1
|
Pérez-Millan A, Lal-Trehan Estrada UM, Falgàs N, Guillén N, Borrego-Écija S, Juncà-Parella J, Bosch B, Tort-Merino A, Sarto J, Augé JM, Antonell A, Bargalló N, Ruiz-García R, Naranjo L, Balasa M, Lladó A, Sala-Llonch R, Sánchez-Valle R. The Cortical Asymmetry Index for subtyping dementia patients. Eur Radiol 2025:10.1007/s00330-025-11400-y. [PMID: 39934339 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-025-11400-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2024] [Revised: 12/19/2024] [Accepted: 01/02/2025] [Indexed: 02/13/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) usually shows more asymmetric atrophy patterns than Alzheimer's disease (AD). We aim to quantify this asymmetry to differentiate FTD, AD, and FTD subtypes. METHODS We studied T1-MRI scans, including FTD (different phenotypes), AD, and healthy controls (CTR). We defined the Cortical Asymmetry Index (CAI) using measures based on a metric derived from information theory with the cortical thickness measures. Some participants had additional follow-up MRIs, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), or plasma measures. We analysed differences at cross-sectional and longitudinal levels. We then clustered FTD and AD participants based on the CAI values and studied the patients' fluid biomarker characteristics within each cluster. RESULTS A total of 101 FTD patients (64 ± 8 years, 53 men), 230 AD patients (65 ± 10 years, 84 men), and 173 CTR (59 ± 15 years, 67 men) were studied. CAI differentiated FTD, AD, and CTR. It also distinguished the semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA) from the other FTD phenotypes. In FTD, the CAI increased over time. The cluster analysis identified two subgroups within FTD, characterised by different neurofilament-light (NfL) levels, and two subgroups within AD, with different plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) levels. In AD, CAI correlated with GFAP and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE); in FTD, the CAI was associated with NfL levels. CONCLUSIONS The proposed method quantifies asymmetries previously described visually. The CAI could define clinically and biologically meaningful disease subgroups in the differential diagnosis of AD and FTD and its subtypes. CAI could also be of interest in tracking disease progression in FTD. KEY POINTS Question There is a need to find quantitative metrics from MRI that can identify disease subgroups, and that could be useful for diagnosis and tracking. Findings We propose a Cortical Asymmetry Index that differentiates Alzheimer's disease (AD) from Frontotemporal dementia (FTD), distinguishes FTD subtypes, correlates with NFL and GFAP levels, and monitors FTD progression. Clinical relevance Our proposed index holds the potential to support clinical applications for diagnosis and disease tracking in AD and FTD, using a quantitative summary metric from MRI data. It also contributes to the understanding of these diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnès Pérez-Millan
- Alzheimer's Disease and Other Cognitive Disorders Group, Service of Neurology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Fundació Recerca Clínic Barcelona-IDIBAPS, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
- Institut de Neurociències, University of Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Biomedicine, University of Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Uma Maria Lal-Trehan Estrada
- Institut de Neurociències, University of Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Biomedicine, University of Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Neus Falgàs
- Alzheimer's Disease and Other Cognitive Disorders Group, Service of Neurology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Fundació Recerca Clínic Barcelona-IDIBAPS, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Núria Guillén
- Alzheimer's Disease and Other Cognitive Disorders Group, Service of Neurology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Fundació Recerca Clínic Barcelona-IDIBAPS, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sergi Borrego-Écija
- Alzheimer's Disease and Other Cognitive Disorders Group, Service of Neurology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Fundació Recerca Clínic Barcelona-IDIBAPS, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Juncà-Parella
- Alzheimer's Disease and Other Cognitive Disorders Group, Service of Neurology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Fundació Recerca Clínic Barcelona-IDIBAPS, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Beatriz Bosch
- Alzheimer's Disease and Other Cognitive Disorders Group, Service of Neurology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Fundació Recerca Clínic Barcelona-IDIBAPS, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Adrià Tort-Merino
- Alzheimer's Disease and Other Cognitive Disorders Group, Service of Neurology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Fundació Recerca Clínic Barcelona-IDIBAPS, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Sarto
