Masterclass: Hypermobility and hypermobility related disorders

Decoding injury risk: Exploring the impact of asymptomatic hypermobility on lower limb injury risk factors in young female volleyball players

Generalized hypermobility is associated with higher rates of musculoskeletal injuries, a trend also observed in volleyball. We aimed to investigate how asymptomatic hypermobility affects other suggested lower limb injury risk factors. Fifty female volleyball players (22 hypermobile, 28 non-hypermobile) were assessed using Beighton scores (BS) and lower limb injury risk factors based on the Landing Error Scoring System, single-leg dynamic balance, and Limb Symmetry Index (LSI) for single-leg hop and triple hop for distance. Spearman's correlations assessed relationships between BS and the risk factors, and t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests compared risk factors between non-hypermobile and asymptomatic hypermobile groups. No significant associations were found between BS and most risk factors, except for a negative correlation with the centre of pressure range of motion in the medio-lateral direction during dynamic balance on the non-dominant leg (ρ = -0.332; p = 0.015). The only significant group difference was in the LSI for single-leg hop distance, where the hypermobile group showed greater symmetry (r = 0.28, p = 0.041). The association between BS and dynamic balance was weak, with no clear difference in injury risk factors were observed between groups, suggesting hypermobile players may not need specialized training programs.

No significant links between somatognosia, stereognosia, and hypermobility: sensory processing unlikely to drive common complaints in hypermobile population

BACKGROUND

Previous research has demonstrated impaired proprioception and poorer responses to tactile deep pressure, visual-tactile integration, and vestibular stimuli in individuals with generalized hypermobility, potentially leading to sensory processing issues. Therefore, we aimed to explore the influence of hypermobility on somatognosia and stereognosia.

METHODS

Forty-six participants were assessed using the Beighton score and categorized into three groups: non-hypermobile (n = 20), symptomatic hypermobile (n = 13), and asymptomatic hypermobile (n = 13). Somatognosia was evaluated using the shoulder width test in the vertical plane and pelvic width test in the vertical and horizontal planes. Stereognosia was assessed with Petrie's test. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was examined the relationship between the Beighton score and measures of somatognosia and stereognosia. An unpaired t-test was used to compare variables between hypermobile (both symptomatic and asymptomatic) and non-hypermobile individuals, while a one-way ANOVA was used to compare data between the three groups.

RESULTS

No significant relationship was observed between Beighton scores and measures of somatognosia and stereognosia. The t-test revealed no statistically significant differences between hypermobile and non-hypermobile groups in the shoulder width, two pelvic widths, and Petrie's tests (all p ≥ 0.105). Similarly, one-way ANOVA showed no statistically significant differences between the three groups across these tests (all p ≥ 0.177).

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that somatognosia and stereognosia are not significantly related to the Beighton score and do not significantly differ between the groups studied. These sensory processing functions are unlikely to contribute to the common complaints reported by hypermobile individuals.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

The Impact of Pain on Everyday Activities of People With Hypermobility Spectrum Disorders or Hypermobility Ehlers Danlos Syndrome

BACKGROUND

This study describes aspects of pain and how pain affects everyday life and examines the relation between chronic pain and activity limitations in people with hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD) or hypermobility Ehlers Danlos syndrome (hEDS).

METHODS

This cross-sectional study used data from 2016 to 2021 obtained from the Swedish quality registry for pain rehabilitation (SQRP), comparing those with HSD/hEDS with the larger group of people with mixed chronic pain conditions as a reference group (RG).

RESULTS

Of the 43,801 people registered in the SQRP, 1211 (2.8%) were diagnosed with HSD/hEDS (88.9% women). The mean age of the HSD/hEDS group was younger (36.3 ± 11.8) than the RG (45.7 ± 12.8). The HSD/hEDS group had a statistically significant (p < 0.001) earlier onset of pain (calculated in years) in contrast to the RG. In the HSD/hEDS group, 80.1% had persistent pain; in the RG, 74.2% had persistent pain. The HSD/hEDS group reported more pain locations (20.0 ± 7.9) than the RG (14.8 ± 8.8). The HSD/hEDS group reported more problems performing leisure, social, and household activities than the RG; however, pain intensity was statistically significantly lower (p < 0.001) in the HSD/hEDS related to the RG.

