1
|
Christopher JA, Geladaki A, Dawson CS, Vennard OL, Lilley KS. Subcellular Transcriptomics and Proteomics: A Comparative Methods Review. Mol Cell Proteomics 2022; 21:100186. [PMID: 34922010 PMCID: PMC8864473 DOI: 10.1016/j.mcpro.2021.100186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Revised: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The internal environment of cells is molecularly crowded, which requires spatial organization via subcellular compartmentalization. These compartments harbor specific conditions for molecules to perform their biological functions, such as coordination of the cell cycle, cell survival, and growth. This compartmentalization is also not static, with molecules trafficking between these subcellular neighborhoods to carry out their functions. For example, some biomolecules are multifunctional, requiring an environment with differing conditions or interacting partners, and others traffic to export such molecules. Aberrant localization of proteins or RNA species has been linked to many pathological conditions, such as neurological, cancer, and pulmonary diseases. Differential expression studies in transcriptomics and proteomics are relatively common, but the majority have overlooked the importance of subcellular information. In addition, subcellular transcriptomics and proteomics data do not always colocate because of the biochemical processes that occur during and after translation, highlighting the complementary nature of these fields. In this review, we discuss and directly compare the current methods in spatial proteomics and transcriptomics, which include sequencing- and imaging-based strategies, to give the reader an overview of the current tools available. We also discuss current limitations of these strategies as well as future developments in the field of spatial -omics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josie A Christopher
- Department of Biochemistry, Cambridge Centre for Proteomics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Milner Therapeutics Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Aikaterini Geladaki
- Department of Biochemistry, Cambridge Centre for Proteomics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Charlotte S Dawson
- Department of Biochemistry, Cambridge Centre for Proteomics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Milner Therapeutics Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Owen L Vennard
- Department of Biochemistry, Cambridge Centre for Proteomics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Milner Therapeutics Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kathryn S Lilley
- Department of Biochemistry, Cambridge Centre for Proteomics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Milner Therapeutics Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Markey FB, Parashar V, Batish M. Methods for spatial and temporal imaging of the different steps involved in RNA processing at single-molecule resolution. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-RNA 2020; 12:e1608. [PMID: 32543077 DOI: 10.1002/wrna.1608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2019] [Revised: 05/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
RNA plays a quintessential role as a messenger of information from genotype (DNA) to phenotype (proteins), as well as acts as a regulatory molecule (noncoding RNAs). All steps in the journey of RNA from synthesis (transcription), splicing, transport, localization, translation, to its eventual degradation, comprise important steps in gene expression, thereby controlling the fate of the cell. This lifecycle refers to the majority of RNAs (primarily mRNAs), but not other RNAs such as tRNAs. Imaging these processes in fixed cells and in live cells has been an important tool in developing an understanding of the regulatory steps in RNAs journey. Single-cell and single-molecule imaging techniques enable a much deeper understanding of cellular biology, which is not possible with bulk studies involving RNA isolated from a large pool of cells. Classic techniques, such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), as well as more recent aptamer-based approaches, have provided detailed insights into RNA localization, and have helped to predict the functions carried out by many RNA species. However, there are still certain processing steps that await high-resolution imaging, which is an exciting and upcoming area of research. In this review, we will discuss the methods that have revolutionized single-molecule resolution imaging in general, the steps of RNA processing in which these methods have been used, and new emerging technologies. This article is categorized under: RNA Export and Localization > RNA Localization RNA Methods > RNA Analyses in Cells RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > Small Molecule-RNA Interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatu Badiane Markey
- Department of Microbiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - Vijay Parashar
- Department of Medical and Molecular Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA
| | - Mona Batish
