Short review of SEC, a potential dexamethasone-sparing regimen for glioblastoma: Spironolactone, ecallantide, clotrimazole

UBC4: A Repurposed Drug Regimen for Adjunctive Use During Bladder Cancer Treatment

After it has metastasized, bladder cancer, the malignant transformation of the bladder urothelium, continues to be a common cause of death after maximal use of all currently available standard treatments. To address this problem in 2025, the drug repurposing movement within oncology aims to identify medicines in common general medical care use that have data indicating that they can interfere or inhibit a growth driving element that has been identified in bladder cancer. This paper now outlines extensive preclinical data showing that four drugs from general medical practice meet these criteria-the melatonergic drug ramelteon, the antidepressant fluoxetine, the antibiotic dapsone, and the analgesic drug celecoxib. This is the UBC4 regimen, meant as a possible adjunct added to standard treatments of metastatic bladder cancer. Three factors justify a clinical pilot trial of UBC4: (1) the UBC4 drugs are usually well tolerated and carry a low risk of harm, (2) the commonly fatal outcome of bladder cancer once it has widely metastasized, plus (3) the strong preclinical database showing UBC growth inhibition by each of the individual UBC4 drugs as outlined in this paper.

Age-stratified comorbid and pharmacologic analysis of patients with glioblastoma

Background

Increased age is a strong and unfavorable prognostic factor for patients with glioblastoma (GBM). However, the relationships between stratified patient age, comorbidities, and medications have yet to be explored in GBM patient survival analyses.

Objective

To evaluate co-morbid conditions, tumor-related symptoms, medication prescriptions, and subject age for patients with GBM and to establish potential targets for prospective studies.

Methods

Electronic health records for 565 patients with IDHwt GBM were evaluated at a single center between January 1, 2000 and August 9, 2021 were retrospectively assessed. Data were stratified by MGMT promoter methylation status when available and were used to construct multivariable time-dependent cox models and intra-cohort hazards.

Results

Younger (<65 years of age) but not older (≥65 years) GBM patients demonstrated a worse prognosis with movement related disabilities (P < 0.0001), gait/balance difficulty (P = 0.04) and weakness (P = 0.007), as well as psychiatric conditions, mental health disorders (P = 0.002) and anxiety (P = 0.001). In contrast, older but not younger GBM patients demonstrated a worse prognosis with epilepsy (P = 0.039). Both groups had worse survival with confusion/altered mental status (P = 0.023 vs < 0.000) and an improved survival with a Temozolomide prescription. Older but not younger GBM patients experienced an improved hazard with a prescription of ace-inhibitor medications (P = 0.048).

Conclusion

Age-dependent novel associations between clinical symptoms and medications prescribed for co-morbid conditions were demonstrated in patients with GBM. The results of the current work support future mechanistic studies that investigate the negative relationship(s) between increased age, comorbidities, and drug therapies for differential clinical decision-making across the lifespan of patients with GBM.

Dexamethasone in Patients with Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Glioblastomas are the most common primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Although modern management strategies have modestly improved overall survival, the prognosis remains dismal, with treatment side effects often impinging on the clinical course. Glioblastomas cause neurological dysfunction by infiltrating CNS tissue and via perifocal oedema formation. The administration of steroids such as dexamethasone is thought to alleviate symptoms by reducing oedema. However, despite its widespread use, the evidence for the administration of dexamethasone is limited and conflicting. Therefore, we aimed to review the current evidence concerning the use and outcomes of dexamethasone in patients with glioblastoma.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis according to the PRISMA-P guidelines. We performed a restricted search using the keywords "Dexamethasone" and "Glioblastoma" on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Academic Search Premier. We included studies reporting on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in glioblastoma patients receiving higher or lower dexamethasone doses. The risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I. We performed a meta-analysis using a random effects model for OS and PFS.

RESULTS

Twenty-two retrospective studies were included. Higher doses of dexamethasone were associated with poorer OS (hazard ratio 1.62, confidence interval 1.40-1.88) and PFS (1.49, 1.23-1.81). OS remained worse even when studies corrected for clinical status (1.52, 1.38-1.67).

CONCLUSION

Despite the widespread use of dexamethasone in glioblastoma patients, its use is correlated with worse long-term outcomes. Consequently, Dexamethasone administration should be restricted to selected symptomatic patients. Future prospective studies are crucial to confirm these findings.

Emerging diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets in post-stroke hemorrhagic transformation and brain edema

Stroke is a devastating condition that can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. The aftermath of a stroke, particularly hemorrhagic transformation (HT) and brain edema, can significantly impact the prognosis of patients. Early detection and effective management of these complications are crucial for improving outcomes in stroke patients. This review highlights the emerging diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets including claudin, occludin, zonula occluden, s100β, albumin, MMP-9, MMP-2, MMP-12, IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, IFN-γ, TGF-β, IL-10, IL-4, IL-13, MCP-1/CCL2, CXCL2, CXCL8, CXCL12, CCL5, CX3CL1, ICAM-1, VCAM-1, P-selectin, E-selectin, PECAM-1/CD31, JAMs, HMGB1, vWF, VEGF, ROS, NAC, and AQP4. The clinical significance and implications of these biomarkers were also discussed.