- Alzheimer's Disease and Other Cognitive Disorders Group, Service of Neurology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Fundació Recerca Clínic Barcelona-IDIBAPS, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep Maria Augé
- Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Antonell
- Alzheimer's Disease and Other Cognitive Disorders Group, Service of Neurology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Fundació Recerca Clínic Barcelona-IDIBAPS, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Núria Bargalló
- Image Diagnostic Centre, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER de Salud Mental, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Magnetic Resonance Image Core Facility, IDIBAPS, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Raquel Ruiz-García
- Immunology Service, Biomedical Diagnostic Center, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Naranjo
- Immunology Service, Biomedical Diagnostic Center, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mircea Balasa
- Alzheimer's Disease and Other Cognitive Disorders Group, Service of Neurology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Fundació Recerca Clínic Barcelona-IDIBAPS, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Albert Lladó
- Alzheimer's Disease and Other Cognitive Disorders Group, Service of Neurology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Fundació Recerca Clínic Barcelona-IDIBAPS, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
- Institut de Neurociències, University of Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Roser Sala-Llonch
- Institut de Neurociències, University of Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Biomedicine, University of Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), Barcelona, Spain
- Institute of Biomedical Research August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Raquel Sánchez-Valle
- Alzheimer's Disease and Other Cognitive Disorders Group, Service of Neurology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Fundació Recerca Clínic Barcelona-IDIBAPS, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
- Institut de Neurociències, University of Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
- Departament de Medicina, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Antonioni A, Raho EM, Granieri E, Koch G. Frontotemporal dementia. How to deal with its diagnostic complexity? Expert Rev Neurother 2025:1-35. [PMID: 39911129 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2025.2461758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2024] [Revised: 01/27/2025] [Accepted: 01/29/2025] [Indexed: 02/07/2025]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) encompasses a group of heterogeneous neurodegenerative disorders. Aside from genetic cases, its diagnosis is challenging, particularly in the early stages when symptoms are ambiguous, and structural neuroimaging does not reveal characteristic patterns. AREAS COVERED The authors performed a comprehensive literature search through MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to gather evidence to aid the diagnostic process for suspected FTD patients, particularly in early phases, even in sporadic cases, ranging from established to promising tools. Blood-based biomarkers might help identify very early neuropathological stages and guide further evaluations. Subsequently, neurophysiological measures reflecting functional changes in cortical excitatory/inhibitory circuits, along with functional neuroimaging assessing brain network, connectivity, metabolism, and perfusion alterations, could detect specific changes associated to FTD even decades before symptom onset. As the neuropathological process advances, cognitive-behavioral profiles and atrophy patterns emerge, distinguishing specific FTD subtypes. EXPERT OPINION Emerging disease-modifying therapies require early patient enrollment. Therefore, a diagnostic paradigm shift is needed - from relying on typical cognitive and neuroimaging profiles of advanced cases to widely applicable biomarkers, primarily fluid biomarkers, and, subsequently, neurophysiological and functional neuroimaging biomarkers where appropriate. Additionally, exploring subjective complaints and behavioral changes detected by home-based technologies might be crucial for early diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annibale Antonioni
- Doctoral Program in Translational Neurosciences and Neurotechnologies, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, FE, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, FE, Italy
| | - Emanuela Maria Raho
- Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, FE, Italy
| | - Enrico Granieri
- Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, FE, Italy
| | - Giacomo Koch
- Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, FE, Italy
- Center for Translational Neurophysiology of Speech and Communication (CTNSC), Italian Institute of Technology (IIT), Ferrara, FE, Italy
