Laser Ablation for Cerebral Metastases

Novel radiotherapeutic strategies in the management of brain metastases: Challenging the dogma

The role of radiation therapy in the management of brain metastasis is evolving. Advancements in machine learning techniques have improved our ability to both detect brain metastasis and our ability to contour substructures of the brain as critical organs at risk. Advanced imaging with PET tracers and magnetic resonance imaging-based artificial intelligence models can now predict tumor control and differentiate tumor progression from radiation necrosis. These advancements will help to optimize dose and fractionation for each patient's lesion based on tumor size, histology, systemic therapy, medical comorbidities/patient genetics, and tumor molecular features. This review will discuss the current state of brain directed radiation for brain metastasis. We will also discuss future directions to improve the precision of stereotactic radiosurgery and optimize whole brain radiation techniques to improve local tumor control and prevent cognitive decline without forming necrosis.

Advances in Imaging Modalities for Pediatric Brain and Spinal Cord Tumors

BACKGROUND

Neuroimaging has evolved from anatomical imaging toward a multi-modality comprehensive anatomical and functional imaging in the past decades, important functional data like perfusion-weighted imaging, permeability imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), tractography, metabolic imaging, connectomics, event-related functional imaging, resting state functional imaging, and much more is now being offered.

SUMMARY

Precision diagnostics has proven to be essential for precision treatment. Many minimal invasive techniques have been developed, taking advantage of digital subtraction angiography and interventional neuroradiology. Furthermore, intraoperative CT and/or MRI and more recently MR-guided focused ultrasound have complemented the diagnostic and therapeutic armamentarium.

KEY MESSAGES

In the current manuscript, we discuss standard imaging sequences including advanced techniques like DWI, DTI, susceptibility-weighted imaging, and 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy, various perfusion weighted imaging approaches including arterial spin labeling, dynamic contrast enhanced imaging, and dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging. Pre-, intra, and postoperative surgical imaging including visualize imaging will be discussed. The value of connectomics will be presented for its value in neuro-oncology. Minimal invasive therapeutic possibilities of interventional neuroradiology and image-guided laser ablation and MR-guided high-intensity-focused ultrasound will be presented for treatment of pediatric brain and spinal cord tumors. Finally, a comprehensive review of spinal cord tumors and matching neuropathology has been included.

Opportunities and Alternatives of Modern Radiation Oncology and Surgery for the Management of Resectable Brain Metastases

Postsurgical radiotherapy (RT) has been early proven to prevent local tumor recurrence, initially performed with whole brain RT (WBRT). Subsequent to disadvantageous cognitive sequalae for the patient and the broad distribution of modern linear accelerators, focal irradiation of the tumor has omitted WBRT in most cases. In many studies, the effectiveness of local RT of the resection cavity, either as single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or hypo-fractionated stereotactic RT (hFSRT), has been demonstrated to be effective and safe. However, whereas prospective high-level incidence is still lacking on which dose and fractionation scheme is the best choice for the patient, further ablative techniques have come into play. Neoadjuvant SRS (N-SRS) prior to resection combines straightforward target delineation with an accelerated post-surgical phase, allowing an earlier start of systemic treatment or rehabilitation as indicated. In addition, low-energy intraoperative RT (IORT) on the surgical bed has been introduced as another alternative to external beam RT, offering sterilization of the cavity surface with steep dose gradients towards the healthy brain. This consensus paper summarizes current local treatment strategies for resectable brain metastases regarding available data and patient-centered decision-making.

