Evaluation of the accuracy and stress distribution of 3-unit implant supported prostheses obtained by different manufacturing methods

An in vitro study using confocal laser scanning microscopy to evaluate the marginal misfits of different implant-supported frameworks

PURPOSE

This study aimed to develop and evaluate a simple, non-destructive method for assessing the misfit and passivity of implant-retained prostheses frameworks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To simulate the rehabilitation of a mandible posterior partially edentulous area using 3-unit screw-retained frameworks supported by two implants were fabricated and divided into the following five groups (n = 10 in each group): OP = one-piece framework cast in Co-Cr with the conventional method (control-group); Co-Cr frameworks sectioned and welded by laser (=LAS) or tungsten inert gas (=TIG); Co-Cr CAD-CAM = milled Co-Cr framework; Zir CAD-CAM = milled zirconia framework. The horizontal |X| and vertical |Y| misfits were measured using confocal laser scanning microscopy with one or both screws tightened. Data were analyzed by a two-way ANOVA with repeated measures and Bonferroni correction (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

The greatest |X| misfit was observed in the OP group with both screws tightened (290 µm) and one screw tightened (388 and 340 µm). The conventional casting groups sectioned and welded by laser or TIG had lower mean values (235.35 µm, both screws tightened; and 275 µm, one screw tightened) than the OP framework. However, these values still exceeded those of the milled Co-Cr and zirconia frameworks (190 and 216 µm with both screws tightened). Across all reading conditions, every framework subjected to testing consistently maintained vertical |Y| misfit levels below the threshold of 53 µm; however, the milled frameworks exhibited higher vertical misfits than the frameworks obtained by the conventional cast method.

CONCLUSIONS

The frameworks, whether cast and sectioned with laser welding or milled from Co-Cr, exhibit improved marginal misfit and enhanced passive fit when compared to other fabrication methods. Additionally, the use of confocal laser scanning microscopy is highly effective for passivity and misfit analysis.

Single missing molar with wide mesiodistal length restored using a single or double implant-supported crown: A self-controlled case report and 3D finite element analysis

PURPOSE

Based on a self-controlled case, this study evaluated the finite element analysis (FEA) results of a single missing molar with wide mesiodistal length (MDL) restored by a single or double implant-supported crown.

METHODS

A case of a missing bilateral mandibular first molar with wide MDL was restored using a single or double implant-supported crown. The implant survival and peri-implant bone were compared. FEA was conducted in coordination with the case using eight models with different MDLs (12, 13, 14, and 15 mm). Von Mises stress was calculated in the FEA to evaluate the biomechanical responses of the implants under increasing vertical and lateral loading, including the stress values of the implant, abutment, screw, crown, and cortical bone.

RESULTS

The restorations on the left and right sides supported by double implants have been used for 6 and 12 years, respectively, and so far have shown excellent osseointegration radiographically.The von Mises stress calculated in the FEA showed that when the MDL was >14 mm, both the bone and prosthetic components bore more stress in the single implant-supported strategy. The strength was 188.62-201.37 MPa and 201.85-215.9 MPa when the MDL was 14 mm and 15 mm, respectively, which significantly exceeded the allowable yield stress (180 MPa).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the single implant-supported crown, the double implant-supported crown reduced peri-implant bone stress and produced a more appropriate stress transfer model at the implant-bone interface when the MDL of the single missing molar was ≥14 mm.

Effect of different implant angulations on the biomechanical performance of prosthetic screws in two implant-supported, screw-retained prostheses: A numerical and experimental study

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: A mesiodistal angle frequently forms between 2 splinted implant-supported, screw-retained fixed dental prostheses (TIS-FDPs). Mechanical complications commonly occur in prosthetic screws. Studies regarding the effect of the degree of implant angulation on the biomechanical performance of prosthetic screws in TIS-FDPs are sparse.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this numerical and experimental study was to investigate the effects of different implant angulations on the biomechanical performance, including stress distribution, stability of the screw joint, and surface morphology change of the prosthetic screws in TIS-FDPs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

TIS-FDPs were classified into 4 groups: 0, 10, 20, and 30 degrees based on the degree of mesiodistal angle between the long axes of the 2 implants. In the finite element analysis (FEA), 4 series of 3D models were constructed and loaded with simulated occlusal forces. The von Mises stresses and rotational angles of the prosthetic screws were then calculated. In the mechanical test, each group of 5 TIS-FDPs with 10 prosthetic screws was tested under 1 million loading cycles by using a universal testing machine. The removal torque values (RTVs) and the surface roughness of the prosthetic screws were measured after cyclic loading. The normality of the outcome variables was assessed by the Shapiro-Wilk test. Analysis of variance and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used for further analysis (α=.05).

