Applying organisation theory to understand barriers and facilitators to the implementation of baby-friendly: A multisite qualitative study

Factors Affecting Breastfeeding in Births Given During the Day and at Night; A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study

Objective: How giving birth at night and during the day affects the breastfeeding process should be evaluated when health services are planned. In this study, we investigated the effect of giving birth at night and during the day on the breastfeeding process. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional comparative study, we included 228 women who gave birth at night and 192 women who gave birth during the day. We compared the effect of giving birth at night or during the day on breastfeeding with the univariate analysis in terms of intrapartum and postpartum factors. Results: While the mothers who gave birth during the daytime started the first breastfeeding earlier (p < 0.001), the duration of the first breastfeeding and skin-to-skin contact practice was longer in mothers who gave birth at night (p < 0.05). While the rate of formula supplementing in babies born at night was 44.8%, it was 55.2% in babies born during the day (p < 0.001). The rate of receiving support from health workers (p = 0.040) and intending to breastfeed babies exclusively after discharge (p < 0.05) was higher in mothers who gave birth during the day than it was in mothers who gave birth at night. Conclusion: Day and night labor have different advantages and disadvantages on breastfeeding. It is important to address these differences in terms of intrapartum and postpartum care process to prevent negative breastfeeding experiences in the early period.

Breastfeeding experiences of patients in baby-friendly certified hospital settings: protocol for a scoping review

INTRODUCTION

The Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative is a global programme that is meant to support breastfeeding within organisations. Most of the current literature is focused on implementation and uptake of the programme; however, little is known about the patient experience of breastfeeding within these settings. By exploring this current gap in the literature, we may discover important contextual elements of the breastfeeding experience. The objective of this protocol is to provide a framework for a scoping review where we aim to understand the extent and type of evidence in relation to the patient experience of breastfeeding in Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI)-certified settings.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The proposed scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. The databases to be searched for relevant literature include MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Scopus in April 2023. A grey literature scan will include reviewing documents from professional organisations/associations. For all sources of evidence that meet the inclusion criteria, data will be extracted and presented in a table format. The results of the search and the study inclusion process will be reported in full in the final scoping review and presented in a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. Participants in this review will include any individual who delivered their baby in a BFHI-certified setting. Exploring the patient experience will involve reviewing their subjective perceptions of events related to breastfeeding. These events must occur in a BFHI-certified hospital, and therefore, home births and other outpatient settings will be excluded.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required for this scoping review protocol or the final review. Knowledge gained from this research will be disseminated through the primary author's PhD dissertation work, as well as manuscript publications and conference presentations.

"Breast is best"… until they say so

In this autoethnographic article, I discuss the consequences of being exposed to two competing breastfeeding discourses during my first mothering experience-the "self-regulated dyad" and the "externally regulated dyad" discourse. The former represents the ideal scenario and the evidence-based practices recommended by the World Health Organization (i.e., breastfeeding on demand, internally regulated by the dyad). The externally regulated discourse refers to the standardized health interventions that take over when difficulties arise (e.g., weight gain deviations and latching issues). Building on Kugelmann's critique about our blind reliance on "standardized health," existing evidence, and my breastfeeding journey, I argue that unqualified and unindividualized breastfeeding interventions are highly counterproductive. To illustrate these points, I discuss the implications of the polarized interpretation of pain and the limited dyadically focused support. I then move on to analyze how ambivalent social positioning around breastfeeding impacts our experience. In particular, I found that I was highly regarded as a "good, responsible mum" up till my baby was 6 months, and how breastfeeding became increasingly challenged by others when my daughter was approaching her first birthday. Here, I discuss how performing attachment mothering identity work allowed me to navigate these challenges. Against this backdrop, I reflect upon feminist ambivalent positionings on breastfeeding and the complexity of balancing the promotion of women's hard-earned rights while supporting them to engage in whatever baby-feeding choice they feel appropriate. I conclude that unless we acknowledge the physical and social complexities of the process, and our healthcare systems seriously invest in allocating human resources and training them appropriately, breastfeeding rates may continue to suffer and women continue to interiorize it as their own failure.

Social Interactions and Institutional Structures that Influence 24-Hour Rooming-in for New Mothers and Newborns in the Hospital Setting

PURPOSE

To describe the social interactions and institutional structures that influence the consistent practice of 24-hour rooming-in of new mothers and newborns in the hospital setting.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHOD

Using an institutional ethnographic design, data were gathered via semistructured interviews and on-unit observations. Data were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for themes. Study interviews were conducted between February 2020 and June 2021.