Building Team Medicine in the Management of CNS Metastases

CNS metastases are often terminal for cancer patients and occur at an approximately 10-fold higher rate than primary CNS tumors. The incidence of these tumors is approximately 70,000-400,000 cases annually in the US. Advances that have occurred over the past two decades have led to more personalized treatment approaches. Newer surgical and radiation techniques, as well as targeted and immune therapies, have enanled patient to live longer, thus increasing the risk for the development of CNS, brain, and leptomeningeal metastases (BM and LM). Patients who develop CNS metastases have often been heavily treated, and options for future treatment could best be addressed by multidisciplinary teams. Studies have indicated that patients with brain metastases have improved survival outcomes when cared for in high-volume academic institutions using multidisciplinary teams. This manuscript discusses a multidisciplinary approach for both parenchymal brain metastases as well as leptomeningeal metastases implemented in three academic institutions. Additionally, with the increasing development of healthcare systems, we discuss optimizing the management of CNS metastases across healthcare systems and integrating basic and translational science into our clinical care to further improve outcomes. This paper summarizes the existing therapeutic approaches to the treatment of BM and LM and discusses novel and emerging approaches to optimizing access to neuro-oncologic care while simultaneously integrating multidisciplinary teams in the care of patients with BM and LM.

Hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (HSRS) as a salvage treatment for brain metastases failing prior stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)

INTRODUCTION

Various treatment options exist to salvage stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) failures for brain metastases, including repeat SRS and hypofractionated SRS (HSRS). Our objective was to report outcomes specific to salvage HSRS for brain metastases that failed prior HSRS/SRS.

METHODS

Patients treated with HSRS to salvage local failures (LF) following initial HSRS/SRS, between July 2010 and April 2020, were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcomes were the rates of LF, radiation necrosis (RN), and symptomatic radiation necrosis (SRN). Univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) analyses using competing risk regression were performed to identify predictive factors for each endpoint.

RESULTS

120 Metastases in 91 patients were identified. The median clinical follow up was 13.4 months (range 1.1-111.1), and the median interval between SRS courses was 13.1 months (range 3.0-56.5). 115 metastases were salvaged with 20-35 Gy in 5 fractions and the remaining five with a total dose ranging from 20 to 24 Gy in 3-fractions. 67 targets (56%) were postoperative cavities. The median re-treatment target volume and biological effective dose (BED₁₀) was 9.5 cc and 37.5 Gy, respectively. The 6- and 12- month LF rates were 18.9% and 27.7%, for RN 13% and 15.6%, and for SRN were 6.1% and 7.0%, respectively. MVA identified larger re-irradiation volume (hazard ratio [HR] 1.02, p = 0.04) and shorter interval between radiosurgery courses (HR 0.93, p < 0.001) as predictors of LF. Treatment of an intact target was associated with a higher risk of RN (HR 2.29, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Salvage HSRS results in high local control rates and toxicity rates that compare favorably to those single fraction SRS re-irradiation experiences reported in the literature.

Integrated Ultrasound and Photoacoustic-Guided Laser Ablation Theranostic Endoscopic System

Advancements in ablation techniques have paved the way towards the development of safer and more effective clinical procedures for treating various maladies such as atrial fibrillation (AF). AF is characterized by rapid, chaotic atrial activation and is commonly treated using radiofrequency applicators or laser ablation catheters. However, the lack of thermal lesion formation and temperature monitoring capabilities in these devices prevents them from measuring the treatment outcome directly. In addition, poor differentiation between healthy and ablated tissues leads to incomplete ablation, which reduces safety and causes complications in patients. Hence, a novel photoacoustic (PA)-guided laser ablation theranostic device was developed around a traditional phased-array endoscope. The proposed technology provides lesion formation, tissue distinguishing, and temperature monitoring capabilities. Our results have validated the lesion monitoring capability of the proposed technology through PA correlation maps. The tissue distinguishing capability of the theranostic device was verified by the measurable differences in the PA signal between pre-and post-ablated mice myocardial tissue. The increase in the PA signal with temperature variations caused by the ablation laser confirmed the ability of the proposed device to provide temperature feedback.

[High-intensity laser therapy in clinical medicine: scientometric analysis of evidence of effectiveness]

INTRODUCTION

High-intensity laser technologies are widely used in modern restorative medicine, and indications for their use are expanding annually. These technologies are effective, potentially safe methods of treating many diseases. with pronounced therapeutic effects.