- Department of Microbiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey, USA.,Department of Medical and Molecular Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schmidt A, Gao G, Little SR, Jalihal AP, Walter NG. Following the messenger: Recent innovations in live cell single molecule fluorescence imaging. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-RNA 2020; 11:e1587. [PMID: 31990126 DOI: 10.1002/wrna.1587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2019] [Revised: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 01/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Messenger RNAs (mRNAs) convey genetic information from the DNA genome to proteins and thus lie at the heart of gene expression and regulation of all cellular activities. Live cell single molecule tracking tools enable the investigation of mRNA trafficking, translation and degradation within the complex environment of the cell and in real time. Over the last 5 years, nearly all tools within the mRNA tracking toolbox have been improved to achieve high-quality multi-color tracking in live cells. For example, the bacteriophage-derived MS2-MCP system has been improved to facilitate cloning and achieve better signal-to-noise ratio, while the newer PP7-PCP system now allows for orthogonal tracking of a second mRNA or mRNA region. The coming of age of epitope-tagging technologies, such as the SunTag, MoonTag and Frankenbody, enables monitoring the translation of single mRNA molecules. Furthermore, the portfolio of fluorogenic RNA aptamers has been expanded to improve cellular stability and achieve a higher fluorescence "turn-on" signal upon fluorogen binding. Finally, microinjection-based tools have been shown to be able to track multiple RNAs with only small fluorescent appendages and to track mRNAs together with their interacting partners. We systematically review and compare the advantages, disadvantages and demonstrated applications in discovering new RNA biology of this refined, expanding toolbox. Finally, we discuss developments expected in the near future based on the limitations of the current methods. This article is categorized under: RNA Export and Localization > RNA Localization RNA Structure and Dynamics > RNA Structure, Dynamics, and Chemistry RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > RNA-Protein Complexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Schmidt
- Single Molecule Analysis Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Guoming Gao
- Single Molecule Analysis Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.,Biophysics Graduate Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Saffron R Little
- Single Molecule Analysis Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.,Program in Chemical Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Ameya P Jalihal
- Single Molecule Analysis Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.,Cell and Molecular Biology Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Nils G Walter
- Single Molecule Analysis Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Russo J, Mundell CT, Charley PA, Wilusz C, Wilusz J. Engineered viral RNA decay intermediates to assess XRN1-mediated decay. Methods 2018; 155:116-123. [PMID: 30521847 DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2018.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2018] [Revised: 11/27/2018] [Accepted: 11/30/2018] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Both RNA synthesis and decay must be balanced within a cell to achieve proper gene expression. Additionally, modulation of RNA decay specifically offers the cell an opportunity to rapidly reshape the transcriptome in response to specific stimuli or cues. Therefore, it is critical to understand the underlying mechanisms through which RNA decay contribute to gene expression homeostasis. Cell-free reconstitution approaches have been used successfully to reveal mechanisms associated with numerous post-transcriptional RNA processes. Historically, it has been difficult to examine all aspects of RNA decay in such an in vitro setting due, in part, to limitations on the ability to resolve larger RNAs through denaturing polyacrylamide gels. Thus, in vitro systems to study RNA decay rely on smaller, less biologically relevant RNA fragments. Herein, we present an approach to more confidently examine RNA decay parameters of large mRNA size transcripts through the inclusion of an engineered XRN1-resistant reporter RNA (xrRNA). By placing a 67 nucleotide xrRNA near the 3' end of any in vitro transcribed RNA with variable size or sequence context, investigators can observe the accumulation of the xrRNA as a readout of exoribonuclease-mediated 5'-3' decay. This approach may allow in vitro RNA decay assays to include full biologically relevant mRNA/mRNPs, extending their utility and allow improved experimental design considerations to promote biologically relevant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Russo
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80525, United States
| | - Cary T Mundell
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80525, United States; Program in Cell & Molecular Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80525, United States
| | - Phillida A Charley
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80525, United States
| | - Carol Wilusz
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80525, United States; Program in Cell & Molecular Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80525, United States
| | - Jeffrey Wilusz
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80525, United States; Program in Cell & Molecular Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80525, United States.
| |
Collapse
|