1
|
Haderer L, Zhou Y, Tang P, Daneshgar A, Globke B, Krenzien F, Reutzel-Selke A, Weinhart M, Pratschke J, Sauer IM, Hillebrandt KH, Keshi E. Thrombogenicity Assessment of Perfusable Tissue-Engineered Constructs: A Systematic Review. TISSUE ENGINEERING. PART B, REVIEWS 2025; 31:126-161. [PMID: 39007511 DOI: 10.1089/ten.teb.2024.0078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/16/2024]
Abstract
Vascular surgery is facing a critical demand for novel vascular grafts that are biocompatible and thromboresistant. This urgency is particularly applicable to bypass operations involving small caliber vessels. In the realm of tissue engineering, the development of fully vascularized organs is promising as a solution to organ shortage for transplantation. To achieve this, it is essential to (re)construct a biocompatible and nonthrombogenic vascular network within these organs. In this systematic review, we identify, classify, and discuss basic principles and methods used to perform in vitro/ex vivo dynamic thrombogenicity testing of perfusable tissue-engineered organs and tissues. We conducted a preregistered systematic review of studies published in the last 23 years according to PRISMA-P Guidelines. This comprised a systematic data extraction, in-depth analysis, and risk of bias assessment of 116 included studies. We identified shaking (n = 28), flow loop (n = 17), ex vivo (arteriovenous shunt, n = 33), and dynamic in vitro models (n = 38) as the main approaches for thrombogenicity assessment. This comprehensive review reveals a prevalent lack of standardization and provides a valuable guide in the design of standardized experimental setups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luna Haderer
- Department of Surgery, Experimental Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Yijun Zhou
- Department of Surgery, Experimental Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Tang
- Department of Surgery, Experimental Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Assal Daneshgar
- Department of Surgery, Experimental Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Brigitta Globke
- Department of Surgery, Experimental Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Krenzien
- Department of Surgery, Experimental Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Anja Reutzel-Selke
- Department of Surgery, Experimental Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marie Weinhart
- Cluster of Excellence Matters of Activity, Image Space Material funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy - EXC 2025 - 390648296, Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hanover, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Experimental Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence Matters of Activity, Image Space Material funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy - EXC 2025 - 390648296, Berlin, Germany
| | - Igor Maximillian Sauer
- Department of Surgery, Experimental Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence Matters of Activity, Image Space Material funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy - EXC 2025 - 390648296, Berlin, Germany
| | - Karl Herbert Hillebrandt
- Department of Surgery, Experimental Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Eriselda Keshi
- Department of Surgery, Experimental Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dias ML, Wajsenzon IJR, Alves GBN, Paranhos BA, Andrade CBV, Siqueira Monteiro VR, de Sousa RMR, da Silva Pereira ENG, Rodrigues KL, Daliry A, Mello DB, Coeli dos Santos Goldenberg R. Cirrhotic Liver Sustains In Situ Regeneration of Acellular Liver Scaffolds after Transplantation into G-CSF-Treated Animals. Cells 2023; 12:cells12070976. [PMID: 37048049 PMCID: PMC10093225 DOI: 10.3390/cells12070976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Acellular liver scaffolds (ALS) produced by decellularization have been successfully explored for distinct regenerative purposes. To date, it is unknown whether transplanted ALSs are affected by cirrhotic livers, either becoming cirrhotic themselves or instead remaining as a robust template for healthy cell growth after transplantation into cirrhotic rats. Moreover, little is known about the clinical course of recipient cirrhotic livers after ALS transplantation. To address these questions, we transplanted ALSs into cirrhotic rats previously treated with the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Here, we report successful cellular engraftment within the transplanted ALSs at 7, 15, and 30 days after transplantation. Recellularization was orchestrated by liver tissue cell activation, resident hepatocytes and bile duct proliferation, and an immune response mediated by the granulocyte components. Furthermore, we showed that transplanted ALSs ensured a pro-regenerative and anti-inflammatory microenvironment, attracted vessels from the host cirrhotic tissue, and promoted progenitor cell recruitment. ALS transplantation induced cirrhotic liver regeneration and extracellular matrix remodeling. Moreover, the transplanted ALS sustained blood circulation and attenuated alterations in the ultrasonographic and biochemical parameters in cirrhotic rats. Taken together, our results confirm that transplanted ALSs are not affected by cirrhotic livers and remain a robust template for healthy cell growth and stimulated cirrhotic liver regeneration.
Collapse
|
4
|
Mazloomnejad R, Babajani A, Kasravi M, Ahmadi A, Shariatzadeh S, Bahrami S, Niknejad H. Angiogenesis and Re-endothelialization in decellularized scaffolds: Recent advances and current challenges in tissue engineering. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2023; 11:1103727. [PMID: 36873356 PMCID: PMC9978201 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1103727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Decellularization of tissues and organs has recently become a promising approach in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine to circumvent the challenges of organ donation and complications of transplantations. However, one main obstacle to reaching this goal is acellular vasculature angiogenesis and endothelialization. Achieving an intact and functional vascular structure as a vital pathway for supplying oxygen and nutrients remains the decisive challenge in the decellularization/re-endothelialization procedure. In order to better understand and overcome this issue, complete and appropriate knowledge of endothelialization and its determining variables is required. Decellularization methods and their effectiveness, biological and mechanical characteristics of acellular scaffolds, artificial and biological bioreactors, and their possible applications, extracellular matrix surface modification, and different types of utilized cells are factors affecting endothelialization consequences. This review focuses on the characteristics of endothelialization and how to optimize them, as well as discussing recent developments in the process of re-endothelialization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Radman Mazloomnejad
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Amirhesam Babajani
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammadreza Kasravi
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Armin Ahmadi
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Siavash Shariatzadeh
- Department of Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Soheyl Bahrami
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology in AUVA Research Center, Vienna, Austria
| | - Hassan Niknejad
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dias ML, Paranhos BA, Goldenberg RCDS. Liver scaffolds obtained by decellularization: A transplant perspective in liver bioengineering. J Tissue Eng 2022; 13:20417314221105305. [PMID: 35756167 PMCID: PMC9218891 DOI: 10.1177/20417314221105305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Liver transplantation is the only definitive treatment for many diseases that affect this organ, however, its quantity and viability are reduced. The study of liver scaffolds based on an extracellular matrix is a tissue bioengineering strategy with great application in regenerative medicine. Collectively, recent studies suggest that liver scaffold transplantation may assist in reestablishing hepatic function in preclinical diseased animals, which represents a great potential for application as a treatment for patients with liver disease in the future. This review focuses on useful strategies to promote liver scaffold transplantation and the main open questions about this context. We outline the current knowledge about ex vivo bioengineered liver transplantation, including the surgical techniques, recipient survival time, scaffold preparation before transplantation, and liver disease models. We also highlight the current limitations and future directions regarding in vivo bioengineering techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marlon Lemos Dias
- Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.,Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Medicina Regenerativa - INCT - REGENERA, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
| | - Bruno Andrade Paranhos
- Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.,Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Medicina Regenerativa - INCT - REGENERA, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
| | - Regina Coeli Dos Santos Goldenberg
- Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.,Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Medicina Regenerativa - INCT - REGENERA, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|