Delayed rupture of a basilar artery aneurysm treated with coils: case report and review of the literature

Characteristics of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms with Delayed Rupture Following Coil Embolization: Case Series and Review of the Literature

Objective

Long-term clinical outcomes including delayed rupture of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) after coil embolization (CE) remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the precise timing of re-treatment for recanalized UIAs before rupture.

Methods

From February 2012 to June 2020, a total of 197 patients with 207 UIAs underwent CE in our institution and were followed up for more than 6 months. The follow-up period, as well as morphological changes from treatment to recanalization, regrowth, and rupture, was retrospectively analyzed. Delayed rupture was defined as a rupture that occurred more than 1 month after CE.

Results

The average length of follow-up was 48.7 months. Three of 207 UIAs (1.45%) ruptured after CE. The aneurysm locations were the middle cerebral artery (MCA), anterior communicating artery (AcomA), and internal carotid artery-posterior communicating artery (ICA-Pcomm). The annual rupture rate after CE was 0.36%. Immediately after the first CE, treated aneurysms were graded according to the Modified Raymond-Roy Classification with class II for MCA aneurysms and class IIIb for AcomA and ICA-Pcomm aneurysms. The ICA-Pcomm aneurysm was treated with two additional CEs and was finally graded as class I. In all cases, DSA or MRA before aneurysm rupture showed recanalization and regrowth of aneurysms. The average periods from final embolization to regrowth and from regrowth to rupture were 54.3 months (±16.8) and 2.3 months (±0.9), respectively.

Conclusion

UIAs with recanalization and regrowth after CE should undergo re-treatment as early as possible.

Microsurgical treatment of basilar tip aneurysms: is it still acceptable?

OBJECTIVE

Basilar tip aneurysms (BTAs) have a complex anatomy, making them difficult to treat. We describe our surgical results for BTAs.

METHODS

From 2004 to 2015 (12 years), a total of 25 small BTAs and two giant BTAs were treated in the Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo.

RESULTS

In 23 patients harboring aneurysms positioned anteriorly or straight, all aneurysms were clipped (complete exclusion in all on follow-up angiography). In two patients with posteriorly positioned aneurysms, there was residual neck. All patients submitted to surgical treatment of small aneurysms presented with late Glasgow Outcome Scale scores of 4 or 5. Two patients with giant aneurysms died.

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment of these lesions may be accomplished with quite high success rates and low morbidity.

The Medina Embolic Device: early clinical experience from a single center

Objective

To report our initial experience with the Medina Embolic Device (MED) in unruptured intracranial aneurysms either as sole treatment or in conjunction with additional devices.

Methods

15 consecutive patients (6 women, 9 men) with unruptured aneurysms were treated between September 2015 and April 2016. The aneurysm fundus measured at least 5 mm. We evaluated the angiographic appearances of treated aneurysms at the end of the procedure and at follow-up, the clinical status, complications, and requirement for adjunctive devices.

Results

The MED was successfully deployed in all but one case and adjunctive devices were required in 10 cases. Aneurysm locations were middle cerebral artery bifurcation (n=3), internal carotid artery (ICA) bifurcation (n=1), supraclinoid ICA (n=5), posterior communicating artery (n=1), anterior communicating artery (n=2), cavernous ICA (n=2), distal basilar sidewall (n=1), basilar tip (n=1). Three patients had complications although none could be attributed to the MED. Immediate angiographic results were modified Raymond-Roy classification (mRRC) I=1, mRRC II=5, mRRC IIIa=3, mRRC IIIb=5, and one patient showed contrast stasis within the fundus of the aneurysm. Follow-up angiography was available in 11 patients, with four showing complete aneurysm exclusion, six with stable remnants and one patient with an enlarging neck remnant.

Conclusions

The MED represents a major step forward in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. It can result in rapid exclusion of an aneurysm from the circulation and has a good safety profile. We believe that the true value of the MED will be in combining its use with adjunctive devices such as endoluminal flow diverters that will result in rapid aneurysmal exclusion.

Rebleeding of a neck remnant in a case of ruptured aneurysm initially treated with coils

The follow-up and indications for retreatment of intracranial aneurysms treated endovascularly are still a matter of debate. We report the case of a patient with a ruptured aneurysm who was treated twice with coils and regularly followed up with MRI/MR angiography which showed a neck remnant that finally rebled.

Rebleeding of a neck remnant in a case of ruptured aneurysm initially treated with coils

The follow-up and indications for retreatment of intracranial aneurysms treated endovascularly are still a matter of debate. We report the case of a patient with a ruptured aneurysm who was treated twice with coils and regularly followed up with MRI/MR angiography which showed a neck remnant that finally rebled.