1
|
Liu L, Zhou N, Zheng X, Cao W. A Technologist's Vigilance: Identifying and Correcting a Cotton Ball-Induced MRI Artefact to Prevent Misdiagnosis in Pediatric Patients. Cureus 2025; 17:e81252. [PMID: 40291241 PMCID: PMC12031644 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.81252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/26/2025] [Indexed: 04/30/2025] Open
Abstract
Wrap-around artefacts in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are common, typically caused by anatomical structures outside the Field of View (FOV) overlapping into the imaging area. This paper reports a rare source of wrap-around artifact, a wet cotton ball, whose image was inadvertently included in cranial imaging, potentially leading to misdiagnosis as pathological conditions such as otomastoiditis, postoperative changes, or intracranial hemorrhage. Hence, there is a need to enhance MRI technologists' awareness of such artifacts. We analyzed four consecutive cases of cranial MRI scans with similar artifacts, all located on the right side of the brain but in different regions. On axial T2-weighted images (T2WI) and T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T2FLAIR) sequences, the artifacts appeared as oval-shaped, relatively well-defined heterogeneous high signals. On axial T1-weighted images (T1WI), signal intensity and border clarity varied, with artifact locations slightly more lateral compared to T2WI and T2FLAIR. The artifacts in the first three cases were not identified by the MRI technologists. However, in the fourth case, a patient with head trauma, the MRI technologist noticed inconsistencies in the artifact characteristics across different sequences, as well as similarities to a previous case of cranial trauma, which raised suspicion of an artifact. Systematic image analysis and equipment inspection subsequently revealed a wet cotton ball attached to the outer surface of the head-and-neck coil, inadvertently left there by a radiology nurse during preparation for a previous case. Upon removal of the cotton ball and rescanning the sequences with artifacts in cases 3 and 4, the artifacts disappeared, confirming the wet cotton ball as the source. Additionally, upon review, similar artifacts were found in the first two cases but overlooked due to various reasons. The aim of this study is to improve MRI technologists' recognition of artifacts caused by non-metallic foreign objects, avoiding misdiagnosis, and to prompt us to refine our examination protocols and enhance radiology nurses' awareness of MRI safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Longping Liu
- Department of Radiology, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, CHN
| | - Nan Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, CHN
| | - Xiaoli Zheng
- Department of Radiology, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, CHN
| | - Weiguo Cao
- Department of Radiology, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, CHN
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nieves‐Vazquez HA, Ozkaya E, Meinhold W, Geahchan A, Bane O, Ueda J, Taouli B. Deep Learning-Enabled Automated Quality Control for Liver MR Elastography: Initial Results. J Magn Reson Imaging 2025; 61:985-994. [PMID: 39776044 PMCID: PMC11706309 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.29490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Revised: 06/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several factors can impair image quality and reliability of liver magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), such as inadequate driver positioning, insufficient wave propagation and patient-related factors. PURPOSE To report initial results on automatic classification of liver MRE image quality using various deep learning (DL) architectures. STUDY TYPE Retrospective, single center, IRB-approved human study. POPULATION Ninety patients (male = 51, mean age 52.8 ± 14.1 years). FIELD STRENGTHS/SEQUENCES 1.5 T and 3 T MRI, 2D GRE, and 2D SE-EPI. ASSESSMENT The curated dataset was comprised of 914 slices obtained from 149 MRE exams in 90 patients. Two independent observers examined the confidence map overlaid elastograms (CMOEs) for liver stiffness measurement and assigned a quality score (non-diagnostic vs. diagnostic) for each slice. Several DL architectures (ResNet18, ResNet34, ResNet50, SqueezeNet, and MobileNetV2) for binary quality classification of individual CMOE slice inputs were evaluated, using an 8-fold stratified cross-validation (800 slices) and a test dataset (114 slices). A majority vote ensemble combining the models' predictions of the highest-performing architecture was evaluated. STATISTICAL TEST The inter-observer agreement and the agreement between DL models and one observer were assessed using Cohen's unweighted Kappa coefficient. Accuracy, precision, and recall of the cross-validation and the ensemble were calculated for the test dataset. RESULTS The average accuracy across the eight models trained using each architecture ranged from 0.692 to 0.851 for the test dataset. The ensemble of the best performing architecture (SqueezeNet) yielded an accuracy of 0.921. The inter-observer agreement was excellent (Kappa 0.896 [95% CI 0.845-0.947]). The agreement between observer 1 and the predictions of each SqueezeNet model was slight to almost perfect (Kappa range: 0.197-0.831) and almost perfect for the ensemble (Kappa: 0.833). CONCLUSION Our initial study demonstrates an automated DL-based approach for classifying liver 2D MRE diagnostic quality with an average accuracy of 0.851 (range 0.675-0.921) across the SqueezeNet models. EVIDENCE LEVEL 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Efe Ozkaya
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging InstituteIcahn School of Medicine Mount SinaiNew YorkNew YorkUSA
