Identifying individuals with autism spectrum disorder based on the principal components of whole-brain phase synchrony

Automated diagnosis of autism with artificial intelligence: State of the art

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) represents a panel of conditions that begin during the developmental period and result in impairments of personal, social, academic, or occupational functioning. Early diagnosis is directly related to a better prognosis. Unfortunately, the diagnosis of ASD requires a long and exhausting subjective process. We aimed to review the state of the art for automated autism diagnosis and recognition in this research. In February 2022, we searched multiple databases and sources of gray literature for eligible studies. We used an adapted version of the QUADAS-2 tool to assess the risk of bias in the studies. A brief report of the methods and results of each study is presented. Data were synthesized for each modality separately using the Split Component Synthesis (SCS) method. We assessed heterogeneity using the I 2 statistics and evaluated publication bias using trim and fill tests combined with ln DOR. Confidence in cumulative evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach for diagnostic studies. We included 344 studies from 186,020 participants (51,129 are estimated to be unique) for nine different modalities in this review, from which 232 reported sufficient data for meta-analysis. The area under the curve was in the range of 0.71-0.90 for all the modalities. The studies on EEG data provided the best accuracy, with the area under the curve ranging between 0.85 and 0.93. We found that the literature is rife with bias and methodological/reporting flaws. Recommendations are provided for future research to provide better studies and fill in the current knowledge gaps.

Comprehensive exploration of multi-modal and multi-branch imaging markers for autism diagnosis and interpretation: insights from an advanced deep learning model

Autism spectrum disorder is a complex neurodevelopmental condition with diverse genetic and brain involvement. Despite magnetic resonance imaging advances, autism spectrum disorder diagnosis and understanding its neurogenetic factors remain challenging. We propose a dual-branch graph neural network that effectively extracts and fuses features from bimodalities, achieving 73.9% diagnostic accuracy. To explain the mechanism distinguishing autism spectrum disorder from healthy controls, we establish a perturbation model for brain imaging markers and perform a neuro-transcriptomic joint analysis using partial least squares regression and enrichment to identify potential genetic biomarkers. The perturbation model identifies brain imaging markers related to structural magnetic resonance imaging in the frontal, temporal, parietal, and occipital lobes, while functional magnetic resonance imaging markers primarily reside in the frontal, temporal, occipital lobes, and cerebellum. The neuro-transcriptomic joint analysis highlights genes associated with biological processes, such as "presynapse," "behavior," and "modulation of chemical synaptic transmission" in autism spectrum disorder's brain development. Different magnetic resonance imaging modalities offer complementary information for autism spectrum disorder diagnosis. Our dual-branch graph neural network achieves high accuracy and identifies abnormal brain regions and the neuro-transcriptomic analysis uncovers important genetic biomarkers. Overall, our study presents an effective approach for assisting in autism spectrum disorder diagnosis and identifying genetic biomarkers, showing potential for enhancing the diagnosis and treatment of this condition.

Do it the transformer way: A comprehensive review of brain and vision transformers for autism spectrum disorder diagnosis and classification

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a condition observed in children who display abnormal patterns of interaction, behavior, and communication with others. Despite extensive research efforts, the underlying causes of this neurodevelopmental disorder and its biomarkers remain unknown. However, advancements in artificial intelligence and machine learning have improved clinicians' ability to diagnose ASD. This review paper investigates various MRI modalities to identify distinct features that characterize individuals with ASD compared to typical control subjects. The review then moves on to explore deep learning models for ASD diagnosis, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs), autoencoders, graph convolutions, attention networks, and other models. CNNs and their variations are particularly effective due to their capacity to learn structured image representations and identify reliable biomarkers for brain disorders. Computer vision transformers often employ CNN architectures with transfer learning techniques like fine-tuning and layer freezing to enhance image classification performance, surpassing traditional machine learning models. This review paper contributes in three main ways. Firstly, it provides a comprehensive overview of a recommended architecture for using vision transformers in the systematic ASD diagnostic process. To this end, the paper investigates various pre-trained vision architectures such as VGG, ResNet, Inception, InceptionResNet, DenseNet, and Swin models that were fine-tuned for ASD diagnosis and classification. Secondly, it discusses the vision transformers of 2020th like BiT, ViT, MobileViT, and ConvNeXt, and applying transfer learning methods in relation to their prospective practicality in ASD classification. Thirdly, it explores brain transformers that are pre-trained on medically rich data and MRI neuroimaging datasets. The paper recommends a systematic architecture for ASD diagnosis using brain transformers. It also reviews recently developed brain transformer-based models, such as METAFormer, Com-BrainTF, Brain Network, ST-Transformer, STCAL, BolT, and BrainFormer, discussing their deep transfer learning architectures and results in ASD detection. Additionally, the paper summarizes and discusses brain-related transformers for various brain disorders, such as MSGTN, STAGIN, and MedTransformer, in relation to their potential usefulness in ASD. The study suggests that developing specialized transformer-based models, following the success of natural language processing (NLP), can offer new directions for image classification problems in ASD brain biomarkers learning and classification. By incorporating the attention mechanism, treating MRI modalities as sequence prediction tasks trained on brain disorder classification problems, and fine-tuned on ASD datasets, brain transformers can show a great promise in ASD diagnosis.

