Developing parallel ant colonies filtered by deep learned constrains for predicting RNA secondary structure with pseudo-knots

RNA structure prediction using deep learning - A comprehensive review

In computational biology, accurate RNA structure prediction offers several benefits, including facilitating a better understanding of RNA functions and RNA-based drug design. Implementing deep learning techniques for RNA structure prediction has led tremendous progress in this field, resulting in significant improvements in prediction accuracy. This comprehensive review aims to provide an overview of the diverse strategies employed in predicting RNA secondary structures, emphasizing deep learning methods. The article categorizes the discussion into three main dimensions: feature extraction methods, existing state-of-the-art learning model architectures, and prediction approaches. We present a comparative analysis of various techniques and models highlighting their strengths and weaknesses. Finally, we identify gaps in the literature, discuss current challenges, and suggest future approaches to enhance model performance and applicability in RNA structure prediction tasks. This review provides a deeper insight into the subject and paves the way for further progress in this dynamic intersection of life sciences and artificial intelligence.

Wfold: A new method for predicting RNA secondary structure with deep learning

Precise estimations of RNA secondary structures have the potential to reveal the various roles that non-coding RNAs play in regulating cellular activity. However, the mainstay of traditional RNA secondary structure prediction methods relies on thermos-dynamic models via free energy minimization, a laborious process that requires a lot of prior knowledge. Here, RNA secondary structure prediction using Wfold, an end-to-end deep learning-based approach, is suggested. Wfold is trained directly on annotated data and base-pairing criteria. It makes use of an image-like representation of RNA sequences, which an enhanced U-net incorporated with a transformer encoder can process effectively. Wfold eventually increases the accuracy of RNA secondary structure prediction by combining the benefits of self-attention mechanism's mining of long-range information with U-net's ability to gather local information. We compare Wfold's performance using RNA datasets that are within and across families. When trained and evaluated on different RNA families, it achieves a similar performance as the traditional methods, but dramatically outperforms the state-of-the-art methods on within-family datasets. Moreover, Wfold can also reliably forecast pseudoknots. The findings imply that Wfold may be useful for improving sequence alignment, functional annotations, and RNA structure modeling.

Machine learning for RNA 2D structure prediction benchmarked on experimental data

Since the 1980s, dozens of computational methods have addressed the problem of predicting RNA secondary structure. Among them are those that follow standard optimization approaches and, more recently, machine learning (ML) algorithms. The former were repeatedly benchmarked on various datasets. The latter, on the other hand, have not yet undergone extensive analysis that could suggest to the user which algorithm best fits the problem to be solved. In this review, we compare 15 methods that predict the secondary structure of RNA, of which 6 are based on deep learning (DL), 3 on shallow learning (SL) and 6 control methods on non-ML approaches. We discuss the ML strategies implemented and perform three experiments in which we evaluate the prediction of (I) representatives of the RNA equivalence classes, (II) selected Rfam sequences and (III) RNAs from new Rfam families. We show that DL-based algorithms (such as SPOT-RNA and UFold) can outperform SL and traditional methods if the data distribution is similar in the training and testing set. However, when predicting 2D structures for new RNA families, the advantage of DL is no longer clear, and its performance is inferior or equal to that of SL and non-ML methods.

RNA-targeted small-molecule drug discoveries: a machine-learning perspective

In the past two decades, machine learning (ML) has been extensively adopted in protein-targeted small molecule (SM) discovery. Once trained, ML models could exert their predicting abilities on large volumes of molecules within a short time. However, applying ML approaches to discover RNA-targeted SMs is still in its early stages. This is primarily because of the intrinsic structural instability of RNA molecules that impede the structure-based screening or designing of RNA-targeted SMs. Recently, with more studies revealing RNA structures and a growing number of RNA-targeted ligands being identified, it resulted in an increased interest in the field of drugging RNA. Undeniably, intracellular RNA is much more abundant than protein and, if successfully targeted, will be a major alternative target for therapeutics. Therefore, in this context, as well as under the premise of having RNA-related research data, ML-based methods can get involved in improving the speed of traditional experimental processes. [Figure: see text].

Secondary structure prediction of long noncoding RNA: review and experimental comparison of existing approaches

MOTIVATION

In contrast to messenger RNAs, the function of the wide range of existing long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) largely depends on their structure, which determines interactions with partner molecules. Thus, the determination or prediction of the secondary structure of lncRNAs is critical to uncover their function. Classical approaches for predicting RNA secondary structure have been based on dynamic programming and thermodynamic calculations. In the last 4 years, a growing number of machine learning (ML)-based models, including deep learning (DL), have achieved breakthrough performance in structure prediction of biomolecules such as proteins and have outperformed classical methods in short transcripts folding. Nevertheless, the accurate prediction for lncRNA still remains far from being effectively solved. Notably, the myriad of new proposals has not been systematically and experimentally evaluated.

RESULTS

In this work, we compare the performance of the classical methods as well as the most recently proposed approaches for secondary structure prediction of RNA sequences using a unified and consistent experimental setup. We use the publicly available structural profiles for 3023 yeast RNA sequences, and a novel benchmark of well-characterized lncRNA structures from different species. Moreover, we propose a novel metric to assess the predictive performance of methods, exclusively based on the chemical probing data commonly used for profiling RNA structures, avoiding any potential bias incorporated by computational predictions when using dot-bracket references. Our results provide a comprehensive comparative assessment of existing methodologies, and a novel and public benchmark resource to aid in the development and comparison of future approaches.

AVAILABILITY

Full source code and benchmark datasets are available at: https://github.com/sinc-lab/lncRNA-folding.

CONTACT

lbugnon@sinc.unl.edu.ar.

Review of machine learning methods for RNA secondary structure prediction

Secondary structure plays an important role in determining the function of noncoding RNAs. Hence, identifying RNA secondary structures is of great value to research. Computational prediction is a mainstream approach for predicting RNA secondary structure. Unfortunately, even though new methods have been proposed over the past 40 years, the performance of computational prediction methods has stagnated in the last decade. Recently, with the increasing availability of RNA structure data, new methods based on machine learning (ML) technologies, especially deep learning, have alleviated the issue. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of RNA secondary structure prediction methods based on ML technologies and a tabularized summary of the most important methods in this field. The current pending challenges in the field of RNA secondary structure prediction and future trends are also discussed.