RESULTS

Seven mother-baby nurses were interviewed, and three on-unit observations of 2 hours each were conducted. Analysis of interview data revealed a consensus that Baby-Friendly does not always feel mother-friendly. Three major themes identifying social interactions were identified: the mother as a patient, managing expectations, and inconsistencies in practice. Three themes identified institutional structures that influenced 24-hour rooming-in: rates of induction of labor and cesarean birth, nurse staffing, and monitoring of nursery use.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Our findings provide insights about how the everyday work of 24-hour rooming-in is organized and experienced by nurses on the mother-baby units at the study hospital. Themes highlight specific social interactions and institutional structures that affect the practice and can be used by hospital leaders and educators to develop targeted interventions for ensuring consistent 24-hour rooming-in.

Barriers and Strategies for Successful Implementation of Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative: A Scoping Review

Introduction

Implementation of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) with maternal and/or neonatal services in all health care facilities is valuable to protect, promote and support breastfeeding and the well-being of young children. It is essential to identify challenges that hinder the successful implementation of BFHI and explore strategies to overcome those barriers to promote, protect and support breastfeeding practices of mothers all over the world.

Methods

A scoping review of evidence-based literature was undertaken. A total of 44 articles on BFHI published globally between the years 2000 and 2021 were reviewed and analyzed.

Results

The barriers to the successful implementation of the BFHI include the absence of clearly stated policies on breastfeeding, lack of uniform understanding of BFHI, insufficient support and resources, disagreements/lack of collaboration among health care professionals, maternal circumstances, and hospital routines and practices. The strategies for successful implementation of BFHI include health care providers’ leadership, teamwork/collaboration, adequate staffing and financial resources, education, mentoring and skills training opportunities for healthcare professionals, continuous monitoring of the BFHI steps, compliance with every step of BFHI, mother-centred approach, and regulation on marketing and sale of breastmilk.

Conclusions

GThe role of multi-layered interventions, interdisciplinary collaboration and partnership-based approach is critical in minimizing barriers and promoting the successful implementation of BFHI in all healthcare settings.

A nation‐wide study on the common reasons for infant formula supplementation among healthy, term, breastfed infants in US hospitals

In‐hospital infant formula supplementation of breastfed infants reduces breastfeeding duration, yet little is known about common reasons for infant formula supplementation. We examined the three most common reasons for in‐hospital infant formula supplementation of healthy, term, breastfed infants in the US reported by hospital staff. Hospital data were obtained from the 2018 Maternity Practices in Infant Nutrition and Care survey (n = 2045), which is completed by hospital staff. An open‐ended question on the top three reasons for in‐hospital infant formula supplementation was analyzed using thematic qualitative analysis and the frequencies for each reason were reported. The top three most common reasons for in‐hospital infant formula supplementation reported by hospital staff included medical indications (70.0%); maternal request/preference/feelings (55.9%); lactation management‐related issues (51.3%); physical but non‐medically indicated reasons (36.1%); social influences (18.8%); perceived cultural/societal/demographic factors (8.2%) and medical staff/institutional practices (4.7%). These findings suggest that a variety of factors should be considered to address unnecessary infant formula supplementation. Lactation management support delivered in a timely and culturally sensitive manner and targeted to mother‐infant dyads with potential medical and physical indications may reduce unnecessary in‐hospital infant formula supplementation.

The three most commonly reported reasons by hospital staff for infant formula supplementation were found to be related to medical indications (70.0%); maternal request/preference/feelings about breastfeeding such as frustration or lack of confidence (55.9%); lactation management‐related issues (51.3%); physical but non‐medically indicated reasons (36.1%); social influences (18.8%); perceived cultural/societal/demographic factors (8.2%); and medical staff/institutional practices (4.7%).

Underlying many of the reported three most common reasons for infant formula supplementation is potentially lack of lactation management support that considers the social influences (e.g. from family and friends) and that is culturally relevant.

These findings suggest that a variety of factors should be considered to address unnecessary infant formula supplementation.

A Mixed-Methods Examination of Inpatient Breastfeeding Education Using a Human Factors Perspective

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine postpartum, inpatient mother-lactation educator (LE) breastfeeding education, resulting perceptions, and patient-reported worries and outcomes. In the breastfeeding literature, there is inadequate insight into the mother-LE relationship, and specifically, the extent to which contextual factors are elicited and information is tailored accordingly. In this study, we were specifically interested in maternal contextual factors. Materials and Methods: Using a mixed methods approach, we (1) captured 20 postpartum, inpatient mother-LE breastfeeding education sessions and analyzed them for the presence of maternal contextual factors, (2) administered separate perception questions to mothers and LEs, and (3) conducted 13 follow-up interviews with mothers after being discharged from the hospital. Results: Inpatient breastfeeding education is delivered in dynamic and busy clinical settings, characterized by potential distractions such as delivery of medical care. Maternal contextual factors are infrequently elicited during the education. Although both LEs and mothers rate the sessions positively, potential gaps remain as highlighted by the analyses of semistructured interviews with mothers. Conclusion: Human factors perspective, theories, and methods are relevant to the characterization of facilitators and barriers of current breastfeeding education, as well as to the development of interventions to support the delivery of human-centered, effective, and timely breastfeeding education.