CONCLUSIONS

There were indications that pain affected daily activities for people with HSD/hEDS, who had earlier onset of pain, marked more pain locations, and had more persistent pain, but pain intensity was not as decisive in contrast to the RG.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

In a comparison yielding statistically significant results (p < 0.001), persons with hypermobility spectrum disorder (HSD) or hypermobility Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS) reported earlier pain onset, longer pain durations, and a greater number of pain locations but surprisingly, lower pain intensity than the reference group which consisted of a mixed group of pain conditions. These pain characteristics affected daily activities, indicating a substantial impact on daily life for those with HSD/hEDS.

Letter regarding "The usefulness of the genetic panel in the classification and refinement of diagnostic accuracy of Mexican patients with Marfan syndrome and other connective tissue disorders"

Dear Editor, We have read the article "The usefulness of the genetic panel in the classification and refinement of diagnostic accuracy of Mexican patients with Marfan syndrome and other connective tissue disorders", recently published in your esteemed journal. We are a team dedicated to diagnosing, approaching, and managing patients with connective tissue disorders, particularly hypermobile spectrum disorders (HSD) and Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS). We appreciate the research group's effort to address the complexity of connective tissue disorders using a multi-panel genetic approach and their analysis of genotype-phenotype associations in a cohort of Mexican patients. However, we would like to express our concern regarding two specific points that we consider crucial for the comprehensive understanding and management of these disorders. Read more in the PDF.

Physical therapy interventions in generalized hypermobility spectrum disorder and hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Physical therapy (PT) plays a central role in treating individuals with Generalized Hypermobility Spectrum Disorder (G-HSD) and Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (hEDS). However, there is limited research describing these individuals' PT management. This review aims to systematically map the evidence on PT interventions to treat this patient population.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase from January 2000 to April 2023 was performed. After the screening process, studies were appraised and classified based on the type of PT interventions used. Five reviewers independently assessed the articles.

RESULTS

The search produced 757 articles. Twenty-eight met the inclusion criteria. The studies included 630 participants, mostly female, with a mean age of 26.2 (ranging from 2 to 69). The PT interventions used were therapeutic exercise, patient instruction, motor function training, adaptive equipment, manual therapy, and functional training.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence indicates that therapeutic exercise and motor function training are efficacious methods to treat individuals with G-HSD and hEDS. There is also weak evidence for using adaptive equipment, patient instruction, manual therapy, and functional training. Recent studies emphasize multidisciplinary care and understanding of the psychological impact of G-HSD/hEDS. Additional research is needed to determine the effectiveness and dosage of PT interventions.

The effect of plyometric training and moderating variables on stretch-shortening cycle function and physical qualities in female post peak height velocity volleyball players

Purpose: Although several studies investigated the effect of plyometric training on physical performance, there is a lack of clarity regarding the effectiveness of plyometric training or its moderator variables in youth female volleyball players. The primary aim of this study was to explore the effect of horizontal plyometric training on explosive stretch-shortening cycle hops and jumps in the vertical and horizontal directions in female post peak height velocity (PHV) volleyball players. The secondary aim was to assess the influence of participant and training related moderators on horizontal plyometric training in post-PHV volleyball players. Methods: A total of 23 post-PHV volleyball players participated in this 8-week intervention with horizontal plyometric exercises, twice a week. Pre-testing and post-testing included bilateral and unilateral vertical sub-maximal hopping, horizontal jumping and hopping, and a drop jump test. The effectiveness of the intervention was assessed using a paired t-test. The influence of internal moderators such as age, maturity and body mass and external moderators such as training volume were assessed using regression and correlation analysis. Results: An 8-week plyometric training improved sub-maximal hopping at 2.5 Hz left by 4.4%, bilateral sub-maximal hopping at 2.0 Hz by 9.5% and bilateral sub-maximal hopping at 2.2 Hz by 6.8% in post-PHV female volleyball players. Horizontal jumping and hopping, reactive strength index and other sub-maximal hopping conditions did not improve significantly. Body mass had a large moderating effect on vertical unilateral sub-maximal hopping at 2.5 Hz right (p = 0.010, η 2 = 0.314), vertical unilateral hopping at 3.0 Hz right (p = 0.035, η 2 = 0.170), and vertical unilateral hopping at 3.0 Hz left (p = 0.043, η 2 = 0.203). Training volume together with generalized joint hypermobility moderated right leg triple broad hop performance, whereas maturity and age did not moderate any variables. Conclusion: This study determined that 8 weeks of horizontal plyometric training can improve unilateral absolute leg stiffness in post-PHV female volleyball players, and this training effect can be moderated by body mass. Furthermore, the training effect on triple hopping performance on the right leg can be moderated by combined training volume with generalized joint hypermobility.