Sampling inequalities affect generalization of neuroimaging-based diagnostic classifiers in psychiatry

BACKGROUND

The development of machine learning models for aiding in the diagnosis of mental disorder is recognized as a significant breakthrough in the field of psychiatry. However, clinical practice of such models remains a challenge, with poor generalizability being a major limitation.

METHODS

Here, we conducted a pre-registered meta-research assessment on neuroimaging-based models in the psychiatric literature, quantitatively examining global and regional sampling issues over recent decades, from a view that has been relatively underexplored. A total of 476 studies (n = 118,137) were included in the current assessment. Based on these findings, we built a comprehensive 5-star rating system to quantitatively evaluate the quality of existing machine learning models for psychiatric diagnoses.

RESULTS

A global sampling inequality in these models was revealed quantitatively (sampling Gini coefficient (G) = 0.81, p < .01), varying across different countries (regions) (e.g., China, G = 0.47; the USA, G = 0.58; Germany, G = 0.78; the UK, G = 0.87). Furthermore, the severity of this sampling inequality was significantly predicted by national economic levels (β =  - 2.75, p < .001, R²_adj = 0.40; r =  - .84, 95% CI: - .41 to - .97), and was plausibly predictable for model performance, with higher sampling inequality for reporting higher classification accuracy. Further analyses showed that lack of independent testing (84.24% of models, 95% CI: 81.0-87.5%), improper cross-validation (51.68% of models, 95% CI: 47.2-56.2%), and poor technical transparency (87.8% of models, 95% CI: 84.9-90.8%)/availability (80.88% of models, 95% CI: 77.3-84.4%) are prevailing in current diagnostic classifiers despite improvements over time. Relating to these observations, model performances were found decreased in studies with independent cross-country sampling validations (all p < .001, BF₁₀ > 15). In light of this, we proposed a purpose-built quantitative assessment checklist, which demonstrated that the overall ratings of these models increased by publication year but were negatively associated with model performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Together, improving sampling economic equality and hence the quality of machine learning models may be a crucial facet to plausibly translating neuroimaging-based diagnostic classifiers into clinical practice.

Evaluation of Risk of Bias in Neuroimaging-Based Artificial Intelligence Models for Psychiatric Diagnosis: A Systematic Review

IMPORTANCE

Neuroimaging-based artificial intelligence (AI) diagnostic models have proliferated in psychiatry. However, their clinical applicability and reporting quality (ie, feasibility) for clinical practice have not been systematically evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically assess the risk of bias (ROB) and reporting quality of neuroimaging-based AI models for psychiatric diagnosis.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

PubMed was searched for peer-reviewed, full-length articles published between January 1, 1990, and March 16, 2022. Studies aimed at developing or validating neuroimaging-based AI models for clinical diagnosis of psychiatric disorders were included. Reference lists were further searched for suitable original studies. Data extraction followed the CHARMS (Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modeling Studies) and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. A closed-loop cross-sequential design was used for quality control. The PROBAST (Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool) and modified CLEAR (Checklist for Evaluation of Image-Based Artificial Intelligence Reports) benchmarks were used to systematically evaluate ROB and reporting quality.

FINDINGS

A total of 517 studies presenting 555 AI models were included and evaluated. Of these models, 461 (83.1%; 95% CI, 80.0%-86.2%) were rated as having a high overall ROB based on the PROBAST. The ROB was particular high in the analysis domain, including inadequate sample size (398 of 555 models [71.7%; 95% CI, 68.0%-75.6%]), poor model performance examination (with 100% of models lacking calibration examination), and lack of handling data complexity (550 of 555 models [99.1%; 95% CI, 98.3%-99.9%]). None of the AI models was perceived to be applicable to clinical practices. Overall reporting completeness (ie, number of reported items/number of total items) for the AI models was 61.2% (95% CI, 60.6%-61.8%), and the completeness was poorest for the technical assessment domain with 39.9% (95% CI, 38.8%-41.1%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This systematic review found that the clinical applicability and feasibility of neuroimaging-based AI models for psychiatric diagnosis were challenged by a high ROB and poor reporting quality. Particularly in the analysis domain, ROB in AI diagnostic models should be addressed before clinical application.

