Assessment and care for non-medical risk factors in current antenatal health care

Working in smaller teams in community midwifery practices to foster continuity of carer: Midwives' experiences - A qualitative study in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND

Midwife-led continuity of carer (MLCC) improves health outcomes and increases pregnant women's satisfaction. Working in smaller teams in community midwifery practices is one of the ways to promote continuity of carer.

AIM

To gain insight into the experiences of Dutch community midwives regarding working in smaller teams, by identifying motivators and barriers.

METHODS

A qualitative study was conducted using individual, semi-structured interviews (n=9). The sample was purposively selected. The interviews were analysed using the Abbreviated Grounded Theory.

FINDINGS

Four themes were identified: 1) Ideal implementation of working in smaller teams, 2) Best care for pregnant women, 3) Conflicts with the current maternity care system, 4) Personal interests of the midwife. The core concept connecting all themes was midwives' experiences of an 'inner conflict' regarding working in smaller teams.

CONCLUSION

A strong motivation for working in smaller teams is the wish to provide the best care for pregnant women through offering more continuity of carer. The structure of maternity care, financially and organisationally, acts as a barrier in the transition to working in smaller teams. How community midwives manage these motivators and barriers depends on their personal interests, vision, and personal life. The balance between the motivators and barriers can create an inner conflict among the midwives. This inner conflict encompasses an ethical issue: what is the best care and what is it worth? A discussion within the professional group concerning the practical and ethical aspects of working in smaller teams is needed to find ways to reduce the inner conflict of community midwives who wish to work in smaller teams, thereby promoting the implementation of MLCC.

The impact of screening for social risks on OBGYN patients and providers: A systematic review of current evidence and key gaps

BACKGROUND

Increasingly, policymakers and professional organizations support screening for social assets and risks during clinical care. Scant evidence exists on how screening impacts patients, providers, or health systems.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review published literature for evidence of the clinical utility of screening for social determinants of health in clinical obstetric and gynecologic (OBGYN) care.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We systematically searched Pubmed (March 2022, 5,302 identified) and identified additional articles using hand sorting (searching articles citing key articles (273 identified) and through bibliography review (20 identified)).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all articles that measured a quantitative outcome of systematic social determinants of health (SDOH) screening in an OBGYN clinical setting. Each identified citation was reviewed by two independent reviewers at both the title/abstract and full text stages.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We identified 19 articles for inclusion and present the results using narrative synthesis.

MAIN RESULTS

The majority of articles reported on SDOH screening during prenatal care (16/19) and the most common SDOH was intimate partner violence (13/19 studies). Overall, patients had favorable attitudes towards SDOH screening (in 8/9 articles measuring attitudes), and referrals were common following positive screening (range 5.3%-63.6%). Only two articles presented data on the effects of SDOH screening on clinicians and none on health systems. Three articles present data on resolution of social needs, with inconsistent results.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited evidence exists on the benefits of SDOH screening in OBGYN clinical settings. Innovative studies leveraging existing data collection are needed to expand and improve SDOH screening.

Maternal characteristics associated with referral to obstetrician-led care in low-risk pregnant women in the Netherlands: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

In the Netherlands, maternity care is divided into midwife-led care (for low-risk women) and obstetrician-led care (for high-risk women). Referrals from midwife-led to obstetrician-led care have increased over the past decade. The majority of women are referred during their pregnancy or labour. Referrals are based on a continuous risk assessment of the health and characteristics of mother and child, yet referral for non-medical factors and characteristics remain unclear. This study investigated which maternal characteristics are associated with women's referral from midwife-led to obstetrician-led care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study in one midwife-led care practice in the Netherlands included 1096 low-risk women during January 2015-17. The primary outcomes were referral from midwife-led to obstetrician-led care in (1) the antepartum period and (2) the intrapartum period. In total, 11 maternal characteristics were identified. Logistic regression models of referral in each period were fitted and stratified by parity.

