Changes in recruitment of motor cortex excitation and inhibition in patients with drug-induced tardive syndromes

Extrapyramidal System/Symptoms/Signs Should Be Retired

The term "extrapyramidal system/symptoms/signs" and the acronym "EPS" have been abundantly used in neurology and psychiatry literature for more than a century. However, EPS has been increasingly criticized, especially by movement disorder neurologists, for its lack of clinical, anatomical, and physiologic definition. Contrary to traditional assumptions, pyramidal and extrapyramidal systems are not mutually exclusive. The acronym EPS, commonly used to denote drug-induced movement disorders, lacks specificity in conveying the nature and severity of these and other movement disorders. Consequently, we propose that the term is retired from scientific literature and that clinicians use specific phenomenologic descriptors for the various hypokinetc and hyperkinetic movement disorders.

Dystonia, chorea, hemiballismus and other dyskinesias

Hyperkinesias are heterogeneous involuntary movements that significantly differ in terms of clinical and semeiological manifestations, including rhythm, regularity, speed, duration, and other factors that determine their appearance or suppression. Hyperkinesias are due to complex, variable, and largely undefined pathophysiological mechanisms that may involve different brain areas. In this chapter, we specifically focus on dystonia, chorea and hemiballismus, and other dyskinesias, specifically, levodopa-induced, tardive, and cranial dyskinesia. We address the role of neurophysiological studies aimed at explaining the pathophysiology of these conditions. We mainly refer to human studies using surface and invasive in-depth recordings, as well as spinal, brainstem, and transcortical reflexology and non-invasive brain stimulation techniques. We discuss the extent to which the neurophysiological abnormalities observed in hyperkinesias may be explained by pathophysiological models. We highlight the most relevant issues that deserve future research efforts. The potential role of neurophysiological assessment in the clinical context of hyperkinesia is also discussed.

Are there differences in cortical excitability between akinetic-rigid and tremor-dominant subtypes of Parkinson's disease?

OBJECTIVE

To assess by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) the excitability of various cortical circuits in akinetic-rigid and tremor-dominant subtypes of Parkinson's disease (PD).

METHODS

The study included 92 patients with PD according to UK Brain Bank criteria, with akinetic-rigid (n = 64) or tremor-dominant (n = 28) subtype. Cortical excitability study, including resting and active motor thresholds (rMT and aMT), input-output curve of motor evoked potentials, contralateral and ipsilateral silent periods (cSP and iSP), short and long-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI and LICI), and intracortical facilitation (ICF) were measured. The results obtained were compared to a control group of 30 age- and sex-matched healthy subjects.

RESULTS

The patients in the tremor group had significantly lower rMT and aMT compared to controls and akinetic-rigid patients and significantly shorter iSP duration compared to akinetic-rigid patients, while iSP latency tended to be longer in akinetic-rigid patients compared to controls. There were no significant differences between the two PD subgroups regarding other cortical excitability parameters, including paired-pulse TMS parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Only subtle differences of cortical excitability were found between patients with akinetic-rigid vs. tremor-dominant subtype of PD.

SIGNIFICANCE

The clinical heterogeneity of PD patients probably has an impact on cortical excitability measures, far beyond the akinetic-rigid versus tremor-dominant profile.