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional RadiologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Waiman Meinhold
- School of Mechanical EngineeringGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Amine Geahchan
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging InstituteIcahn School of Medicine Mount SinaiNew YorkNew YorkUSA
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional RadiologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Octavia Bane
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging InstituteIcahn School of Medicine Mount SinaiNew YorkNew YorkUSA
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional RadiologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Jun Ueda
- School of Mechanical EngineeringGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Bachir Taouli
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging InstituteIcahn School of Medicine Mount SinaiNew YorkNew YorkUSA
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional RadiologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Manso Jimeno M, Ravi KS, Fung M, Oyekunle D, Ogbole G, Vaughan JT, Geethanath S. Automated detection of motion artifacts in brain MR images using deep learning. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2025; 38:e5276. [PMID: 39439086 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.5276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Revised: 10/01/2024] [Accepted: 10/03/2024] [Indexed: 10/25/2024]
Abstract
Quality assessment, including inspecting the images for artifacts, is a critical step during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data acquisition to ensure data quality and downstream analysis or interpretation success. This study demonstrates a deep learning (DL) model to detect rigid motion in T1-weighted brain images. We leveraged a 2D convolutional neural network (CNN) trained on motion-synthesized data for three-class classification and tested it on publicly available retrospective and prospective datasets. Grad-CAM heatmaps enabled the identification of failure modes and provided an interpretation of the model's results. The model achieved average precision and recall metrics of 85% and 80% on six motion-simulated retrospective datasets. Additionally, the model's classifications on the prospective dataset showed 93% agreement with the labeling of a radiologist a strong inverse correlation (-0.84) compared to average edge strength, an image quality metric indicative of motion. This model is aimed at inline automatic detection of motion artifacts, accelerating part of the time-consuming quality assessment (QA) process and augmenting expertise on-site, particularly relevant in low-resource settings where local MR knowledge is scarce.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Manso Jimeno
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, New York, USA
- Columbia Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, New York, USA
| | - Keerthi Sravan Ravi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, New York, USA
- Columbia Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, New York, USA
| | - Maggie Fung
- MR Clinical Solutions, GE Healthcare, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dotun Oyekunle
- Department of Radiology, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Godwin Ogbole
- Department of Radiology, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - John Thomas Vaughan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, New York, USA
- Columbia Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
- Zuckerman Institute, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sairam Geethanath
- Columbia Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Daudé P, Ramasawmy R, Javed A, Lederman RJ, Chow K, Campbell-Washburn AE. Inline automatic quality control of 2D phase-contrast flow MRI for subject-specific scan time adaptation. Magn Reson Med 2024; 92:751-760. [PMID: 38469944 PMCID: PMC11142871 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.30083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop an inline automatic quality control to achieve consistent diagnostic image quality with subject-specific scan time, and to demonstrate this method for 2D phase-contrast flow MRI to reach a predetermined SNR. METHODS We designed a closed-loop feedback framework between image reconstruction and data acquisition to intermittently check SNR (every 20 s) and automatically stop the acquisition when a target SNR is achieved. A free-breathing 2D pseudo-golden-angle spiral phase-contrast sequence was modified to listen for image-quality messages from the reconstructions. Ten healthy volunteers and 1 patient were imaged at 0.55 T. Target SNR was selected based on retrospective analysis of cardiac output error, and performance of the automatic SNR-driven "stop" was assessed inline. RESULTS SNR calculation and automated segmentation was feasible within 20 s with inline deployment. The SNR-driven acquisition time was 2 min 39 s ± 67 s (aorta) and 3 min ± 80 s (main pulmonary artery) with a min/max acquisition time of 1 min 43 s/4 min 52 s (aorta) and 1 min 43 s/5 min 50 s (main pulmonary artery) across 6 healthy volunteers, while ensuring a diagnostic measurement with relative absolute error in quantitative flow measurement lower than 2.1% (aorta) and 6.3% (main pulmonary artery). CONCLUSION The inline quality control enables subject-specific optimized scan times while ensuring consistent diagnostic image quality. The distribution of automated stopping times across the population revealed the value of a subject-specific scan time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Daudé