RESULTS

In the antepartum period, referral among nulliparous women was associated with an older maternal age (aOR, 1.07; 95%CI, 1.05-1.09), being underweight (0.45; 0.31-0.64), overweight (2.29; 1.91-2.74), or obese (2.65; 2.06-3.42), a preconception period >1 year (1.34; 1.07-1.66), medium education level (0.76; 0.58-1.00), deprivation (1.87; 1.54-2.26), and sexual abuse (1.44; 1.14-1.82). Among multiparous women, a referral was associated with being underweight (0.40; 0.26-0.60), obese (1.61; 1.30-1.98), a preconception period >1 year (1.71; 1.27-2.28), employment (1.38; 1.19-1.61), deprivation (1.23; 1.03-1.46), highest education level (0.63; 0.51-0.80), psychological problems (1.24; 1.06-1.44), and one or multiple consultations with an obstetrician (0.68; 0.58-0.80 and 0.64; 0.54-0.76, respectively). In the intrapartum period, referral among nulliparous women was associated with an older maternal age (1.02; 1.00-1.05), being underweight (1.67; 1.15-2.42), a preconception period >1 year (0.42; 0.31-0.57), medium or high level of education (2.09; 1.49-2.91 or 1.56; 1.10-2.22, respectively), sexual abuse (0.46; 0.33-0.63), and multiple consultations with an obstetrician (1.49; 1.15-1.94). Among multiparous women, referral was associated with an older maternal age (1.02; 1.00-1.04), being overweight (0.65; 0.51-0.83), a preconception period >1 year (0.33; 0.17-0.65), non-Dutch ethnicity (1.98; 1.61-2.45), smoking (0.75; 0.57-0.97), sexual abuse (1.49; 1.09-2.02), and one or multiple consultations with an obstetrician (1.34; 1.06-1.70 and 2.09; 1.63-2.69, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This exploratory study showed that several non-medical maternal characteristics of low-risk pregnant women are associated with referral from midwife-led to obstetrician-led care, and how these differ by parity and partum period.

The Experiences of Midwives in Caring for Vulnerable Pregnant Women in The Netherlands: A Qualitative Cross-Sectional Study

Vulnerable pregnant women have an increased risk for preterm birth and perinatal mortality. This study identifies the perspectives, perceived barriers, and perceived facilitators of midwives toward current care for vulnerable pregnant women in the Netherlands. Knowing those perspectives, barriers, and facilitators could help increase quality of care, thereby reducing the risks of preterm birth and perinatal mortality. Midwives working in primary care practices throughout the Netherlands were interviewed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted remotely through a video conference program, audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded based on the theoretical domains framework and concepts derived from the interviews, using NVivo-12. All midwives provided psychosocial care for vulnerable pregnant women, expected positive consequences for those women resulting from that care, considered it their task to identify and refer vulnerable women, and intended to improve the situation for mother and child. The main barriers perceived by midwives were too many organizations being involved, inadequate communication between care providers, lack of time to care for vulnerable women, insufficient financing to provide adequate care, and uncooperative clients. The main facilitators were having care coordinators, treatment guidelines, vulnerability detection tools, their own knowledge about local psychosocial organizations, good communication skills, cooperative clients, consultation with colleagues, and good communication between care providers. The findings suggest that midwives are highly motivated to care for vulnerable women and perceive a multitude of facilitators. However, they also perceive various barriers for providing optimal care. A national guideline on how to care for vulnerable women, local overviews of involved organizations, and proactive midwives who ensure connections between the psychosocial and medical domain could help to overcome these barriers, and therefore, maximize effectiveness of the care for vulnerable pregnant women.

The role of structured Antenatal Risk Management (sARM) on experiences with antenatal care by vulnerable clients

INTRODUCTION

Vulnerable clients (i.e. clients reporting psychopathology, psychosocial problems, or substance use, and/or features of deprivation) represent a challenge in perinatal care, both in term of care process and outcome. Adhering to a structured care process (i.e. structured Antenatal Risk Management [sARM]) has shown to benefit professionals in supporting vulnerable clients, but its effect on client experiences is yet to be determined. As better processes are assumed to benefit outcome, we investigated the relationship between vulnerable clients' experiences with antenatal care in perinatal units adhering to differing degrees of sARM.

METHODS

We combined data from two sources: on the client level antenatal collected survey data from which vulnerability status (Mind2Care instrument) and client experiences (ReproQ questionnaire) were derived, and on the unit level interview data from healthcare providers from which the unit degree of sARM was ascertained.