RESULTS

The FEA results showed that the von Mises stresses of the prosthetic screws were concentrated in the first screw thread crest engaged with the abutment, and the maximum values of the threads and the rotation angles of the prosthetic screws increased in the 2-implant mesiodistal angulation from 0 to 30 degrees. The mechanical tests showed that the RTVs of the prosthetic screws in each group were not significantly different after 1 million loading cycles (P=.107). The surface roughness of the crest of the first 2 threads of the prosthetic screws in the 30-degree group changed significantly compared with those in the other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

When TIS-FDPs were delivered, larger angulations of the 2 splinted implants seemed to increase the stress concentrated on the crest of the first engaged thread and the rotation angles of the prosthetic screws. After 1 million loading cycles, significant surface adhesive wear was identified on the crest of the first 2 threads of the prosthetic screws in the 30-degree group compared with groups with a smaller angulation.

Optimization of stress distribution of bone-implant interface (BII)

Many studies have found that the threshold of occlusal force tolerated by titanium-based implants is significantly lower than that of natural teeth due to differences in biomechanical mechanisms. Therefore, implants are considered to be susceptible to occlusal trauma. In clinical practice, many implants have shown satisfactory biocompatibility, but the balance between biomechanics and biofunction remains a huge clinical challenge. This paper comprehensively analyzes and summarizes various stress distribution optimization methods to explore strategies for improving the resistance of the implants to adverse stress. Improving stress resistance reduces occlusal trauma and shortens the gap between implants and natural teeth in occlusal function. The study found that: 1) specific implant-abutment connection design can change the force transfer efficiency and force conduction direction of the load at the BII; 2) reasonable implant surface structure and morphological character design can promote osseointegration, maintain alveolar bone height, and reduce the maximum effective stress at the BII; and 3) the elastic modulus of implants matched to surrounding bone tissue can reduce the stress shielding, resulting in a more uniform stress distribution at the BII. This study concluded that the core BII stress distribution optimization lies in increasing the stress distribution area and reducing the local stress peak value at the BII. This improves the biomechanical adaptability of the implants, increasing their long-term survival rate.

Effect of Splinting of Tilted External Hexagon Implants on 3-Unit Implant-Supported Prostheses in the Posterior Maxilla: A 3D Finite Element Analysis

PURPOSE

To assess the effects of tilted external hexagon implants and splinted restorations in terms of stress distribution on the bone tissue, implants, and prosthetic screws, using three-dimensional finite element analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six models were used to simulate a posterior maxilla bone block (type IV) from the first premolar to the first molar. Each model included three 4.1-mm-diameter external hexagon implants with varying inclinations (0°, 17°, and 30°) and crown designs (splinted and nonsplinted restorations). The forces applied were as follows: 400 N axially (50 N for each slope of the cusp) and 200 N obliquely (45° only on the buccal slope of the cusp). Stress distribution on the implants and prosthetic screw was evaluated using Von Mises stress, while the maximum principal stress was used to evaluate the stress distribution in the bone tissue.

RESULTS

The oblique load increased the stress on all the structures in all the models. Increased inclination of the implants resulted in higher stress concentration in the bone tissue, implants, and prosthetic screws. However, splinted restorations contributed to reduction of the stress for the oblique loading, mainly in the bone tissue and prosthetic screw of the first molar, as the stress was shared between the first and second premolar restorations.

CONCLUSIONS

Tilted implants increased proportionally the stress on bone tissue and prosthetic screws of models. Additionally, splinting restorations reduced the stress concentration area in the simulated bone tissue, implants, and prosthetic screws in the first molar, as the stress was shared with the adjacent implants.

