Field separation‐based speciation analysis of inorganic arsenic in public well water in Hungary

A critical review of on-site inorganic arsenic screening methods

Approximately 94 to 220 million people worldwide are at risk of drinking well water containing arsenic > 10 µg/L, the WHO guideline value. To identify non-compliant domestic wells, assess health risks and reduce exposure, accurate and rapid on-site inorganic arsenic screening methods are desirable because all domestic wells worldwide need to be tested. Here, the principles, advantages and limitations of commonly used colorimetry, electrochemistry, and biosensing methods are critically reviewed, with the performance compared with laboratory-based benchmark methods. Most commercial kits are based on the classic Gutzeit reaction. Despite being semi-quantitative, the more recent and more expensive products display improved and acceptable accuracy and shorter testing time (∼10 min). Carried out by trained professionals, electrochemical methods are also feasible for on-site analysis, although miniaturization is desirable yet challenging. Biosensing using whole bacterial cells or bio-engineered materials such as aptamers is promising, if incorporated with function specific nanomaterials and biomaterials. Since arsenic is frequently found as arsenite in reducing groundwater and subject to oxidation during sampling, transportation and storage, on-site separation and sample preservation are feasible but the specific methods should be chosen based on sample matrix and tested before use. To eliminate arsenic exposure among hundreds of millions of mostly rural residents worldwide, we call for concerted efforts in research community and regulatory authority to develop accurate, rapid, and affordable tests for on-site screening and monitoring of arsenic in drinking water. Access to affordable testing will benefit people who are socioeconomically disadvantaged.

Impact process of the aquitard to regional arsenic accumulation of the underlying aquifer in Central Yangtze River Basin

The clayey aquitard has the potential to release geogenic poisonous chemicals such as arsenic (As) to the adjacent aquifer owing to complex hydrologic or biogeochemical processes. However, it remains unclear whether the aquitard has effect on As enrichment in the underlying aquifer in regions without extensive groundwater pumping, and the related processes have been poorly known. Based on piezometer water chemistry, stable water isotopes, sediment chemistry and reactive-transport model, this study aims to reveal the impact process of the aquitard to As accumulation of underlying aquifer from central Yangtze River Basin, a As-affected area without extensive groundwater pumping. On the whole, As migrated from top to bottom of the aquitard (especially the depth over 10 m) and significantly influenced the As accumulation in the underlying aquifer. Nonetheless, the results of three topical boreholes showed two different hydrogeological conditions affected As release in the aquitard and enrichment in the underlying aquifer. Different hydrogeological conditions could result in the input of different species organic carbon and then impact As concentrations in the aquifer. When the aquitard was near surface water bodies, the reductive dissolution of iron oxides was the main driver for As release and the aquitard had a significant influence on the enrichment of arsenic in the aquifer. At areas without surface water bodies nearby, the desorption of As(V) from minerals was the main source of As and the concentrations of As in pore water were quite low; this pattern had little effect on the enrichment of arsenic in the aquifer.

Arsenic behavior in different biogeochemical zonations approximately along the groundwater flow path in Datong Basin, northern China

Studies have shown that arsenic is desorbed/released into groundwater as a result of bacterial reduction of As(V) and Fe(III). However, bacterial activities like sulfate reduction process can also reduce the content of arsenic in groundwater. In this study, we examined the effects of different biogeochemical processes (e.g. NO₃^- and SO₄^2- reduction) on arsenic, by investigating the chemical characteristics and bacterial community structure of groundwater in the Datong Basin, northern China. Along the groundwater flow path, arsenic concentration increased from <1 to 947.6μg/L with dominant bacteria change from aerobic (Fluviicola, Rhodococcus) to denitrifying bacteria (Thauera, Gallionella), and then to sulfate reducing bacteria (Desulfosporosinus). According to the groundwater redox sensitive indicators (Eh, NO₃^-, SO₄^2-/Cl^- and Fe²⁺) concentrations (or ratios), the sampling points were approximately divided into three zones (I, I'' and II). Variation in features of these indicators suggested that the groundwater evolved from a weakly oxidizing environment (Zone I, Eh average 93.3mV, respectively) to strong reducing environment (Zone II, Eh average -101.8mV). In Zone I, bacteria mainly consuming O₂ or NO₃^- were found which inhibits Fe(III) and As(V) reduction reaction, resulting in a low As zone (<1 to 3.3μg/L). However, in Zone II, where O₂ and NO₃^- have been depleted, SO₄^2- reduction appears to be the dominant process, and the Fe(III) and As(V) reduction processes are also occurring and hence, enrichment of As in the groundwater (2.8 to 947.6μg/L, average 285.6μg/L). Besides, bacterial Fe(III) reduction process was retarded due to the weakly alkaline conditions (pH7.60-8.11, average 7.83), but abiotic Fe(III) reduction by HS^- may be continued. Therefore, we conclude that the Fe(III) and As(V) reduction processes contributed to arsenic enrichment in the groundwater, and the reductive desorption of arsenate is the main occurring process especially in the weakly alkaline environment. Moreover, NO₃^- reduction process can significantly restrain the release of arsenic, but the process of SO₄^2- reduction is insignificant for arsenic concentration decline in natural groundwater.

