Student perceptions of knowledge development and consolidation in a clinical community of practice

Cost identification in health professions education: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Resource scarcity in health professions education (HPE) demands rigorous consideration of costs. Yet, thus far, we have been unable to completely and consistently identify the costs of HPE. To address this knowledge gap and enable use of economic evidence in decision making, a detailed overview of all existing costs and approaches to cost identification in HPE is needed.

OBJECTIVES

This review summarises the diversity of costs, cost perspectives and cost identification methods used in economic research of HPE to answer the following questions: which educational topics, costs, cost perspectives and cost identification methods are being investigated in HPE literature?

METHODS

This investigation followed the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines for scoping reviews. PubMed, ERIC, CINAHL and PsycINFO were iteratively searched for English language publications between 2012 and 2022 that reported costs of HPE. Data was extracted for study characteristics, educational context and economic methodology.

RESULTS

A total of 136 articles of original research on the costs of educating all major licence healthcare professionals were included. A diffuse interest in costs is reflected in publications from 93 distinct journals and by the diversity of educational topics and cost types explored. However, the majority of investigations failed to define the cost perspective (86, 63%) and cost identification methods (117, 86%) and did not demonstrate common reporting structure or cost terminology, all of which contribute to persistent inconsistencies in cost identification.

CONCLUSION

The source of disharmonious cost identification in HPE is fuelled by diverse interests and divergent concepts of costs and costing methodology. Left in its current state, disharmonious cost identification will continue to limit transparency, comparison and synthesis of evidence, hamper objectivity in implementation and policy decisions and impede the efficient and sustainable allocation of resources. A research agenda must be developed, prioritised, and validated by the broader community to develop a theoretical framework for HPE cost research, define stakeholders, elicit values and preferences and chart a path toward harmonised costing.

Challenges and opportunities of evaluating work based interprofessional learning: insights from a pediatric interprofessional training ward

Introduction

Interprofessional collaboration among healthcare professionals is fostered through interprofessional education (IPE). Work-based IPE has demonstrated effectiveness within interprofessional training wards. We developed the Interprofessional Training Ward in Pediatrics (IPAPED) and employ a combination of established assessment tools and a newly created IPAPED questionnaire, directed at to assess both students' learning experiences and program structure. This paper presents the development and analysis of the psychometric properties of the IPAPED questionnaire.

Methods

Nursing trainees and medical students participated in IPAPED. The IPAPED questionnaire was developed to complement established instruments, based on IPE frameworks. Interprofessional collaboration and communication were represented in subscales in part 1 of the questionnaire. Part 2 focused on the IPAPED program itself. Statistical analyses included calculation of internal consistency for part 1 and exploratory factor analyses for part 2.

Results

All IPAPED participants between November 2017 and November 2022 completed the questionnaire (n = 105). 94 of 105 questionnaires were analyzed. Internal consistency for part 1 was low (Cronbach's α <0.58). Exploratory factor analyses revealed three distinct factors: teaching and learning material, interprofessional learning facilitation and professional guidance by nurses on the ward.

Discussion

Our results illustrate the challenge of performing high quality, theory based evaluation in a work-based setting. However, exploratory factor analyses highlighted the opportunity of focusing on both learning facilitators and staff on the wards to ensure a maximum learning output for participants. Developing program-specific questionnaires to gain insight into local structures has the potential to improve work-based IPE formats.

Shared Reading as a Community of Practice for Overcoming the Generation Gap and Improving Psychological Safety in Rural Family Medicine Education: A Grounded-Theory Approach

Background A community of practice (CoP) is essential for continuous professional development in family medicine. A CoP in medical education comprises a group of individuals who share common interests and learn and share knowledge, skills, and attitudes. The generation gap between teachers and learners can influence their effective collaboration in family medicine education. To address this issue, shared reading, which involves group discussions on medical texts, effectively promotes intergenerational learning within a CoP. Shared reading is particularly beneficial in rural contexts, where medical resources are scarce, and the generation gap between teachers and learners is wide. This study examines how shared reading facilitates learning and practice among family medicine trainees in rural areas. Methods This qualitative study utilized a grounded-theory approach. It involved the participation of eight family medicine residents, five junior residents, and seven medical students from Unnan City Hospital, Japan, in shared reading sessions between August 2022 and March 2023. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with all participants after the sessions. Results Data analysis using the grounded-theory approach yielded three themes: facilitating learning and motivation, respectful collaboration with teachers, and developing a relationship that fosters psychological safety. First, through shared reading, the participants had opportunities to learn about medical issues and engage in continual dialogues with colleagues and teachers. Second, the participants felt motivated to apply their newly acquired knowledge at work and collaborate with teachers. Third, they acquired self-regulated learning skills by adapting their motivations to their interests and experiences. Increased interaction between participants and teachers during the sessions helped mitigate the generation gap and enhanced psychological safety. Conclusions Shared reading effectively promotes continuous learning and motivates medical learners to apply their knowledge and collaborate with teachers. It facilitates the development of self-regulated learning skills, helps mitigate the generation gap, and enhances psychological safety among educators and learners in rural medical education.

