Urinary tract infection in patients with multiple sclerosis: An overview

Unraveling the complex relationship: Multiple sclerosis, urinary tract infections, and infertility

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune system disorder that affects the central nervous system (CNS) and progressively damages nerve fibers and protective myelin. People with MS often experience a wide range of complications, including lower urinary tract dysfunction, urinary tract infections (UTIs) and sexual dysfunction. MS is common in young people and can lead to sexual dysfunction (SD) and infertility, which becomes more pronounced as the disease progresses.

RESULTS

Over the past two decades, significant advances have been made in the management of MS, which may slow the progression of the disease and alter its course. However, UTI and SD remain significant challenges for these patients. Awareness of the underlying complications of MS, such as UTIs and infertility, is crucial for prevention, early detection and appropriate treatment, as there is a causal relationship between UTIs and the use of corticosteroids during an attack.

CONCLUSION

This article provides an overview of potential microbial pathogens that contribute to the development of MS, as well as an assessment of people with MS who report UTIs and infertility.

Multiple Sclerosis: An Emergency Medicine-Focused Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a rare but serious condition associated with significant morbidity.

OBJECTIVE

This review provides a focused assessment of MS for emergency clinicians, including the presentation, evaluation, and emergency department (ED) management based on current evidence.

DISCUSSION

MS is an autoimmune disorder targeting the central nervous system (CNS), characterized by clinical relapses and radiological lesions disseminated in time and location. Patients with MS most commonly present with long tract signs (e.g., myelopathy, asymmetric spastic paraplegia, urinary dysfunction, Lhermitte's sign), optic neuritis, or brainstem syndromes (bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia). Cortical syndromes or multifocal presentations are less common. Radiologically isolated syndrome and clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) may or may not progress to chronic forms of MS, including relapsing remitting MS, primary progressive MS, and secondary progressive MS. The foundation of outpatient management involves disease-modifying therapy, which is typically initiated with the first signs of disease onset. Management of CIS and acute flares of MS in the ED includes corticosteroid therapy, ideally after diagnostic testing with imaging and lumbar puncture for cerebrospinal fluid analysis. Emergency clinicians should evaluate whether patients with MS are presenting with new-onset debilitating neurological symptoms to avoid unnecessary testing and admissions, but failure to appropriately diagnose CIS or MS flare is associated with increased morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

An understanding of MS can assist emergency clinicians in better diagnosing and managing this neurologically devastating disease.

Disease-modifying drugs, multiple sclerosis and infection-related healthcare use in British Columbia, Canada: a population-based study

Background

Much remains unknown surrounding the disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) used to treat multiple sclerosis and infection-related healthcare use in the 'real-world' setting. We examined if DMD exposure was associated with altered infection-related healthcare use.

Methods

We assessed if DMD (versus no) exposure was associated with altered infection-related hospitalizations, physician claims, and prescriptions filled in British Columbia, Canada (1996-2017). Healthcare use was assessed using negative binomial and proportional means regression models, reported as sex-/age-/comorbidity-/calendar year-/socioeconomic-adjusted rate and hazard ratios [aRR, aHR], with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]).

Findings

We identified 19,360 multiple sclerosis cases (13,940/19,360; 72.0% women; mean age at study start = 44.5 standard deviation, SD = 13.3; mean follow-up = 11.7 [SD = 7.3] years). Relative to unexposed periods, exposure to any DMD was associated with a lower infection-related rate of physician claims (aRR = 0.88; 95% CI:0.85-0.92) and hazard of hospitalization (aHR = 0.64; 95% CI:0.56-0.73), and a higher rate of infection-related prescriptions (aRR = 1.14; 95% CI:1.08-1.20). Exposure to any injectable or oral DMD was associated with a lower infection-related rate of physician claims (injectable aRR = 0.88; 95% CI:0.84-0.92, oral aRR = 0.83; 95% CI:0.77-0.90) and hazard of hospitalization (injectable aHR = 0.65; 95% CI:0.56-0.75, oral aHR = 0.54; 95% CI:0.38-0.77), whereas intravenous DMD exposure was not (aRR = 0.99; 95% CI:0.86-1.14, aHR = 0.73; 95% CI:0.49-1.09). Exposure to any injectable or intravenous DMD was associated with a higher rate of infection-related prescriptions (injectable aRR = 1.15; 95% CI:1.08-1.22, intravenous = 1.34; 95% CI:1.15-1.56), whereas oral DMDs were not (aRR = 0.98; 95% CI:0.91-1.05).