- Laboratory of Imaging Technology, Cardiovascular Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung & Blood Institute, NIH, USA
| | - Rajiv Ramasawmy
- Laboratory of Imaging Technology, Cardiovascular Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung & Blood Institute, NIH, USA
| | - Ahsan Javed
- Laboratory of Imaging Technology, Cardiovascular Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung & Blood Institute, NIH, USA
| | - Robert J Lederman
- Cardiovascular Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung & Blood Institute, NIH, USA
| | - Kelvin Chow
- Siemens Healthcare Ltd., Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Adrienne E. Campbell-Washburn
- Laboratory of Imaging Technology, Cardiovascular Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung & Blood Institute, NIH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Murali S, Ding H, Adedeji F, Qin C, Obungoloch J, Asllani I, Anazodo U, Ntusi NAB, Mammen R, Niendorf T, Adeleke S. Bringing MRI to low- and middle-income countries: Directions, challenges and potential solutions. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2024; 37:e4992. [PMID: 37401341 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2022] [Revised: 05/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023]
Abstract
The global disparity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a major challenge, with many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) experiencing limited access to MRI. The reasons for limited access are technological, economic and social. With the advancement of MRI technology, we explore why these challenges still prevail, highlighting the importance of MRI as the epidemiology of disease changes in LMICs. In this paper, we establish a framework to develop MRI with these challenges in mind and discuss the different aspects of MRI development, including maximising image quality using cost-effective components, integrating local technology and infrastructure and implementing sustainable practices. We also highlight the current solutions-including teleradiology, artificial intelligence and doctor and patient education strategies-and how these might be further improved to achieve greater access to MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjana Murali
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Hao Ding
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Fope Adedeji
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - Cathy Qin
- Department of Imaging, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Johnes Obungoloch
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
| | - Iris Asllani
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Udunna Anazodo
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- The Research Institute of London Health Sciences Centre and St. Joseph's Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ntobeko A B Ntusi
- Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town and Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
- South African Medical Research Council Extramural Unit on Intersection of Noncommunicable Diseases and Infectious Diseases, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Regina Mammen
- Department of Cardiology, The Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon, UK
| | - Thoralf Niendorf
- Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility (BUFF), Max-Delbrück Centre for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sola Adeleke
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- High Dimensional Neuro-oncology, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Belton N, Hagos MT, Lawlor A, Curran KM. Towards a unified approach for unsupervised brain MRI Motion Artefact Detection with few shot Anomaly Detection. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2024; 115:102391. [PMID: 38718561 DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2024.102391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
Automated Motion Artefact Detection (MAD) in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a field of study that aims to automatically flag motion artefacts in order to prevent the requirement for a repeat scan. In this paper, we identify and tackle the three current challenges in the field of automated MAD; (1) reliance on fully-supervised training, meaning they require specific examples of Motion Artefacts (MA), (2) inconsistent use of benchmark datasets across different works and use of private datasets for testing and training of newly proposed MAD techniques and (3) a lack of sufficiently large datasets for MRI MAD. To address these challenges, we demonstrate how MAs can be identified by formulating the problem as an unsupervised Anomaly Detection (AD) task. We compare the performance of three State-of-the-Art AD algorithms DeepSVDD, Interpolated Gaussian Descriptor and FewSOME on two open-source Brain MRI datasets on the task of MAD and MA severity classification, with FewSOME achieving a MAD AUC >90% on both datasets and a Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient of 0.8 on the task of MA severity classification. These models are trained in the few shot setting, meaning large Brain MRI datasets are not required to build robust MAD algorithms. This work also sets a standard protocol for testing MAD algorithms on open-source benchmark datasets. In addition to addressing these challenges, we demonstrate how our proposed 'anomaly-aware' scoring function improves FewSOME's MAD performance in the setting where one and two shots of the anomalous class are available for training. Code available at https://github.com/niamhbelton/Unsupervised-Brain-MRI-Motion-Artefact-Detection/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niamh Belton
