Underlying source of the relation between polypeptide conformation and strength of NH···O hydrogen bonds

The influence of solvent on conformational properties of peptides with Aib residue-a DFT study

The conformational propensities of the Aib residue on the example of two model peptides Ac-Aib-NHMe (1) and Ac-Aib-NMe2 (2), were studied by B3LYP and M06-2X functionals, in the gas phase and in the polar solvents. To verify the reliability of selected functionals, we also performed MP2 calculations for the tested molecules in vacuum. Polarizable continuum models (PCM and SMD) were used to estimate the solvent effect. Ramachandran maps were calculated to find all energy minima. Noncovalent intramolecular interactions due to hydrogen-bonds and dipole attractions between carbonyl groups are responsible for the relative stabilities of the conformers. In order to verify the theoretical results, the available conformations of similar X-ray structures from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center (CCDC) were analyzed. The results of the calculations show that both derivatives with the Aib residue in the gas phase prefer structures stabilized by intramolecular N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds, i.e., C5 and C7 conformations, while polar solvent promotes helical conformation with φ, ψ values equal to +/-60°, +/-40°. In addition, in the case of molecule 2, the helical conformation is the only one available in the polar environment. This result is fully consistent with the X-ray data. Graphical abstract Effect of solvent on the Ramachandran maps of the model peptides with Aib residue.

Weak H-bonds. Comparisons of CH···O to NH···O in proteins and PH···N to direct P···N interactions

Whereas CH···O H-bonds are usually weaker than interpeptide NH···O H-bonds, this is not necessarily the case within proteins. The nominally weaker CH···O are surprisingly strong, comparable to, and in some cases stronger than, the NH···O H-bonds in the context of the forces that hold together the adjacent strands in protein β-sheets. The peptide NH is greatly weakened as proton donor in certain conformations of the protein backbone, particularly extended structures, and forms correspondingly weaker H-bonds. The PH group is a weak proton donor, but will form PH···N H-bonds. However, there is a stronger interaction in which P can engage, in which the P atom, not the H, directly approaches the N electron donor to establish a direct P···N interaction. This approach is stabilized by the same sort of electron transfer from the N lone pair to the P-H σ* antibond that characterizes the PH···N H-bond.

Identification of spectroscopic patterns of CH...O H-bonds in proteins

Ab initio calculations are used to identify characteristics of vibrational and NMR spectra that signal the involvement of a protein backbone in a CH...O H-bond and that distinguish this sort of interaction from other H-bonds in which a protein might participate. Glycine and alanine dipeptides, in both their C7 and C5 minimum-energy structures, are paired with formamide in a number of different H-bonding arrangements. The CH...O H-bond is characterized by a small contraction of the C-H bond length, along with a blue shift in its stretching frequency, accompanied by an intensification of this vibrational band. In the context of NMR spectra, the bridging CH proton's chemical shift is moved downfield by 1-2 ppm. The aforementioned features are not produced by other H-bonds in which the protein backbone might participate, such as NH proton donation or accepting a proton via the peptide C=O.

The Strength with Which a Peptide Group Can Form a Hydrogen Bond Varies with the Internal Conformation of the Polypeptide Chain

The strength of the H-bond formed between a dipeptide and a proton acceptor molecule is assessed by correlated ab initio quantum calculations for a broad range of different conformations of the dipeptide. The H-bond energy is very sensitive to the internal (phi,psi) angles, even when the geometry of the H-bond does not vary significantly from one conformation to another. This result indicates that the peptide NH is a much less potent proton donor in certain conformations than in others. In particular, extended conformations of a polypeptide are capable of only weak H-bonds. Thus, the interstrand NH...O H-bonds in parallel and antiparallel beta-sheets are expected to be significantly weaker than those found in other conformations, such as helices, ribbons, and beta-bends, even if the H-bond geometries are similar.