Interpretation

DMD exposure for the treatment of MS was associated with differences in infection-related healthcare use. While infection-related hospitalizations and physician visits were lower, prescription fills were higher. How these differences in infection-related healthcare use affect outcomes in persons with multiple sclerosis warrants consideration.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); German Research Foundation (DFG).

Multiple sclerosis and pregnancy: Pathogenesis, influencing factors, and treatment options

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune-mediated degenerative disease of the central nervous system, characterized by inflammatory demyelination. It is primarily found in women of childbearing age, making pregnancy a significant concern for both patients with MS and clinicians. To assist these patients in achieving their desire for pregnancy, reducing MS relapses during all stages of pregnancy, preventing the progression of MS, mitigating the impact of MS treatment on the course and outcome of pregnancy, and a thorough understanding of the relationship between pregnancy and MS, as well as specific management and the application of relevant medications for MS patients at each stage of pregnancy, are essential. This article provides an update on pregnancy-related issues in women with MS, including the general recommendations for management at each stage of pregnancy.

Secondary hypogammaglobulinemia in patients with multiple sclerosis on anti-CD20 therapy: Pathogenesis, risk of infection, and disease management

Hypogammaglobulinemia is characterized by reduced serum immunoglobulin levels. Secondary hypogammaglobulinemia is of considerable interest to the practicing physician because it is a potential complication of some medications and may predispose patients to serious infections. Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) treated with B-cell-depleting anti-CD20 therapies are particularly at risk of developing hypogammaglobulinemia. Among these patients, hypogammaglobulinemia has been associated with an increased risk of infections. The mechanism by which hypogammaglobulinemia arises with anti-CD20 therapies (ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, ublituximab, rituximab) remains unclear and does not appear to be simply due to the reduction in circulating B-cell levels. Further, despite the association between anti-CD20 therapies, hypogammaglobulinemia, and infections, there is currently no generally accepted monitoring and treatment approach among clinicians treating patients with MS. Here, we review the literature and discuss possible mechanisms of secondary hypogammaglobulinemia in patients with MS, hypogammaglobulinemia results in MS anti-CD20 therapy clinical trials, the risk of infection for patients with hypogammaglobulinemia, and possible strategies for disease management. We also include a suggested best-practice approach to specifically address secondary hypogammaglobulinemia in patients with MS treated with anti-CD20 therapies.

Outcomes and Health Care Service Use in Adults 50 Years or Older With and Without Multiple Sclerosis: A 6-Year Observational Analysis

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) typically presents in young adulthood. Recent data show the highest prevalence of MS in people aged 55 to 64 years; however, there are limited studies of this population.

METHODS

Administrative US claims data from IBM-Truven MarketScan commercial and Medicare databases (2011-2017) were analyzed. People with MS 50 years or older were assigned to the aging MS cohort (n = 10,746). The matched controls were people 50 years or older without MS (n = 10,746). Multivariable models compared outcomes between groups.