- Non Invasive Brain Stimulation Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Santa Lucia, Roma, RM, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hüper L, Steinacker P, Polyakova M, Mueller K, Godulla J, Herzig S, Danek A, Engel A, Diehl‐Schmid J, Classen J, Fassbender K, Fliessbach K, Jahn H, Kassubek J, Kornhuber J, Landwehrmeyer B, Lauer M, Obrig H, Oeckl P, Prudlo J, Saur D, Anderl‐Straub S, Synofzik M, Wagner M, Wiltfang J, Winkelmann J, Volk AE, FTLD Consortium Germany, Huppertz H, Otto M, Schroeter ML. Neurofilaments and progranulin are related to atrophy in frontotemporal lobar degeneration - A transdiagnostic study cross-validating atrophy and fluid biomarkers. Alzheimers Dement 2024; 20:4461-4475. [PMID: 38865340 PMCID: PMC11247715 DOI: 10.1002/alz.13863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) encompasses behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal syndrome/degeneration, and primary progressive aphasias (PPAs). We cross-validated fluid biomarkers and neuroimaging. METHODS Seven fluid biomarkers from cerebrospinal fluid and serum were related to atrophy in 428 participants including these FTLD subtypes, logopenic variant PPA (lvPPA), Alzheimer's disease (AD), and healthy subjects. Atrophy was assessed by structural magnetic resonance imaging and atlas-based volumetry. RESULTS FTLD subtypes, lvPPA, and AD showed specific profiles for neurofilament light chain, phosphorylated heavy chain, tau, phospho-tau, amyloid beta1-42 from serum/cerebrospinal fluid, and brain atrophy. Neurofilaments related to regional atrophy in bvFTD, whereas progranulin was associated with atrophy in semantic variant PPA. Ubiquitin showed no effects. DISCUSSION Results specify biomarker and atrophy patterns in FTLD and AD supporting differential diagnosis. They identify neurofilaments and progranulin in interaction with structural imaging as promising candidates for monitoring disease progression and therapy. HIGHLIGHTS Study cross-validated neuroimaging and fluid biomarkers in dementia. Five kinds of frontotemporal lobar degeneration and two variants of Alzheimer's disease. Study identifies disease-specific fluid biomarker and atrophy profiles. Fluid biomarkers and atrophy interact in a disease-specific way. Neurofilaments and progranulin are proposed as biomarkers for diagnosis and therapy.
Collapse
|
4
|
Boutoleau-Bretonnière C, Thomas-Anterion C, Deruet AL, Lamy E, El Haj M. Beauty and Paintings: Aesthetic Experience in Patients with Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia When Viewing Abstract and Concrete Paintings. Brain Sci 2024; 14:500. [PMID: 38790477 PMCID: PMC11118895 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14050500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Revised: 05/11/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
We assessed the aesthetic experience of patients with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) to understand their ability to experience feelings of the sublime and to be moved when viewing paintings. We exposed patients with bvFTD and control participants to concrete and abstract paintings and asked them how moved they were by these paintings and whether the latter were beautiful or ugly. Patients with bvFTD declared being less moved than control participants by both abstract and concrete paintings. No significant differences were observed between abstract and concrete paintings in both patients with bvFTD and control participants. Patients with bvFTD provided fewer "beautiful" and more "ugly" responses than controls for both abstract and concrete paintings. No significant differences in terms of "beautiful" and "ugly" responses were observed between abstract and concrete paintings in both patients with bvFTD and control participants. These findings suggest disturbances in the basic affective experience of patients with bvFTD when they are exposed to paintings, as well as a bias in their ability to judge the aesthetic quality of paintings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Boutoleau-Bretonnière
- INSERM, CMRR Neurologie, CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, CIC 04, 44000 Nantes, France
- Laboratoire de Psychologie des Pays de la Loire, Nantes Université, Université Angers, LPPL, UR 4638, 44000 Nantes, France
| | - Catherine Thomas-Anterion
- Laboratoire d’Etudes des Mécanismes Cognitifs, EA 3082, Université Lyon 2, 69500 Bron, France;
- Plein-Ciel, 69007 Lyon, France
| | - Anne-Laure Deruet
- INSERM, CMRR Neurologie, CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, CIC 04, 44000 Nantes, France
| | - Estelle Lamy
- INSERM, CMRR Neurologie, CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, CIC 04, 44000 Nantes, France
| | - Mohamad El Haj
- Laboratoire de Psychologie des Pays de la Loire, Nantes Université, Université Angers, LPPL, UR 4638, 44000 Nantes, France
- Clinical Gerontology Department, CHU Nantes, Bd Jacques Monod, 44093 Nantes, France
- Institut Universitaire de France, 75005 Paris, France
