The effects of anodal tDCS on pain reduction in people with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The effects of combined transcranial direct Current stimulation with physiotherapy for physical function in subjects with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) emerges as a promising therapeutic intervention for knee osteoarthritis (KOA), yet its impact on physical function remains insufficiently explored.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the relative effects of tDCS for physical function in patients with KOA.

METHODS

Pubmed, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Database were explored as of August 2023 to identify studies to be included in the current systematic review and metaanalysis. Randomized controlled trials in patients with KOA comparing tDCS with placebo were included. The outcomes defined were measures of physical function (questionnaires, gait, or physical performance). The Risk of Bias tool was used to assess bias in the randomized controlled trials, whereas the PEDro scale was applied for methodological quality, and the certainty of evidence for each outcome was assessed through GRADE. Results for each outcome were synthesized using meta-analysis (random-effects model, I2-test for heterogeneity) and a subgroup analysis was performed to improve the sensitivity of the results and to explore potential moderating factors of the effect sizes.

RESULTS

Ten studies with good to excellent quality were included, analyzing a total of 628 participants. Regarding physical function, tDCS showed a favorable effect (ES: -0.58; 95%CI -0.82, -0.33; I2: 52.1%) with a low risk of bias and low to moderate certainty of evidence. The concurrent application of physiotherapy interventions and tDCS improved the effects on pain and function. Applying physiotherapy interventions, as well as adding peripheral currents, increased the effect sizes (ES: -0.95, k = 3, p = .018; ES: -0.95, k = 4 p = .001, respectively). The pattern of application of the tDCS, either daily or in alternate days, did not moderate the effect size (p = .619). Meta-regression revealed that the number of tDCS sessions did not moderate the effect size either (p = .242).

CONCLUSION

The tDCS might be a promising therapeutic approach to enhance physical function in subjects affected with KOA. However, further systematic reviews with meta-analyses should be performed with standardized and proven-efficacy physiotherapy programs, as well as with long-term results, to ascertain whether the improvement may be sustained over time. This study provides valuable insights into optimizing tDCS interventions for enhanced outcomes in the management of KOA.Protocol available via PROSPERO [CRD42023440676].

"Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in managing pain and recovery: A clinical case of radial capitellum fracture"

INTRODUCTION

The management of pain and functional recovery following a radial capitellum fracture poses a significant clinical challenge, especially in individuals whose professions, such as physiotherapy, demand optimal joint functionality. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) emerges as a potential non-pharmacological intervention for pain management, necessitating exploration in the context of orthopedic injuries.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 41-year-old male physiotherapist presented with a MASON 2 radial capitellum fracture following a fall, experiencing notable pain (NPRS 6/7) and functional impairment (DASH 45/100, PRTEE 43/100). Conservative management, involving immobilization and potential surgical consideration, was employed, followed by tDCS for pain management. Post-tDCS, significant improvements were observed in pain and functional scores (NPRS to 0, DASH to 14.2, PRTEE to 7), alongside enhancements in range of motion and muscle strength.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

The application of tDCS showcased notable efficacy in pain reduction and functional improvement, highlighting its potential in augmenting pain management strategies post-fracture. However, the variability in responses and lack of standardized application protocols necessitate further research to optimize its clinical utility. The balance between immobilization for fracture healing and mobilization for preventing stiffness and facilitating recovery was pivotal in managing the fracture and ensuring functional improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

This case underscores the potential of tDCS in managing pain and facilitating functional recovery in radial capitellum fractures, warranting further exploration and standardization of its application in clinical practice. The integrated, patient-centric approach, involving interdisciplinary collaboration and personalized care, was crucial in ensuring positive outcomes and provides a framework for managing similar orthopedic cases.