RESULTS

A total of N = 1.176 clients from N = 38 units were included in the study. Vulnerable clients with psychosocial problems reported more negative experiences than non-vulnerable clients. In high sARM units, vulnerable clients, regardless of type of problems, reported more negative experiences than non-vulnerable clients. In multiple regression analysis this effect disappeared and only vulnerability defined as psychosocial problems remained predictive for negative experiences.

CONCLUSIONS

Vulnerable clients, specifically those with psychosocial problems, present a challenge in perinatal healthcare. Negative appraisal of care might be an unavoidable drawback of adhering to sARM. It also stresses the need for improving caregiver-client expectations and system side improvements.

The meaning of caring in prenatal care from Swedish women's perspectives

AIM

To deepen understanding of the meaning of caring in prenatal care from Swedish women's perspectives.

METHOD

Ten women, who had given birth between 1 and 2 months previously, were interviewed. The women have taken part in the routine programme that constitutes maternity care Sweden. A hermeneutic approach inspired by Gadamer was used to analyse the data and gain a deeper understanding of the women's experiences.

FINDINGS

Three themes were identified in the hermeneutical analysis. The themes highlight an existential and ontological aspect for caring as experienced of the women in the study: invitation and caring promise, witnessing and confirmation, and caring emerges in vulnerability.

CONCLUSION

The life-changing gravidity and vulnerability motivates caritative care during pregnancy. Reception of caring is not just a superficial feeling, but gives a new understanding of life on an ontological level. In a genuine caring relationship, the pregnant woman not only receives something but also a power and an opportunity to go further and find her own inner strength.

Vulnerable pregnant women in antenatal practice: Caregiver's perception of workload, associated burden and agreement with objective caseload, and the influence of a structured organisation of antenatal risk management

INTRODUCTION

pregnancy care for vulnerable women is often perceived as a burden by caregivers as vulnerable clients require complex case management, additional time, and more often show adverse perinatal outcomes. Vulnerable clients bring about additional work strain for the caregiver, especially when the workload is high. We define client vulnerability as coexistence of psychopathology, psychosocial problems or substance use, together with features of deprivation. We investigated, as part of a national programme, whether the subjective caregiver's perception of workload and the objective registry-based caseload of vulnerable clients are in agreement, and whether a structured organisation of antenatal risk management reduces the burden associated with the perceived workload, in particular if the objective caseload is high.

METHODS

we combined three data sources: (1) at the unit level (i.e. midwifery practice, obstetric unit) interview data from caregivers, from which we derived a) the (subjective) caregiver's perception of workload, b) the associated burden and c) organisational structure of antenatal risk management, (2) at the unit level perinatal registry data, from which we derived a) unit characteristics and b) (objective) unit specific caseload, and (3) at the individual client level survey data collected during the first antenatal visit, from which the prevalence of vulnerable clients was derived. The study area was the South-West Netherlands (2.5 million inhabitants), containing areas with varying degrees of urbanisation and deprivation.

FINDINGS

sixteen units had complete data on all measures. Generally, subjective workload and objective caseload were only weakly related, the relation being modified by the organisation of antenatal risk management. If the organisational structure of antenatal risk management was low, the experienced burden was high, even if the objective caseload was low. Highly structured antenatal risk management was associated with a medium to low burden.

DISCUSSION

our observational study suggests that even a high caseload can be dealt with by structured antenatal risk management. A change from the current individual case-finding policies towards a more universal screen-like approach may thus benefit both the client and the caregiver.

Process for massage therapy practice and essential assessment

BACKGROUND

Little evidence exists about processes in massage therapy practice. Investigating current frameworks is warranted. This qualitative study is a secondary data analysis using grounded theory to understand how massage therapy experts describe massage therapy practice.

METHODS

31 massage therapy experts were invited to a 2-day symposium to discuss best practices for the profession. Through qualitative analysis, memoing, and discussion, the data were summarized into themes.

RESULTS

Three themes were identified around massage therapy practice: 1) client centered, 2) structure for practice, and 3) influencing factors. Each theme is clarified and expanded.

DISCUSSION

Conceptual models were developed for research and clinical practice and a definition for massage therapy practice was identified. Challenges and limitations are discussed.

CONCLUSION

The goal of providing these models is to give massage therapists tools to deliver the best possible care. The models need testing to see if they help advance the profession.