Rapid high-resolution volumetric T1 mapping using a highly accelerated stack-of-stars Look Locker technique

Review of oxygen-enhanced lung mri: Pulse sequences for image acquisition and T1 measurement

Oxygen-enhanced MR imaging (OE-MRI) is a special proton imaging technique that can be performed without modifying the scanner hardware. Many fundamental studies have been conducted following the initial reporting of this technique in 1996, illustrating the high potential for its clinical application. This review aims to summarise and analyse current pulse sequences and T1 measurement methods for OE-MRI, including fundamental theories, existing pulse sequences applied to OE-MRI acquisition and T1 mapping. Wash-in and wash-out time identify lung function and are sensitive to ventilation; thus, dynamic OE-MRI is also discussed in this review. We compare OE-MRI with the primary competitive technique, hyperpolarised gas MRI. Finally, an overview of lower-field applications of OE-MRI is highlighted, as relatively recent publications demonstrated positive results. Lower-field OE-MRI, which is lower than 1.5 T, could be an alternative modality for detecting lung diseases. This educational review is aimed at researchers who want a quick summary of the steps needed to perform pulmonary OE-MRI with a particular focus on sequence design, settings, and quantification methods.

Rapid fat-water separated T1 mapping using a single-shot radial inversion-recovery spoiled gradient recalled pulse sequence

T1 mapping is increasingly used in clinical practice and research studies. With limited scan time, existing techniques often have limited spatial resolution, contrast resolution and slice coverage. High fat concentrations yield complex errors in Look-Locker T1 methods. In this study, a dual-echo 2D radial inversion-recovery T1 (DEradIR-T1) technique was developed for fast fat-water separated T1 mapping. The DEradIR-T1 technique was tested in phantoms, 5 volunteers and 28 patients using a 3 T clinical MRI scanner. In our study, simulations were performed to analyze the composite (fat + water) and water-only T1 under different echo times (TE). In standardized phantoms, an inversion-recovery spin echo (IR-SE) sequence with and without fat saturation pulses served as a T1 reference. Parameter mapping with DEradIR-T1 was also assessed in vivo, and values were compared with modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI). Bland-Altman analysis and two-tailed paired t-tests were used to compare the parameter maps from DEradIR-T1 with the references. Simulations of the composite and water-only T1 under different TE values and levels of fat matched the in vivo studies. T1 maps from DEradIR-T1 on a NIST phantom (Pcomp  = 0.97) and a Calimetrix fat-water phantom (Pwater  = 0.56) matched with the references. In vivo T1 was compared with that of MOLLI: R comp 2 = 0.77 ; R water 2 = 0.72 . In this work, intravoxel fat is found to have a variable, echo-time-dependent effect on measured T1 values, and this effect may be mitigated using the proposed DRradIR-T1.

Repeatability and robustness of MP-GRASP T1 mapping

PURPOSE

To demonstrate the repeatability of fast 3D T1 mapping using Magnetization-Prepared Golden-angle RAdial Sparse Parallel (MP-GRASP) MRI and its robustness to variation of imaging parameters including flip angle and spatial resolution in phantoms and the brain.

THEORY AND METHODS

Multiple imaging experiments were performed to (1) assess the robustness of MP-GRASP T1 mapping to B1 inhomogeneity using a single tube phantom filled with uniform MnCl2 liquid; (2) compare the repeatability of T1 mapping between MP-GRASP and inversion recovery-based spin-echo (IR-SE; over 12 scans), using a commercial T1MES phantom; (3) evaluate the longitudinal variation of T1 estimation using MP-GRASP with varying imaging parameters, including spatial resolution, flip angle, TR/TE, and acceleration rate, using the T1MES phantom (106 scans performed over a period of 12 months); and (4) evaluate the variation of T1 estimation using MP-GRASP with varying imaging parameters in the brain (24 scans in a single visit). In addition, the accuracy of MP-GRASP T1 mapping was also validated against IR-SE by performing linear correlation and calculating the Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC).

RESULTS

MP-GRASP demonstrates good robustness to B1 inhomogeneity, with intra-slice variability below 1% in the single tube phantom experiment. The longitudinal variability is good both in the phantom (below 2.5%) and in the brain (below 2%) with varying imaging parameters. The T1 values estimated from MP-GRASP are accurate compared to that from the IR-SE imaging (R2 = 0.997, Lin's CCC = 0.996).

CONCLUSION

MP-GRASP shows excellent repeatability of T1 estimation over time, and it is also robust to variation of different imaging parameters evaluated in this study.

Bias, Repeatability and Reproducibility of Liver T1 Mapping With Variable Flip Angles

Background

Three‐dimensional variable flip angle (VFA) methods are commonly used for T₁ mapping of the liver, but there is no data on the accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility of this technique in this organ in a multivendor setting.

Purpose

To measure bias, repeatability, and reproducibility of VFA T₁ mapping in the liver.

Study Type

Prospective observational.

Population

Eight healthy volunteers, four women, with no known liver disease.

Field Strength/Sequence

1.5‐T and 3.0‐T; three‐dimensional steady‐state spoiled gradient echo with VFAs; Look‐Locker.

Assessment

Traveling volunteers were scanned twice each (30 minutes to 3 months apart) on six MRI scanners from three vendors (GE Healthcare, Philips Medical Systems, and Siemens Healthineers) at two field strengths. The maximum period between the first and last scans among all volunteers was 9 months. Volunteers were instructed to abstain from alcohol intake for at least 72 hours prior to each scan and avoid high cholesterol foods on the day of the scan.

Statistical Tests

Repeated measures ANOVA, Student t‐test, Levene's test of variances, and 95% significance level. The percent error relative to literature liver T₁ in healthy volunteers was used to assess bias. The relative error (RE) due to intrascanner and interscanner variation in T₁ measurements was used to assess repeatability and reproducibility.

Results

The 95% confidence interval (CI) on the mean bias and mean repeatability RE of VFA T₁ in the healthy liver was 34 ± 6% and 10 ± 3%, respectively. The 95% CI on the mean reproducibility RE at 1.5 T and 3.0 T was 29 ± 7% and 25 ± 4%, respectively.

Data Conclusion

Bias, repeatability, and reproducibility of VFA T₁ mapping in the liver in a multivendor setting are similar to those reported for breast, prostate, and brain.

Level of Evidence

1

Technical Efficacy Stage

1