- LPPL—Laboratoire de Psychologie des Pays de la Loire, Faculté de Psychologie, Université de Nantes, Chemin de la Censive du Tertre, BP 81227, CEDEX 3, 44312 Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ogonowski N, Santamaria-Garcia H, Baez S, Lopez A, Laserna A, Garcia-Cifuentes E, Ayala-Ramirez P, Zarante I, Suarez-Obando F, Reyes P, Kauffman M, Cochran N, Schulte M, Sirkis DW, Spina S, Yokoyama JS, Miller BL, Kosik KS, Matallana D, Ibáñez A. Frontotemporal dementia presentation in patients with heterozygous p.H157Y variant of TREM2. J Med Genet 2023; 60:894-904. [PMID: 36813542 PMCID: PMC10447405 DOI: 10.1136/jmg-2022-108627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cell 2 (TREM2) is a major regulator of neuroinflammatory processes in neurodegeneration. To date, the p.H157Y variant of TREM2 has been reported only in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Here, we report three patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) from three unrelated families with heterozygous p.H157Y variant of TREM2: two patients from Colombian families (study 1) and a third Mexican origin case from the USA (study 2). METHODS To determine if the p.H157Y variant might be associated with a specific FTD presentation, we compared in each study the cases with age-matched, sex-matched and education-matched groups-a healthy control group (HC) and a group with FTD with neither TREM2 mutations nor family antecedents (Ng-FTD and Ng-FTD-MND). RESULTS The two Colombian cases presented with early behavioural changes, greater impairments in general cognition and executive function compared with both HC and Ng-FTD groups. These patients also exhibited brain atrophy in areas characteristic of FTD. Furthermore, TREM2 cases showed increased atrophy compared with Ng-FTD in frontal, temporal, parietal, precuneus, basal ganglia, parahippocampal/hippocampal and cerebellar regions. The Mexican case presented with FTD and motor neuron disease (MND), showing grey matter reduction in basal ganglia and thalamus, and extensive TDP-43 type B pathology. CONCLUSION In all TREM2 cases, multiple atrophy peaks overlapped with the maximum peaks of TREM2 gene expression in crucial brain regions including frontal, temporal, thalamic and basal ganglia areas. These results provide the first report of an FTD presentation potentially associated with the p.H157Y variant with exacerbated neurocognitive impairments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Ogonowski
- Latin American Institute for Brain Health (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibanez, Adolfo Ibanez University, Santiago, Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile
| | - Hernando Santamaria-Garcia
- Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI), University California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Ph.D Program of Neuroscience, Bogotá, Colombia
- Hospital Universitario San Ignacio. Centro de Memoria y Cognición Intellectus, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | - Andrea Lopez
- Hospital Universitario de la Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogota, Colombia
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Andrés Laserna
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia
- University of Rochester Medical Center. Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine. of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Rochester, NY, New York, USA
| | - Elkin Garcia-Cifuentes
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia
- Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Paola Ayala-Ramirez
- Human Genomics Institute, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia
| | | | | | - Pablo Reyes
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Marcelo Kauffman
- Hospital General de Agudos Jose Maria Ramos Mejia Consultorio y Laboratorio de Neurogenetica, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Universidad Austral. IIMT-FCB. Conicet, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | - Daniel W Sirkis
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Weil Institute of Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Salvatore Spina
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jennifer S Yokoyama
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Weil Institute of Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Kenneth S Kosik
- University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, USA
| | - Diana Matallana
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia
- Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fe, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Agustín Ibáñez
- Latin American Institute for Brain Health (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibanez, Adolfo Ibanez University, Santiago, Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile
- Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI), Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Cognitive Neuroscience Center (CNC), Universidad de San Andres & CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van Engelen MPE, Verfaillie SCJ, Dols A, Oudega ML, Boellaard R, Golla SSV, den Hollander M, Ossenkoppele R, Scheltens P, van Berckel BNM, Pijnenburg YAL, Vijverberg EGB. Altered brain metabolism in frontotemporal dementia and psychiatric disorders: involvement of the anterior cingulate cortex. EJNMMI Res 2023; 13:71. [PMID: 37493827 PMCID: PMC10371967 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-023-01020-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Behavioural symptoms and frontotemporal hypometabolism overlap between behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) and