RESULTS

Infections were more frequent in the aging MS cohort vs matched controls (61% vs 45%; P < .0001); urinary tract, acute upper respiratory tract, and herpes zoster were the most frequent infection types. Malignancy rates were 20% for both groups (P = .8167); skin, breast, and prostate malignancies were the most frequent types. Skilled nursing facilities (aging MS cohort, 12%; matched controls, 3%; P < .0001) and MRI (aging MS cohort, 87%; matched controls, 37%; P < .0001) were used more frequently in the aging MS cohort; brain and spine were the most frequent types of MRI in the aging MS cohort. Time to first cane/walker or wheelchair use was shorter in the aging MS cohort (cane/walker use: HR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.9-2.3; P < .0001; wheelchair use: HR, 6.9; 95% CI, 6.0-8.1; P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In people 50 years or older, measures typically associated with worse health primarily resulted from having MS rather than being a consequence of aging alone.

Potentially preventable hospitalizations and use of preventive services among people with multiple sclerosis: Large cohort study, USA

BACKGROUND

Individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) report barriers to accessing care, including receipt of preventive services. Potentially preventable hospitalization (PPH) is an important marker for access to, and receipt of timely care. However, few national studies have examined PPH risk in people with MS or considered the role of preventive care in reducing PPH risk among this patient population. Our objective was to examine PPH risk among adults with MS compared with their counterparts without MS.

METHODS

Optum® Clinformatics® Data Mart (2007-2017) was used to identify 6198 individuals with an MS diagnosis and their propensity-score matched counterparts without MS. Diagnostic and procedural codes were used to identify the presence of preventive hospitalizations, which were defined as quality indicators by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) during the 4-year follow-up period since the diagnosis of MS. Information on receipt of preventive services and office visits was also extracted. Adjusted generalized estimating equations were used to examine the association between MS diagnosis and PPHs. To examine the role of preventive services on odds of PPH amongst people with MS, we reported the adjusted marginal odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

The rate of any PPH among people with MS was double that of those without MS (131.6 vs 62.5 per 10,000). We identified higher odds of specific PPH indicators among people with MS compared to those without. Individuals with MS had 65% higher odds of hospitalization for pneumonia (OR=1.65, 95% CI: 1.01, 2.30), with similar significant findings observed for urinary tract infections (OR=4.90, 95% CI: 2.51, 9.57). In MS patients, receipt of preventive services, namely cholesterol screening (OR=0.76, 95% CI: 0.60, 0.95) and annual wellness visits were associated with lower odds of any PPH (OR=0.57, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.76).

CONCLUSION

People with MS were at a higher risk for PPHs compared with their counterparts without MS. Use of appropriate preventive services reduced the risk of PPH among the general population and among those with MS. More efforts are needed to encourage and facilitate the use of preventive care among people with MS. Receipt of timely and appropriate preventive care in this population may reduce the risk for PPH.

Definitions of Urinary Tract Infection Used in Interventional Studies Involving Neurourological Patients-A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Neurourological patients often encounter bacteriuria without any symptoms or may experience symptoms suspicious of urinary tract infections (UTIs). However, there is a lack of guidelines that unequivocally state the definition of UTIs in this specific patient group.

OBJECTIVE

To present all used definitions of UTIs in neurourological patients.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

This systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Studies were identified by electronic search of Medline, Embase, Cochrane controlled trials databases, and clinicaltrial.gov without a time limitation (last search September 2020) and by screening of reference lists and reviews. The occurrences of the various UTI definitions were counted and the frequencies calculated.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

After screening 7164 abstracts, we included 32 studies enrolling a total of 8488 patients with a neurourological disorder who took part in an interventional clinical study. UTI definitions were heterogeneous. The concordance to predefined definitions was low.

CONCLUSIONS

Interventional clinical studies rarely report specific definitions for UTIs, and both clinical and laboratory criteria used are heterogeneous. A generally accepted UTI definition for neurourological patients is urgently needed.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Patients suffering from neurological disorders often experience symptoms in their lower urinary tract that resemble urinary tract infections. Furthermore, they can have positive urine cultures without symptoms (the so-called asymptomatic bacteriuria). However, clinical studies rarely report specific definitions for urinary tract infections, and when it is done, they are heterogeneous. A generally accepted urinary tract infection definition for neurourological patients is urgently needed. TAKE  HOME MESSAGE: Interventional clinical studies on neurourological patients rarely report specific definitions for urinary tract infections (UTIs), and both clinical and laboratory criteria used are heterogeneous. A generally accepted UTI definition for neurourological patients is urgently needed.

