Dermatomycosis: comparison of the performance of calcofluor and potassium hydroxide 30% for the direct examination of skin scrapings and nails

Comparison of fungal fluorescent staining and ITS rDNA PCR-based sequencing with conventional methods for the diagnosis of onychomycosis

BACKGROUND

The current gold standard for diagnosing onychomycosis is direct microscopic examination and culturing. Fungal culture is a time-consuming procedure, while direct microscopy of potassium hydroxide (KOH) mounts suffers from low sensitivity. More rapid and sensitive methods for the diagnosis of onychomycosis are in high demand.

OBJECTIVE

To establish an effective method for the diagnosis of onychomycosis by assessing the efficacies of fungal fluorescent staining and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) ribosomal DNA (rDNA) polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based sequencing.

METHODS

A total of 204 clinical specimens from patients with suspected onychomycosis were analysed. The gold standard for a true positive sample was positive by KOH, culturing or both methods. All specimens were also tested by fungal fluorescent staining and ITS rDNA PCR-based sequencing. We compared the detection, sensitivity and specificity for these two methods with conventional methods.

RESULTS

In total, 126 (62%) and 102 (50%) were detected by fluorescent staining and PCR-based sequencing, respectively. According to the conventional diagnostic standard, the sensitivity of fluorescent staining and PCR-based sequencing was 97% and 78%, respectively, and specificities of 89% and 90%, respectively. Use of fluorescence enhanced the sensitivity of direct examination by 12% compared with KOH. PCR-based sequencing increased the sensitivity by 6% compared with culturing.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluorescence microscopy has a higher sensitivity for the detection of fungi in nail specimens compared with KOH and can be used as a rapid screening tool. PCR-based sequencing was faster and more sensitive compared with culture and when used in conjunction with fluorescence microscopy resulted in higher efficiency.

Reappraisal of Conventional Diagnosis for Dermatophytes

Dermatophytoses include a wide variety of diseases involving glabrous skin, nails and hair. These superficial infections are a common cause of consultation in dermatology. In many cases, their diagnosis is not clinically obvious, and mycological analysis therefore is required. Direct microscopic examination of the samples using clearing agents provides a quick response to the clinician and is usually combined with cultures on specific media, which must be used to overcome the growth of contaminating moulds that may hamper the recovery of dermatophytes. Accurate identification of the causative agent (i.e. at the species level), currently based on morphological criteria, is necessary not only to initiate an appropriate treatment but also for setting prophylactic measures. However, conventional methods often lack sensitivity and species identification may require up to 4 weeks if subcultures are needed. Histological analysis, which is considered the "gold standard" for the diagnosis of onychomycoses, is seldom performed, and as direct examination, it does not allow precise identification of the pathogen. Nevertheless, a particular attention to the quality of clinical specimens is warranted. Moreover, the sensitivity of direct examination may be greatly enhanced by the use of fluorochromes such as calcofluor white. Likewise, sensitivity of the cultures could be enhanced by the use of culture media containing antifungal deactivators. With the generalization of molecular identification by gene sequencing or MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, the contribution of historical biochemical or physiological tests to species identification of atypical isolates is now limited. Nevertheless, despite the recent availability of several PCR-based kits and an extensive literature on molecular methods allowing the detection of fungal DNA or both detection and direct identification of the main dermatophyte species, the biological diagnosis of dermatophytosis in 2016 still relies on both direct examination and cultures of appropriate clinical specimens.

[Biological diagnosis of onychomycoses. Direct examination after simplified technique of PAS staining]

Confirmation of fungal origin of onychopathy by mycological examination is essential. For that purpose, in parallel to the cultivation of biological samples, achieving a sensitive and informative direct examination of nail fragments and subungual material is primordial. Among the direct examination techniques, and inspired from a technique of reference in histo-pathology (the "periodic acid-Schiff reagent" reaction), the simplified technique of PAS staining according to Hotchkiss and MacManus is the technique of choice. Easy to implement and very sensitive, it can immediately and formally confirm the diagnosis of onychomycosis, mention the type of fungus (yeast, dermatophyte, Hyphomycete opportunistic) and suspect a possible multiple involvement.

Diagnosis of clinically relevant fungi in medicine and veterinary sciences

This review focuses on the most economically and epidemiologically important fungi affecting humans and animals. This paper will also summarize the different techniques, either molecular, based on nucleic acid and antibody analysis, or nonmolecular such as microscopy, culture, UV Wood's lamp, radiology, and spectroscopy used to identify species or group of fungi assisting clinicians to take the best control approach to clear such infections. On the molecular side, the paper will review results on genome sequencing which can help colleagues to identify their own DNA/RNA tests if they are interested in the diagnostic of fungi in medicine and veterinary medicine.

Conventional methods for the diagnosis of dermatophytosis

Dermatophytes are keratinolytic fungi responsible for a large variety of diseases that can affect glabrous skin, nails and hair. In many cases, the diagnosis is not clinically obvious, and mycological analysis is required. This includes both direct microscopic examination and cultures. First of all, clinical specimens have to be sampled according to localization and characteristics of the lesions. Direct microscopic examination is usually performed using clearing reagents (KOH or Amman's chloral-lactophenol), but its sensitivity may be greatly enhanced by the use of stains or fluorochromes such as Congo red or Calcofluor white. Histological analysis is an efficient method, but it is constraining for the patients and, as direct examination, it does not allow precise identification of the pathogen. Cultures are therefore needed, and specific culture media may be used to overcome the growth of rapidly growing contaminating moulds which may hamper the recovery of dermatophytes. Identification at the species level which may be useful to initiate an appropriate treatment or for setting prophylactic measures, relies on macroscopic and microscopic morphology. Subcultures on culture media which stimulate conidiation and, for some species, the production of pigments, are often necessary. Additionally, in case of atypical isolates, some biochemical or physiological tests may be performed such as the search for urease activity or the in vitro hair perforation test. However, their contribution to species identification is rather limited, and progress is still needed for the development of biochemical or immunological tests allowing an accurate identification at the species level, pending for the availability of molecular biology-based kits.