primary psychiatric disorders (PPD), hampering diagnostic distinction. Voxel-wise comparisons of brain metabolism might identify specific frontotemporal-(hypo)metabolic regions between bvFTD and PPD. We investigated brain metabolism in bvFTD and PPD and its relationship with behavioural symptoms, social cognition, severity of depressive symptoms and cognitive functioning. RESULTS Compared to controls, bvFTD showed decreased metabolism in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) (p < 0.001), orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), temporal pole, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) and caudate, whereas PPD showed no hypometabolism. Compared to PPD, bvFTD showed decreased metabolism in the dACC (p < 0.001, p < 0.05FWE), insula, Broca's area, caudate, thalamus, OFC and temporal cortex (p < 0.001), whereas PPD showed decreased metabolism in the motor cortex (p < 0.001). Across bvFTD and PPD, decreased metabolism in the temporal cortex (p < 0.001, p < 0.05FWE), dACC and frontal cortex was associated with worse social cognition. Decreased metabolism in the dlPFC was associated with compulsiveness (p < 0.001). Across bvFTD, PPD and controls, decreased metabolism in the PFC and motor cortex was associated with executive dysfunctioning (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate subtle but distinct metabolic patterns in bvFTD and PPD, most strongly in the dACC. The degree of frontotemporal and cingulate hypometabolism was related to impaired social cognition, compulsiveness and executive dysfunctioning. Our findings suggest that the dACC might be an important region to differentiate between bvFTD and PPD but needs further validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Paule E van Engelen
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Sander C J Verfaillie
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GGZ inGeest Specialized Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annemieke Dols
- Department of Psychiatry, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mardien L Oudega
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GGZ inGeest Specialized Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Mood, Anxiety, Psychosis, Sleep & Stress Program, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marijke den Hollander
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- EQT Life Sciences Partners, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yolande A L Pijnenburg
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Everard G B Vijverberg
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Prajjwal P, Shashank S, Al-Ezzi SMS, Sharma B, Aubourg O, Kaushish A, Marsool MDM, Nagre A, Asharaf S. Frontotemporal dementia: Addressing the scattered harbingers of genetics and its relationship with glucose metabolism, bipolar disorder, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Dis Mon 2023; 69:101545. [PMID: 36925418 DOI: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2023.101545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/15/2023]
Abstract
Frontotemporal Dementia, also known by the name Pick's disease, is a rare form of dementia that can run for several generations. The two key characteristics are argyrophilic, spherical intraneuronal inclusions, which most frequently impact the frontal and temporal poles, and localized cortical atrophy (Pick bodies). Although personality decline and memory loss are frequently more severe than the visuospatial and apraxia disorders that are common in Alzheimer's disease, clinical overlap with other non-Alzheimer degenerative disorders is being increasingly recognized. The limbic system, which includes the hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, and amygdala, typically experiences the greatest levels of neuronal loss and degeneration. In the hippocampus's dentate fascia, several Pick bodies are frequently seen. Leukoencephalopathy and inflated cortical neurons are less specific symptoms (Pick cells). In this paper, we review the factors leading to Picks disease along with its pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, imaging, treatment, prognosis, and a comprehensive discussion on the same. We have also discussed the relationship of frontotemporal dementia with glucose metabolism, bipolar disorder, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, all of which are emerging fields of interest and need more studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priyadarshi Prajjwal
- Department of Neurology, Bharati Vidyapeeth University Medical College, Pune, India
| | - Singam Shashank
- Department of Neurology, Shadan Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India
| | | | - Bhavya Sharma
- Medical Student, Department of Medicine, Medical College, Baroda, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
| | - Obed Aubourg
- Doctor of Medicine, University of Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Akshita Kaushish
- MSc Biochemistry, Dolphin Institute of Biomedical and Natural Sciences, Dehradun, India
| | | | - Abhijit Nagre
- Medical Student, Department of Medicine, Topiwala National Medical College, Mumbai, India
