Multiple modality approach to assess adherence to medications across time in Multiple Sclerosis

Psychometric evaluation of the 5-item Medication Adherence Report Scale questionnaire in persons with multiple sclerosis

The 5-item Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5) is a reliable and valid questionnaire for evaluating adherence in patients with asthma, hypertension, and diabetes. Validity has not been determined in multiple sclerosis (MS). We aimed to establish criterion validity and reliability of the MARS-5 in persons with MS (PwMS). Our prospective study included PwMS on dimethyl fumarate (DMF). PwMS self-completed the MARS-5 on the same day before baseline and follow-up brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 3 and 9 months after treatment initiation and were graded as highly and medium adherent upon the 24-cut-off score, established by receiver operator curve analysis. Health outcomes were represented by relapse occurrence from the 1st DMF dispense till follow-up brain MRI and radiological progression (new T2 MRI lesions and quantitative analysis) between baseline and follow-up MRI. Criterion validity was established by association with the Proportion of Days Covered (PDC), new T2 MRI lesions, and Beliefs in Medicines questionnaire (BMQ). The reliability evaluation included internal consistency and the test-retest method. We included 40 PwMS (age 37.6 ± 9.9 years, 75% women), 34 were treatment-naive. No relapses were seen during the follow-up period but quantitative MRI analysis showed new T2 lesions in 6 PwMS. The mean (SD) MARS-5 score was 23.1 (2.5), with 24 PwMS graded as highly adherent. The higher MARS-5 score was associated with higher PDC (b = 0.027, P<0.001, 95% CI: (0.0134-0.0403)) and lower medication concerns (b = -1.25, P<0.001, 95% CI: (-1.93-(-0,579)). Lower adherence was associated with increased number (P = 0.00148) and total volume of new T2 MRI lesions (P = 0.00149). The questionnaire showed acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.72) and moderate test-retest reliability (r = 0.62, P < 0.0001, 95% CI: 0.33-0.79). The MARS-5 was found to be valid and reliable for estimating medication adherence and predicting medication concerns in persons with MS.

Factors Associated With Disease-Modifying Therapy Adherence and Persistence in Multiple Sclerosis: A Scoping Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) receiving disease-modifying therapies (DMT) show published adherence rates of 27.0% to 93.8% and published persistence rates of 49.7% to 96.5%. Improvements in DMT adherence and persistence are key to optimizing MS care, and enhanced understanding could improve MS disease management and identify research gaps. This scoping literature review aims to examine the nature and findings of the literature evaluating factors associated with DMT adherence and persistence in patients with MS.

METHODS

Eligible articles included in the literature review were quantitative clinical studies written in English, included adherence or persistence as primary outcomes, and accounted for covariates/confounders. The articles were assessed to identify factors associated with adherence/persistence and analyzed according to DMT type (self-injectable, oral, infusion).

RESULTS

Fifty-eight studies (103,450 patients) were included. Study distribution by DMT type was self-injectable only (n = 41), oral only (n = 2), infusion only (n = 1), and more than 1 type (n = 14). Older age and previous DMT use were associated with increased adherence and/or persistence. Increased alcohol consumption, DMT adverse events, higher education, and higher body mass index were negatively associated with adherence and/or persistence. Greater number and severity of relapses was associated with increased adherence but decreased persistence.

CONCLUSIONS

Most studies examined factors associated with adherence and persistence to self-injectable DMTs. These factors should be evaluated further for oral and infusion DMTs. Insights into the modifiable factors associated with adherence and persistence could guide treatment decisions and help improve adherence and clinical outcomes.

Using an Intervention Mapping Approach to Improve Adherence to Disease-Modifying Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Up to 50% of individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) who are prescribed disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) do not take them as advised. Although many studies report on DMT adherence rate, few studies report on interventions involving individuals with MS. The current paper describes the development of an intervention aimed at improving adherence to DMTs among identified nonadherent individuals with MS.

METHODS

An intervention was developed using an Intervention Mapping approach, recommendations from reviews on medication adherence, and input from individuals with MS. Its content was determined by theories of health behavior (specifically, a perceptions and practicalities approach), empirical evidence collected among the specific target population (an observational "needs assessment" stage [n = 186]), and other studies.

RESULTS

A personalized intervention was tailored to the reasons for nonadherence, uncovered during the observational needs assessment stage, to be delivered sequentially by a neurologist and a psychologist. After the intervention objectives were identified, components of the intervention were set: psychoeducation and ways of coping with adverse effects; modification of unhelpful treatment beliefs (such modifications were found predictive of adherence in the observational phase of the study); improving confidence and self-efficacy; and developing strategies for remembering to take DMTs. These components were embedded within motivational interviewing.

CONCLUSIONS

Intervention Mapping was useful in developing an intervention grounded both in the theoretical approach of perceptions and practicalities and in empirical evidence from the literature and the target sample; concurrently, identifying determinants that the intervention did not address. The effectiveness of the intervention-which could potentially improve adherence among individuals with MS-needs to be examined.

