Interest of local intra-arterial fibrinolysis in acute central retinal artery occlusion: Clinical experience in 16 patients

Retina-Brain Homology: The Correlation Between Ophthalmic or Retinal Artery Occlusion and Ischemic Stroke

The retina's similar structure and function to the brain make it a unique visual "window" for studying cerebral disorders. Ophthalmic artery occlusion (OAO) or retinal artery occlusion (RAO) is a severe ophthalmic emergency that significantly affects visual acuity. Studies have demonstrated that patients with OAO or RAO face a notably higher risk of future acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, ophthalmologists often overlook multidisciplinary approach involving the neurologist, to evaluate the risk of AIS and devise clinical treatment strategies for patients with OAO or RAO. Unlike the successful use of thrombolysis in AIS, the application of thrombolysis for OAO or RAO remains limited and controversial due to insufficient reliable evidence. In this review, we aim to summarize the anatomical and functional connections between the retina and the brain, and the clinical connection between OAO or RAO and AIS, compare and review recent advances in the effectiveness and safety of intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolysis therapy in patients with OAO or RAO, and discuss future research directions for OAO or RAO. Our goal is to advance the development of multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment strategies for the disease, as well as to establish expedited pathways or thrombolysis guidelines for vascular intervention.

Improved visual outcomes of central retinal artery occlusion with local intra-arterial fibrinolysis beyond the conventional time window

Local intra-arterial fibrinolysis (LIF) is a promising therapeutic option for CRAO. However, the narrow time window of 6 h has greatly limited the application of LIF. In this study, we explored the efficacy of LIF beyond the conventional time windows and compared the result with conservative therapy. This prospective study included 179 CRAO patients with baseline visual acuity (VA) ≤ 20/400 treated at Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. The mean time from vision loss to presentation was 5.5 days. 58 patients received conventional standard therapy (CST) alone.121 patients underwent LIF. Main outcome was VA improvement ≥ 0.3 logMAR. Secondary outcome was a favorable VA outcome of 20/200 or better. Logistic regressions were performed to identify predictors of visual improvement. 43% patients in the LIF group experienced VA improvement versus 19% with CST (P = 0.002). LIF was associated with 4.0-fold higher likelihood of visual improvement compared to CST (P = 0.001). Poor baseline VA (light perception or no light perception) and shortened prothrombin time (PT) were associated with greater chance of visual improvement with LIF. However, LIF showed no significant advantage over CST for favorable VA outcomes. No major complications occurred. LIF beyond the therapeutic time window improved vision in functionally blind CRAO patients and showed better efficacy when compared with CST. PT may be a potential predictor of visual outcome after LIF. Our findings could complement existing time-based treatment guidelines and potentially allow for personalized decisions on the use of LIF beyond time windows.

Thrombolysis for central retinal artery occlusion: An individual participant-level meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether thrombolysis improves outcomes in non-arteritic central retinal artery occlusion (naCRAO) is uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the rate of visual recovery after intra-venous thrombolysis (IVT) or intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) administration of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) or urokinase among patients with naCRAO and explore the parameters affecting the final visual acuity (VA).

AIM

We systematically searched six databases. Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) and VA of ⩾20/100 were used to quantify visual recovery. To explore the role of other factors on visual recovery, we defined two models for studies with aggregated data (designs 1 and 2) and 16 models for individual participant data (IPD, models 1-16).

SUMMARY OF REVIEW

We included data from 771 patients out of 72 publications in nine languages. Visual improvement for ⩾0.3 logMAR was reported in 74.3% of patients who received IVT-tPA within 4.5 h (CI: 60.9-86.0%; unadjusted rate: 73.2%) and 60.0% of those who received IAT-tPA within 24 h (CI: 49.1-70.5%; unadjusted rate: 59.6%). VA of ⩾20/100 was observed among 39.0% of patients after IVT-tPA within 4.5 h and 21.9% of those with IAT-tPA within 24 h. IPD models highlighted the association between improved visual outcomes and VA at presentation, at least 2 weeks follow-up before reporting the final VA, antiplatelet therapy, and shorter symptom onset to thrombolysis window.

CONCLUSION

Early thrombolytic therapy with tPA is associated with enhanced visual recovery in naCRAO. Future studies should refine the optimum time window for thrombolysis in naCRAO.

Efficacy and safety of intra-arterial thrombolysis in patients with central retinal artery occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) in patients with central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO).

