Isoflurane for spinal anesthesia in the rat

Anesthetic protocols for urodynamic studies of the lower urinary tract in small rodents-A systematic review

Urodynamic studies in rats and mice are broadly used to examine pathomechnisms of disease and identify and test therapeutic targets. This review aims to highlight the effects of the anesthetics on the lower urinary tract function and seeks to identify protocols that allow recovery from anesthesia and repeated measurements while preserving the function which is being studied. All studies published in English language, which compared the data obtained under various types of anesthesia and the urodynamics performed in awake animals were included. It appears that urethane, an anesthetic recommended extensively for the investigation of lower urinary tract function, is appropriate for acute urodynamic studies only. Major advantages of urethane are its stability and ability to preserve the micturition reflex. Due to its toxicity and carcinogenicity, urethane anesthesia should not be used for recovery procedures. This review evaluated available alternatives including propofol, isoflurane and combinations of urethane, ketamine/xylazine, ketamine/medetomidine, and/or fentanyl/fluanisone/midazolam. Different effects have been demonstrated among these drugs on the urinary bladder, the urethral sphincter, as well as on their neuroregulation. The lowest incidence of adverse effects was observed with the use of a combination of ketamine and xylazine. Although the variations in the reviewed study protocols represent a limitation, we believe that this summary will help in standardizing and optimizing future experiments.

Isoflurane decreases substantia gelatinosa neuron excitability and synaptic transmission from periphery in the rat spinal dorsal horn

Isoflurane is an inhaled anesthetic, though its actions at the cellular level remain controversial. By using acute spinal cord slices from adult rats and the whole-cell recording technique, we found that aqueous isoflurane at the minimum alveolar concentration decreased postsynaptic neural excitability and enhanced membrane conductance, while suppressing glutamate release from presynaptic afferent onto substantia gelatinosa (lamina II) neurons in the dorsal horn. The data demonstrate that isoflurane modulates synaptic transmission from peripheral to the spinal cord via both pre- and postsynaptic effects and these actions may underlie its spinal anesthesia.

Subcutaneous L-tyrosine elicits cutaneous analgesia in response to local skin pinprick in rats

The purpose of the study was to estimate the ability of L-tyrosine to induce cutaneous analgesia and to investigate the interaction between L-tyrosine and the local anesthetic lidocaine. After subcutaneously injecting the rats with L-tyrosine and lidocaine in a dose-dependent manner, cutaneous analgesia (by blocking the cutaneous trunci muscle reflex-CTMR) was evaluated in response to the local pinprick. The drug-drug interaction was analyzed by using an isobolographic method. We showed that both L-tyrosine and lidocaine produced dose-dependent cutaneous analgesia. On the 50% effective dose (ED50) basis, the rank of drug potency was lidocaine (5.09 [4.88-5.38] μmol)>L-tyrosine (39.1 [36.5-41.8] μmol) (P<0.05). At the equipotent doses (ED25, ED50, and ED75), the duration of cutaneous analgesia caused by L-tyrosine lasted longer than that caused by lidocaine (P<0.01). Lidocaine co-administered with L-tyrosine exhibited an additive effect on infiltrative cutaneous analgesia. Our pre-clinical study demonstrated that L-tyrosine elicits the local/cutaneous analgesia, and the interaction between L-tyrosine and lidocaine is additive. L-tyrosine has a lower potency but much greater duration of cutaneous analgesia than lidocaine. Adding L-tyrosine to lidocaine preparations showed greater duration of cutaneous analgesia compared with lidocaine alone.

Promazine and chlorpromazine for prolonged spinal anesthesia in rats

Though promazine and chlorpromazine elicited cutaneous anesthesia, no study of spinal anesthesia with chlorpromazine and promazine has been reported. This study was to examine whether chlorpromazine and promazine produce spinal anesthesia. Using a rat model via intrathecal injection, we tested spinal blockades of motor function and nociception by promazine, chlorpromazine or bupivacaine, and so were dose-response studies and durations. We demonstrated that chlorpromazine and promazine elicited dose-dependent spinal blockades in motor function and nociception. On the 50% effective dose (ED(50)) basis, the rank of potency of these drugs was bupivacaine>promazine>chlorpromazine (P<0.05 for the differences). On an equipotent basis (25% effective dose [ED(25)], ED(50), and ED(75)), the block duration caused by chlorpromazine or promazine was longer than that caused by the long-lasting local anesthetic bupivacaine (P<0.01 for the differences). Chlorpromazine and promazine, as well as bupivacaine, showed longer duration of sensory block than that of motor block. Our data reported that intrathecal promazine and chlorpromazine with a more sensory-selective action over motor blockade had less potent and longer-lasting spinal blockades when compared with bupivacaine.