Duloxetine ameliorates the impairment of diffuse noxious inhibitory control in rat models of peripheral neuropathic pain and knee osteoarthritis pain

Neuroinflammation in osteoarthritis: From pain to mood disorders

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of musculoskeletal disease, and its prevalence is increasing due to the aging of the population. Chronic pain is the most burdensome symptom of OA that significantly lowers patients' quality of life, also due to its frequent association with emotional comorbidities, such as anxiety and depression. In recent years, both chronic pain and mood alterations have been linked to the development of neuroinflammation in the peripheral nervous system, spinal cord and supraspinal brain areas. Thus, mechanisms at the basis of the development of the neuroinflammatory process may indicate promising targets for novel treatment for pain and affective comorbidities that accompany OA. In order to assess the key role of neuroinflammation in the maintenance of chronic pain and its potential involvement in development of psychiatric components, the monoiodoacetate (MIA) model of OA in rodents has been used and validated. In the present commentary article, we aim to summarize up-to-date results achieved in this experimental model of OA, focusing on glia activation and cytokine production in the sciatic nerve, dorsal root ganglia (DRGs), spinal cord and brain areas. The association of a neuroinflammatory state with the development of pain and anxiety- and depression-like behaviors are discussed. Results suggest that cells and molecules involved in neuroinflammation may represent novel targets for innovative pharmacological treatments of OA pain and mood comorbidities.

The antidepressant drugs vortioxetine and duloxetine differentially and sex-dependently affect animal well-being, cognitive performance, cardiac redox status and histology in a model of osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis represents a leading cause of disability with limited treatment options. Furthermore, it is frequently accompanied by cardiovascular and cognitive disorders, which can be exacerbated by osteoarthritis or drugs used for its treatment. Here, we examined the behavioral and cardiac effects of the novel antidepressant vortioxetine in an osteoarthritis model, and compared them to duloxetine (an established osteoarthritis treatment). Osteoarthritis was induced in male and female rats with an intraarticular sodium-monoiodoacetate injection. Antidepressants were orally administered for 28 days following induction. During this period the acetone, burrowing and novel-object-recognition tests (NORT) were used to assess the effects of antidepressants on pain hypersensitivity (cold allodynia), animal well-being and cognitive performance, respectively. Following behavioral experiments, heart muscles were collected for assessment of redox status/histology. Antidepressant treatment dose-dependently reduced cold allodynia in rats with osteoarthritis. Duloxetine (but not vortioxetine) depressed burrowing behavior in osteoarthritic rats in a dose-related manner. Osteoarthritis induction reduced cognitive performance in NORT, which was dose-dependently alleviated by vortioxetine (duloxetine improved performance only in female rats). Furthermore, duloxetine (but not vortioxetine) increased oxidative stress parameters in the heart muscles of female (but not male) rats and induced histological changes in cardiomyocytes indicative of oxidative damage. Vortioxetine displayed comparable efficacy to duloxetine in reducing pain hypersensitivity. Furthermore, vortioxetine (unlike duloxetine) dose-dependently improved cognitive performance and had no adverse effect on burrowing behavior (animal surrogate of well-being) and cardiac redox status/histology. Our results indicate that vortioxetine could be a potential osteoarthritis treatment (with better characteristics compared to duloxetine).

Common Cholinergic, Noradrenergic, and Serotonergic Drugs Do Not Block VNS-Mediated Plasticity

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) delivered during motor rehabilitation enhances recovery from a wide array of neurological injuries and was recently approved by the U.S. FDA for chronic stroke. The benefits of VNS result from precisely timed engagement of neuromodulatory networks during rehabilitative training, which promotes synaptic plasticity in networks activated by rehabilitation. Previous studies demonstrate that lesions that deplete these neuromodulatory networks block VNS-mediated plasticity and accompanying enhancement of recovery. There is a great deal of interest in determining whether commonly prescribed pharmacological interventions that influence these neuromodulatory networks would similarly impair VNS effects. Here, we sought to directly test the effects of three common pharmaceuticals at clinically relevant doses that target neuromodulatory pathways on VNS-mediated plasticity in rats. To do so, rats were trained on a behavioral task in which jaw movement during chewing was paired with VNS and received daily injections of either oxybutynin, a cholinergic antagonist, prazosin, an adrenergic antagonist, duloxetine, a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, or saline. After the final behavioral session, intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) was used to evaluate reorganization of motor cortex representations, with area of cortex eliciting jaw movement as the primary outcome. In animals that received control saline injections, VNS paired with training significantly increased the movement representation of the jaw compared to naïve animals, consistent with previous studies. Similarly, none of the drugs tested blocked this VNS-dependent reorganization of motor cortex. The present results provide direct evidence that these common pharmaceuticals, when used at clinically relevant doses, are unlikely to adversely impact the efficacy of VNS therapy.

