Self-reported physical function is strongly related to pain behavior and pain interference and weakly related to physical capacity in people with chronic low back pain

Relationship Between Objective Performance and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function in Patients With Stroke

BACKGROUND

The relationship between self-reported physical function (PF) and objective performance in patients with stroke remains unclear. This study explored how various self-reported health domains influence the correlation between Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) PF and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study examined patients with stroke who completed the TUG and PROMIS PF within 90 days post stroke. Correlations between these measures were analyzed, both overall and stratified by performance on other patient-reported outcomes (Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders cognitive function, depression, and the following PROMIS scales: global health, social satisfaction, pain, sleep, and fatigue). Structural equation modeling assessed how these patient-reported outcomes influenced the PROMIS PF-TUG relationship.

RESULTS

There were 432 patients with average age 63.7 (SD 13.5) years. Average TUG and PROMIS PF scores were 16.6 (SD 10.4) seconds and 36.8 (SD 8.5), respectively. TUG and PROMIS PF showed moderate correlation (r=-0.47 [95% CI, -0.54 to -0.40]). Fatigue (r=-0.53 [95% CI, -0.59 to -0.45]) and satisfaction with social roles (r=0.53 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.60]) had the strongest correlations with PROMIS PF. Both social roles (estimate=0.08, SE=0.02, P=0.001) and fatigue (0.06, SE=0.02, P=0.001) demonstrated indirect effects on the TUG-PROMIS PF relationship. Although not significant, correlations between PROMIS PF and TUG scores were consistently weaker in patients with poor scores in any patient-reported outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

There is only moderate correlation between self-reported PF and the performance measure TUG, which is mediated by fatigue and satisfaction with social roles. These findings highlight the importance of considering these broader dimensions of health in addition to physical capacity when interpreting patient-reported PF scores.

Relationships between pain cognitions and physical function in a sample of racially diverse, sedentary individuals with chronic pain

BACKGROUND

Pain from musculoskeletal pain conditions is often persistent, bothersome, and negatively impacts physical function. Individuals with musculoskeletal pain report difficulty with walking and regular activities. For some, this may be related to overly negative pain cognitions, such as pain catastrophizing and kinesiophobia. In a geographically and racially diverse sample, we examined relationships between pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, and multimodal physical function (i.e., self-report, performance-based, objective).

METHODS

Participants were sedentary adults with ≥3 months of chronic musculoskeletal pain. Participants completed self-report measures of pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale), kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia), and physical function (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale 2.0). Performance-based physical function was assessed in-clinic with the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT). Physical function was objectively measured with ≥4 days of ActiGraph wear outside the clinic. We conducted descriptive, correlation, and linear regression statistics in SPSS.

RESULTS

Higher levels of pain catastrophizing (β = 0.42) and kinesiophobia (β = 0.25) were significantly associated with worse self-reported physical function. Neither pain catastrophizing nor kinesiophobia were related to performance-based or objectively measured physical function. The direction and significance of relationships between pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, and physical function measures were consistent in unadjusted and adjusted regression models.

CONCLUSIONS

Pain catastrophizing and kinesiophobia are associated with an individual's perceived physical functioning. Behavioral interventions designed to enhance physical function may benefit from including cognitive restructuring to challenge catastrophic thoughts about pain, as well as thoughts about injuring oneself or worsening pain with movement. More work is needed to understand why neither pain catastrophizing nor kinesiophobia were significantly associated with performance-based or objective assessment of physical function. It is possible that other pain-related cognitions, for example self-efficacy for pain control, or variables (e.g., in vivo pain catastrophizing, mood, stress, sleep) assessed closer in time to performance-based or objective measures of physical function are more relevant.

Using a measurement type-independent metric to compare patterns of determinants between patient-reported versus performance-based physical function in hemodialysis patients

PURPOSE

We applied a previously established common T-score metric for patient-reported and performance-based physical function (PF), offering the unique opportunity to directly compare measurement type-specific patterns of associations with potential laboratory-based, psychosocial, sociodemographic, and health-related determinants in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

We analyzed baseline data from the CONVINCE trial (N = 1,360), a multinational randomized controlled trial comparing high-flux hemodialysis with high-dose hemodiafiltration. To explore the associations of potential determinants with performance-based versus patient-reported PF, we conducted multiple linear regression (backward elimination with cross-validation and Lasso regression). We used standardized T-scores as estimated from the PROMIS PF short-form 4a (patient-reported PF) and the Physical Performance Test (performance-based PF) as dependent variables.

RESULTS

Performance-based and patient-reported PF were both significantly associated with a laboratory marker-based indicator of muscle mass (simplified creatinine index), although the effects were relatively small (partial f2 = 0.04). Age was negatively associated with PF; the effect size was larger for performance-based (partial f2 = 0.12) than for patient-reported PF (partial f2 = 0.08). Compared to performance-based PF, patient-reported PF showed a stronger association with self-reported health domains, particularly pain interference and fatigue. When using the individual difference between patient-reported and performance-based T-scores as outcome, we found that younger age and more fatigue were associated with lower patient-reported PF compared to performance-based PF (small effect size).

CONCLUSION

Patient-reported and performance-based assessments were similarly associated with an objective marker of physical impairment in hemodialysis patients. Age and fatigue may result in discrepancies when comparing performance-based and patient-reported scores on the common PF scale. Trial Registration CONVINCE is registered in the Dutch Trial Register (Register ID: NL64750.041.18). The registration can be accessed at: https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/52958 .

The relationships between spinal amplitude of movement, pain and disability in low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The role of spinal movement alterations in low back pain (LBP) remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analyses examined the relationships between spinal amplitude of movement, disability and pain intensity in patients with LBP.

DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT

We searched PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Pedro and Web of Science for relevant articles until 14th March 2023. Risk of bias was assessed with the Quality in Prognostic Studies Tool. We analysed the relationships between amplitude of movement, disability and pain intensity with standard correlational meta-analyses and meta-analytic structural equation modelling (MASEM) in cross-sectional and longitudinal data.

RESULTS

A total of 106 studies (9001 participants) were included. In cross-sectional data, larger amplitude of movement was associated with lower disability (pooled coefficient: -0.25, 95% confidence interval: [-0.29 to -0.21]; 69/5899 studies/participants) and pain intensity (-0.13, [-0.17 to -0.09]; 74/5806). An increase in amplitude of movement was associated with a decrease in disability (-0.23, [-0.31 to -0.15]; 33/2437) and pain intensity (-0.25, [-0.33 to -0.17]; 38/2172) in longitudinal data. MASEM revealed similar results and, in addition, showed that amplitude of movement had a very small influence on the pain intensity-disability relationship.

CONCLUSIONS

These results showed a significant but small association between amplitude of movement and disability or pain intensity. Moreover, they demonstrated a direct association between an increase in amplitude of movement and a decrease in pain intensity or disability, supporting interventions aiming to reduce protective spinal movements in patients with LBP.

SIGNIFICANCE

The large meta-analyses performed in this work revealed an association between reductions in spinal amplitude of movement and increased levels of disability and pain intensity in people with LBP. Moreover, it highlighted that LBP recovery is associated with a reduction in protective motor behaviour (increased amplitude of movement), supporting the inclusion of spinal movement in the biopsychosocial understanding and management of LBP.