1
|
Taguibao C, Ajraoui S, Centra J, Reid KF, Daskalopoulou C, Freniche AC, Hamilton AL, Horstman AMH, Collins BX, Dunn J, Izmailova ES. Identifying Concepts of Physical Activity Which Are Clinically Meaningful to Patients and Care Providers: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research. Clin Transl Sci 2025; 18:e70191. [PMID: 40183139 PMCID: PMC11969172 DOI: 10.1111/cts.70191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2024] [Revised: 02/14/2025] [Accepted: 02/22/2025] [Indexed: 04/05/2025] Open
Abstract
Physical activity (PA) is indispensable for overall health. Sub-optimal PA is linked to reduced quality of life (QOL) and premature death. In clinical research and therapeutics development, defining aspects of PA that are meaningful to patients and care providers is essential for designing tailored interventions, identifying individual contextual factors, and enhancing patient satisfaction and engagement in their own well-being. As digital health technologies (DHTs) measuring PA rapidly evolve, there is an opportunity to further define concepts. A systematic review of qualitative studies to identify concepts of PA that are meaningful to patients and care providers was conducted. Conditions covered included Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancer, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, chronic heart failure, sickle cell disease, osteoarthritis, and sarcopenia. We analyzed studies published in the last 20 years utilizing qualitative or mixed methods techniques to describe aspects of PA that patients want to prevent from worsening or improve. Among the 5228 articles returned, 105 studies were included. Thematic synthesis revealed five meaningful aspects of health (MAH) related to PA: ambulation-dependent activities, balance-dependent activities, activities needing upper limb function, changing body positions, and participating in activities of different intensities. Patients also reported PA as important to QOL and influenced by internal and external facilitators and barriers. This research presents new findings related to PA MAHs across various therapeutic areas, which go beyond walking. The findings provide a foundation for defining concepts of interest, measures, and endpoints, with applications in clinical research and care, including patient-focused development of digitally derived measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Salma Ajraoui
- Patient‐Centered SolutionsIQVIADurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Jake Centra
- Digital Medicine SocietyBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Kieran F. Reid
- Laboratory of Exercise Physiology and Physical Performance, Boston Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center for Function Promoting TherapiesBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | | | - Alberto Conde Freniche
- Nestlé Institute of Health Sciences, Nestlé Research, Société des Produits Nestlé S.A.LausanneLausanneSwitzerland
| | | | - Astrid M. H. Horstman
- Nestlé Institute of Health Sciences, Nestlé Research, Société des Produits Nestlé S.A.LausanneLausanneSwitzerland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rahmati S, Galavi Z, Kavyani B, Arshadi H, Geerts J, Sharifi H. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with multiple sclerosis disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Midwifery 2024; 134:104004. [PMID: 38703425 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2024.104004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Revised: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Little is known regarding the impact of multiple sclerosis (MS) on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Consequently, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to study the impacts of MS on maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with a history of MS. METHODS This review was designed in line with the PRISMA guidelines. Two researchers conducted independent reviews of the literature without time restrictions until January 2023 using international databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL Plus, Embase, Scopus, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. A random-effect meta-analysis, using the db metan command in Stata 17.2, was used to calculate the pooled measure of association. RESULTS The meta-analysis identified 15 studies involving 33,174,541 pregnant women (32,191 with MS and 33,142,350 as controls). The findings indicate that women with a history of MS are at an increased risk of cesarean delivery (OR=1.28, 95% Confidence Intervals [CI]: 1.14-1.45, p-value: 0.042). Also, these women are at higher risk of neonatal outcomes, such as preterm birth (OR= 1.39, 95% CI: 1.08-1.78, p-value: 0.02), congenital malformations (OR=1.32, 95%CI: 1.16-1.50, p-value: 0.031), Apgar score <7 (OR=2.13, 95% CI: 1.19-3.79, p-value: 0.03), and small for gestational age (OR=1.27, 95% CI: 1.08-1.51, p-value: 0.040). CONCLUSION Pregnant women with MS have a greater chance of adverse pregnancy results than pregnant women without MS. Consequently, pregnant women with MS should create detailed before and after pregnancy plans, in consultation with their doctors, spouses, families, and friends, regarding the necessary care and supplements. Future studies applying a prospective cohort design that control for potential confounders are needed to further validate the findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoboo Rahmati
- Phd of Epidemiology, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Public Health, Kerman University Of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Zahra Galavi
- Student Research Committee, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Batoul Kavyani
- Student Research Committee, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Homa Arshadi
- Student Research Committee, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Jaason Geerts
- Centre for International Human Resource Management (CIHRM), University of Cambridge Judge Business School, Cambridge, UK; Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Department of Research and Leadership Development, The Canadian College of Health Leaders, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Hamid Sharifi
- HIV/STI Surveillance Research Center, and WHO Collaborating Center for HIV Surveillance, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran; Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liao H, Fan P, Ruan H, Qiu W, Zhang M, Li H. Characteristics of recurrence risk perception and coping strategies in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A qualitative study. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2024; 84:105419. [PMID: 38364767 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.105419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 12/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) has high recurrence and disability rates, cases of relapses can be recognized, and timely intervention can be provided if the risk of relapse is properly perceived. However, there have been no studies to explore patients' perceptions of recurrence risk and coping strategies. This study aimed to explore the characteristics of relapse risk perception and coping strategies of patients with NMOSD. METHODS We adopted the phenomenological method of qualitative research. Face-to-face, semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 15 patients with NMOSD. The interview data were then analyzed using the Colaizzi seven-step analysis. RESULTS The analysis revealed five major themes. The first theme was the 'perception of possibility of relapse', which included subjectively underestimating the likelihood of relapse and shifted from underestimation to overestimation; the second theme was 'relapse warning signs perception'; the third theme was 'perception of relapse triggers', which included understanding relapse triggers, potential misconceptions about relapse triggers, and no identifiable cause of recurrence; the fourth theme was 'perception of the relapse consequences', encompassing severe impairment of body structure and function, prominent psychological problems, limited family roles and social functions, and heavy financial burden; and the final theme was 'relapse risk coping strategies', which included actively yearning for and seeking information support, recurrence risk prevention/management, limitations of coping strategies. CONCLUSIONS This study's findings revealed that newly diagnosed patients as well as those who relapsed subjectively underestimated the likelihood of relapse before they had experienced multiple (two or more) relapses. In contrast, patients who had experienced multiple relapses had transitioned from initial underestimation to subsequent overestimation. Additionally, patients' compliance with medication was identified as a relapse-risk behaviors that was very manageable. The occurrence of relapse is associated with significant and extensive adverse effects on patients. Consequently, patients are eager to communicate with their healthcare providers regarding treatment planning and relapse management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haifen Liao
- School of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China
| | - Ping Fan
- Department of Neurology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong, China
| | - Hengfang Ruan
- Department of Neurology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong, China
| | - Wei Qiu
- Department of Neurology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong, China
| | - Meifen Zhang
- School of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China.