Healthcare experiences among adults with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and hypermobility spectrum disorder in the United States

PURPOSE

This cross-sectional mixed-method study examined healthcare experiences among individuals in the US with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS) and hypermobility spectrum disorder (HSD), genetic connective tissue disorders. We hypothesized that many individuals with these conditions would report low satisfaction with healthcare and low health-related quality of life, and that lower healthcare satisfaction would be related to lower health-related quality of life and self-efficacy for symptom management.

METHODS

Adults living in the US with hEDS or HSD (N= 2125) completed an online survey assessing satisfaction with healthcare, health-related quality of life, and symptom management self-efficacy. Qualitative data also were gathered on desired changes to improve healthcare.

RESULTS

Participants reported low satisfaction with healthcare and lower health-related quality of life and symptom management self-efficacy than norm groups. Lower satisfaction with healthcare was associated with lower health-related quality of life and lower symptom management self-efficacy, ps <.001. The most common desired change to improve healthcare was more knowledge about hEDS and HSD among healthcare professionals.

CONCLUSIONS

U.S. adults with joint hypermobility report negative healthcare experiences and poor health-related quality of life. Future research should explore ways to improve the healthcare experiences and quality of care for individuals with hEDS and HSD.Implications for RehabilitationIndividuals with hypermobility spectrum disorder (HSD) and hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS) score worse than the U.S. population on most health-related quality of life domains and symptom management self-efficacy.Individuals with HSD and hEDS report low levels of satisfaction with healthcare compared to norm groups.Participants particularly wanted to see improvements in the level of awareness and education about HSD and hEDS among healthcare professionals, provider attitudes about HSD and hEDS, and healthcare accessibility and convenience.Individuals who were less satisfied with their healthcare reported lower health-related quality of life and lower symptom management self-efficacy, underscoring the importance of improving healthcare experiences.

Placing joint hypermobility in context: traits, disorders and syndromes

BACKGROUND

Joint hypermobility (JHM) is a common physical trait. It may occur alone or in combination with musculoskeletal (MSK) pain, outside or within more complex phenotypes. Hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD) are diagnosed in individuals with JHM and related MSK pain, when an alternative diagnosis cannot be identified. Conversely, the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) encompasses a group of rare hereditary connective tissue disorders featuring JHM along with other pleiotropic manifestations. The 2017 EDS Classification identifies 13 different subtypes. Hypermobile EDS (HEDS) is the only EDS variant still lacking a confirmatory test.

SOURCES OF DATA

Literature was reviewed searching for the most relevant papers related to key arguments. Particular attention was focused on papers published after the 2017 Classification.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

Definition, epidemiology, assessment tools and patterns of JHM are presented. The morbid nature of the 2017 EDS Classification and of the 'spectrum' is also illustrated.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

We discuss current limitations and disagreements concerning the 'spectrum', HSD and HEDS.

GROWING POINTS

In the clinical context, elucidation of the pathophysiology of pain related to JHM should develop in parallel with the analysis of pleiotropic manifestations of syndromes with JHM.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

Future challenges concerning classification, nosology, diagnosis and management of JHM, EDS and related disorders are discussed.

Hypermobility spectrum disorders: A review

It remains a clinical challenge identifying when joint hypermobility (JH) is responsible for pain. Previous nomenclature utilized terms such as (benign) joint hypermobility syndrome (JHS) but this was updated in 2017 as advances in genetics provide a basis for nearly all variants of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) with the exception of hypermobile EDS (hEDS). New terminology describes hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSDs) as the updated term for JHS. Diagnosis of a subtype of HSDs should be considered in patients who have JH coupled with the presence of secondary musculo-skeletal manifestations (trauma, chronic pain, disturbed proprioception, and other manifestations) and at the exclusion of hEDS. Extra-articular manifestations are common. Treatment relies on management strategies for other chronic pain syndromes with a multidisciplinary approach likely optimal. Lifestyle modifications focus on weight loss and exercise. Physical therapy helps strengthen periarticular muscles, improving mobility. Pharmacologic therapies focus on judicious use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen. Serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor may help widespread pain. Avoidance of opioids remains prudent. The purpose of this review is to provide clinicians the rationale for the update in nomenclature, understand the musculoskeletal and extra-articular manifestations of the subtypes of HSDs, considerations when making the diagnosis, and treatment.