| | - Shahnaz Asharaf
- Department of Neurology, Travancore Medical College, Kollam, Kerala, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Risacher SL, Apostolova LG. Neuroimaging in Dementia. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2023; 29:219-254. [PMID: 36795879 DOI: 10.1212/con.0000000000001248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Neurodegenerative diseases are significant health concerns with regard to morbidity and social and economic hardship around the world. This review describes the state of the field of neuroimaging measures as biomarkers for detection and diagnosis of both slowly progressing and rapidly progressing neurodegenerative diseases, specifically Alzheimer disease, vascular cognitive impairment, dementia with Lewy bodies or Parkinson disease dementia, frontotemporal lobar degeneration spectrum disorders, and prion-related diseases. It briefly discusses findings in these diseases in studies using MRI and metabolic and molecular-based imaging (eg, positron emission tomography [PET] and single-photon emission computerized tomography [SPECT]). LATEST DEVELOPMENTS Neuroimaging studies with MRI and PET have demonstrated differential patterns of brain atrophy and hypometabolism in different neurodegenerative disorders, which can be useful in differential diagnoses. Advanced MRI sequences, such as diffusion-based imaging, and functional MRI (fMRI) provide important information about underlying biological changes in dementia and new directions for development of novel measures for future clinical use. Finally, advancements in molecular imaging allow clinicians and researchers to visualize dementia-related proteinopathies and neurotransmitter levels. ESSENTIAL POINTS Diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases is primarily based on symptomatology, although the development of in vivo neuroimaging and fluid biomarkers is changing the scope of clinical diagnosis, as well as the research into these devastating diseases. This article will help inform the reader about the current state of neuroimaging in neurodegenerative diseases, as well as how these tools might be used for differential diagnoses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon L Risacher
- Address correspondence to Dr Shannon L. Risacher, 355 W 16th St, Indianapolis, IN 46202,
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Brain PET adds value in diagnosing neurodegenerative disorders, especially frontotemporal dementia (FTD) due to its syndromic presentation that overlaps with a variety of other neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders. 18F-FDG-PET has improved sensitivity and specificity compared with structural MR imaging, with optimal diagnostic results achieved when both techniques are utilized. PET demonstrates superior sensitivity compared with SPECT for FTD diagnosis that is primarily a supplement to other imaging and clinical evaluations. Tau-PET and amyloid-PET primary use in FTD diagnosis is differentiation from Alzheimer disease, although these methods are limited mainly to research settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Ward
- Division of Neuroradiology, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in Saint. Louis, Saint Louis, MO 63130, USA
| | - Maria Ly
- Division of Neuroradiology, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in Saint. Louis, Saint Louis, MO 63130, USA
| | - Cyrus A. Raji
- Division of Neuroradiology, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in Saint. Louis, Saint Louis, MO 63130, USA,Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, 4525 Scott Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA,Corresponding author. Division of Neuroradiology, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in Saint. Louis, Saint Louis, MO 63130.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lampe L, Huppertz HJ, Anderl-Straub S, Albrecht F, Ballarini T, Bisenius S, Mueller K, Niehaus S, Fassbender K, Fliessbach K, Jahn H, Kornhuber J, Lauer M, Prudlo J, Schneider A, Synofzik M, Kassubek J, Danek A, Villringer A, Diehl-Schmid J, Otto M, Schroeter ML. Multiclass prediction of different dementia syndromes based on multi-centric volumetric MRI imaging. Neuroimage Clin 2023; 37:103320. [PMID: 36623349 PMCID: PMC9850041 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Dementia syndromes can be difficult to diagnose. We aimed at building a classifier for multiple dementia syndromes using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS Atlas-based volumetry was performed on T1-weighted MRI data of 426 patients and 51 controls from the multi-centric German Research Consortium of Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration including patients with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, Alzheimer's disease, the three subtypes of primary progressive aphasia, i.e., semantic, logopenic and nonfluent-agrammatic variant, and the atypical parkinsonian syndromes progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal syndrome. Support vector machine classification was used to classify each patient group against controls (binary classification) and