Arsenic contamination of drinking water in Ireland: A spatial analysis of occurrence and potential risk

The presence of arsenic in groundwater has become a global concern due to the health risks from drinking water with elevated concentrations. The Water Framework Directive (WFD) of the European Union calls for drinking water risk assessment for member states. The present study amalgamates readily available national and sub-national scale datasets on arsenic in groundwater in the Republic of Ireland. However, due to the presence of high levels of left censoring (i.e. arsenic values below an analytical detection limit) and changes in detection limits over time, the application of conventional statistical methods would inhibit the generation of meaningful results. In order to handle these issues several arsenic databases were integrated and the data modelled using statistical methods appropriate for non-detect data. In addition, geostatistical methods were used to assess principal risk components of elevated arsenic related to lithology, aquifer type and groundwater vulnerability. Geographic statistical methods were used to overcome some of the geographical limitations of the Irish Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sample database. Nearest-neighbour inverse distance weighting (IDW) and local indicator of spatial association (LISA) methods were used to estimate risk in non-sampled areas. Significant differences were also noted between different aquifer lithologies, indicating that Rhyolite, Sandstone and Shale (Greywackes), and Impure Limestone potentially presented a greater risk of elevated arsenic in groundwaters. Significant differences also occurred among aquifer types with poorly productive aquifers, locally important fractured bedrock aquifers and regionally important fissured bedrock aquifers presenting the highest potential risk of elevated arsenic. No significant differences were detected among different groundwater vulnerability groups as defined by the Geological Survey of Ireland. This research will assist management and future policy directions of groundwater resources at EU level and guide future research focused on understanding arsenic mobilisation processes to facilitate in guiding future development, testing and treatment requirements of groundwater resources.

Arsenic releasing characteristics during the compaction of muddy sediments

Muddy sediments are abundant in pore water and capable of preserving a large amount of chemicals, such as arsenic. Muddy sediments would transform into aquicludes or aquitards during long-term compaction and burial. It remains unclear whether the release of arsenic from muddy sediments poses a potential contamination risk to groundwater in the adjacent aquifer. An indoor compaction simulation experiment was conducted, coupled with an investigation on vertical geochemical profiles of muddy sediments in one actual borehole. In this experiment, aqueous arsenic in released pore water ranged from 17.5 to 21.3 μg L^-1 and the accumulated content of the released arsenic was 17.576 μg during the compaction. As(iii) was the main As species in released pore water and had good correlations with Fe²⁺ and Mn. The analysis of the solid phase showed a remarkable depletion of Fe-Mn oxide bound arsenic during the compaction. In the profiles of the actual borehole, the contents of Fe-Mn oxide bound arsenic also exhibited a gradual decreasing trend from shallow to deep. Based on both the indoor experiment and the field profile, it can be concluded that the reductive dissolution of Fe-Mn oxides took place in arsenic-rich muddy sediments and Fe-Mn oxide-bound arsenic transformed into soluble arsenic, then soluble arsenic was released into the adjacent aquifer along with the pore water in the long-term compaction and burial.

A new method for thioarsenate preservation in iron-rich waters by solid phase extraction

In order to preserve iron-rich samples for arsenic speciation analysis, mineral acids or EDTA are typically added to prevent oxidation and precipitation of iron. However, when sulfide is present, and thioarsenates ([HAs(V)S(-II)nO4-n](2-), n = 1-4) can form, these methods are unsuitable due to arsenic sulfide precipitation or artifact speciation changes. Here, a new method based on separating the anionic arsenic species from cationic iron in the presence of sulfide via solid phase extraction (SPE) has been investigated. Synthetic solutions containing arsenite, arsenate, monothioarsenate, and trithioarsenate were passed through the anion-exchange resin AG2-X8, after which the resin was washed, eluted, and speciation of each step analyzed by IC-ICP-MS. Retention on the resin of 96.8 ± 0.2%, 98.8 ± 0.2%, and 99.6 ± 0.3% was found for arsenate, monothioarsenate, and trithioarsenate, respectively. Cationic iron (90 μM Fe(II)) was not retained (0.4 ± 0.2%). Uncharged arsenite passed through the resin in the absence of sulfide, while 47.3% of arsenite were retained at tenfold sulfide excess via thiol groups binding to the organic resin structure. Elution with 3 × 15 mL of 0.5 M salicylate, including a soak time, resulted in quantitative recovery of all retained species. Stability of the retained species on the resin was tested with iron-rich, natural waters from a Czech mineral spring. Arsenate, monothioarsenate, dithioarsenate, and trithioarsenate were successfully separated from iron and recovered after 6 d. Thus, SPE presents a viable answer to the problem of preserving arsenic in the presence of both iron and sulfide.

