Sex, defense, and risk assessment: Who could ask for anything more?

Neural Circuits of Fear and Anxiety: Insights from a Neuroethological Perspective

The predatory imminence continuum (PIC) of antipredator defensive behavior has been a helpful strategy for modeling anxiety and fear-related disorders in nonclinical research. The PIC is divided into three different sequential stages that reflect defensive behavioral strategy in response to predatory imminence. However, the PIC was experimentally addressed with a series of shock-based fear conditioning experiments rather than predatory threats. In this article, we consider the PIC in a more naturalistic behavioral setting, focusing on analyzing the neural systems of animals responding to terrestrial and aerial predators. Of relevance, there is a sequential engagement of the distinct neural circuits along each phase of the PIC. In the preencounter phase, prefrontal cortical networks are particularly involved in planning and organizing behavioral responses to ambiguous threats. As the predatory cues or the real predator is detected, there is an engagement of amygdalar and hippocampal > hypothalamic pathways in conjunction with the periaqueductal gray, which organize fear responses. This dynamic particularly reveals how specific neural circuits are set into action to subserve distinct defensive responses. Moreover, we further explore the neural circuits governing other fearful situations outside the context of the PIC, including agonistic social encounters and interoceptive challenges. This analysis reveals an interesting overlap between the neural systems responding to these threats and those involved in response to predatory threats. The present review clarifies how defensive circuits respond to natural threats and provides a more realistic view of the neural systems underlying anxiety and fear responses.

Neural correlates of opioid-induced risk-taking behavior in the prelimbic prefrontal cortex

Opioid use disorder occurs alongside impaired risk-related decision-making, but the underlying neural correlates are unclear. We developed an approach-avoidance conflict task using a modified conditioned place preference procedure to study neural signals of risky opioid seeking in the prefrontal cortex, a region implicated in executive decision-making. Following morphine conditioned place preference, rats underwent a conflict test in which fear-inducing cat odor was introduced in the previously drug-paired side of the apparatus. While the saline-exposed control group avoided cat odor, the morphine group included two subsets of rats that either maintained a preference for the paired side despite the presence of cat odor (Risk-Takers) or exhibited increased avoidance (Risk-Avoiders), as revealed by K-means clustering. Single-unit recordings from the prelimbic cortex (PL) demonstrated decreased neuronal activity upon acute morphine exposure in both Risk-Takers and Risk-Avoiders, but this firing rate suppression was absent after repeated morphine administration. Risk-Avoiders also displayed distinct post-morphine excitation in PL which persisted across conditioning. During the preference test, subpopulations of PL neurons in all groups were either excited or inhibited when rats entered the paired side. Interestingly, the inhibition in PL activity was lost during the subsequent conflict test in both saline and Risk-Avoider groups, but persisted in Risk-Takers. Additionally, Risk-Takers showed an increase in the proportion of PL neurons displaying location-specific firing in the drug-paired side from the preference to the conflict test. Together, our results suggest that persistent PL inhibitory signaling in the drug-associated context during motivational conflict may underlie increased risk-taking behavior following opioid exposure.Significance statement Risky opioid use is well established in opioid use disorder, but the underlying neural correlates are poorly understood. In this study, we present findings from a novel behavioral task in which rats face a motivational conflict between contextual opioid reward memory and a naturalistic predator threat. Performing neuronal recordings in the prelimbic prefrontal cortex (PL), a brain region critical for executive decision-making, we demonstrate enhanced representation of drug-associated context and persistent inhibitory signaling by PL neurons that occur alongside opioid-induced risk-taking behavior. Our findings refine a preclinical model for studying addiction, establish PL as a prime region for investigating drug-environment interactions, and positions the prefrontal cortex as a candidate region for translational studies targeting risky opioid use.

What Dyadic Internet Street Fight Videos Can and Cannot Tell Us About the Ethological, Game Theoretic, and Sex-Differentiated Phenomenology of Human Physical Aggression

Street fight videos on the internet may provide information about little known aspects of human physical aggression, but their reliability is unclear. Analyses of 100 dyadic fight videos addressing ethological, game theoretic and sex-differentiated questions derived from research on other animals found that prefight verbalizations or gestural signals of nonaggressive or aggressive intent loosely predicted who would strike first and who would win. The head is the preferred strike target. Ordinal severity rankings of different strikes ranged from 1 for spitting to 5 for choking. Half the videos showed briefer, unilateral assaults beginning with one or more high severity strikes, little evidence of escalation and fewer bystander interventions. A quarter of these were sneak attacks. The other videos showed longer fights with reciprocal strikes, some evidence of strike severity escalation and more bystander intervention. Both types were equally injurious. Winner/loser outcomes were reliably identified by postfight behaviors and/or signs of injury. Winners had advantageous prefight resource holding potential (RHP: greater height and/or vigor) significantly more often than losers. Consistent with tendencies for fights to occur between animals of the same sex, there were more male/male and female/female fights and fewer male/female fights than expected from random pairings of men and women in the videos. Female/female fights involved proportionally more hair-pulling, extended bouts of rapidly repeated strikes and longest durations. Bystanders intervened in over half the videos, attempting to separate fighters or help losers more often than they attacked the loser. Carefully selected internet street fight videos can provide important information.

Sounding the Alarm: Sex Differences in Rat Ultrasonic Vocalizations during Pavlovian Fear Conditioning and Extinction

Pavlovian fear conditioning is a prevalent tool in the study of aversive learning, which is a key component of stress-related psychiatric disorders. Adult rats can exhibit various threat-related behaviors, including freezing, motor responses, and ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs). While these responses can all signal aversion, we know little about how they relate to one another. Here we characterize USVs emitted by male and female rats during cued fear acquisition and extinction, and assess the relationship between different threat-related behaviors. We found that males consistently emitted >22 kHz calls (referred to here as "alarm calls") than females, and that alarm call frequency in males, but not females, related to the intensity of the shock stimulus. Interestingly, 25% of males and 45% of females did not emit any alarm calls at all. Males that did make alarm calls had significantly higher levels of freezing than males who did not, while no differences in freezing were observed between female Alarm callers and Non-alarm callers. Alarm call emission was also affected by the predictability of the shock; when unpaired from a tone cue, both males and females started emitting alarm calls significantly later. During extinction learning and retrieval sessions, males were again more likely than females to emit alarm calls, which followed an extinction-like reduction in frequency. Collectively these data suggest sex dependence in how behavioral readouts relate to innate and conditioned threat responses. Importantly, we suggest that the same behaviors can signal sex-dependent features of aversion.