| | - Huijuan Li
- Department of Neurology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Simpson R, Posa S, Bruno T, Simpson S, Wasilewski MB, Robinson LR, Munce S, Bayley M, Feinstein A. Conceptualization, use, and outcomes associated with compassion in the care of people with multiple sclerosis: a scoping review. J Neurol 2023; 270:1300-1322. [PMID: 36445508 PMCID: PMC9707147 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11497-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Compassion is widely regarded as an important component of high-quality healthcare. However, its conceptualization, use, and associated outcomes in the care of people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) have not been synthesized. The aim of this review is to scope the peer reviewed academic literature on the conceptualization, use, and outcomes associated with compassion in the care of PwMS. METHODS Studies were eligible for inclusion if reporting primary research data from quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods studies on the conceptualization, use, and outcomes associated with compassion in the care of PwMS. Relevant studies were identified through searching five electronic databases (CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO) in January 2022. We followed the guidance outlined in the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) manual for evidence synthesis, and also referred to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for Scoping Reviews Checklist (PRISMA-ScR). Simple descriptive methods were used to chart quantitative findings, and a descriptive approach with basic content analysis was employed to describe qualitative findings. RESULTS Fifteen studies were included (participant n = 1722): eight quantitative, six mixed-methods, one exclusively qualitative. Synthesized qualitative data revealed that PwMS conceptualize compassion as involving self-kindness, agency, and acceptance. PwMS report using self-compassion in response to unpleasant sensations and experiences. Quantitative findings suggest that compassion may mediate benefit finding, reduced distress, and improved quality of life (QoL) in PwMS, that those with the condition may become more compassionate through time, and that self-compassion specifically can be increased through training in mindfulness. In this context, greater self-compassion in PwMS correlates with less depression and fatigue, better resilience and QoL. Among studies, self-compassion was the most common outcome measure for PwMS. CONCLUSIONS A nascent literature exists on the conceptualization, use, and outcomes associated with compassion in the care of PwMS. Further research is required to better understand what compassion means to PwMS and those caring for them. However, self-compassion can be cultivated among PwMS and may be helpful for managing unpleasant somatic symptoms and in benefit finding. Impact on other health outcomes is less clear. The use of compassion by health care providers in the care of PwMS is unstudied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Simpson
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
- University Health Network, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, 347 Rumsey Rd, East York, Toronto, ON, M4G 2V6, Canada.