Adherence to physical rehabilitation delivered via tele-rehabilitation for people with multiple sclerosis: a scoping review protocol

INTRODUCTION

Using tele-rehabilitation methods to deliver exercise, physical activity (PA) and behaviour change interventions for people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) has increased in recent years, especially since the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. This scoping review aims to provide an overview of the literature regarding adherence to therapeutic exercise and PA delivered via tele-rehabilitation for pwMS.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Frameworks described by Arksey and O'Malley and Levac et al underpin the methods. The following databases will be searched from 1998 to the present: Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Health Management Information Consortium Database, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, Pedro, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, US National Library of Medicine Registry of Clinical Trials, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform portal and The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. To identify papers not included in databases, relevant websites will be searched. Searches are planned for 2023. With the exception of study protocols, papers on any study design will be included. Papers reporting information regarding adherence in the context of prescribed therapeutic exercise and PA delivered via tele-rehabilitation for pwMS will be included. Information relating to adherence may comprise; methods of reporting adherence, adherence levels (eg, exercise diaries, pedometers), investigation of pwMS' and therapists' experiences of adherence or a discussion of adherence. Eligibility criteria and a custom data extraction form will be piloted on a sample of papers. Quality assessment of included studies will use Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklists. Data analysis will involve categorisation, enabling findings relating to study characteristics and research questions to be presented in narrative and tabular format.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval was not required for this protocol. Findings will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences. Consultation with pwMS and clinicians will help to identify other dissemination methods.

Medication habits among persons with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Though habitual behavior is part of medication-taking behavior, studies of adherence to medication among persons with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (PwRRMS) have not prospectively examined habit in relation to disease-modifying treatments (DMTs).

OBJECTIVES

1. Examine habit dimensions - repetition, lack of awareness, and lack of control - across time and route of administration (oral vs. injectable). 2. Examine the association (prospective and cross sectional) of the dimension of repetition and the habit index with adherence and persistence in medication taking and to medication perceptions.

METHODS

PwMS (n = 140), in their first year of treatment with a DMT, were prospectively assessed at three time points: at baseline, 6 months later (Time 1), and 12 months later (Time 2). Clinical and demographic information were obtained in-person, as were patient-reported medication habits and medication perceptions. Adherence and persistence were assessed with a combination of self-reporting and retrospective review of medication claims.

RESULTS

Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), with dimension as the within-subject factor at each time point, indicated that the repetition dimensions at all points were significantly higher than lack of awareness and lack of control dimensions. Repeated measures ANOVA, with time as the within-subject factor and route of administration as between-subject factor, yielded a significant time effect in repetition and lack of awareness dimensions so that they increased across time but not in lack of control; administration route effects were found to be nonsignificant in all dimensions. Repetition at Time 1 was positively associated with patient-reported adherence at this time point (r_s = 0.33, p = 0.002) but this was not consistently found at other time points . Likewise, reported repetition at Time 1 was higher among PwRMS who persisted with their medication a year later than among those who did not persist. Perceptions of medication (concern, harm, and overtreatment) were significantly negatively associated with reported repetition.

CONCLUSIONS

Over time, PwRMS reported an increase in two habit dimensions, repetition and lack of awareness, in medication taking. No significant differences in habit by administration modality were found. The habit dimension of repetition was significantly associated with perceptions of medication, adherence, and prospectively predicted persistence. However, the low values obtained for lack of awareness and lack of control, compared with the higher levels of repetition, indicate that the habit is not well ingrained. Hence, intervention to target habit formation and maintenance, to be tailored to the individual, are a promising venue for enhancing medication adherence and improving disease outcomes.

Beliefs about medication as predictors of medication adherence in a prospective cohort study among persons with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Though adherence to disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) among persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) varies and is often below 80%, only few prospective studies on adherence examined predictors beyond demographic and clinical characteristics.

OBJECTIVES

Identify antecedents to adherence and persistence to DMT in a prospective design among PwMS.

METHODS

PwMS (n = 186) were prospectively assessed at three time points: baseline, 6 (Time 1) and 12 months later (Time 2). Clinical, demographic information and patient-reported medication beliefs, illness perceptions, medication habits, perceived health and affect were surveyed in-person. Adherence and persistence were assessed by a combination of self-reports and retrospective review of medication claims.

FINDINGS

PwMS were 69.9% (Time 1) and 71% (Time 2) adherent to their DMTs and 64.5.9% were persistent. Beliefs about Medications were consistently predictive at both time points (baseline to Time 1 and Time 1 to Time 2) of medication adherence and persistence whereas other perceptions were predictive in some analyses; clinical and demographic characteristics were mostly not predictive of adherence nor persistence. The prospective association of beliefs about medication with adherence held also in multivariate analyses (OR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-0.99, p = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence and persistence are predicted by medication beliefs of PwMS. As medication beliefs are modifiable, they should be assessed periodically and targeted as a focus of tailored interventions aimed to improve adherence and consequently health outcomes in PwMS.

REGISTRATION

Clinical trials registry # NCT02488343 , date: 06/08/2015.

Mobile phone-based e-diary for assessment and enhancement of medications adherence among patients with multiple sclerosis

Background

Adherence to multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) is essential for realization of their optimal effectiveness and benefits.

Objective

To evaluate the usefulness and validity of a smartphone-based e-diary as a tool for adherence assessment as well as its effectiveness as a promoter of adherence to DMDs.

Methods

An MS tailored e-diary (MyMS&Me) reminded patients to take their DMDs on time. DMD intake was self-recorded in the e-diary by the participants. Three methods of adherence evaluation were compared: e-diary derived, retrospective self-reported, and the medication possession rate (MPR). The proportion of patients with poor adherence to DMDs (defined as MPR <80%) among e-diary users was compared with a control group without intervention.

Results

Sixty-two patients downloaded the e-diary (Female: 41 (66%), Expanded Disability Status Scale 3.2 ± 2.2) and 55 controls were enrolled. The median difference between e-diary-derived adherence and the MPR was –3% (95% limits of agreement: −53% to 12%). The median difference between retrospective self-reported adherence and the MPR was 0.3% (95% limits of agreement: −20% to 42%). The proportion of participants with poor adherence to DMDs was similar in the e-diary and control groups (10% vs. 13%, p = 0.6).

Conclusions

Substantial and clinically important disagreement between methods of medication adherence evaluation was noted. Smartphone reminders did not significantly improve the MPR of DMDs.