PURPOSE OF RESEARCH

Analysis of scientific evidence of the effectiveness and safety of high-intensity laser therapy in patients with various diseases.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A comprehensive scientometric analysis of evidence-based studies of the effectiveness and safety of high-intensity laser therapy methods was carried out according to electronic databases (Google scholar, PEDro, PubMed, Cochrane DATABASE) for the period from 2006 to 2021.

RESULTS

High-intensity laser therapy has a wide range of significantly pronounced therapeutic effects. and it is an effective method of treating patients with various diseases. Various technologies and methods of its application are widely used in various fields of clinical medicine. Individually developed therapy protocols are needed, with optimal exposure parameters for each patient, intervals between procedures.

CONCLUSION

It is advisable to develop more reliable and standard evaluation criteria, regular generalization and analysis of existing evidence, careful planning and implementation of further large-scale randomized controlled trials to study the effects of high-intensity laser radiation both as a single effect and as part of combinations with other treatment methods. The effectiveness of combination therapy requires further analysis in the course of conducting new benign clinical trials.

Outcomes and Principles of Patient Selection for Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for Metastatic Brain Tumor Management: A Multisite Institutional Case Series

BACKGROUND

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is an emerging treatment modality for both primary brain tumors and metastases. We report initial outcomes after LITT for metastatic brain tumors across 3 sites at our institution and discuss potential strategies for optimal patient selection and outcomes.

METHODS

International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Tenth Revision codes were used to identify patients with malignant brain tumors treated via LITT across all 3 Mayo Clinic sites with at least 6 months follow-up. Local control was based on radiologic and clinical evidence. Overall survival was measured from time of receiving LITT until death or end of the study period.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were treated for progression of a single (n = 21) or multiple (n = 2) previously radiated metastatic lesions and/or radiation necrosis. Median age was 56 years (interquartile range, 47-66.5 years). LITT achieved local control of the lesion in most patients with metastatic tumors or radiation necrosis (n = 18; 81.8%) for the duration of follow-up. One patient did not have local control data available. Thirteen (56.5%) patients remained alive at the end of the study period. No other patients died of their treated disease during the study period; 5 of 10 deaths were attributable to central nervous system progression outside the treated lesion. Although median survival for this cohort has not yet been reached, the current median survival is 16 months (interquartile range, 12-48.5 months) after LITT for metastatic/radiation necrosis lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

LITT was associated with sustained local control in 81.8% of patients treated for radiographic progression of metastatic central nervous system disease.

Supralesional Ablation Volumes Are Feasible in the Posterior Fossa and May Provide Enhanced Symptomatic Relief

BACKGROUND

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) for posterior fossa lesions remains rare as the small size of the infratentorial compartment, proximity to the brainstem, and thickness/angulation of the occipital bone creates barriers to procedural success. Furthermore, evaluation of the effect of ablation volume on outcomes is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze our institutional experience with LITT in the posterior fossa stratifying perioperative and long-term outcomes by ablation volumes.

METHODS

Seventeen patients with posterior fossa lesions treated with LITT from 2013 to 2020 were identified. Local progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, steroid dependence, and edema reduction were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier analysis grouped by ablation volume. Preoperative, postoperative, and last known Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) were compared using a matched paired t test.

RESULTS

No differences in pathology, preoperative KPS, or preoperative lesion volume were found between patients with total (100%-200% increase in pre-LITT lesion volume) versus radical (>200% increase in pre-LITT lesion volume) ablations. Patients who underwent radical ablation had a higher postoperative KPS (93 vs 82, P = .02) and higher KPS (94 vs 87, P = .04) and greater reduction in perilesional edema at last follow-up (P = .01). Median follow-up was 80.8 wk.

CONCLUSION

Despite obvious anatomical challenges, our results demonstrate that radical ablations are both feasible and safe in the posterior fossa. Furthermore, radical ablations may lead to greater decreases in perilesional edema and improved functional status both immediately after surgery and at last follow-up. Thus, LITT should be considered for patients with otherwise unresectable or radioresistant posterior fossa lesions.