| | - Stephanie Posa
- St. John's Rehab Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Tania Bruno
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sharon Simpson
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Marina B Wasilewski
- St. John's Rehab Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lawrence R Robinson
- St. John's Rehab Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sarah Munce
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Mark Bayley
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- University Health Network, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, 347 Rumsey Rd, East York, Toronto, ON, M4G 2V6, Canada
| | - Anthony Feinstein
- Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Consultation/Liaison Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ware M, O’Connor P, Bub K, Backus D, McCully K. The role of worry in exercise and physical activity behavior of people with multiple sclerosis. Health Psychol Behav Med 2022; 10:786-805. [PMID: 36016871 PMCID: PMC9397454 DOI: 10.1080/21642850.2022.2112197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: This study is a secondary analysis of data from a mixed methods exploration of fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis (MS), a chronic autoimmune disease affecting the central nervous system. During initial analysis, worry emerged during discussions of the fatigue experience. The purpose of this study is to explore worry in relationship to exercise and physical activity behavior. Methods: Mixed methods were used to address the research question. 55 people with MS provided demographic and survey data (habitual physical activity, body perception, functioning). 35 participated in semi-structured interviews on the topics of fatigue, body sensations, emotions, and their effects on physical activity. Qualitative data were analyzed utilizing constructivist grounded theory. Quantitative data were analyzed utilizing multiple regression. Results: Qualitative theory described participants’ thoughts and experiences regarding the consequences of fatigue during activity, and how they appear to influence subsequent actions. Worry played a critical role in thought processes regarding physical activity. Aspects of body perception were weak quantitative predictors of physical activity behavior after control of physical functionality. Conclusions: The most significant finding of this study was the description and dialogue about worry as a factor that shapes perceptions of the benefits and value of exercise and physical activity. Physical activity practitioners could benefit from seeking to understand physical-activity-related worry when examining physical activity behavior and designing programming.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Ware
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
- Department of Kinesiology, College of Education, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| | - Patrick O’Connor
- Department of Kinesiology, College of Education, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| | - Kristen Bub
- Department of Educational Psychology, College of Education, University of Georgia Athens, GA, USA
| | | | - Kevin McCully
- Department of Kinesiology, College of Education, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li X, Miao X, Wang Y, Sun J, Gao H, Han J, Li Y, Wang Q, Sun C, Liu J. Central nervous system tumefactive demyelinating lesions: Risk factors of relapse and follow-up observations. Front Immunol 2022; 13:1052678. [PMID: 36532021 PMCID: PMC9752826 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1052678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To track the clinical outcomes in patients who initially presented with tumefactive demyelinating lesions (TDLs), we summarized the clinical characteristics of various etiologies, and identified possible relapse risk factors for TDLs. Methods Between 2001 and 2021, 116 patients initially presented with TDLs in our hospital were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were followed for relapse and clinical outcomes, and grouped according to various etiologies. Demographic information, clinical data, imaging data, and laboratory results of patients were obtained and analyzed. The risk factors of relapse were analyzed by the Log-Rank test and the Cox proportional hazard model in multivariate analysis. Result During a median follow-up period of 72 months, 33 patients were diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS), 6 patients with Balo, 6 patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), 10 patients with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated demyelination (MOGAD), 1 patient with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), and the remaining 60 patients still have no clear etiology. These individuals with an unknown etiology were categorized independently and placed to the other etiology group. In the other etiology group, 13 patients had recurrent demyelinating phases, while 47 patients did not suffer any more clinical events. Approximately 46.6% of TDLs had relapses which were associated with multiple functional system involvement, first-phase Expanded Disability Status Scale score, lesions morphology, number of lesions, and lesions location (P<0.05). And diffuse infiltrative lesions (P=0.003, HR=6.045, 95%CI:1.860-19.652), multiple lesions (P=0.001, HR=3.262, 95%CI:1.654-6.435) and infratentorial involvement (P=0.006, HR=2.289, 95%CI:1.064-3.853) may be independent risk factors for recurrence. Relapse free survival was assessed to be 36 months. Conclusions In clinical practice, around 46.6% of TDLs relapsed, with the MS group showing the highest recurrence rate, and lesions location, diffuse infiltrative lesions, and multiple lesions might be independent risk factors for relapse. Nevertheless, despite extensive diagnostic work and long-term follow-up, the etiology of TDLs in some patients was still unclear. And these patients tend to have monophase course and a low rate of relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinnan Li
- Senior Department of Neurology, The First Medical Center of People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiuling Miao
- Senior Department of Neurology, The First Medical Center of People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yaming Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Junzhao Sun
- Senior Department of Neurosurgery, The First Medical Center of People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Haifeng Gao
- Department of Neurology, Tangshan Gongren Hospital, Tangshan, China
| | - Jing Han
- Senior Department of Neurology, The First Medical Center of People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yuxin Li
- Senior Department of Neurology, The First Medical Center of People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Qingjun Wang
- Department of Radiology, Sixth Medical Center of People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China,*Correspondence: Jianguo Liu, ; Chenjing Sun, ; Qingjun Wang,
| | - Chenjing Sun
- Senior Department of Neurology, The First Medical Center of People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China,*Correspondence: Jianguo Liu, ; Chenjing Sun, ; Qingjun Wang,
| | - Jianguo Liu
- Senior Department of Neurology, The First Medical Center of People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China,*Correspondence: Jianguo Liu, ; Chenjing Sun, ; Qingjun Wang,
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Solomon AJ, Arrambide G, Brownlee W, Cross AH, Gaitan MI, Lublin FD, Makhani N, Mowry EM, Reich DS, Rovira À, Weinshenker BG, Cohen JA. Confirming a Historical Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis: Challenges and Recommendations. Neurol Clin Pract 2022; 12:263-269. [PMID: 35747540 PMCID: PMC9208427 DOI: 10.1212/cpj.0000000000001149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Patients with a historical diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS)-a patient presenting with a diagnosis of MS made previously and by a different clinician-present specific diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in clinical practice. Application of the McDonald criteria is most straightforward when applied contemporaneously with a syndrome typical of an MS attack or relapse; however, retrospective application of the criteria in some patients with a historical diagnosis of MS can be problematic. Limited patient recollection of symptoms and evolution of neurologic examination and MRI findings complicate confirmation of an earlier MS diagnosis and assessment of subsequent disease activity or clinical progression. Adequate records for review of prior clinical examinations, laboratory results, and/or MRI scans obtained at the time of diagnosis or during ensuing care may be inadequate or unavailable. This article provides recommendations for a clinical approach to the evaluation of patients with a historical diagnosis of MS to aid diagnostic confirmation, avoid misdiagnosis, and inform therapeutic decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Solomon
