MRI-based Whole-Tumor Radiomics to Classify the Types of Pediatric Posterior Fossa Brain Tumor

Radiomics for Differentiation of Pediatric Posterior Fossa Tumors: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Literature

PURPOSE

To better define the overall performance of the current radiomics-based models for the discrimination of pediatric posterior fossa tumors.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of the databases PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus was designed and conducted by an experienced librarian. We estimated overall sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE). Event rates were pooled across studies using a random-effects meta-analysis, and the χ2 test was performed to assess the heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Overall SEN and SPE for differentiation between MB, PA, and EP were found to be promising, with SEN values of 93% (95% CI = 0.88-0.96), 83% (95% CI = 0.66-0.93), and 85% (95% CI = 0.71-0.93), and corresponding SPE values of 87% (95% CI = 0.82-0.90), 95% (95% CI = 0.90-0.98) and 90% (95% CI = 0.84-0.94), respectively. For MB, there is a better trend for LR classifiers, while textural features are the most used and the best performing (ACC 96%). As for PA and EP, a synergistic employment of LR and NN classifiers, accompanied by geometrical or morphological features, demonstrated superior performance (ACC 94% and 96%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic performance is high, making radiomics a helpful method to discriminate these tumor types. In the forthcoming years, we expect even more precise models.

Radiomics-Assisted Computed Tomography-Based Analysis to Evaluate Lung Morphology Characteristics after Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

Purpose: Children with congenital diaphragmatic hernia suffer from long-term morbidity, including lung function impairment. Our study aims to analyze lung morphology characteristics via radiomic-assisted extraction of lung features in patients after congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair. Materials and Methods: 72 patients were retrospectively analyzed after approval by the local research ethics committee. All the image data were acquired using a third-generation dual-source CT (SOMATOM Force, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). Dedicated software was used for image analysis, segmentation, and processing. Results: Radiomics analysis of pediatric chest CTs of patients with status after CDH was possible. Between the ipsilateral (side of the defect) and contralateral lung, three shape features and two higher-order texture features were considered statistically significant. Contralateral lungs in patients with and without ECMO treatment showed significant differences in two shape features. Between the ipsilateral lungs in patients with and without the need for ECMO 1, a higher-order texture feature was depicted as statistically significant. Conclusions: By adding quantitative information to the visual assessment of the radiologist, radiomics-assisted feature analysis could become an additional tool in the future to assess the degree of lung hypoplasia in order to further improve the therapy and outcome of CDH patients.

Differentiation between cerebral alveolar echinococcosis and brain metastases with radiomics combined machine learning approach

BACKGROUND

Cerebral alveolar echinococcosis (CAE) and brain metastases (BM) share similar in locations and imaging appearance. However, they require distinct treatment approaches, with CAE typically treated with chemotherapy and surgery, while BM is managed with radiotherapy and targeted therapy for the primary malignancy. Accurate diagnosis is crucial due to the divergent treatment strategies.

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of radiomics and machine learning techniques based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to differentiate between CAE and BM.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed MRI images of 130 patients (30 CAE and 100 BM) from Xinjiang Medical University First Affiliated Hospital and The First People's Hospital of Kashi Prefecture, between January 2014 and December 2022. The dataset was divided into training (91 cases) and testing (39 cases) sets. Three dimensional tumors were segmented by radiologists from contrast-enhanced T1WI images on open resources software 3D Slicer. Features were extracted on Pyradiomics, further feature reduction was carried out using univariate analysis, correlation analysis, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). Finally, we built five machine learning models, support vector machine, logistic regression, linear discrimination analysis, k-nearest neighbors classifier, and Gaussian naïve bias and evaluated their performance via several metrics including sensitivity (recall), specificity, positive predictive value (precision), negative predictive value, accuracy and the area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

The area under curve (AUC) of support vector classifier (SVC), linear discrimination analysis (LDA), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and gaussian naïve bias (NB) algorithms in training (testing) sets are 0.99 (0.94), 1.00 (0.87), 0.98 (0.92), 0.97 (0.97), and 0.98 (0.93), respectively. Nested cross-validation demonstrated the robustness and generalizability of the models. Additionally, the calibration plot and decision curve analysis demonstrated the practical usefulness of these models in clinical practice, with lower bias toward different subgroups during decision-making.

CONCLUSION

The combination of radiomics and machine learning approach based on contrast enhanced T1WI images could well distinguish CAE and BM. This approach holds promise in assisting doctors with accurate diagnosis and clinical decision-making.