The relationship between the undergraduate clinical learning environment and work readiness in new graduate nurses: A pre-post survey study

BACKGROUND

Due to projected nurse shortages, it is necessary that undergraduate programs optimise work readiness outcomes in new graduate nurses. Research that quantitatively evaluates characteristics of clinical nursing programs that predict increased work readiness is required.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the relationship between the undergraduate clinical learning environment and nurse perceptions of work readiness prior to and following, commencement as a new graduate nurse.

DESIGN

A pre-post follow-up study. Undergraduates were surveyed at the end of their Bachelor's degree (baseline) and at 8-10 weeks after commencement as a graduate nurse (Time 1).

SETTING

A multi-site, metropolitan private hospital in Victoria, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

Nursing graduates who completed a university fellowship program (n = 26), or were undertaking their graduate year and had completed placement blocks within (n = 18) or outside (n = 31) the healthcare organisation.

METHODS

Participants self-completed the Clinical Learning Environment Inventory (CLEI) and Work Readiness Scale for Graduate Nurses (WRS-GN) at baseline and Time 1. Multiple regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

CLEI scores significantly predicted work readiness outcomes (all p-values<.05), accounting for 16-36% and 17-28% of the variance of WRS-GN scores at baseline and Time 1, respectively. After adjusting for clustering due to clinical placement groups, CLEI Individualisation (p = .023) and Valuing Nurses Work (p = .01) predicted improved Time 1 WRS-GN Organisational Acumen. CLEI Innovative and Adaptive Culture scores predicted poorer Time 1 Organisational Acumen (p = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Learning environments that offered high levels of individualised attention and valued nurses' work appeared to facilitate post-graduation engagement and identification with nursing practice. However, highly innovative and adaptive education may detract from optimal work readiness. Findings revealed that while important, the clinical learning environment only accounted for a small-to-moderate degree of nursing graduates' work readiness. To facilitate robust evidence-based improvement of clinical nursing education, future research should attempt to empirically establish the value of additional facilitators of work readiness.

The use of therapeutic untruths by learning disability nursing students

BACKGROUND

The use of therapeutic untruths raises a number of ethical issues, which have begun to be explored to some extent, particularly in dementia care services, where their use has been found to be high. Little is known, however, about their use by health professionals working in learning disability services.

RESEARCH QUESTION

The study aimed to explore the frequency of use of therapeutic untruths by student learning disability nurses, and by their colleagues; how effective the students perceived them to be as a means of responding to behaviours that challenge; and their level of comfort with using them.

RESEARCH DESIGN

A correlational design was used to gather data from an online version of the Best Interest Scale, adapted for a learning disability context. Participants were 30 learning disability student nurses (female = 28, ages 18-48 years, M = 26.8, standard deviation = 7.3) studying at a university in the North-East of England.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

The study was reviewed and received ethical approval from the first author's university ethics committee.

FINDINGS

Overall, 96% of participants reported using therapeutic untruths. 'Omission' was the most frequently used type of therapeutic untruths, the most effective and the type that the students felt most comfortable using. Frequency of use of therapeutic untruths correlated significantly and positively with perceived effectiveness and the level of comfort that the students felt when using them, for all types of therapeutic untruths.

CONCLUSION

The use of therapeutic untruths by the student nurses was consistent with that found in research in dementia care services in the United Kingdom and abroad. Further research to explore the generalisability of the results to the wider context of learning disability services is needed. The study highlights that there may be a need for more formal guidance and educational input to student nurses in the use of therapeutic untruths with people with a learning disability.