Determining the skills needed by frontline NHS staff to deliver quality improvement: findings from six case studies

Background

Previous studies have detailed the technical, learning and soft skills healthcare staff deploy to deliver quality improvement (QI). However, research has mainly focused on management and leadership skills, overlooking the skills frontline staff use to improve care. Our research explored which skills mattered to frontline health practitioners delivering QI projects.

Study design

We used a theory-driven approach, informed by communities of practice, knowledge-in-practice-in-context and positive deviance theory. We used case studies to examine skill use in three pseudonymised English hospital Trusts, selected on the basis of Care Quality Commission rating. Seventy-three senior staff orientation interviews led to the selection of two QI projects at each site. Snowball sampling obtained a maximally varied range of 87 staff with whom we held 122 semistructured interviews at different stages of QI delivery, analysed thematically.

Results

Six overarching ‘Socio-Organisational Functional and Facilitative Tasks’ (SOFFTs) were deployed by frontline staff. Several of these had to be enacted to address challenges faced. The SOFFTs included: (1) adopting and promulgating the appropriate organisational environment; (2) managing the QI rollercoaster; (3) getting the problem right; (4) getting the right message to the right people; (5) enabling learning to occur; and (6) contextualising experience. Each task had its own inherent skills.

Conclusion

Our case studies provide a nuanced understanding of the skills used by healthcare staff. While technical skills are important, the ability to judge when and how to use wider skills was paramount. The provision of QI training and fidelity to the improvement programme may be less of a priority than the deployment of SOFFT skills used to overcome barriers. QI projects will fail if such skills and resources are not accessed.

Perspectives of Nurses in Mississippi on Implementation of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative

OBJECTIVE

To describe the experiences and perceptions of Mississippi maternity nurses in hospitals that gained Baby-Friendly designation, including perceived barriers and facilitators to implementation of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative.

DESIGN

Descriptive qualitative study using thematic analysis of focus group data.

SETTING

Maternity care services of five Baby-Friendly-designated hospitals in Mississippi.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-two maternity nurses.

METHODS

We conducted 90-minute in-person focus groups in which participants described their hospitals' Baby-Friendly experiences. We analyzed focus group transcripts thematically to describe the facilitators and barriers to implementation of the Baby-Friendly initiative.

RESULTS

We identified five main themes: The Change Required for BFHI Was Hard, Nurses Felt Empowered by Taking Leadership Roles, Patient Education Was Pivotal to Practice Implementation, Nurses Felt Challenged by Unintended Consequences, and Attitudes Changed From Negative to Positive Over the Course of Adoption.

CONCLUSION

Participants from hospitals throughout Mississippi shared similar experiences and cited common facilitators and barriers to achieving Baby-Friendly designation. Participants described the overall process of Baby-Friendly designation as challenging but worthwhile because of the resulting improvements in maternity care, nurses' knowledge, and health outcomes for women and their newborns. Nurses at other hospitals that seek to obtain designation can learn from these experiences to make their own transitions easier.

Breastfeeding and the origins of health: Interdisciplinary perspectives and priorities

Breastfeeding and human milk (HM) are critically important to maternal, infant and population health. This paper summarizes the proceedings of a workshop that convened a multidisciplinary panel of researchers to identify key priorities and anticipated breakthroughs in breastfeeding and HM research, discuss perceived barriers and challenges to achieving these breakthroughs and propose a constructive action plan to maximize the impact of future research in this field. Priority research areas identified were as follows: (1) addressing low breastfeeding rates and inequities using mixed methods, community partnerships and implementation science approaches; (2) improving awareness of evidence-based benefits, challenges and complexities of breastfeeding and HM among health practitioners and the public; (3) identifying differential impacts of alternative modes of HM feeding including expressed/pumped milk, donor milk and shared milk; and (4) developing a mechanistic understanding of the health effects of breastfeeding and the contributors to HM composition and variability. Key barriers and challenges included (1) overcoming methodological limitations of epidemiological breastfeeding research and mechanistic HM research; (2) counteracting 'breastfeeding denialism' arising from negative personal breastfeeding experiences; (3) distinguishing and aligning research and advocacy efforts; and (4) managing real and perceived conflicts of interest. To advance research on breastfeeding and HM and maximize the reach and impact of this research, larger investments are needed, interdisciplinary collaboration is essential, and the scientific community must engage families and other stakeholders in research planning and knowledge translation.

Using the Knowledge-to-Action Framework to understand experiences of breastfeeding guideline implementation: A qualitative study

AIM

To examine the perceptions and experiences of health care professionals and mothers in relation to the implementation of a breastfeeding clinical practice guideline (CPG).

BACKGROUND

Breastfeeding CPG applications remain limited, and qualitative studies have indicated the need to overcome the perception by professionals of difficulties in applying recommendations.