- Department of Neurological Sciences (AJS), Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, University Health Center - Arnold 2, Burlington, VT; Servei de Neurologia-Neuroimmunologia (GA), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya, (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (WB), London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (AHC), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Department of Neurology (MIG), Neuroimmunology Section, FLENI, Buenos Aires City, Argentina; The Corinne Goldsmith Dickinson Center for Multiple Sclerosis (FDL), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology (NM), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Multiple Sclerosis Precision Medicine Center of Excellence (EMM), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Translational Neuroradiology Section (DSR), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Section of Neuroradiology (ÀR), Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Neurology (BGW), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Mellen Center for MS Treatment and Research (JAC), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Georgina Arrambide
- Department of Neurological Sciences (AJS), Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, University Health Center - Arnold 2, Burlington, VT; Servei de Neurologia-Neuroimmunologia (GA), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya, (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (WB), London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (AHC), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Department of Neurology (MIG), Neuroimmunology Section, FLENI, Buenos Aires City, Argentina; The Corinne Goldsmith Dickinson Center for Multiple Sclerosis (FDL), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology (NM), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Multiple Sclerosis Precision Medicine Center of Excellence (EMM), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Translational Neuroradiology Section (DSR), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Section of Neuroradiology (ÀR), Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Neurology (BGW), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Mellen Center for MS Treatment and Research (JAC), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Wallace Brownlee
- Department of Neurological Sciences (AJS), Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, University Health Center - Arnold 2, Burlington, VT; Servei de Neurologia-Neuroimmunologia (GA), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya, (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (WB), London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (AHC), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Department of Neurology (MIG), Neuroimmunology Section, FLENI, Buenos Aires City, Argentina; The Corinne Goldsmith Dickinson Center for Multiple Sclerosis (FDL), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology (NM), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Multiple Sclerosis Precision Medicine Center of Excellence (EMM), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Translational Neuroradiology Section (DSR), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Section of Neuroradiology (ÀR), Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Neurology (BGW), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Mellen Center for MS Treatment and Research (JAC), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Anne H Cross
- Department of Neurological Sciences (AJS), Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, University Health Center - Arnold 2, Burlington, VT; Servei de Neurologia-Neuroimmunologia (GA), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya, (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (WB), London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (AHC), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Department of Neurology (MIG), Neuroimmunology Section, FLENI, Buenos Aires City, Argentina; The Corinne Goldsmith Dickinson Center for Multiple Sclerosis (FDL), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology (NM), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Multiple Sclerosis Precision Medicine Center of Excellence (EMM), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Translational Neuroradiology Section (DSR), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Section of Neuroradiology (ÀR), Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Neurology (BGW), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Mellen Center for MS Treatment and Research (JAC), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - María I Gaitan
- Department of Neurological Sciences (AJS), Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, University Health Center - Arnold 2, Burlington, VT; Servei de Neurologia-Neuroimmunologia (GA), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya, (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (WB), London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (AHC), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Department of Neurology (MIG), Neuroimmunology Section, FLENI, Buenos Aires City, Argentina; The Corinne Goldsmith Dickinson Center for Multiple Sclerosis (FDL), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology (NM), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Multiple Sclerosis Precision Medicine Center of Excellence (EMM), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Translational Neuroradiology Section (DSR), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Section of Neuroradiology (ÀR), Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Neurology (BGW), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Mellen Center for MS Treatment and Research (JAC), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Fred D Lublin
- Department of Neurological Sciences (AJS), Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, University Health Center - Arnold 2, Burlington, VT; Servei de Neurologia-Neuroimmunologia (GA), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya, (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (WB), London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (AHC), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Department of Neurology (MIG), Neuroimmunology Section, FLENI, Buenos Aires City, Argentina; The Corinne Goldsmith Dickinson Center for Multiple Sclerosis (FDL), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology (NM), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Multiple Sclerosis Precision Medicine Center of Excellence (EMM), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Translational Neuroradiology Section (DSR), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Section of Neuroradiology (ÀR), Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Neurology (BGW), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Mellen Center for MS Treatment and Research (JAC), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Naila Makhani
- Department of Neurological Sciences (AJS), Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, University Health Center - Arnold 2, Burlington, VT; Servei de Neurologia-Neuroimmunologia (GA), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya, (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (WB), London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (AHC), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Department of Neurology (MIG), Neuroimmunology Section, FLENI, Buenos Aires City, Argentina; The Corinne Goldsmith Dickinson Center for Multiple Sclerosis (FDL), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology (NM), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Multiple Sclerosis Precision Medicine Center of Excellence (EMM), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Translational Neuroradiology Section (DSR), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Section of Neuroradiology (ÀR), Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Neurology (BGW), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Mellen Center for MS Treatment and Research (JAC), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Ellen M Mowry
- Department of Neurological Sciences (AJS), Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, University Health Center - Arnold 2, Burlington, VT; Servei de Neurologia-Neuroimmunologia (GA), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya, (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (WB), London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (AHC), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Department of Neurology (MIG), Neuroimmunology Section, FLENI, Buenos Aires City, Argentina; The Corinne Goldsmith Dickinson Center for Multiple Sclerosis (FDL), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology (NM), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Multiple Sclerosis Precision Medicine Center of Excellence (EMM), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Translational Neuroradiology Section (DSR), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Section of Neuroradiology (ÀR), Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Neurology (BGW), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Mellen Center for MS Treatment and Research (JAC), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Daniel S Reich