- Science Foundation Ireland Centre for Research Training in Machine Learning, Ireland; School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Misgina Tsighe Hagos
- Science Foundation Ireland Centre for Research Training in Machine Learning, Ireland; School of Computer Science, University College Dublin, Ireland
| | - Aonghus Lawlor
- School of Computer Science, University College Dublin, Ireland; Insight Centre for Data Analytics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Kathleen M Curran
- Science Foundation Ireland Centre for Research Training in Machine Learning, Ireland; School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Aggarwal K, Manso Jimeno M, Ravi KS, Gonzalez G, Geethanath S. Developing and deploying deep learning models in brain magnetic resonance imaging: A review. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2023; 36:e5014. [PMID: 37539775 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.5014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain has benefited from deep learning (DL) to alleviate the burden on radiologists and MR technologists, and improve throughput. The easy accessibility of DL tools has resulted in a rapid increase of DL models and subsequent peer-reviewed publications. However, the rate of deployment in clinical settings is low. Therefore, this review attempts to bring together the ideas from data collection to deployment in the clinic, building on the guidelines and principles that accreditation agencies have espoused. We introduce the need for and the role of DL to deliver accessible MRI. This is followed by a brief review of DL examples in the context of neuropathologies. Based on these studies and others, we collate the prerequisites to develop and deploy DL models for brain MRI. We then delve into the guiding principles to develop good machine learning practices in the context of neuroimaging, with a focus on explainability. A checklist based on the United States Food and Drug Administration's good machine learning practices is provided as a summary of these guidelines. Finally, we review the current challenges and future opportunities in DL for brain MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kunal Aggarwal
- Accessible MR Laboratory, Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, USA
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marina Manso Jimeno
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, New York, USA
- Columbia Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, New York, USA
| | - Keerthi Sravan Ravi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, New York, USA
- Columbia Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, New York, USA
| | - Gilberto Gonzalez
- Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sairam Geethanath
- Accessible MR Laboratory, Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mazurek MH, Parasuram NR, Peng TJ, Beekman R, Yadlapalli V, Sorby-Adams AJ, Lalwani D, Zabinska J, Gilmore EJ, Petersen NH, Falcone GJ, Sujijantarat N, Matouk C, Payabvash S, Sze G, Schiff SJ, Iglesias JE, Rosen MS, de Havenon A, Kimberly WT, Sheth KN. Detection of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Using Low-Field, Portable Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Stroke. Stroke 2023; 54:2832-2841. [PMID: 37795593 PMCID: PMC11103256 DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.123.043146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neuroimaging is essential for detecting spontaneous, nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Recent data suggest ICH can be characterized using low-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Our primary objective was to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of ICH on a 0.064T portable MRI (pMRI) scanner using a methodology that provided clinical information to inform rater interpretations. As a secondary aim, we investigated whether the incorporation of a deep learning (DL) reconstruction algorithm affected ICH detection. METHODS The pMRI device was deployed at Yale New Haven Hospital to examine patients presenting with stroke symptoms from October 26, 2020 to February 21, 2022. Three raters independently evaluated pMRI examinations. Raters were provided the images alongside the patient's clinical information to simulate real-world context of use. Ground truth was the closest conventional computed tomography or 1.5/3T MRI. Sensitivity and specificity results were grouped by DL and non-DL software to investigate the effects of software advances. RESULTS A total of 189 exams (38 ICH, 89 acute ischemic stroke, 8 subarachnoid hemorrhage, 3 primary intraventricular hemorrhage, 51 no intracranial abnormality) were evaluated. Exams were correctly classified as positive or negative for ICH in 185 of 189 cases (97.9% overall accuracy). ICH was correctly detected in 35 of 38 cases (92.1% sensitivity). Ischemic stroke and no intracranial abnormality cases were correctly identified as blood-negative in 139 of 140 cases (99.3% specificity). Non-DL scans had a sensitivity and specificity for ICH of 77.8% and 97.1%, respectively. DL scans had a sensitivity and specificity for ICH of 96.6% and 99.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS These results demonstrate improvements in ICH detection accuracy on pMRI that may be attributed to the integration of clinical information in rater review and the incorporation of a DL-based algorithm. The use of pMRI holds promise in providing diagnostic neuroimaging for patients with ICH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mercy H. Mazurek
- Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Teng J. Peng
- Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Rachel Beekman
- Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Annabel J. Sorby-Adams