Technologies to support the diagnosis and/or treatment of neurodevelopmental disorders: A systematic review

In recent years, there has been a great interest in utilizing technology in mental health research. The rapid technological development has encouraged researchers to apply technology as a part of a diagnostic process or treatment of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (NDDs). With the large number of studies being published comes an urgent need to inform clinicians and researchers about the latest advances in this field. Here, we methodically explore and summarize findings from studies published between August 2019 and February 2022. A search strategy led to the identification of 4108 records from PubMed and APA PsycInfo databases. 221 quantitative studies were included, covering a wide range of technologies used for diagnosis and/or treatment of NDDs, with the biggest focus on Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). The most popular technologies included machine learning, functional magnetic resonance imaging, electroencephalogram, magnetic resonance imaging, and neurofeedback. The results of the review indicate that technology-based diagnosis and intervention for NDD population is promising. However, given a high risk of bias of many studies, more high-quality research is needed.

Classifying ASD based on time-series fMRI using spatial-temporal transformer

As the prevalence of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) increases globally, more and more patients need to receive timely diagnosis and treatment to alleviate their suffering. However, the current diagnosis method of ASD still adopts the subjective symptom-based criteria through clinical observation, which is time-consuming and costly. In recent years, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) neuroimaging techniques have emerged to facilitate the identification of potential biomarkers for diagnosing ASD. In this study, we developed a deep learning framework named spatial-temporal Transformer (ST-Transformer) to distinguish ASD subjects from typical controls based on fMRI data. Specifically, a linear spatial-temporal multi-headed attention unit is proposed to obtain the spatial and temporal representation of fMRI data. Moreover, a Gaussian GAN-based data balancing method is introduced to solve the data unbalance problem in real-world ASD datasets for subtype ASD diagnosis. Our proposed ST-Transformer is evaluated on a large cohort of subjects from two independent datasets (ABIDE I and ABIDE II) and achieves robust accuracies of 71.0% and 70.6%, respectively. Compared with state-of-the-art methods, our results demonstrate competitive performance in ASD diagnosis.

Acquisition time for functional near-infrared spectroscopy resting-state functional connectivity in assessing autism

SIGNIFICANCE

Resting state functional connectivity (RSFC) can be used to assess autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Measuring RSFC usually takes 5 to 10 min, during which children with ASD may have difficulty keeping their heads motionless. Therefore, a short acquisition time for RSFC would make clinical implementation more feasible.

AIM

To find a suitable acquisition time necessary for measuring RSFC with functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) for the differentiation between children with ASD and typically developing (TD) children.

APPROACH

We used fNIRS to record the spontaneous hemodynamic fluctuations from the bilateral temporal lobes of 25 children with ASD and 22 TD children. The recorded signals were truncated into several segments with different time windows, and then the homotopic RSFC was computed for each of these segments and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

We observed even in a very short time duration of 0.5 min, the RSFC had already existed a significant difference between the two groups, and 2.0 min might be the minimal time required for measuring RSFC for accurate differentiation between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The fNIRS-RSFC acquired even in a short time, e.g., 2.0 min, might be a reliable feature for the differentiation between children with ASD and TD children.

Can Autism Be Diagnosed with Artificial Intelligence? A Narrative Review

Radiomics with deep learning models have become popular in computer-aided diagnosis and have outperformed human experts on many clinical tasks. Specifically, radiomic models based on artificial intelligence (AI) are using medical data (i.e., images, molecular data, clinical variables, etc.) for predicting clinical tasks such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD). In this review, we summarized and discussed the radiomic techniques used for ASD analysis. Currently, the limited radiomic work of ASD is related to the variation of morphological features of brain thickness that is different from texture analysis. These techniques are based on imaging shape features that can be used with predictive models for predicting ASD. This review explores the progress of ASD-based radiomics with a brief description of ASD and the current non-invasive technique used to classify between ASD and healthy control (HC) subjects. With AI, new radiomic models using the deep learning techniques will be also described. To consider the texture analysis with deep CNNs, more investigations are suggested to be integrated with additional validation steps on various MRI sites.