METHODS

A qualitative study was conducted in a Spanish public hospital that implemented the Registered Nurses´ Association of Ontario breastfeeding CPG from 2012 through 2015. Between May and August 2017, 27 semi-structured interviews were conducted with managers, with professionals in maternity and paediatric departments and with mothers. Deductive content analysis was performed following the stages in the Knowledge-To-Action (KTA) Framework.

RESULTS

We obtained five main categories: (a) problem as opportunity; (b) adequate context and adapted recommendations; (c) extent of implementation; (d) impact of results; and (e) knowledge use normalization.

CONCLUSIONS

The KTA Framework assists understanding of the participation of the main actors in breastfeeding CPG implementation.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT

The nature of the interventions and the participation of managers, different professionals and mothers in a multi-unit setting generate a complex implementation process that reveals key factors to be taken into account in future CPG implementations.

Barriers Perceived by Managers and Clinical Professionals Related to the Implementation of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Breastfeeding through the Best Practice Spotlight Organization Program

International institutions facilitate the contact of health professionals to evidence-based recommendations for promoting exclusive breast feeding (BF). However, the achievement of good rates of exclusive BF is still far from the optimum. The intention of the present work is to determine the barriers identified by managers and health professionals involved in the implementation and sustainability of Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) for breastfeeding under the auspices of the Best Practice Spotlight Organization program. A qualitative research study was carried out. The participants were managers, healthcare assistants, nurses, midwives, pediatricians and gynecologists. Semi-structured interviews were conducted which were transcribed and analyzed using the six steps of thematic analysis. Twenty interviews were conducted, which defined four major themes: (1) Lack of resources and their adaptation; (2) Where, Who and How; (3) Dissemination and reach of the project to the professionals; and (4) The mother and her surroundings. This research identifies the barriers perceived by the health professionals involved in the implementation, with the addition of the managers as well. Novel barriers appeared such as the ambivalent role of the midwives and the fact that this CPG is about promoting health. The efforts for promoting the implementation program should be continuous, and the services should be extended to primary care.

Health care providers' perception of facilitators and barriers for the practice of skin-to-skin contact in Saudi Arabia: A qualitative study

OBJECTIVES

To identify Health Care Providers' (HCPs') perceived facilitators, barriers and requirements for implementing the practice of Skin-to-Skin Contact (SSC) immediately after vaginal birth.

DESIGN

A descriptive qualitative study with semi-structured interviews. Two theoretical frameworks were used to guide the data analysis: Theoretical Domains and the Grol and Wensing's barriers to and facilitators of change in health care practice.

SETTINGS

Two public hospitals in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia with 7000 and 6000 births per year, respectively.

PARTICIPANTS

A purposeful sample of 20 obstetricians, midwives, and nurses.

FINDINGS

The HCPs' perceived facilitators included buy-in of the practice of SSC. Existing or potential barriers included the absence of a detailed policy and guidelines to support the practice of SSC, lack of capabilities and motivations to implement the practice of SSC, mothers not interested in SSC, lack of professional collaboration, staffing and time constraints, and a medicalised birth environment that prioritised interventions over SSC.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATION TO PRACTICE

The insights gained from identification of facilitators and barriers for SSC practice in this study can assist the development of a tailored multi-level implementation strategy at the individual, social and organisational levels to provide continuous uninterrupted SSC immediately after birth. The practice of SSC could likely be successfully implemented if there is multidisciplinary collaboration that prioritises the practice of SCC.

A Guide to Multisite Qualitative Analysis

The aims of multisite qualitative research, originally developed within the case study tradition, are to produce findings that are reflective of context, while also holding broader applicability across settings. Such knowledge is ideal for informing health and social interventions by overcoming the limitations of research developed through methodological approaches that either "strip" context, or that hold relevance for a site-specific group or population. Yet, despite the potential benefits of multisite qualitative research, there is a paucity of analytical guidance to support researchers in achieving these yields. In this article, we present an analytical approach for conducting multisite qualitative analysis (MSQA) across various methodologies to maximize the potential of qualitative research, enhance rigor, and support the development of interventions that are tailored to the populations that they are intended to serve.

The uptake and implementation of the Baby Friendly Health Initiative in Australia

PROBLEM

Despite evidence that implementation of the Initiative has been effective in increasing breastfeeding rates and duration of breastfeeding worldwide; the uptake is low with only 70 Baby Friendly accredited maternity facilities across Australia (approximately 23% of facilities).

BACKGROUND

The Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding and International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes shaped the foundation for the Initiative to implement practices that protect, promote and support breastfeeding. There is evidence that implementation of the Initiative is impacted by individual and organisational culture, organisational support, and education. Organisational change is also identified as playing an important role in the successful implementation of the Initiative. Despite policy and guideline support for the Initiative at national and state levels in Australia the uptake of the Initiative is low.

AIM

The aim of this research was to explore health practitioners' perspectives about the uptake and implementation of the Initiative in Australia.