Determination of total arsenic and arsenic species in drinking water, surface water, wastewater, and snow from Wielkopolska, Kujawy-Pomerania, and Lower Silesia provinces, Poland

Arsenic is a ubiquitous element which may be found in surface water, groundwater, and drinking water. In higher concentrations, this element is considered genotoxic and carcinogenic; thus, its level must be strictly controlled. We investigated the concentration of total arsenic and arsenic species: As(III), As(V), MMA, DMA, and AsB in drinking water, surface water, wastewater, and snow collected from the provinces of Wielkopolska, Kujawy-Pomerania, and Lower Silesia (Poland). The total arsenic was analyzed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), and arsenic species were analyzed with use of high-performance liquid chromatography inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (HPLC/ICP-MS). Obtained results revealed that maximum total arsenic concentration determined in drinking water samples was equal to 1.01 μg L(-1). The highest concentration of total arsenic in surface water, equal to 3778 μg L(-1) was determined in Trująca Stream situated in the area affected by geogenic arsenic contamination. Total arsenic concentration in wastewater samples was comparable to those determined in drinking water samples. However, significantly higher arsenic concentration, equal to 83.1 ± 5.9 μg L(-1), was found in a snow sample collected in Legnica. As(V) was present in all of the investigated samples, and in most of them, it was the sole species observed. However, in snow sample collected in Legnica, more than 97 % of the determined concentration, amounting to 81 ± 11 μg L(-1), was in the form of As(III), the most toxic arsenic species.

Urinary arsenic profiles reveal exposures to inorganic arsenic from private drinking water supplies in Cornwall, UK

Private water supplies (PWS) in Cornwall, South West England exceeded the current WHO guidance value and UK prescribed concentration or value (PCV) for arsenic of 10 μg/L in 5% of properties surveyed (n = 497). In this follow-up study, the first of its kind in the UK, volunteers (n = 207) from 127 households who used their PWS for drinking, provided urine and drinking water samples for total As determination by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and urinary As speciation by high performance liquid chromatography ICP-MS (HPLC-ICP-MS). Arsenic concentrations exceeding 10 μg/L were found in the PWS of 10% of the volunteers. Unadjusted total urinary As concentrations were poorly correlated (Spearman's ρ = 0.36 (P < 0.001)) with PWS As largely due to the use of spot urine samples and the dominance of arsenobetaine (AB) from seafood sources. However, the osmolality adjusted sum, U-As(IMM), of urinary inorganic As species, arsenite (As(III)) and arsenate (As(V)), and their metabolites, methylarsonate (MA) and dimethylarsinate (DMA), was found to strongly correlate (Spearman's ρ: 0.62 (P < 0.001)) with PWS As, indicating private water supplies as the dominant source of inorganic As exposure in the study population of PWS users.

Hydrogeochemistry of co-occurring geogenic arsenic, fluoride and iodine in groundwater at Datong Basin, northern China

Abnormal levels of co-occurring arsenic (As), fluorine (F) and iodine (I) in groundwater at Datong Basin, northern China are geochemically unique. Hydrochemical, (18)O and (2)H characteristics of groundwater were analyzed to elucidate their mobilization processes. Aqueous As, F and I ranged from 5.6 to 2680 μg/L, 0.40 to 3.32 mg/L and 10.1 to 186 μg/L, respectively. High As, F and I groundwater was characterized by moderately alkaline, high HCO3(-), Fe(II), HS(-) and DOC concentrations with H3AsO3, F(-) and I(-) as the dominant species. The plots of δ(18)O values and Cl/Br ratios versus Cl(-) concentration demonstrate build-up of more oxidizing conditions and precipitation of carbonate minerals induced by vertical recharge and intensive evaporation facilitate As retention to Fe (hydr) oxides, but enhance F and I mobilization from host minerals. Under reducing conditions, As and I can be simultaneously released via reductive dissolution of Fe (hydr) oxides and reduction of As(V) and I(V) while F migration may be retarded due to effects of dissolution-precipitation equilibria between carbonate minerals and fluorite. With the prevalence of sulfate-reducing condition and lowering of HCO3(-) concentration, As and I may be sequestered by Fe(II) sulfides and F is retained to fluorite and on clay mineral surfaces.

A simplified analysis of dimethylarsinic acid by wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry combined with a strong cation exchange disk

Dimethylarsinic acid (DMA(V)) was pre-concentrated from water samples using a strong cation exchange (SCX) disk functionalized with sulfonic groups, before being analyzed by wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (WDXRF). The adsorption of DMA(V) occurred preferentially on the surface of the SCX disk, regardless of pH levels, probably due to interactions with the sulfonic functional groups. However, no other arsenic species, such as arsenate (iAs(V)), arsenite (iAs(III)), and monomethylarsonic acid (MMA(V)), were retained. The SCX-WDXRF method produced a strongly linear calibration curve (R(2)=0.9996) with its limit of detection at 0.218 μgL(-1) when a one-liter water sample was used for pre-concentration. The As intensity of the system was sensitive to the Pb content retained on the SCX disk owing to the proximity of the As-Kα and Pb-Lα lines. To compensate for this interference, a correction factor was developed by considering the calibration slope ratio between the X-ray intensity measured at a Bragg angle of 48.781° and the Pb content of the SCX disks. The results of spike tests for iAs(V), iAs(III), MMA(V), and DMA(V) with and without the addition of Pb in synthetic landfill leachate exhibited reasonable recoveries (i.e., 98-105%) after the spectral adjustment for the Pb interference.