Comparative effectiveness of cladribine tablets versus fingolimod in the treatment of highly active multiple sclerosis: A real-world study

Evaluation of the Efficacy, Safety, and Adherence to Oral Drug Therapy in Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Background and Objectives: Selecting appropriate disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) is crucial for optimizing treatment and slowing disease progression in multiple sclerosis (MS). Real-world studies assess drug efficacy and usage in routine clinical practice. Therefore, the goal of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of oral drug therapy in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and the particularities of adherence to the therapy. Materials and Methods: A retrospective and prospective study was conducted at the Neurology Clinic of the Kaunas Clinics of the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences. The medical records of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) were reviewed. The retrospective study included 286 patients, and the prospective study included 175 patients. Results: The study population included 131 patients on teriflunomide (TFN), 53 on dimethyl fumarate (DMF), 37 on fingolimod (FTY), and 65 on cladribine (CLAD). The overall absolute reduction in the ARR over 4 years of treatment was higher in the second-line (FTY and CLAD) group (-2.00) compared with the first-line (-0.99) group (TFN and DMF). The total EDSS scores of patients who received FTY and CLAD were higher in the second (3.09, p = 0.024), third (3.94, p = 0.015), and fourth (3.6, p = 0.002) years of treatment, compared with the patients of first-line therapy. MRI revealed that the number of contrast-enhancing and new lesions was lower among patients taking second-line drugs in the second year (4.7% and 18.6%, respectively). The worst adherence to the drug therapy due to forgetfulness was observed in the DMF group (30.8%). Lymphopenia was less frequent in the TFN group (93.1%) and more frequent in the FTY group (86.5%) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Over four years, second-line patients had greater ARR reduction, fewer MRI lesions, and higher EDSS from year two. DMF showed the lowest adherence, mainly due to patient forgetfulness, while lymphopenia occurred most frequently with FTY.

Different Treatment Outcomes of Multiple Sclerosis Patients Receiving Ocrelizumab or Ofatumumab

OBJECTIVE

B-cell-depletion via CD20 antibodies is a safe and effective treatment for active relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). Both ocrelizumab (OCR) and ofatumumab (OFA) have demonstrated efficacy in randomized controlled trials and are approved for treatment of RMS, yet nothing is known on their comparative effectiveness, especially in the real-world setting.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study includes patients that were started on either OCR or OFA between September 2021 and December 2023. Patients were followed until June 2024 and recruited at 3 large tertiary centers in Germany (Duesseldorf, Essen, and Giessen). Propensity-score-matching was used to address baseline imbalances among patients. Clinical relapses, presence of new or enlarging MRI lesions and 6-month confirmed disability worsening were evaluated. Non-inferiority of OFA compared to OCR was evaluated through comparison of Kaplan-Meier-estimates.

RESULTS

A total of 1,138 patients were initially enrolled in the cohort. Following patient selection and propensity-score-matching, 544 OCR and 417 OFA patients were included in the final analysis. In our primary analysis, OFA was non-inferior to OCR in terms of relapses, disability progression, and accrual of MRI lesions. Subgroup analyses confirmed findings in previously naïve and platform-treated patients. Potential differences between OFA and OCR were seen in patients switching from S1P receptor modulators or natalizumab.

CONCLUSION

We here provide comparative data on the effectiveness of OCR and OFA in patients with active RMS. OFA was non-inferior to OCR in the overall cohort. Potential differences observed in patients switching from S1P receptor modulators or natalizumab require further validation. ANN NEUROL 2025;97:583-595.

Cladribine use trend in Latin America: the changes in patient profile impact in the drug effectiveness

INTRODUCTION

Cladribine was approved for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in our country in 2018. A previous study by our group showed that its use among high efficacy therapies options has been increasing along the years.

OBJECTIVE

to analyze the cladribine use trend across time since its approval.

METHOD

A retrospective cohort study was performed. People with MS (pwMS) treated with cladribine were included. Two periods were defined: P1 = 2018 - 2020 and P2 = 2021 - 2023. A comparative analysis was carry out between P1 and P2 to assess the trend of use, clinical/demographic characteristics, and effectiveness.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety- seven people with MS (pwMS) were included, mean EDSS: 2.2 ± 3.08, 72.6% female, mean age: 35.2 ± 9 years, mean disease duration: 6.6 ± 5.6 years, mean time lapse under cladribine: 26.1 ± 12.4 months. Regarding patient profile, we found significant differences between P1 and P2 in the MS evolution (p = 0.001) and EDSS ( p = 0.018) prior to initiation of cladribine. In the individualized analysis by year, we found a decrease in relapse number in the year prior to starting cladribine (p = 0.02). A higher proportion of No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA) was found in patients treated at P2 compared to those treated at P1 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

An earlier use of cladribine achieved a significant increase in reaching NEDA. This learning curve in the use of cladribine allows a better identification of the candidate patient and influences the treatment effectiveness.