METHODS

Semi-structured, face-to-face, telephone and Skype interviews were conducted with 12 health practitioners. Thematic analysis was used to analyse data.

RESULTS

Participants identified that the uptake and implementation of the Initiative in Australia is complex. This complexity was related to six themes: (1) policy and guideline support for the Initiative, (2) leadership support to implement the Initiative, (3) improving breastfeeding and Initiative-related knowledge, (4) improving communication between stakeholders regarding the Initiative, (5) accreditation and reaccreditation processes, and (6) implementation complexity.

CONCLUSION

Using organisational change theories as a guide to implementation of the Initiative may be useful for facilities intending to become accredited.

Lactation Consultants' Perceived Barriers to Providing Professional Breastfeeding Support

BACKGROUND

Addressing suboptimal breastfeeding initiation and duration rates is a priority in the United States. To address challenges to improving these rates, the voices of the providers who work with breastfeeding mothers should be heard. Research aim: The purpose of this study was to explore lactation consultants' perceived barriers to managing early breastfeeding problems.

METHODS

This qualitative study was conducted with a grounded theory methodological approach. In-depth interviews were conducted with 30 International Board Certified Lactation Consultants across Florida. Lactation consultants were from a range of practice settings, including hospitals, Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children clinics, private practice, and pediatric offices. Data were digitally recorded, transcribed, and analyzed in Atlas.ti.

RESULTS

A range of barriers was identified and grouped into the following categories/themes: indirect barriers (social norms, knowledge, attitudes); direct occupational barriers (institutional constraints, lack of coordination, poor service delivery); and direct individual barriers (social support, mother's self-efficacy). A model was developed illustrating the factors that influence the role enactment of lactation consultants in managing breastfeeding problems.

CONCLUSION

Inadequate support for addressing early breastfeeding challenges is compounded by a lack of collaboration among various healthcare providers and the family. Findings provide insight into the professional management issues of early breastfeeding problems faced by lactation consultants. Team-based, interprofessional approaches to breastfeeding support for mothers and their families are needed; improving interdisciplinary collaboration could lead to better integration of lactation consultants who are educated and experienced in providing lactation support and management of breastfeeding problems.

Impact of State Legislation on Hospital Breastfeeding Support in New York

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether 2 state mandates, both implemented in 2010, had an impact on NY hospitals providing maternity care. Specifically, we measured changes in hospital staff's awareness, attitudes, and promotion of breastfeeding (BF), maternity care practices, and hospital breastfeeding policies and tested whether they were related to implementation of the Breastfeeding Mothers' Bill of Rights or the mandate for public reporting of hospital-specific BF measures.

DESIGN

In 2009 and 2011, written hospital BF policies were collected and evaluated using a 28-item review tool and hospital BF surveys were conducted. The surveys assessed hospital culture and staff attitudes associated with BF promotion and support and recommended maternity care practices.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

NY hospitals providing maternity care services and hospital staff.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE

Changes over time in hospital BF policies (BF policy score) and implementation of recommended maternity care practices (9 of Ten Steps to Successful BF) were evaluated. The relationships and correlations between these changes in staff awareness, hospital culture, and BF promotion were determined.

RESULTS

Between 2009 and 2011, there were increases in BF policy scores, maternity care practices implemented, and lactation staff (P < .001). Greater awareness by hospital administrators of BF measures was associated with more emphasis in promoting BF (P = .02). Hospitals reporting much more emphasis in promoting BF or reporting large changes in organizational culture had greater increases in BF policy scores and the recommended maternity care practices implemented (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that state mandates requiring key BF policies and support in hospitals and public reporting of BF rates may have led to increased emphasis and promotion of BF, improvement in hospital BF policies, and increased implementation of maternity care practices supporting BF. Implementation of similar policies by other states, combined with rigorous evaluation, is needed to replicate these findings and assess the long-term impact on maternal and infant health outcomes.

Meausures of organizational characteristics associated with adoption and/or implementation of innovations: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

This paper identifies and describes measures of constructs relevant to the adoption or implementation of innovations (i.e., new policies, programs or practices) at the organizational-level. This work is intended to advance the field of dissemination and implementation research by aiding scientists in the identification of existing measures and highlighting methodological issues that require additional attention.

METHODS

We searched for published studies (1973-2013) in 11 bibliographic databases for quantitative, empirical studies that presented outcome data related to adoption and/or implementation of an innovation. Included studies had to assess latent constructs related to the "inner setting" of the organization, as defined by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

RESULTS

Of the 76 studies included, most (86%) were cross sectional and nearly half (49%) were conducted in health care settings. Nearly half (46%) involved implementation of evidence-based or "best practice" strategies; roughly a quarter (26%) examined use of new technologies. Primary outcomes most often assessed were innovation implementation (57%) and adoption (34%); while 4% of included studies assessed both outcomes. There was wide variability in conceptual and operational definitions of organizational constructs. The two most frequently assessed constructs included "organizational climate" and "readiness for implementation." More than half (55%) of the studies did not articulate an organizational theory or conceptual framework guiding the inquiry; about a third (34%) referenced Diffusion of Innovations theory. Overall, only 46% of articles reported psychometric properties of measures assessing latent organizational characteristics. Of these, 94% (33/35) described reliability and 71% (25/35) reported on validity.