METHODS

PubMed and EMBASE were searched for potentially eligible studies that reported IAT in CRAO patients from inception to Nov 8, 2021. Standard mean difference (SMD) was pooled to compare visual acuity (VA) at baseline with final in IAT patients. The rates and odds ratios (OR) were meta-analyzed to compare VA improvement in IAT with non-IAT patients, stratified to different times from onset to procedure, different definitions of VA improvement, and three CRAO stages. Adverse effects were recorded.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were included, enrolling 507 CRAO patients who received IAT and 296 CRAO patients who did not. VA was significantly improved from baseline to final VA in IAT patients (SMD [LogMAR] 0.70, 95% CI [0.51, 0.90]). VA improvement rate was higher in IAT patients than that in non-IAT (56% vs 32%, OR 3.55, 95%CI [1.74, 7.24]), with greater OR in IAT within 6 h from onset to procedure (OR 4.60, 95%CI [1.24, 16.99]) than that beyond 6 h (OR 3.36, 95%CI [1.43, 7.85]). The benefit remained consistent when VA improvement was defined as ≥ 3 lines on the Snellen chart (OR 4.68, 95%CI [2.10, 10.41]) and was even greater when CRAO was incomplete. Five patients had a symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and 21 patients had ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack after IAT.

CONCLUSIONS

IAT treatment has certain potential in ameliorating VA in CRAO patients, which should be balanced against cerebral complications.

A review of the management of central retinal artery occlusion

Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO), the ocular analog of a cerebral stroke, is an ophthalmic emergency. The visual prognosis for overall spontaneous visual recovery in CRAO is low. Furthermore, the risk of future ischemic heart disease and cerebral stroke is increased due to the underlying atherosclerotic risk factors. There is currently no guideline-endorsed treatment for CRAO. This review will describe the anatomy, pathophysiology, epidemiology, and clinical features of CRAO, and investigate the current and future management strategies.

Efficacy of Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis for Acute Central Retinal Artery Occlusion: A Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The best management strategy still remains strong controversy for acute nonarteritic central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO). We thus performed a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy of intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) for visual improvement according to different times from symptom onset.

METHODS

We searched EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science for relevant studies assessing efficiency of IAT in patients with CRAO compared with standard therapy. Fixed-effects and random-effects models were performed.

RESULTS

Five eligible studies including 459 patients with acute CRAO were pooled in the meta-analysis. In all, 219 (47.7%) received IAT, and the mean time from symptom onset to IAT was 13 h. The pooled analysis demonstrates odds ratio (OR) for the procedure of IAT and any visual improvement to be 1.520 (95% confidence intervals [CIs] 1.258-1.837; p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses further indicated that the CRAO patients who received IAT achieved any visual improvement more easily within 6 h from symptom onset (OR = 1.703, 95% CI 1.219-2.381; p = 0.002), but not those beyond 6 h (OR = 1.260, 95% CI 0.973-1.632; p = 0.080).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis of available published data supports IAT to be an alternative treatment option for CRAO patients within 6 h from symptom onset.

Thrombolysis for Central Retinal Artery Occlusion in 2020: Time Is Vision!

BACKGROUND

Acute nonarteritic central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is an eye stroke with poor visual prognosis and no proven effective therapies. Given advances in acute stroke care, thrombolysis in CRAO merits critical re-examination. We review the evidence for intravenous (IV) and intra-arterial (IA) tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in CRAO management.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane online databases were systematically searched from 1960 to present, for reports of acute IV or IA therapy with alteplase or tenecteplase in nonarteritic CRAO patients. English language case reports, case series, interventional studies, or randomized controlled trials were included. The study type, age and number of subjects, the regimen administered, the time since symptoms' onset, visual outcome, and safety reports were noted.

RESULTS

Use of IV thrombolysis with alteplase was reported in 7 articles encompassing 111 patients, with 54% of them receiving IV tPA within 4.5 hours of symptom onset, and none developing symptomatic intracranial or ocular hemorrhage. Six studies described IA alteplase administration, with only 18 of a total of 134 patients (13.4%) treated within the first 6 hours after visual loss. The reported adverse events were minimal. Visual outcomes post-IV and IA thrombolysis were heterogeneously reported; however, most studies demonstrated benefit of the respective reperfusion therapies when administered very early. We found no reports of tenecteplase administration in CRAO.