Treatment Challenges in Multiple Sclerosis – A Continued Role for Glatiramer Acetate?

Earlier diagnosis, access to disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), and improved supportive care have favorably altered the disease course of multiple sclerosis (MS), leading to an improvement in long-term outcomes for people with MS (PwMS). This success has changed the medical characteristics of the population seen in MS clinics. Comorbidities and the accompanying polypharmacy, immune senescence, and the growing number of approved DMTs make selecting the optimal agent for an individual patient more challenging. Glatiramer acetate (GA), a moderately effective DMT, interacts only minimally with comorbidities, other medications, or immune senescence. We describe here several populations in which GA may represent a useful treatment option to overcome challenges due to advanced age or comorbidities (e.g., hepatic or renal disease, cancer). Further, we weigh GA's potential merits in other settings where PwMS and their neurologists must base treatment decisions on factors other than selecting the most effective DMT, e.g., family planning, conception and pregnancy, or the need for vaccination.

Evaluation of Treatment Practices for Urinalyses and Urine Cultures at an Outpatient Multiple Sclerosis Clinic

Background

Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) experience disease flares that can be precipitated by the presence of infection. Discerning asymptomatic bacteriuria from urinary tract infection (UTI) in patients with MS is complicated by lower urinary tract dysfunction, leading to potentially inappropriate antimicrobial use. In this study the antimicrobial treatment practices for positive urine cultures in patients with MS were evaluated.

Methods

In this single-center, retrospective study, positive cultures in patients with MS were included. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients appropriately treated with or without antimicrobial therapy. Secondary end points included antimicrobial selection and urinalysis positivity.

Results

Two hundred thirty-six cultures from 139 patients were evaluated. Treatment was inappropriate in 81 of 201 treated cultures (40%). Frequency, nocturia, dysuria, and foul-smelling urine were reported by patients in 54 (23%), 10 (4%), 25 (11%), and 14 (6%) cultures, respectively. The antimicrobial selected was too broad in spectrum for 35 of 201 (17%). Of those, fluoroquinolones were the agents used in 33 of 35 cases (94%). A urinalysis was sent in 203 cases (86%), with 197 (84%) positive for at least one predefined positivity criteria.

Conclusions

Urinalyses and urine cultures are performed frequently in patients with MS, often independent of symptoms. Patients with MS could be treated for asymptomatic bacteriuria at higher rates than the general population, and traditional urinary symptoms may not be appropriate indicators of infection. Empirical therapy for UTI is frequently used in this population, often resulting in inappropriate and/or too broad of antimicrobial therapy.

Evaluation of Urinary Tract Infection following Corticosteroid Therapy in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Exacerbation

The first treatment for multiple sclerosis exacerbation is usually short-term intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP), with or without a regimen of oral prednisone taper (OPT). This study aims to evaluate the effects of IVMP and OPT in comparison with IVMP alone in raising the risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) and posttreatment improvement of urinary tract symptoms in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. This double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted on 56 people with multiple sclerosis relapse who had undergone methylprednisolone for 5 days. Patients were randomly split into two groups: oral prednisolone and placebo (tapering for 20 days). Demographic data, duration of multiple sclerosis, urinary tract symptoms, the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, and urine data were analyzed. The incidence of UTI in the intervention and control groups did not differ significantly ( $p=560$ ). However, the improvement of urinary tract symptoms in the intervention group was significantly more favorable than in the control group ( $p\le 0.001$ ). Furthermore, administering OPT after IVMP did not increase the risk of UTI occurrence in patients with multiple sclerosis exacerbation. The urine analysis results did not show any differences at baseline and after the corticosteroid tapering regimen. Due to the risk of infection by corticosteroids, it is no longer necessary to do further urinary screening in this group of patients.