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of clarity associated with construct definitions, inconsistent use of theory, absence of standardized reporting criteria for implementation research, and the fact that few measures have demonstrated reliability or validity were among the limitations highlighted in our review. Given these findings, we recommend that increased attention be devoted toward the development or refinement of measures using common psychometric standards. In addition, there is a need for measure development and testing across diverse settings, among diverse population samples, and for a variety of types of innovations.

Implementing a WIC-Based Intervention to Promote Exclusive Breastfeeding: Challenges, Facilitators, and Adaptive Strategies

OBJECTIVE

Understand factors that contributed to the implementation of a successful multicomponent intervention to promote exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) within Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Woman, Infants, and Children (WIC) clinics.

DESIGN

Qualitative study of staff implementers' experiences using implementation status reports, facilitated group discussion immediately after implementation, and WIC administrative data.

SETTING

WIC staff from 12 clinics participated in an EBF Learning Community composed of 8 intervention trainings and ongoing support from trainers and peers.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 47 WIC staff including 11 directors, 20 other administrators, 8 nutritionists, and 6 peer counselors.

INTERVENTION

A WIC-integrated EBF promotion initiative, supported through a Learning Community, composed of prenatal screening, tailored trimester-specific counseling, and timely postpartum follow-up.

PHENOMENON OF INTEREST

Challenges and facilitators to implementation within clinics.

ANALYSIS

Iterative qualitative analysis using directed, emergent, and thematic coding.

RESULTS

Implementation experiences were characterized by (1) perceived benefits of implementation, including improved EBF knowledge and counseling confidence among staff; and (2) managing implementation, including responding to challenges posed by clinic settings (resources, routine practices, values, and perceptions of mothers) through strategies such as adapting clinic practices and intervention components.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Implementation was shaped by clinic setting and adaptive strategies. Future WIC interventions may benefit from formal consideration of intervention fit with local clinic setting and allowable adaptations.

Understanding process and context in breastfeeding support interventions: The potential of qualitative research

Considerable effort has been made in recent years to gain a better understanding of the effectiveness of different interventions for supporting breastfeeding. However, research has tended to focus primarily on measuring outcomes and has paid comparatively little attention to the relational, organizational, and wider contextual processes that may impact delivery of an intervention. Supporting a woman with breastfeeding is an interpersonal encounter that may play out differently in different contexts, despite the apparently consistent aims and structure of an intervention. We consider the limitations of randomized controlled trials for building understanding of the ways in which different components of an intervention may impact breastfeeding women and how the messages conveyed through interactions with breastfeeding supporters might be received. We argue that qualitative methods are ideally suited to understanding psychosocial processes within breastfeeding interventions and have been underused. After briefly reviewing qualitative research to date into experiences of receiving and delivering breastfeeding support, we discuss the potential of theoretically informed qualitative methodologies to provide fuller understanding of intervention processes by focusing on three examples: phenomenology, ethnography, and discourse analysis. The paper concludes by noting some of the epistemological differences between the broadly positivist approach of trials and qualitative methodologies, and we suggest there is a need for further dialog as to how researchers might bridge these differences in order to develop a fuller and more holistic understanding of how best to support breastfeeding women.

Hospital Staff's Perceptions with Regards to the Baby-Friendly Initiative

BACKGROUND

Adherence to Baby Friendly Initiative (BFI) practices is low in Canadian hospitals, despite evidence showing a positive impact of BFI practices on breastfeeding rates and duration. In 2012, the provincial Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care added BFI status to its progress indicators for Public Health Units, which are now required to begin BFI implementation.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore health care workers' self-reported knowledge of the BFI and their perceptions of the importance of its components.

METHODS

A questionnaire was electronically sent to 2237 employees working at our institution.

RESULTS

Questionnaires were completed by 651 participants, of which 110 (16.9%) and 87 (13.5%) participants reported having good knowledge of the BFI and the Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding, respectively. Multiple logistic regression showed that having children and having received formal breastfeeding education were associated with higher self-reported knowledge. Additionally, 481 (75%) participants reported that it was important or very important to them that the institution adopt the BFI. Having children and being an allied health professional were associated with perceiving the implementation of the BFI as important.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study have allowed us to identify potential barriers to implementation of the BFI, which can be targeted through system changes and staff education. Through this approach, we hope to facilitate acceptance of the BFI at our institution and increase support for optimal breastfeeding practices among our patients.