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neurocritical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dheeraj Lalwani
- Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Julia Zabinska
- Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Emily J. Gilmore
- Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Nils H. Petersen
- Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Guido J. Falcone
- Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Charles Matouk
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Sam Payabvash
- Department of Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Gordon Sze
- Department of Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Steven J. Schiff
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Yale Center for Brain & Mind Heath, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Juan Eugenio Iglesias
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Matthew S. Rosen
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Adam de Havenon
- Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - W. Taylor Kimberly
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neurocritical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kevin N. Sheth
- Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Yale Center for Brain & Mind Heath, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mirkin S, Albensi BC. Should artificial intelligence be used in conjunction with Neuroimaging in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease? Front Aging Neurosci 2023; 15:1094233. [PMID: 37187577 PMCID: PMC10177660 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1094233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive, neurodegenerative disorder that affects memory, thinking, behavior, and other cognitive functions. Although there is no cure, detecting AD early is important for the development of a therapeutic plan and a care plan that may preserve cognitive function and prevent irreversible damage. Neuroimaging, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and positron emission tomography (PET), has served as a critical tool in establishing diagnostic indicators of AD during the preclinical stage. However, as neuroimaging technology quickly advances, there is a challenge in analyzing and interpreting vast amounts of brain imaging data. Given these limitations, there is great interest in using artificial Intelligence (AI) to assist in this process. AI introduces limitless possibilities in the future diagnosis of AD, yet there is still resistance from the healthcare community to incorporate AI in the clinical setting. The goal of this review is to answer the question of whether AI should be used in conjunction with neuroimaging in the diagnosis of AD. To answer the question, the possible benefits and disadvantages of AI are discussed. The main advantages of AI are its potential to improve diagnostic accuracy, improve the efficiency in analyzing radiographic data, reduce physician burnout, and advance precision medicine. The disadvantages include generalization and data shortage, lack of in vivo gold standard, skepticism in the medical community, potential for physician bias, and concerns over patient information, privacy, and safety. Although the challenges present fundamental concerns and must be addressed when the time comes, it would be unethical not to use AI if it can improve patient health and outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Mirkin
- Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, United States
| | - Benedict C. Albensi
- Barry and Judy Silverman College of Pharmacy, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, United States
- St. Boniface Hospital Research, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nazir S, Dickson DM, Akram MU. Survey of explainable artificial intelligence techniques for biomedical imaging with deep neural networks. Comput Biol Med 2023; 156:106668. [PMID: 36863192 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2022] [Revised: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/21/2023]
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques of deep learning have revolutionized the disease diagnosis with their outstanding image classification performance. In spite of the outstanding results, the widespread adoption of these techniques in clinical practice is still taking place at a moderate pace. One of the major hindrance is that a trained Deep Neural Networks (DNN) model provides a prediction, but questions about why and how that prediction was made remain unanswered. This linkage is of utmost importance for the regulated healthcare domain to increase the trust in the automated diagnosis system by the practitioners, patients and other stakeholders. The application of deep learning for medical imaging has to be interpreted with caution due to the health and safety concerns similar to blame attribution in the case of an accident involving autonomous cars. The consequences of both a false positive and false negative cases are far reaching for patients' welfare and cannot be ignored. This is exacerbated by the fact that the state-of-the-art deep learning algorithms comprise of complex interconnected structures, millions of parameters, and a 'black box' nature, offering little understanding of their inner working unlike the traditional machine learning algorithms. Explainable AI (XAI) techniques help to understand model predictions which help develop trust in the system, accelerate the disease diagnosis, and meet adherence to regulatory requirements. This survey provides a comprehensive review of the promising field of XAI for biomedical imaging diagnostics. We also provide a categorization of the XAI techniques, discuss the open challenges, and provide future directions for XAI which would be of interest to clinicians, regulators and model developers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sajid Nazir