- Department of Neurological Sciences (AJS), Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, University Health Center - Arnold 2, Burlington, VT; Servei de Neurologia-Neuroimmunologia (GA), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya, (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (WB), London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (AHC), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Department of Neurology (MIG), Neuroimmunology Section, FLENI, Buenos Aires City, Argentina; The Corinne Goldsmith Dickinson Center for Multiple Sclerosis (FDL), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology (NM), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Multiple Sclerosis Precision Medicine Center of Excellence (EMM), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Translational Neuroradiology Section (DSR), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Section of Neuroradiology (ÀR), Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Neurology (BGW), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Mellen Center for MS Treatment and Research (JAC), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Àlex Rovira
- Department of Neurological Sciences (AJS), Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, University Health Center - Arnold 2, Burlington, VT; Servei de Neurologia-Neuroimmunologia (GA), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya, (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (WB), London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (AHC), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Department of Neurology (MIG), Neuroimmunology Section, FLENI, Buenos Aires City, Argentina; The Corinne Goldsmith Dickinson Center for Multiple Sclerosis (FDL), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology (NM), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Multiple Sclerosis Precision Medicine Center of Excellence (EMM), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Translational Neuroradiology Section (DSR), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Section of Neuroradiology (ÀR), Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Neurology (BGW), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Mellen Center for MS Treatment and Research (JAC), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Brian G Weinshenker
- Department of Neurological Sciences (AJS), Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, University Health Center - Arnold 2, Burlington, VT; Servei de Neurologia-Neuroimmunologia (GA), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya, (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (WB), London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (AHC), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Department of Neurology (MIG), Neuroimmunology Section, FLENI, Buenos Aires City, Argentina; The Corinne Goldsmith Dickinson Center for Multiple Sclerosis (FDL), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology (NM), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Multiple Sclerosis Precision Medicine Center of Excellence (EMM), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Translational Neuroradiology Section (DSR), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Section of Neuroradiology (ÀR), Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Neurology (BGW), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Mellen Center for MS Treatment and Research (JAC), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jeffrey A Cohen
- Department of Neurological Sciences (AJS), Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, University Health Center - Arnold 2, Burlington, VT; Servei de Neurologia-Neuroimmunologia (GA), Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya, (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (WB), London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (AHC), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Department of Neurology (MIG), Neuroimmunology Section, FLENI, Buenos Aires City, Argentina; The Corinne Goldsmith Dickinson Center for Multiple Sclerosis (FDL), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology (NM), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Multiple Sclerosis Precision Medicine Center of Excellence (EMM), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Translational Neuroradiology Section (DSR), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Section of Neuroradiology (ÀR), Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Neurology (BGW), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Mellen Center for MS Treatment and Research (JAC), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Faraclas E, Lynn J, Lau JD, Merlo A. Health-Related Quality of Life in people with Multiple Sclerosis: How does this Population Compare to Population-based Norms in Different Health Domains? J Patient Rep Outcomes 2022; 6:12. [PMID: 35107657 PMCID: PMC8810961 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-022-00415-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purposes of this investigation were to (1) identify the domains of health-related quality of life most impacted in people with RRMS, (2) compare the health-related QOL in people with RRMS to general population norms, and (3) to describe subgroups within the RRMS population that have similar health and wellness needs. METHODS This was a cross-sectional QOL investigation of adults with RRMS. The SF-36v2 survey and demographic information were collected electronically via Qualtrics. Participants (n = 120) were recruited through social media and the National Multiple Sclerosis Society of the United States. One-sample Z-tests were completed for all subscales, and component mean scores to determine if a difference between the sample and population norms existed. RESULTS All values of z were statistically significant, p < .01, for all subscale and composite scores. Social function, physical function, and the mental health component scores had the lowest subscale means. A first stage depression screen revealed that 49% of the surveyed population were at risk for depression, compared to 18% in the general population. Further dividing the sample into years since MS diagnosis, the recently diagnosed group had 61% at risk for depression. CONCLUSIONS Challenges related to the mental health of individuals with RRMS are influencing overall health-related QOL. Early on in the disease course (0-3 years), mental health affected QOL more than physical health. More attention must be given to the nonphysical domains of health to advance the QOL for people with RRMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Faraclas
- Doctor of Philosophy in Health Sciences Program, Rocky Mountain University of Health Professions, Provo, UT, USA.
- Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Worcester, MA, USA.
| | - Jeff Lynn
- Slippery Rocky University, Slippery Rock, PA, USA
| | - Jeffery D Lau
- Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, Rocky Mountain University of Health Professions, Provo, UT, USA
| | - Angela Merlo
- Department of Physical Therapy, Eastern Washington University, Spokane, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Beckmann H, Heesen C, Augustin M, Blome C. The 27-Item Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life Questionnaire: A New Brief Measure Including Treatment Burden and Work Life. Int J MS Care 2021; 24:147-153. [DOI: 10.7224/1537-2073.2020-088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Treatment- and work-related aspects have been neglected in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures in multiple sclerosis (MS). We aimed to develop a brief instrument covering all important impairment-, activity-, participation-, and treatment-related aspects for use in research and practice.
Methods: The 27-item Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (MS-QLQ27) was developed using open item collection, a multidisciplinary expert panel, and cognitive pretesting. It was evaluated for reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness with 100 patients presenting with relapse (84 at follow-up ~14 days later). Construct validity was analyzed by correlating the MS-QLQ27 with the disease-specific Hamburg Quality of Life Questionnaire in MS (HAQUAMS) and generic HRQOL instuments. The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) was used to analyze known-groups validity. Responsiveness was determined as the correlation of changes in MS-QLQ27 scores with changes in validation criteria.
