Comparison of electrodiagnosis, neurosonography and MR neurography in localization of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow

Electrodiagnosis and Ultrasound Imaging for Ulnar Nerve Entrapment at the Elbow: A Review

Entrapment neuropathy of the ulnar nerve at the elbow, the so-called cubital tunnel syndrome, is the second most frequent focal mononeuropathy after carpal tunnel syndrome in adults. Currently, there is a pressing need to identify cost-effective biomarkers and procedures capable of accurately detecting alterations in ulnar nerve structural and functional integrity. Established electrophysiological techniques, such as motor and sensory nerve conduction studies, along with needle electromyography of specific muscles, represent the gold standard for ulnar nerve electrodiagnosis. Concurrently, the introduction of neuromuscular ultrasound and its integration into electromyographic laboratories has significantly impacted structural diagnosis and the precise localization of ulnar nerve pathology over the past two decades. In this review, our objective is to summarize the current knowledge on both classical and advanced diagnostic methods utilized in clinical neurophysiology laboratories. We aim to provide a synthesis of modern electrodiagnostic and neurosonographic techniques, with a particular emphasis on easily attainable, clinically relevant parameters.

Ultrasound of the Ulnar Nerve: A Pictorial Review: Part 2: Pathological Ultrasound Findings

This is the second part of a two-part article in which we focus on the ultrasound (US) appearance of the pathological ulnar nerve (UN) and its main branches. Findings in a wide range of our pathological cases are presented with high-resolution US images obtained with the latest-generation US machines and transducers.

Diffusion Tensor Imaging of Peripheral Nerves: Current Status and New Developments

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is an emerging technique for peripheral nerve imaging that can provide information about the microstructural organization and connectivity of these nerves and complement the information gained from anatomical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences. With DTI it is possible to reconstruct nerve pathways and visualize the three-dimensional trajectory of nerve fibers, as in nerve tractography. More importantly, DTI allows for quantitative evaluation of peripheral nerves by the calculation of several important parameters that offer insight into the functional status of a nerve. Thus DTI has a high potential to add value to the work-up of peripheral nerve pathologies, although it is more technically demanding. Peripheral nerves pose specific challenges to DTI due to their small diameter and DTI's spatial resolution, contrast, location, and inherent field inhomogeneities when imaging certain anatomical locations. Numerous efforts are underway to resolve these technical challenges and thus enable wider acceptance of DTI in peripheral nerve MRI.

Meta-analysis of the normal diffusion tensor imaging values of the peripheral nerves in the upper limb

Peripheral neuropathy affects 1 in 10 adults over the age of 40 years. Given the absence of a reliable diagnostic test for peripheral neuropathy, there has been a surge of research into diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) because it characterises nerve microstructure and provides reproducible proxy measures of myelination, axon diameter, fibre density and organisation. Before researchers and clinicians can reliably use diffusion tensor imaging to assess the 'health' of the major nerves of the upper limb, we must understand the "normal" range of values and how they vary with experimental conditions. We searched PubMed, Embase, medRxiv and bioRxiv for studies which reported the findings of DTI of the upper limb in healthy adults. Four review authors independently triple extracted data. Using the meta suite of Stata 17, we estimated the normal fractional anisotropy (FA) and diffusivity (mean, MD; radial, RD; axial AD) values of the median, radial and ulnar nerve in the arm, elbow and forearm. Using meta-regression, we explored how DTI metrics varied with age and experimental conditions. We included 20 studies reporting data from 391 limbs, belonging to 346 adults (189 males and 154 females, ~ 1.2 M:1F) of mean age 34 years (median 31, range 20-80). In the arm, there was no difference in the FA (pooled mean 0.59 mm²/s [95% CI 0.57, 0.62]; I² 98%) or MD (pooled mean 1.13 × 10^-3 mm²/s [95% CI 1.08, 1.18]; I² 99%) of the median, radial and ulnar nerves. Around the elbow, the ulnar nerve had a 12% lower FA than the median and radial nerves (95% CI - 0.25, 0.00) and significantly higher MD, RD and AD. In the forearm, the FA (pooled mean 0.55 [95% CI 0.59, 0.64]; I² 96%) and MD (pooled mean 1.03 × 10^-3 mm²/s [95% CI 0.94, 1.12]; I² 99%) of the three nerves were similar. Multivariable meta regression showed that the b-value, TE, TR, spatial resolution and age of the subject were clinically important moderators of DTI parameters in peripheral nerves. We show that subject age, as well as the b-value, TE, TR and spatial resolution are important moderators of DTI metrics from healthy nerves in the adult upper limb. The normal ranges shown here may inform future clinical and research studies.