Current state of radiomics in pediatric neuro-oncology practice: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Radiomics is the process of converting radiological images into high-dimensional data that may be used to create machine learning models capable of predicting clinical outcomes, such as disease progression, treatment response and survival. Pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors differ from adult CNS tumors in terms of their tissue morphology, molecular subtype and textural features. We set out to appraise the current impact of this technology in clinical pediatric neuro-oncology practice.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of the study were to assess radiomics' current impact and potential utility in pediatric neuro-oncology practice; to evaluate the accuracy of radiomics-based machine learning models and compare this to the current standard which is stereotactic brain biopsy; and finally, to identify the current limitations of radiomics applications in pediatric neuro-oncology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards, a systematic review of the literature was carried out with protocol number CRD42022372485 in the prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO). We performed a systematic literature search via PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Studies involving CNS tumors, studies that utilized radiomics and studies involving pediatric patients (age<18 years) were included. Several parameters were collected including imaging modality, sample size, image segmentation technique, machine learning model used, tumor type, radiomics utility, model accuracy, radiomics quality score and reported limitations.

RESULTS

The study included a total of 17 articles that underwent full-text review, after excluding duplicates, conference abstracts and studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria. The most commonly used machine learning models were support vector machines (n=7) and random forests (n=6), with an area under the curve (AUC) range of 0.60-0.94. The included studies investigated several pediatric CNS tumors, with ependymoma and medulloblastoma being the most frequently studied. Radiomics was primarily used for lesion identification, molecular subtyping, survival prognostication and metastasis prediction in pediatric neuro-oncology. The low sample size of studies was a commonly reported limitation.

CONCLUSION

The current state of radiomics in pediatric neuro-oncology is promising, in terms of distinguishing between tumor types; however, its utility in response assessment requires further evaluation which, given the relatively low number of pediatric tumors, calls for multicenter collaboration.

Deciphering Machine Learning Decisions to Distinguish between Posterior Fossa Tumor Types Using MRI Features: What Do the Data Tell Us?

Machine learning (ML) models have become capable of making critical decisions on our behalf. Nevertheless, due to complexity of these models, interpreting their decisions can be challenging, and humans cannot always control them. This paper provides explanations of decisions made by ML models in diagnosing four types of posterior fossa tumors: medulloblastoma, ependymoma, pilocytic astrocytoma, and brainstem glioma. The proposed methodology involves data analysis using kernel density estimations with Gaussian distributions to examine individual MRI features, conducting an analysis on the relationships between these features, and performing a comprehensive analysis of ML model behavior. This approach offers a simple yet informative and reliable means of identifying and validating distinguishable MRI features for the diagnosis of pediatric brain tumors. By presenting a comprehensive analysis of the responses of the four pediatric tumor types to each other and to ML models in a single source, this study aims to bridge the knowledge gap in the existing literature concerning the relationship between ML and medical outcomes. The results highlight that employing a simplistic approach in the absence of very large datasets leads to significantly more pronounced and explainable outcomes, as expected. Additionally, the study also demonstrates that the pre-analysis results consistently align with the outputs of the ML models and the clinical findings reported in the existing literature.

Current role of machine learning and radiogenomics in precision neuro-oncology

In the past few years, artificial intelligence (AI) has been increasingly used to create tools that can enhance workflow in medicine. In particular, neuro-oncology has benefited from the use of AI and especially machine learning (ML) and radiogenomics, which are subfields of AI. ML can be used to develop algorithms that dynamically learn from available medical data in order to automatically do specific tasks. On the other hand, radiogenomics can identify relationships between tumor genetics and imaging features, thus possibly giving new insights into the pathophysiology of tumors. Therefore, ML and radiogenomics could help treatment tailoring, which is crucial in personalized neuro-oncology. The aim of this review is to illustrate current and possible future applications of ML and radiomics in neuro-oncology.

Machine Learning in the Classification of Pediatric Posterior Fossa Tumors: A Systematic Review

Background: Posterior fossa tumors (PFTs) are a morbid group of central nervous system tumors that most often present in childhood. While early diagnosis is critical to drive appropriate treatment, definitive diagnosis is currently only achievable through invasive tissue collection and histopathological analyses. Machine learning has been investigated as an alternative means of diagnosis. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we evaluated the primary literature to identify all machine learning algorithms developed to classify and diagnose pediatric PFTs using imaging or molecular data. Methods: Of the 433 primary papers identified in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, 25 ultimately met the inclusion criteria. The included papers were extracted for algorithm architecture, study parameters, performance, strengths, and limitations. Results: The algorithms exhibited variable performance based on sample size, classifier(s) used, and individual tumor types being investigated. Ependymoma, medulloblastoma, and pilocytic astrocytoma were the most studied tumors with algorithm accuracies ranging from 37.5% to 94.5%. A minority of studies compared the developed algorithm to a trained neuroradiologist, with three imaging-based algorithms yielding superior performance. Common algorithm and study limitations included small sample sizes, uneven representation of individual tumor types, inconsistent performance reporting, and a lack of application in the clinical environment. Conclusions: Artificial intelligence has the potential to improve the speed and accuracy of diagnosis in this field if the right algorithm is applied to the right scenario. Work is needed to standardize outcome reporting and facilitate additional trials to allow for clinical uptake.