Results: Internal consistency was high (Cronbach α = 0.94 at baseline and 0.93 at follow-up). Convergent validity was supported by direction and magnitude of associations with disease-specific and generic instruments. Correlations with change in convergent criteria were strong, indicating responsiveness. The HAQUAMS showed the strongest associations with the MSQLQ27. The MS-QLQ27 showed the highest effect size compared with other patient-reported outcomes and the EDSS. It successfully distinguished between levels of disease severity.
Conclusions: These results indicate that the MS-QLQ27 is a reliable, valid, and highly responsive instrument for assessing HRQOL during relapse evolution in MS. Its advantages are that it is brief yet comprehensive, covering work- and treatment-related aspects not addressed in previous measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Beckmann
- From the Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP) (HB, MA, CB) and Institute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis (INIMS) (CH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Heesen
- From the Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP) (HB, MA, CB) and Institute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis (INIMS) (CH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Augustin
- From the Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP) (HB, MA, CB) and Institute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis (INIMS) (CH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christine Blome
- From the Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP) (HB, MA, CB) and Institute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis (INIMS) (CH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wicks CR, Sloan R, DiMauro S, Thompson EL, Billington S, Webb M, Pepper G. Patients' experiences of self-identification, seeking support, and anticipation of potential relapse in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2021; 56:103259. [PMID: 34628265 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses are associated with increased disability, reduced quality of life and negative psychosocial impacts. However, they often go unrecognised; people with MS (MSers) may face barriers to self-identification of relapses or seeking support for them. The charity Shift.ms sought to better understand 1) MSers' challenges in self-identifying potential relapses, 2) where MSers' seek support for potential relapses, and 3) the impact of the anticipation of relapses on MSers' wellbeing and daily living. METHODS Shift.ms developed a patient perspective 8-question pilot survey (included likert-style, multiple-choice, and optional free-text responses) and shared it with Shift.ms' international online community (n = 20,052). Descriptive quantitative analysis, and content analysis and thematic analysis of qualitative free-text responses were used. RESULTS 1,737 MSers responded. Just under one third (29.9%) of MSers reported that it takes them 24 h or less to self-identify a potential relapse, while more than half (54.5%) reported that identification occurs within 48 h; 55% MSers felt that the "at least 24 h" clinical criterion of relapse classification was appropriate. Challenges to relapse self-identification included confounding background symptoms or infection, variability of relapse symptoms, and individualistic nature of MS. Fatigue was reported to be the most common symptom of relapse (75%), however fatigue was also the symptom most commonly mistaken for relapse (40%). Barriers to relapse self-identification were a shorter duration since MS diagnosis and a perceived lack of consensus around relapse classification. Respondents reported they most often seek relapse support/advice from healthcare professionals (HCPs) (37.1%), family/friends (32.1%), or not at all (16.9%). Rather than temporal criteria (i.e. the 24 h criterion), participants felt that severity of symptoms could play a more critical role in whether to seek support for a potential relapse. Barriers to seeking support/advice included variability in HCP advice and feelings of invalidation. Anticipation of relapses negatively impacted MSers wellbeing; led to reduced participation in activities, and the development of adjustment/coping strategies. Relapse triggers included stress, reduced self-care, infection/illness; 78.5% reported stress or anxiety had triggered relapse. CONCLUSIONS These findings highlight difficulties MSers face in self-identifying relapses, barriers to accessing support, and impact of anticipation of relapses. They also highlight opportunities for improved MSer and HCP communication, dialogue and two-way education to help optimise patient access to relapse support and intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rob Sloan
- Shift.ms, Platform, New Station Street, Leeds, LS1 4JB, UK
| | - Sophie DiMauro
- Shift.ms, Platform, New Station Street, Leeds, LS1 4JB, UK
| | | | - Sam Billington
- Shift.ms, Platform, New Station Street, Leeds, LS1 4JB, UK
| | - Mark Webb
- Shift.ms, Platform, New Station Street, Leeds, LS1 4JB, UK
| | - George Pepper
- Shift.ms, Platform, New Station Street, Leeds, LS1 4JB, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pardini M. Do isolated cognitive relapses exist? Yes. Mult Scler 2021; 27:1486-1487. [PMID: 34410174 DOI: 10.1177/13524585211022191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Pardini
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genova, Italy/IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico S. Martino, Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Celius EG, Thompson H, Pontaga M, Langdon D, Laroni A, Potra S, Bharadia T, Yeandle D, Shanahan J, van Galen P, Alexandri N, Kesselring J. Disease Progression in Multiple Sclerosis: A Literature Review Exploring Patient Perspectives. Patient Prefer Adherence 2021; 15:15-27. [PMID: 33447018 PMCID: PMC7802794 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s268829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Multiple sclerosis (MS) prognosis is often uncertain. This literature review considers patients' understanding of, and perspectives on, MS progression to better comprehend the unmet needs of people with MS (PwMS), in order to improve treatment adherence and quality of life (QoL). METHODS Literature searches for peer-reviewed papers concerning patient perspectives on the progression of MS and comparable conditions, published between January 2000 and January 2020, were conducted. RESULTS Little qualitative evidence exists that examines PwMS' perspectives on MS progression. The understanding and meaning ascribed to terms such as "disease progression" vary. Some PwMS find disease labels stigmatizing, confusing, and disconnected from reality. The lack of a clear definition of progression and discrepancies between PwMS and healthcare professional (HCP) perspectives may contribute to misunderstanding and poor communication. Patient descriptions of progression and relapses include symptoms in addition to those evaluated by standard severity and disability measures. Compared with HCPs, PwMS are still focused on relapse prevention but place higher priority on QoL and ascribe different relative importance to the causes of poor adherence to treatment plans. PwMS want to discuss progression and likely prognosis. Such communication needs to be personalized and delivered with sensitivity, at an appropriate time. Poor treatment adherence may arise from a lack of understanding and poor communication, particularly around treatment goals. The few studies that directly considered patient perspectives on the progression of comparable conditions supported and extended the perspectives of PwMS. Lack of adequate communication by HCPs was the most common theme. CONCLUSION Patient perspectives on disease progression in MS and other chronic progressive conditions are under-investigated and under-reported. The limited evidence available highlights the importance of providing adequate information and effective HCP communication. While further studies are needed, the current evidence base offers information and insights that may help HCPs to enhance patient care, well-being, and treatment adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth G Celius