Krafttraining bei Frauen mit generalisierter Hypermobilität: Machbarkeit, Beschwerden und Effekte

Hintergrund Eine generalisierte Hypermobilität liegt vor, wenn die Beweglichkeit in mehreren Gelenken das übliche Maß übersteigt. Bis zu 30 % der Frauen und 10 % der Männer sind davon betroffen. Hypermobilität ist keine Pathologie, wenn sie jedoch mit Schmerzen und weiteren Symptomen einhergeht, kann sie die Gesundheit und Alltagsfunktionen beeinträchtigen. Zur physiotherapeutischen Behandlung gibt es wenige Studien, wobei Krafttraining eine mögliche Intervention sein könnte.

Ziel Erfassung der Machbarkeit und des Effekts eines Krafttrainings für Frauen mit generalisierter Hypermobilität.

Methode Pre-post-Studie, in der hypermobile Frauen (Beighton-Score > 5) zwischen 20 und 40 Jahren während 12 Wochen ein Krafttraining an Geräten, fokussiert auf Beine und Rücken, absolvierten. Mithilfe eines Protokolls und wöchentlicher Fragebogen wurden das Training und dadurch ausgelöste Beschwerden analysiert. Vor und nach dem Training wurde die Kraft der Knieflexoren und -extensoren sowie der Muskelquerschnitt am Oberschenkel gemessen. Die Analyse erfolgte primär deskriptiv, zusätzlich erfolgte ein Vergleich von 2 Subgruppen mittels Mann-Whitney-U und Chi2-Test.

Ergebnisse 46 Teilnehmerinnen (26,3 ± 4,3 Jahre) absolvierten das Training. 6 davon brachen die Studie vorzeitig ab, davon eine wegen Rückenschmerzen aufgrund einer Diskushernie. 72,5 % der verbleibenden 40 Teilnehmerinnen absolvierten 20 oder mehr Trainings. In 34 % der Trainingswochen wurden geringe Beschwerden angegeben, mehrheitlich an Knie und Rücken. Der Einsatz der verwendeten Gewichte war oft tief, so wurde auf der Legpress mit durchschnittlich 44,8 % des Körpergewichts begonnen, nach 12 Wochen lag das Trainingsgewicht im Mittel bei 52,2 kg, was 85,7 % des Körpergewichts entspricht. Bei der Kraft und beim Muskelquerschnitt wurden keine signifikanten Verbesserungen erreicht, wobei bis zu 17 Teilnehmerinnen (42,5 %) eine Verbesserung von mehr als 10 % erreichten.

Schlussfolgerung Das Krafttraining war für die meisten Teilnehmerinnen machbar und gut verträglich. Das mehrheitlich selbstgesteuerte Training war zu wenig intensiv, um eindeutige Auswirkungen auf Kraft oder Muskelmasse zu erreichen, obwohl einzelne Teilnehmerinnen durchaus davon profitierten. In weiteren Studien sollten individuellere und enger begleitete Trainingsprogramme untersucht werden.

An investigation of body awareness, fatigue, physical fitness, and musculoskeletal problems in young adults with hypermobility spectrum disorder

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Hypermobility Spectrum Disorder (HSD) is associated with excessive joint range of motion and the presence of musculoskeletal symptoms. The objective of this study was to examine body awareness, physical fitness parameters, fatigue levels, and musculoskeletal disorders in young adults with HSD and compare them with those without HSD.

METHODS

Young individuals in the age range of 18-24 years were included in the study. Joint hypermobility of individuals was determined by the Beighton Score. Evaluations were made using the Body Awareness Questionnaire, the Fatigue Severity Scale, the Eurofit Physical Fitness Test Battery, and the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 94 healthy individuals (74 females, 20 males, mean age 21.44 years, SD ± 1.19 years), 47 with HSD and 47 without HSD, were included in the study. It was concluded that body awareness and fatigue levels were similar in two groups (p > 0.05). When physical fitness parameters were examined, there was a significant difference between the two groups in Sit and Reach test and the dominant side grip strength (p < 0.05). There was a significant difference between the two groups in the neck, back, dominant wrist, and total musculoskeletal problems (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

It was concluded that young individuals with HSD had more flexibility, lower grip strength, more pain especially in the neck and back region, and more musculoskeletal disorders in general. Joint hypermobility is a factor to be considered in evaluating functional performance in these individuals.