as a replication cohort.

RESULTS

The prevalence of the Hp2-2 genotype in HPFS was 39%. Compared with HbA1c <6.5%, the RR of CHD for HbA1c ≥6.5% for the Hp2-2 genotype over full follow-up was 3.07 (95% CI: 1.37 to 6.86) to 3.88 (95% CI: 1.31 to 11.52) during the first half of follow-up and 2.16 (95% CI: 0.61 to 7.61) in the second half. The corresponding RRs for the Hp1-1 + Hp2-1 genotypes were: full follow-up, 2.19 (95% CI: 1.14 to 4.24); first half, 1.60 (95% CI: 0.73 to 3.53); and second half, 4.72 (95% CI: 1.26 to 17.65).

CONCLUSIONS

In 2 independent cohorts, the risk of CHD associated with HbA1c ≥6.5% is pronounced in the Hp2-2 genotype, particularly in early cases. The Hp2-2 genotype may identify individuals at greatest CHD risk from hyperglycemia.

Epigenetic Changes in Endothelial Progenitors as a Possible Cellular Basis for Glycemic Memory in Diabetic Vascular Complications

The vascular complications of diabetes significantly impact the quality of life and mortality in diabetic patients. Extensive evidence from various human clinical trials has clearly established that a period of poor glycemic control early in the disease process carries negative consequences, such as an increase in the development and progression of vascular complications that becomes evident many years later. Importantly, intensive glycemic control established later in the disease process cannot reverse or slow down the onset or progression of diabetic vasculopathy. This has been named the glycemic memory phenomenon. Scientists have successfully modelled glycemic memory using various in vitro and in vivo systems. This review emphasizes that oxidative stress and accumulation of advanced glycation end products are key factors driving glycemic memory in endothelial cells. Furthermore, various epigenetic marks have been proposed to closely associate with vascular glycemic memory. In addition, we comment on the importance of endothelial progenitors and their role as endogenous vasoreparative cells that are negatively impacted by the diabetic milieu and may constitute a "carrier" of glycemic memory. Considering the potential of endothelial progenitor-based cytotherapies, future studies on their glycemic memory are warranted to develop epigenetics-based therapeutics targeting diabetic vascular complications.