An Institutional Ethnography of Nurses' Support of Breastfeeding on the Night Shift

OBJECTIVE

To describe nurses' support of breastfeeding on the night shift and to identify the interpersonal interactions and institutional structures that affect this support.

DESIGN

Institutional ethnography.

SETTING

The mother/baby unit of a tertiary care hospital with 4200 births per year.

PARTICIPANTS

Registered nurses (N = 16) who provided care on the night shift to mother/infant dyads in the immediate postpartum period.

METHODS

Data were collected using focus groups, individual and group interviews, and mother/baby unit observations. The focus groups were held before the night shift and had five participants. The nine individual and group interviews were conducted between 0100 and 0230 on the mother/baby unit. Three unit observations were conducted. Interviews were recorded, professionally transcribed, and analyzed using a content analysis method.

RESULTS

Data analysis yielded three themes that described these nurses' support of breastfeeding on the night shift: competing priorities, incongruent expectations, and influential institutional structures. The need of visitors to see their new family members competed with the needs of mothers to rest and breastfeed their newborns. Helping breastfeeding dyads who experienced difficulties competed with providing care to other patients. Parents' expectations regarding newborn behavior were incongruent with the reality of newborn feeding and sleeping patterns. Institutional structures that affected the provision of breastfeeding support by nurses included hospital breastfeeding practices, staffing, and policies.

CONCLUSION

Nurses' support of breastfeeding on the night shift encompasses a complex interplay of interpersonal interactions with new families and visitors regarding priorities and expectations and negotiating institutional structures such as feeding policies and staffing.

Reasons for initial formula supplementation of healthy breastfeeding newborns

In a retrospective review of 302 hospital charts, 38 percent of newborns whose mothers planned to exclusively breastfeed received formula before hospital discharge. Those breastfeeding infants who did not receive formula were significantly younger at first breastfeeding than infants who received formula. Significantly more infants born by cesarean (51 percent) received supplementation than those born vaginally (31 percent). Birth between 9 p.m. and 10 a.m. and a hospital stay for more than 24 hours increased odds of supplementation. Nurses can explore barriers to exclusive breastfeeding unique to their hospitals to develop strategies that facilitate breastfeeding support and decrease formula supplementation.

The bumpy road to implementing the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative in Austria: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) aims to promote and support breastfeeding. Globally, around 20,000 facilities have been designated Baby-Friendly. In Austria, however, only 16% of the maternity units have received BFHI-certification. Internationally, few studies have investigated facilitating or hindering factors for BFHI implementation. The need to extend BFHI-certification rates has been investigated previously, but little is known about why maternity units decide to become BFHI-certified, how BFHI is installed at the unit level, and which factors facilitate or impede the operation of the BFHI in Austria and how barriers are overcome.

METHODS

Using a qualitative approach, (health) professionals' perceptions of the selection, installation, as well as facilitators of and barriers to the BFHI were investigated. 36 semi-structured interviews with persons responsible for BFHI implementation (midwives, nurses, physicians, quality manager) were conducted in three Austrian maternity units. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Interviewees mentioned several motives for selecting the BFHI, including BFHI as a marketing tool, improvement of existing services, as well as collaboration between different professional groups. In each hospital, "change agents" were identified, who promoted the BFHI, teamed up with the managers of other professional groups and finally, with the manager of the unit. Installation of BFHI involved the adoption of project management, development and dissemination of new standards, and training of all staff. Although multiple activities were planned to prepare for actually putting the BFHI into practice, participants mentioned not only facilitating, but also several hindering factors. Interpretations of what facilitated or impeded the operation of BFHI differed among and between professional groups.

CONCLUSION

Successful implementation of the BFHI in Austria depends on a complex interplay of multiple factors including a consensual "bottom-up" selection process, followed by a multifaceted installation stage. Even these activities may be perceived as a hindrance for non-BFHI-certified hospitals. Findings also suggest that despite active preparation, several barriers have to be overcome when BFHI is actually incorporated into routine practices. BFHI seems to pose a great challenge to health professionals' work routines and, thus, clear structural changes of such routines as well as ongoing monitoring and support activities are required.

A meta-ethnographic study of health care staff perceptions of the WHO/UNICEF Baby Friendly Health Initiative

BACKGROUND

Implementation of the Baby Friendly Health Initiative (BFHI) is associated with increases in breastfeeding initiation and duration of exclusive breastfeeding and 'any' breastfeeding. However, implementation of the BFHI is challenging.

AIM

To identify and synthesise health care staff perceptions of the WHO/UNICEF BFHI and identify facilitators and barriers for implementation.

METHOD

Seven qualitative studies, published between 2003 and 2013 were analysed using meta-ethnographic synthesis.