Holistic, Long-Term Management of People with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis with Cladribine Tablets: Expert Opinion from France

Cladribine tablets (CladT) has been available for therapeutic use in France since March 2021 for the management of highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). This high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy (DMT) acts as an immune reconstitution therapy. In contrast to most high-efficacy DMTs, which act via continuous immunosuppression, two short courses of oral treatment with CladT at the beginning of years 1 and 2 of treatment provide long-term control of MS disease activity in responders to treatment, without the need for any further pharmacological treatment for several years. Although the labelling for CladT does not provide guidance beyond the initial treatment courses, real-world data on the therapeutic use of CladT from registries of previous clinical trial participants and patients treated in routine practice indicate that MS disease activity is controlled for a period of years beyond this time for a substantial proportion of patients. Moreover, this clinical experience has provided useful information on how to initiate and manage treatment with CladT. In this article we, a group of expert neurologists from France, provide recommendations on the initiation of CladT in DMT-naïve patients, how to switch from existing DMTs to CladT for patients with continuing MS disease activity, how to manage patients during the first 2 years of treatment and finally, how to manage patients with or without MS disease activity in years 3, 4 and beyond after initiating treatment with CladT. We believe that optimisation of the use of CladT beyond its initial courses of treatment will maximise the benefits of this treatment, especially early in the course of MS when suppression of focal inflammation in the CNS is a clinical priority to limit MS disease progression.

Real-world treatment patterns and effectiveness of cladribine tablets in patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis in the United States

BACKGROUND

Real-world evidence on the use of cladribine tablets (CladT) for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS) in the United States is emerging. The objective of this study was to assess the real-world treatment patterns and effectiveness of CladT in RMS.

METHODS

Adults with RMS initiating CladT were selected from the Symphony Integrated Dataverse. Baseline and follow-up periods were the 12 months before and 24 months after CladT initiation (index date). Switching to another disease-modifying therapy (DMT) and number of CladT courses were described during follow-up. Annualized relapse rate (ARR), MS disease severity, Expanded Disability Status Scale-Derived Disability Indicators (EDSS-DDI), corticosteroid use, and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) were described during Years 1 and 2 of follow-up and compared with baseline.

RESULTS

A total of 539 CladT-treated patients were included (mean age: 49.9 years; 77.6 % female). Over the 2-year follow-up, 91 % and 59 % of patients had one and two CladT courses, respectively, and 7 % of patients had evidence of switching to another DMT. ARR, MS disease severity score, and corticosteroid use decreased significantly during follow-up compared with baseline, while EDSS-DDI remained stable. All-cause and MS-related HRU decreased during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

CladT-treated patients with RMS had low switch rates, reduced ARR, disease severity, corticosteroid use, and HRU.

Real-world use of cladribine tablets (completion rates and treatment persistence) in patients with multiple sclerosis in England: The CLARENCE study

BACKGROUND

Treatment with cladribine tablets, a high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy (DMT), has been available in England since 2017 for patients with highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). Real-world data on treatment completion, persistence and switching in patients treated with cladribine tablets are beginning to emerge, but only small single and multicentre cohorts have reported so far. This longitudinal retrospective observational study (CLARENCE) evaluated a large cohort (>1900) of patients with highly active relapsing MS, receiving cladribine tablets across England, to determine rates of treatment completion, persistence and switching in the real world.

METHODS

Using data obtained from Blueteq® forms, a compulsory requirement for DMT reimbursement in England, we evaluated rates of treatment completion (defined as the proportion of patients who received the full 2-year course of cladribine tablets), treatment persistence (defined as the proportion of patients who did not switch and/or discontinue treatment before receiving the full 2-year course) and treatment switch (defined as the proportion of patients who switched treatment from cladribine tablets to another DMT at any point after their first course). The change in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score between Years 1 and 2 of treatment was also determined. All data were analysed descriptively.

RESULTS

Blueteq® forms were completed for 1934 MS patients treated with cladribine tablets; of these patients, 691 (36%) were treatment naïve. The median EDSS score (range) at treatment initiation with cladribine tablets was 2.5 (0, 8.5). At time of analysis (September 2021, last follow-up point), a total of 1020 (53%) patients had completed the full 2-year course of cladribine tablets. At the same time point, 1762 (91%) patients were considered as treatment persistent (i.e., the patient had completed either 1 course of tablets with <18 months of follow-up data or the full 2-year course of cladribine tablets). Overall, 78 (4%) patients switched to another DMT at any point after their first course, which included 33 (1.7%) patients who switched after completing the full 2-year course. In terms of their disability, 469 (84%) patients had stable EDSS scores between Years 1 and 2 of treatment.

CONCLUSION

In this large real-world study of patients receiving cladribine tablets across England, high rates of treatment persistence and low rates of switching were observed, with only 1.7% of patients receiving the full 2-year course and switching treatment. The majority (84%) of evaluable patients showed stable disability between Years 1 and 2 of treatment. These findings complement earlier data from clinical trials and real-world studies, confirming the effectiveness of cladribine tablets for patients with highly active relapsing MS.