- Deparment of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Correspondence: Elisabeth G Celius Department of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Postboks 4950 Nydalen, Oslo0424, NorwayTel +47 91 50 27 70 Email
| | - Heidi Thompson
- The Neurology Centre, Craigavon Area Hospital, Portadown, UK
| | | | - Dawn Langdon
- Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, London, UK
| | - Alice Laroni
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Italy and IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Stanca Potra
- Patient Member of the MS in the 21st Century Steering Group, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Trishna Bharadia
- Patient Member of the MS in the 21st Century Steering Group, Buckinghamshire, UK
| | - David Yeandle
- Patient Member of the MS in the 21st Century Steering Group, Southampton, UK
| | - Jane Shanahan
- Patient Member of the MS in the 21st Century Steering Group, Ascot, UK
| | - Pieter van Galen
- Patient Member of the MS in the 21st Century Steering Group, Overijse, Belgium
| | - Nektaria Alexandri
- Global Medical Affairs, Neurology and Immunology, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Jürg Kesselring
- Department of Neurology & Neurorehabilitation, Kliniken Valens, Valens, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Schriefer D, Haase R, Ettle B, Ziemssen T. Patient- versus physician-reported relapses in multiple sclerosis: insights from a large observational study. Eur J Neurol 2020; 27:2531-2538. [PMID: 32643851 DOI: 10.1111/ene.14432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The patient's perspective is becoming increasingly important for endpoints in studies on multiple sclerosis. However, relapse data generated from the patient's perspective in combination with independent documentation by the physician are scarce. Our objective was to compare self-reported relapses by the patient to physician-documented relapses within a routine clinical practice setting of quarterly visits. METHODS Two-year data (n = 1921 patients) were extracted from two prospective, non-interventional, multicentre cohort studies in Germany. The number of relapses independently reported by patients and physicians was analysed. In addition, inter-rater reliability and measures of validity were evaluated. Patterns of associations were investigated in subgroup analysis of sociodemographic, clinical and patient-reported outcome measures. RESULTS Patients and physicians showed good overall agreement [κ = 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-0.80]. Nevertheless, patients reported, on average, more relapses than physicians during follow-up (0.55 vs. 0.44; P < 0.001). Corresponding annualized relapse rates were 0.38 (95% CI 0.36-0.39) and 0.30 (95% CI 0.29-0.31), respectively. Differences between physicians and patients were particularly pronounced in patient groups with greater disability levels, decreased health-related quality of life or treatment satisfaction. The positive predictive value was 74.01% (95% CI 71.85-76.07), and the negative predictive value was 98.86% (95% CI 98.67-99.03). CONCLUSION Some disagreement on the occurrence of relapses appears in specific patient subgroups, where factors such as pseudo-relapses or confounding factors may have promoted over- or under-reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Schriefer
- Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, Neurological University Clinic Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - R Haase
- Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, Neurological University Clinic Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - B Ettle
- Novartis Pharma GmbH, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - T Ziemssen
- Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, Neurological University Clinic Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ruiu E, Dubbioso R, Madsen KH, Svolgaard O, Raffin E, Andersen KW, Karabanov AN, Siebner HR. Probing Context-Dependent Modulations of Ipsilateral Premotor-Motor Connectivity in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis. Front Neurol 2020; 11:193. [PMID: 32431655 PMCID: PMC7214689 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: We employed dual-site TMS to test whether ipsilateral functional premotor-motor connectivity is altered in relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RR-MS) and is related to central fatigue. Methods: Twelve patients with RR-MS and 12 healthy controls performed a visually cued Pinch-NoPinch task with their right hand. During the reaction time (RT) period of Pinch and No-Pinch trials, single-site TMS was applied to the left primary motor cortex (M1) or dual-site TMS was applied to the ipsilateral dorsal premotor cortex (PMd) and to M1. We traced context-dependent changes of corticospinal excitability and premotor–motor connectivity by measuring Motor-Evoked Potentials (MEPs) in the right first dorsal interosseus muscle. Central fatigue was evaluated with the Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions (FSMS). Results: In both groups, single-pulse TMS revealed a consistent increase in mean MEP amplitude during the Reaction Time (RT) period relative to a resting condition. Task-related corticospinal facilitation increased toward the end of the RT period in Pinch trials, while it decreased in No-Pinch trials. Again, this modulation of MEP facilitation by trial type was comparable in patients and controls. Dual-site TMS showed no significant effect of a conditioning PMd pulse on ipsilateral corticospinal excitability during the RT period in either group. However, patients showed a trend toward a relative attenuation in functional PMd-M1 connectivity at the end of the RT period in No-Pinch trials, which correlated positively with the severity of motor fatigue (r = 0.69; p = 0.007). Conclusions: Dynamic regulation of corticospinal excitability and ipsilateral PMd-M1 connectivity is preserved in patients with RR-MS. MS-related fatigue scales positively with an attenuation of premotor-to-motor functional connectivity during cued motor inhibition. Significance: The temporal, context-dependent modulation of ipsilateral premotor-motor connectivity, as revealed by dual-site TMS of ipsilateral PMd and M1, constitutes a promising neurophysiological marker of fatigue in MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Ruiu