- Department of Computing, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
| | - Diane M Dickson
- Department of Podiatry and Radiography, Research Centre for Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Muhammad Usman Akram
- Computer and Software Engineering Department, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Manso Jimeno M, Vaughan JT, Geethanath S. Superconducting magnet designs and MRI accessibility: A review. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2023:e4921. [PMID: 36914280 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2022] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Presently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) magnets must deliver excellent magnetic field (B0 ) uniformity to achieve optimum image quality. Long magnets can satisfy the homogeneity requirements but require considerable superconducting material. These designs result in large, heavy, and costly systems that aggravate as field strength increases. Furthermore, the tight temperature tolerance of niobium titanium magnets adds instability to the system and requires operation at liquid helium temperature. These issues are crucial factors in the disparity of MR density and field strength use across the globe. Low-income settings show reduced access to MRI, especially to high field strengths. This article summarizes the proposed modifications to MRI superconducting magnet design and their impact on accessibility, including compact, reduced liquid helium, and specialty systems. Reducing the amount of superconductor inevitably entails shrinking the magnet size, resulting in higher field inhomogeneity. This work also reviews the state-of-the-art imaging and reconstruction methods to overcome this issue. Finally, we summarize the current and future challenges and opportunities in the design of accessible MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Manso Jimeno
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, New York, USA
- Columbia Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, New York, USA
| | - John Thomas Vaughan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, New York, USA
- Columbia Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sairam Geethanath
- Columbia Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, The Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Arnold TC, Freeman CW, Litt B, Stein JM. Low-field MRI: Clinical promise and challenges. J Magn Reson Imaging 2023; 57:25-44. [PMID: 36120962 PMCID: PMC9771987 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 61.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2022] [Revised: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Modern MRI scanners have trended toward higher field strengths to maximize signal and resolution while minimizing scan time. However, high-field devices remain expensive to install and operate, making them scarce outside of high-income countries and major population centers. Low-field strength scanners have drawn renewed academic, industry, and philanthropic interest due to advantages that could dramatically increase imaging access, including lower cost and portability. Nevertheless, low-field MRI still faces inherent limitations in image quality that come with decreased signal. In this article, we review advantages and disadvantages of low-field MRI scanners, describe hardware and software innovations that accentuate advantages and mitigate disadvantages, and consider clinical applications for a new generation of low-field devices. In our review, we explore how these devices are being or could be used for high acuity brain imaging, outpatient neuroimaging, MRI-guided procedures, pediatric imaging, and musculoskeletal imaging. Challenges for their successful clinical translation include selecting and validating appropriate use cases, integrating with standards of care in high resource settings, expanding options with actionable information in low resource settings, and facilitating health care providers and clinical practice in new ways. By embracing both the promise and challenges of low-field MRI, clinicians and researchers have an opportunity to transform medical care for patients around the world. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Campbell Arnold
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied ScienceUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
- Center for Neuroengineering and TherapeuticsUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Colbey W. Freeman
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Brian Litt
- Center for Neuroengineering and TherapeuticsUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Joel M. Stein
- Center for Neuroengineering and TherapeuticsUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Anzai Y, Moy L. Point-of-Care Low-Field-Strength MRI Is Moving Beyond the Hype. Radiology 2022; 305:672-673. [PMID: 35916681 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.221278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshimi Anzai
- From the Department of Radiology and Imaging Science, University of Utah, 30N 1900 E, 1A 71, Salt Lake City, UT 84102 (Y.A.); and Department of Radiology, Center for Biomedical Imaging, Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY (L.M.)
| | - Linda Moy
- From the Department of Radiology and Imaging Science, University of Utah, 30N 1900 E, 1A 71, Salt Lake City, UT 84102 (Y.A.); and Department of Radiology, Center for Biomedical Imaging, Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY (L.M.)
| |
Collapse
|