Lack of association between dopamine receptor D4 variable numbers of tandem repeats gene polymorphism and smoking

Dopamine D4 Receptor Gene Exon III VNTR Variant Influences Smoking Status in Turkish Population

Introduction

Dopaminergic gene variants may affect nicotine dependence through their possible impact on the dopamine reward pathway. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between the variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) variant in exon III of the Dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) gene and genetic predisposition of smoking status in a Turkish population.

Methods

We performed a study comparing 154 subjects as the smoker group, and 111 subjects as the non-smoker group. Genotyping for the DRD4 VNTR variant was performed using a PCR method.

Results

There was a significant difference between smoker and non-smoker groups regarding the distribution of the alleles and genotypes of the DRD4 gene (p=0.000, p=0.000, respectively). The 2R allele was higher in the non-smoker group compare to the smoker group (p=0.000). We found that the 2/7 and 4/9 genotypes were more common in smokers than non-smoker group (p=0.037, p=0.028, respectively) while 2/4 genotype was more prevalent in non-smokers than smokers (p=0.000). When the number of repeat alleles (48 bp) are accepted as short (S) if six or less, and as long (L) if seven or more, it was found that the frequency of S/S genotype of the DRD4 VNTR variant was lower in the smoker group and S/L genotype was higher in the smoker group (p=0.006, p=0.006, respectively). The subjects carrying the S/L genotype have a 2.25-fold increased risk for smoking than a non-smoker.

Conclusion

The results indicated that the subjects carrying DRD4 exon III VNTR S/L genotype have a risk for smoking status in a Turkish population.

The VNTR 48 bp Polymorphism in the DRD4 Gene Is Associated with Higher Tobacco Smoking in Male Mexican Mestizo Smokers with and without COPD

Cigarette smoking is influenced by nicotine’s effects on dopaminergic activity, which appear to be moderated by genetic variation, particularly a variable number tandem repeat (VNTR, 48 bp) polymorphism in the third exon of the dopamine receptor gene (DRD4). Smokers with the VNTR ≥7 repeats (long, L allele) report markedly increased participation in some smoking behaviors; hence, our aim was to evaluate the association of the L allele in Mexican Mestizo smokers with and without COPD. The DRD4 VNTR 48 bp was genotyped in 492 Mexican Mestizo smokers: 164 COPD patients (≥20 cigarettes per day, cpd), 164 heavy smokers without COPD (HS, ≥20 cpd) and 164 light smokers without COPD (LS, 1–10 cpd). In the dominant model analysis (SL + LL vs. SS), men in the COPD and HS groups showed a statistical difference compared to LS (p = 0.01, OR = 2.06, CI 95% 1.17–3.64 and p = 0.05, OR = 1.88, CI 95% 1.03–3.45, respectively). In addition, by clustering smokers >20 cpd (COPD + HS) and comparing with the LS group, we found an association with increased risk of higher tobacco smoking p = 0.01, OR = 1.99, CI 95% 1.18–3.34. In conclusion, the long allele (L) in the VNTR of the DRD4 gene is associated with the risk of presenting higher tobacco smoking in male Mexican Mestizo smokers.

Smoking-specific parenting and smoking onset in adolescence: the role of genes from the dopaminergic system (DRD2, DRD4, DAT1 genotypes)

Although only few studies have shown direct links between dopaminergic system genes and smoking onset, this does not rule out the effect of a gene-environment interaction on smoking onset. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the associations between smoking-specific parenting (i.e., frequency and quality of communication and house rules) and smoking onset while considering the potential moderating role of dopaminergic system genes (i.e., DRD2, DRD4, and DAT1 genotypes). Data from five annual waves of the 'Family and Health' project were used. At time 1, the sample comprised 365 non-smoking adolescents (200 younger adolescents, mean age = 13.31, SD = .48; 165 older adolescents, mean age = 15.19, SD = .57). Advanced longitudinal analyses were used (i.e., logistic regression analyses, (dual) latent growth curves, and cross-lagged path models). The results showed a direct effect of quality of communication on smoking onset. No direct effects were found for frequency of communication and house rules. Furthermore, no direct and moderating effects of the DRD2, DRD4, or DAT1 genotypes were found. In conclusion, the findings indicated that the effects of smoking-specific parenting on smoking are similar for adolescent carriers and non-carriers of the dopaminergic system genes.