FINDINGS

Three overarching themes were identified. First the BFHI was viewed variously as a 'desirable innovation or an unfriendly imposition'. Participants were passionate about supporting breastfeeding and improving consistency in the information provided. This view was juxtaposed against the belief that BFHI represents an imposition on women's choices, and is a costly exercise for little gain in breastfeeding rates. The second theme highlighted cultural and organisational constraints and obstacles to BFHI implementation including resource issues, entrenched staff practices and staff rationalisation of non-compliance. Theme three captured a level of optimism and enthusiasm amongst participants who could identify a dedicated and credible leader to lead the BFHI change process. Collaborative engagement with all key stakeholders was crucial.

CONCLUSIONS

Health care staff hold variant beliefs and attitudes towards BFHI, which can help or hinder the implementation process. The introduction of the BFHI at a local level requires detailed planning, extensive collaboration, and an enthusiastic and committed leader to drive the change process. This synthesis has highlighted the importance of thinking more creatively about the translation of this global policy into effective change at the local level.

Organizational factors associated with readiness to implement and translate a primary care based telemedicine behavioral program to improve blood pressure control: the HTN-IMPROVE study

Background

Hypertension is prevalent and often sub-optimally controlled; however, interventions to improve blood pressure control have had limited success.

Objectives

Through implementation of an evidence-based nurse-delivered self-management phone intervention to facilitate hypertension management within large complex health systems, we sought to answer the following questions: What is the level of organizational readiness to implement the intervention? What are the specific facilitators, barriers, and contextual factors that may affect organizational readiness to change?

Study design

Each intervention site from three separate Veterans Integrated Service Networks (VISNs), which represent 21 geographic regions across the US, agreed to enroll 500 participants over a year with at least 0.5 full time equivalent employees of nursing time. Our mixed methods approach used a priori semi-structured interviews conducted with stakeholders (n = 27) including nurses, physicians, administrators, and information technology (IT) professionals between 2010 and 2011. Researchers iteratively identified facilitators and barriers of organizational readiness to change (ORC) and implementation. Additionally, an ORC survey was conducted with the stakeholders who were (n = 102) preparing for program implementation.

Results

Key ORC facilitators included stakeholder buy-in and improving hypertension. Positive organizational characteristics likely to impact ORC included: other similar programs that support buy-in, adequate staff, and alignment with the existing site environment; improved patient outcomes; is positive for the professional nurse role, and is evidence-based; understanding of the intervention; IT infrastructure and support, and utilization of existing equipment and space.

The primary ORC barrier was unclear long-term commitment of nursing. Negative organizational characteristics likely to impact ORC included: added workload, competition with existing programs, implementation length, and limited available nurse staff time; buy-in is temporary until evidence shows improved outcomes; contacting patients and the logistics of integration into existing workflow is a challenge; and inadequate staffing is problematic. Findings were complementary across quantitative and qualitative analyses.

Conclusions

The model of organizational change identified key facilitators and barriers of organizational readiness to change and successful implementation. This study allows us to understand the needs and challenges of intervention implementation. Furthermore, examination of organizational facilitators and barriers to implementation of evidence-based interventions may inform dissemination in other chronic diseases.

Implementing the ten steps to successful breastfeeding in multiple hospitals serving low-wealth patients in the US: innovative research design and baseline findings

Background

The Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding are maternity practices proven to support successful achievement of exclusive breastfeeding. They also are the basis for the WHO/UNICEF Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI). This study explores implementation of these steps in hospitals that serve predominantly low wealth populations.

Methods

A quasi-experimental design with mixed methods for data collection and analysis was included within an intervention project. We compared the impact of a modified Ten Steps implementation approach to a control group. The intervention was carried out in hospitals where: 1) BFHI designation was not necessarily under consideration, and 2) the majority of the patient population was low wealth, i.e., eligible for Medicaid. Hospitals in the research aspect of this project were systematically assigned to one of two groups: Initial Intervention or Initial Control/Later Intervention. This paper includes analyses from the baseline data collection, which consisted of an eSurvey (i.e., Carolina B-KAP), Maternity Practices in Infant Nutrition and Care survey tool (mPINC), the BFHI Self-Appraisal, key informant interviews, breastfeeding data, and formatted feedback discussion.

Results

Comparability was ensured by statistical and non-parametric tests of baseline characteristics of the two groups. Additional findings of interest included: 1) a universal lack of consistent breastfeeding records and statistics for regular monitoring/review, 2) widespread misinterpretation of associated terminology, 3) health care providers’ reported practices not necessarily reflective of their knowledge and attitudes, and 4) specific steps were found to be associated with hospital breastfeeding rates. A comprehensive set of facilitators and obstacles to initiation of the Ten Steps emerged, and hospital-specific practice change challenges were identified.

Discussion

This is one of the first studies to examine introduction of the Ten Steps in multiple hospitals with a control group and in hospitals that were not necessarily interested in BFHI designation, where the population served is predominantly low wealth, and with the use of a mixed methods approach. Limitations including numbers of hospitals and inability to adhere to all elements of the design are discussed.

Conclusions

For improvements in quality of care for breastfeeding dyads, innovative and site-specific intervention modification must be considered.