Application of PLGA nanoparticles to enhance the action of duloxetine on microglia in neuropathic pain

Duloxetine (DLX) is a selective serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) used for the treatment of pain, but it has been reported to show side effects in 10-20% of patients. Its analgesic efficacy in central pain is putatively related to its influence on descending inhibitory neuronal pathways. However, DLX can also affect the activation of microglia. This study was performed to investigate whether PLGA nanoparticles (NPs), which are expected to enhance targeting to microglia, can improve the analgesic efficacy and limit the side effects of DLX. PLGA NPs encapsulating a low dose of DLX (DLX NPs) were synthesized and characterized and their localization was determined. The analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of DLX NPs were evaluated in a spinal nerve ligation (SNL)-induced neuropathic pain model. The analgesic effect of DLX lasted for only a few hours and disappeared within 1 day. However, DLX NPs alleviated mechanical allodynia, and the effect was maintained for 1 week. DLX NPs were localized to the spinal microglia and suppressed microglial activation, phosphorylation of p38/NF-κB-mediated pathways and the production of inflammatory cytokines in the spinal dorsal horn of SNL rats. We demonstrated that DLX NPs can provide a prolonged analgesic effect by enhanced targeting of microglia. Our observations imply that DLX delivery through nanoparticle encapsulation allows drug repositioning with a prolonged analgesic effect, and reduces the potential side effects of abuse and overdose.

Developments in Understanding Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Controls: Pharmacological Evidence from Pre-Clinical Research

Bulbospinal pathways regulate nociceptive processing, and inhibitory modulation of nociception can be achieved via the activity of diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC), a unique descending pathway activated upon application of a conditioning stimulus (CS). Numerous studies have investigated the effects of varied pharmacological systems on the expression status of a) DNIC (as measured in anaesthetised animals) and b) the descending control of nociception (DCN), a surrogate measure of DNIC-like effects in conscious animals. However, the complexity of the underlying circuitry that governs initiation of a top-down inhibitory response in reaction to a CS, coupled with the methodological limitations associated with using pharmacological tools for its study, has often obscured the exact role(s) of a given drug. In this literature review, we discuss the pharmacological manipulation interrogation strategies that have hitherto been used to examine the functionality of DNIC and DCN. Discreet administration of a substance in the spinal cord or brain is considered in the context of action on one of four hypothetical systems that underlie the functionality of DNIC/DCN, where interpreting the outcome is often complicated by overlapping qualities. Systemic pharmacological modulation of DNIC/DCN is also discussed despite the fact that the precise location of drug action(s) cannot be pinpointed. Chiefly, modulation of the noradrenergic, serotonergic and opioidergic transmission systems impacts DNIC/DCN in a manner that relates to drug class, route of administration and health/disease state implicated. The advent of increasingly sophisticated interrogation tools will expedite our full understanding of the circuitries that modulate naturally occurring pain-inhibiting pathways.

Fight fire with fire: Neurobiology of capsaicin-induced analgesia for chronic pain

Capsaicin, the pungent ingredient in chili peppers, produces intense burning pain in humans. Capsaicin selectively activates the transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1), which is enriched in nociceptive primary afferents, and underpins the mechanism for capsaicin-induced burning pain. Paradoxically, capsaicin has long been used as an analgesic. The development of topical patches and injectable formulations containing capsaicin has led to application in clinical settings to treat chronic pain conditions, such as neuropathic pain and the potential to treat osteoarthritis. More detailed determination of the neurobiological mechanisms of capsaicin-induced analgesia should provide the logical rationale for capsaicin therapy and help to overcome the treatment's limitations, which include individual differences in treatment outcome and procedural discomfort. Low concentrations of capsaicin induce short-term defunctionalization of nociceptor terminals. This phenomenon is reversible within hours and, hence, likely does not account for the clinical benefit. By contrast, high concentrations of capsaicin lead to long-term defunctionalization mediated by the ablation of TRPV1-expressing afferent terminals, resulting in long-lasting analgesia persisting for several months. Recent studies have shown that capsaicin-induced Ca²⁺/calpain-mediated ablation of axonal terminals is necessary to produce long-lasting analgesia in a mouse model of neuropathic pain. In combination with calpain, axonal mitochondrial dysfunction and microtubule disorganization may also contribute to the longer-term effects of capsaicin. The analgesic effects subside over time in association with the regeneration of the ablated afferent terminals. Further determination of the neurobiological mechanisms of capsaicin-induced analgesia should lead to more efficacious non-opioidergic analgesic options with fewer adverse side effects.