CONCLUSIONS

In 2020, nonarteritic CRAO patients should theoretically receive the same thrombolytic therapies, in the same time window, as patients with acute cerebral ischemia. Eye stroke and teleeye stroke code encounters must include an expert ophthalmologic evaluation to confirm the correct diagnosis and to evaluate for ocular signs that may help guide IV tPA administration or IA management. Future research should focus on developing feasible retinal penumbra imaging studies that, similar to cerebral tissue viability or perfusion imaging, can be incorporated into the thrombolysis decision-making algorithm.

Management of Acute Central Retinal Artery Occlusion, a "Retinal Stroke": An Institutional Series and Literature Review

OBJECTIVES

Acute central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is an ophthalmologic emergency that often results in permanent vision loss. Over 25% are associated with acute cerebral ischemia. In the absence of existing Level I treatment options, this study aims to examine institutional practice patterns and review the literature to develop a formalized approach to the treatment of CRAO in the era of ischemic stroke protocols.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective review of institutional practices in the workup and treatment of patients diagnosed with acute non-arteritic (NA) CRAO at a single center from January 2017 to August 2020.

RESULTS

Of 91 patients managed for acute NA-CRAO, 62.6% were male and average age was 66.4 years. Only 20.9% of patients presented within 4 h of symptom onset. 12.1% of patients had evidence of acute stroke on MRI, and 27.5% had ipsilateral internal carotid artery stenosis >50%. Half (52.7%) did not receive any acute treatment for CRAO, excluding antiplatelet/anticoagulation. 48.5% of patients undergoing acute medical treatment had improved visual acuity compared to 29.4% without treatment (p=0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of clear protocol for the management of NA-CRAO. While not reaching statistical significance, our experience mirrors the literature with patients undergoing medical treatment demonstrating improved visual acuity over those without treatment. Given the presence of acute ischemic stroke, carotid disease, and/or stroke risk factors in over 25% of patients with CRAO, multidisciplinary involvement and modern stroke algorithms should be considered for this disease.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Retinal Artery Occlusion: Nationally Representative Data

Background and Purpose- There are few large studies examining comorbidities, outcomes, and acute interventions for patients with retinal artery occlusion (RAO). RAO shares pathophysiology with acute ischemic stroke (AIS); direct comparison may inform emergent treatment, evaluation, and secondary prevention. Methods- The National Readmissions Database contains data on ≈50% of US hospitalizations from 2013 to 2015. We used International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes to identify and compare index RAO and AIS admissions, comorbidities, and interventions and Clinical Comorbidity Software codes to identify readmissions causes, using survey-weighted methods when possible. Cumulative risk of all-cause readmission after RAO ≤1 year was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results- Among 4871 RAO and 1 239 963 AIS admissions, patients with RAO were less likely (P<0.0001) than patients with AIS to have diabetes mellitus (RAO, 24.3% versus AIS, 36.8%), congestive heart failure (9.1% versus 14.8%), atrial fibrillation (15.5% versus 25.2%), or hypertension (62.2% versus 67.6%) but more likely to have valvular disease (13.3% versus 10.5%) and tobacco usage (38.6% versus 32.9%). In RAO admissions, thrombolysis was administered in 2.9% (5.8% in central RAO subgroup, versus 8.0% of AIS), therapeutic anterior chamber paracentesis in 1.0%, thrombectomy in none; 1.4% received carotid endarterectomy during index admission, 1.6% within 30 days. Nearly 1 in 10 patients with RAO were readmitted within 30 days and were more than twice as likely as patients with AIS to be readmitted for dysrhythmia or endocarditis. Readmission for stroke after RAO was the highest within the first 150 days after index admission, and risk was higher in central RAO than in branch RAO. Conclusions- Patients with RAO had high prevalence of many stroke risk factors, particularly valvular disease and smoking, which can be addressed to minimize subsequent risk. Despite less baseline atrial fibrillation, RAO patients were more likely to be readmitted for atrial fibrillation/dysrhythmias. A variety of interventions was administered. AIS risk is the highest shortly after RAO, emphasizing the importance of urgent, thorough neurovascular evaluation.

Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis for Central Retinal Artery Occlusion

Introduction

Central retinal artery occlusion is an ophthalmic emergency which typically causes acute, painless visual loss. Several conservative treatment options are practiced with little benefit. Thrombolysis as a therapeutic option has gathered interest as well as controversy. This paper aims at reviewing the relevant literature to assess the efficacy and safety of intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute central retinal artery occlusion.