Biomechanical evaluation of different implant-abutment connections, retention systems, and restorative materials in the implant-supported single crowns using 3D finite element

This is an in silico study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical influence of different implant-abutment interfaces (external hexagon and Morse taper implants), retention systems (cement- and screw-retained), and restorative crowns (metal-ceramic and monolithic) using three-dimensional finite element analysis (3D-FEA). Eight 3D models were simulated for the maxillary first molar area using InVesalius, Rhinoceros, and SolidWorks and processed using the Femap and NEi Nastran softwares. Axial and oblique forces of 200 N and 100 N, respectively, were applied on the occlusal surface of the prostheses. Microstrain and von Mises stress maps were used to evaluate the deformation (cortical bone tissue) and stress (implants/fixation screws/crowns), respectively for each model. For both loadings, Morse taper implants had lower microstrain values than the external hexagon implants. The retention system did not affect microstrain on the cortical bone tissue under both loadings. However, the cemented prosthesis displayed higher stress with the fixation screw than the external hexagon implants. No difference was observed between the metal-ceramic and zirconia monolithic crowns in terms of microstrain and stress distribution on the cortical bone, implants or components. Morse taper implants can be considered as a good alternative for dental implant rehabilitation because they demonstrated better biomechanical behavior for the bone and fixation screw as compared to external hexagon implants. Cement-retained prosthesis increased the stress on the fixation screw of the external hexagon implants, thereby increasing the risk of screw loosening/fracture in the posterior maxillary area. The use of metal-ceramic or monolithic crowns did not affect the biomechanical behavior of the evaluated structures.

The prosthetic screw loosening of two-implant supported screw-retained fixed dental prostheses in the posterior region: A retrospective evaluation and finite element analysis

The study was aimed to investigate the prosthetic screw loosening of two splinted implants-supported, screw-retained (2-4-unit) fixed dental prostheses (TIS-FDPs) in posterior region and to explore the underlying mechanism. In the retrospective study, a study group of TIS-FDPs (n = 23) presenting prosthetic screw loosening and a control group of TIS-FDPs (n = 32) absent of prosthetic screw loosening during observation period were included. The prosthesis height (PH), inter-implant distance (ID) and cantilever distance (CD) of TIS-FDPs were measured and compared within two groups. In the finite element analysis (FEA) part, three serials of models presenting different clinical scenarios were constructed based on the abovementioned PH, ID and CD values respectively. In the clinical evaluation, the values of pH and CD in study group were statistically higher than those in control group, whereas the values of ID had no significant difference. In the FEA, the results indicated that there was no linear correlation between the increased ID values and the maximum von Mises stresses and the rotation angles. On the other hand, the increased PH and CD values would result in a strong linear growth of the maximum von Mises stresses and the rotation angles. Besides, it was found that the regression coefficients in PH model were all higher than those in ID and CD models. When TIS-FDPs were delivered in posterior region, the PH and the CD, rather than the ID, seemed to have a significant impact on the stress concentration of the prosthetic screws and the incident of prosthetic screws loosening.

Implant framework misfit: A systematic review on assessment methods and clinical complications

BACKGROUND

The fit of implant-supported prostheses is of prime importance for the long-term success of implant therapy.

PURPOSE

This systematic review aimed to evaluate recent evidence on current techniques for assessing implant-framework misfit, its associated strain/stress, and whether these misfits are related to mechanical, biological, and clinical consequences.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An electronic search for publications from January 2010 to October 2020 was performed using the Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases with combined keywords on implant-framework misfit assessments and related clinical complications. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. After full-text analyses, data extraction was implemented on current techniques of misfit assessment and the relationship between the misfit and the induced strain/stress.

RESULTS

A total of 3 in vivo and 92 in vitro studies were selected, including 47 studies on quantifying the degree of implant-framework misfit with dimensional techniques, 24 studies measuring misfit-induced strain/stress with modeling techniques, and 24 studies using both methods. The technical details, advantages, and limitations of each technique were illustrated. The correlation between the implant-framework misfit and the induced strain/stress has been revealed in vitro, while that with the biological complications and implant/prostheses failure was weak in clinical studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Dimensional and modeling techniques are available to measure the implant-framework misfit. The passivity of implant-supported fixed prostheses appeared related to the induced strain/stress, but not the clinical complications. Further studies combining three-dimensional (3D) assessments using dimensional and modeling techniques was needed.