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Section 714, Hvidovre, Denmark.,Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Raffaele Dubbioso
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Section 714, Hvidovre, Denmark.,Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Section 714, Hvidovre, Denmark.,Section for Cognitive Systems, Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Olivia Svolgaard
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Section 714, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Estelle Raffin
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Section 714, Hvidovre, Denmark.,Brain Mind Institute and Centre of Neuroprosthetics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Kasper Winther Andersen
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Section 714, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Anke Ninija Karabanov
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Section 714, Hvidovre, Denmark.,Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hartwig Roman Siebner
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Section 714, Hvidovre, Denmark.,Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Benedict RH, Pol J, Yasin F, Hojnacki D, Kolb C, Eckert S, Tacca B, Drake A, Wojcik C, Morrow SA, Jakimovski D, Fuchs TA, Dwyer MG, Zivadinov R, Weinstock-Guttman B. Recovery of cognitive function after relapse in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2020; 27:71-78. [PMID: 31971066 DOI: 10.1177/1352458519898108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cognitive impairment is common in multiple sclerosis (MS) but its manifestation as acute disease activity is underappreciated. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to examine recovery after MS relapse on multiple tests of cognitive and motor function and explore correlates of change with Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and cognitive reserve. METHODS Fifty relapsing group (RG) and matched stable participants were examined at baseline, during relapse, and at 3-month follow-up. Tests of cognitive processing speed (Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)) and consensus opinion measures of memory, ambulation, and manual dexterity were administered. All RG patients were treated with a 5-day course of Acthar Gel (5 mL/80 IU). RESULTS In RG patients, SDMT declined from 55.2 to 44.6 at relapse and recovered to 51.7, a slope differing from stable controls (p = 0.001). A statistical trend (p = 0.07) for the same effect was observed for verbal memory and was significant for ambulation (p = 0.03). The Cerebral Function Score from the EDSS also changed in the RG and recovered incompletely relative to controls (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION These results replicate earlier reports of cognitive worsening during relapse in MS. Clinically meaningful improvements followed relapse on SDMT and ambulation. Cognitive decline during relapse can be appreciated on neurological exam but not patient-reported outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralph Hb Benedict
- Jacobs Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Jeta Pol
- Jacobs Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Faizan Yasin
- Jacobs Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - David Hojnacki
- Jacobs Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Channa Kolb
- Jacobs Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Svetlana Eckert
- Jacobs Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Beth Tacca
- Jacobs Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Allison Drake
- Jacobs Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Curtis Wojcik
- Jacobs Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | | | - Dejan Jakimovski
- Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Tom A Fuchs
- Jacobs Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA/Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Michael G Dwyer
- Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA/Center for Biomedical Imaging, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Robert Zivadinov
- Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA/Center for Biomedical Imaging, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Bianca Weinstock-Guttman
- Jacobs Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jafarzadeh Bejargafshe M, Hedayati M, Zahabiasli S, Tahmasbpour E, Rahmanzadeh S, Nejad-Moghaddam A. Safety and efficacy of stem cell therapy for treatment of neural damage in patients with multiple sclerosis. Stem Cell Investig 2019; 6:44. [PMID: 32039266 DOI: 10.21037/sci.2019.10.06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2019] [Accepted: 10/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a multifocal inflammatory disease that involves the central nervous system and associated with limbs paralysis and serious problems in sensation, limbs, visual and sphincter. This disease is a result of autoimmune mechanism in which autoantibodies target the self-myelin antigens and cause demyelination. Because of the myelin dysfunction, MS is clinically identified with neurological disabilities. Furthermore, it can be entered into the progressive phase because of irreversible neurodegeneration and axons damage. Unfortunately, there is no effective therapeutic method for this disease and current medications have been focused on amelioration of symptoms and chronic inflammation. Although current immunotherapies ameliorate the reactivity of autoimmune anti-myelin and MS relapse rate, there is no approved method for improvement of the disease progression and repairing of the damaged myelin. Therefore, finding an appropriate clinical treatment for improvement of neurological damages in MS patients is essential. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent cells with high proliferative and self-renewal capacities, as well as immunomodulatory and neuroregenerative effects. Bone marrow and adipose tissues derived MSCs have been considered for the treatment of different diseases because not only they can be easily isolated from these tissues, but also a patient can be served as a donor for himself without the risk of rejection. More importantly, autologous MSCs carry a safer pattern without the risk of malignant transformation. Here, we will discuss the effectiveness of MSCs therapy for MS patients by reviewing of clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mohammad Hedayati
- Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Rasht Branch, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
| | - Sahar Zahabiasli
- Department of Plantprotection, Rasht Branch, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
| | - Eisa Tahmasbpour
- Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine & Biomedical Innovations, Genetics & Metabolism Research Group, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Saeed Rahmanzadeh
- Enzyme Technology Lab, Genetics & Metabolism Research Group, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Amir Nejad-Moghaddam
- Marine Medicine Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|