Methods

A review of the literature was conducted. Keywords included “intra-arterial thrombolysis” or “intra-arterial fibrinolysis” in combination with “central retinal artery occlusion” or “CRAO”. A Cochrane Database search was performed for randomised control trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses using the same keywords.

Results

Twenty-eight studies were identified which included case reports, case series, case-control studies and 1 randomised control trial: the European Assessment Group for Lysis in the Eye Study. Improvement in vision was measured using different methods and at different time points. The findings of these studies generally favour an effect towards intra-arterial thrombolysis however there are many limitations. Additionally, the European Assessment Group for Lysis in the Eye Study showed lack of effect in intra-arterial thrombolysis vs conservative measures.

Conclusion

Current evidence is not sufficient to recommend intra-arterial thrombolysis due to the variability of visual improvement within retrospective studies, heterogeneity in treatment regimens between studies and adverse effects. Intra-arterial thrombolysis may have a role in patients presenting early, particularly if they have monocular vision, after discussion of the risks and benefits. Further high-quality trials assessing the clinical efficacy of intra-arterial thrombolysis may shed more light on this topic.

Acute retinal arterial ischemia

Acute retinal arterial ischemia, which includes transient monocular vision loss (TMVL), branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO), central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) and ophthalmic artery occlusion (OAO), is most commonly the consequence of an embolic phenomenon from the ipsilateral carotid artery, heart or aortic arch, leading to partial or complete occlusion of the central retinal artery (CRA) or its branches. Acute retinal arterial ischemia is the ocular equivalent of acute cerebral ischemia and is an ophthalmic and medical emergency. Patients with acute retinal arterial ischemia are at a high risk of having further vascular events, such as subsequent strokes and myocardial infarctions (MIs). Therefore, prompt diagnosis and urgent referral to appropriate specialists and centers is necessary for further work-up (such as brain magnetic resonance imaging with diffusion weighted imaging, vascular imaging, and cardiac monitoring and imaging) and potential treatment of an urgent etiology (e.g., carotid dissection or critical carotid artery stenosis). Since there are no proven, effective treatments to improve visual outcome following permanent retinal arterial ischemia (central or branch retinal artery occlusion), treatment must focus on secondary prevention measures to decrease the likelihood of subsequent ischemic events.

Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis for Acute Central Retinal Artery Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and purpose

Acute central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is a serious ophthalmologic emergency that may result in monocular blindness. To date, studies evaluating intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) have not shown a definitive clinical benefit. We have conducted a systematic review with a meta-analysis to effectively evaluate this treatment option.

Methods

A systematic literature search was focused on studies containing five or more patients undergoing IAT that included a control group treated with standard therapy. Pooled meta-analysis was performed.

Results

Five retrospective controlled studies and one randomized clinical trial were identified satisfying all inclusion criteria resulting in the analysis of 236 patients treated with IAT and 255 patients treated with ST. A pooled fixed effects analysis resulted in an estimated odds ratio of 2.52, 95% CI (1.69, 3.77) (P < 0.0001) favoring IAT.

Conclusion

IAT is a promising therapeutic option for CRAO with great potential. Further randomized trials are needed to establish a significant benefit and ensure the safety of the intervention.

Visual Improvement after Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis for Central Retinal Artery Occlusion Does Not Correlate with Time to Treatment

BACKGROUND

Intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) for the treatment of acute central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) has demonstrated variable results for improving visual acuity and remains controversial. Despite limited evidence, time from symptom onset to thrombolysis is believed to be an important factor in predicting visual improvement after IAT.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted and individual subject level data were extracted from relevant studies. From these, a secondary analysis was performed. Initial and final logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) scores were either abstracted directly from relevant studies or converted from provided Snellen chart scores. Change in logMAR scores was used to determine overall treatment efficacy.

RESULTS

Data on 118 patients undergoing IAT from five studies were evaluated. Median logMAR improvement in visual acuity was -0.400 (p < 0.001). There was no significant association between logMAR change and time to treatment when time (hours) was described as a continuous variable or described categorically [0-4, 4-8, 8-12, 12+ h; or 0-6, 6-12, 12+ h].

CONCLUSION

The visual improvement observed in this series had no relationship to the time from symptom onset to treatment with IAT. This suggests that patients may have the possibility for improvement even with delayed presentation to the neurointerventionalist. Other factors, such as completeness of retinal occlusion, may be more important than time to treatment. Additional studies to determine optimal patient selection criteria for the endovascular treatment of acute CRAO are needed.