all seven diagnostic groups against each other in a multi-syndrome classifier (multiclass classification). RESULTS The binary classification models reached high prediction accuracies between 71 and 95% with a chance level of 50%. Feature importance reflected disease-specific atrophy patterns. The multi-syndrome model reached accuracies of more than three times higher than chance level but was far from 100%. Multi-syndrome model performance was not homogenous across dementia syndromes, with better performance in syndromes characterized by regionally specific atrophy patterns. Whereas diseases generally could be classified vs controls more correctly with increasing severity and duration, differentiation between diseases was optimal in disease-specific windows of severity and duration. DISCUSSION Results suggest that automated methods applied to MR imaging data can support physicians in diagnosis of dementia syndromes. It is particularly relevant for orphan diseases beside frequent syndromes such as Alzheimer's disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonie Lampe
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology, University Clinic Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | | - Franziska Albrecht
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Tommaso Ballarini
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Sandrine Bisenius
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Karsten Mueller
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Sebastian Niehaus
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany; Institute for Medical Informatics and Biometry, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Klaus Fliessbach
- Clinic for Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry, University of Bonn, and German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
| | - Holger Jahn
- Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Johannes Kornhuber
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Martin Lauer
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Prudlo
- Department of Neurology, University of Rostock, and DZNE, Rostock, Germany
| | - Anja Schneider
- Clinic for Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry, University of Bonn, and German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Goettingen, Germany
| | - Matthis Synofzik
- Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Centre for Neurology & Hertie-lnstitute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tuebingen, Germany & DZNE, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Jan Kassubek
- Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Germany
| | - Adrian Danek
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, München, Germany
| | - Arno Villringer
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology, University Clinic Leipzig, Germany
| | - Janine Diehl-Schmid
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Munich, Germany
| | - Markus Otto
- Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Germany; Department of Neurology, University of Halle, Germany
| | - Matthias L Schroeter
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology, University Clinic Leipzig, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Snowden JS. Changing perspectives on frontotemporal dementia: A review. J Neuropsychol 2022. [DOI: 10.1111/jnp.12297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Revised: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Julie S. Snowden
- Cerebral Function Unit, Manchester Centre for Neurosciences Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust Salford UK
- Division of Neuroscience & Experimental Psychology School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester Manchester UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pizzini FB, Conti E, Bianchetti A, Splendiani A, Fusco D, Caranci F, Bozzao A, Landi F, Gandolfo N, Farina L, Miele V, Trabucchi M, Frisoni GB, Bastianello S. Radiological assessment of dementia: the Italian inter-society consensus for a practical and clinically oriented guide to image acquisition, evaluation, and reporting. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2022; 127:998-1022. [PMID: 36070064 PMCID: PMC9508052 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-022-01534-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiological evaluation of dementia is expected to increase more and more in routine practice due to both the primary role of neuroimaging in the diagnostic pathway and the increasing incidence of the disease. Despite this, radiologists often do not follow a disease-oriented approach to image interpretation, for several reasons, leading to reports of limited value to clinicians. In our work, through an intersocietal consensus on the main mandatory knowledge about dementia, we proposed a disease-oriented protocol to optimize and standardize the acquisition/evaluation/interpretation and reporting of radiological images. Our main purpose is to provide a practical guideline for the radiologist to help increase the effectiveness of interdisciplinary dialogue and diagnostic accuracy in daily practice. RESULTS We defined key clinical and imaging features of the dementias (A), recommended MRI protocol (B), proposed a disease-oriented imaging evaluation and interpretation (C) and report (D) with a glimpse to future avenues (E). The proposed radiological practice is to systematically evaluate and score atrophy, white matter changes, microbleeds, small vessel disease, consider the use of quantitative measures using commercial software tools critically, and adopt a structured disease-oriented report. In the expanding field of cognitive disorders, the only effective assessment approach is the standardized disease-oriented one, which includes a multidisciplinary integration of the clinical picture, MRI, CSF and blood biomarkers and nuclear medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca B. Pizzini
- Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Public Health, University of Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37100 Verona, Italy
| | - Enrico Conti
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Angelo Bianchetti
- Department of Medicine and Rehabilitation, Clinical Institute S. Anna-Gruppo San Donato, Brescia, Italy
- Italian Society of Gerontology and Geriatrics (SIGG), Florence, Italy
- Italian Association of Psychogeriatrics (AIP), Brescia, Italy
| | - Alessandra Splendiani
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Domenico Fusco
- Foundation Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Ferdinando Caranci
- Department of Medicine of Precision, School of Medicine, “Luigi Vanvitelli” University of Campania, 80147 Naples, Italy
| | - Alessandro Bozzao
- NESMOS, Department of Neuroradiology, S. Andrea Hospital, University Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Landi
- Foundation Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Gandolfo
- Diagnostic Imaging Department, Villa Scassi Hospital-ASL 3, Corso Scassi 1, Genoa, Italy
| | - Lisa Farina
- Neuroradiology Department, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Dipartimento Di Radiodiagnostica Emergenza-Urgenza, Azienda Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Marco Trabucchi
- Italian Society of Gerontology and Geriatrics (SIGG), Florence, Italy
- Italian Association of Psychogeriatrics (AIP), Brescia, Italy
- University of “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni B. Frisoni
- Centre de La Mémoire, Geneva University and University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Stefano Bastianello
- Neuroradiology Department, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Why can spontaneous intracranial hypotension cause behavioral changes? A case report and multimodality neuroimaging comparison with frontotemporal dementia. Cortex 2022; 155:322-332. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
14
|
Association of Long-Term Speech Therapy and Neuromodulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia: Lessons from a Case Report. CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/ctn6030017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a neurodegenerative disorder with a progressive loss of language. Long-term support requires speech therapy but also individually set training programs. Here we propose an 8-month individualized speech-training program which alternates 3-week periods of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) treatment with intensive daily language exercises and a 3-week period without tDCS treatment and a less intensive language exercise from home in a patient with non-fluent variant PPA (nfvPPA). The endpoints were the following: adherence to this program, language data after 8 months, questionnaires related to emotional valence, and brain volume changes. The results showed a persistent adherence after 8 months and a positive compliance reported by both the patient and the partner. The language evaluation showed a clinical stabilization. Moreover, a significant and positive influence of tDCS on mood was observed. This is, to our knowledge, the first ever published report of a combined neuromodulation and language training during the course of 8 months. Our finding suggests the feasibility of programs integrating hospital speech therapy, home training, and tDCS modulation in PPA. Further studies should be conducted in order to disentangle the contextual influences on language performance from the tDCS intervention effects and to address the observation of an initial improvement and a subsequent stabilization effect of language performances.
Collapse
|
15
|
Silverman HE, Gazes Y, Barker MS, Manoochehri M, Goldman JS, Wassermann EM, Tierney MC, Cosentino S, Grafman J, Huey ED. Frontal Pole Hypometabolism Linked to Reduced Prosocial Sexual Behaviors in Frontotemporal Dementia and Corticobasal Syndrome. J Alzheimers Dis 2021; 77:821-830. [PMID: 32741826 DOI: 10.3233/jad-200346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Changes in sexual behaviors in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) are common and multifaceted, but not well characterized. OBJECTIVE To characterize changes in sexual behaviors and intimacy in FTD compared to corticobasal syndrome (CBS) and normal controls (NC), and to evaluate the neuroanatomical associations of these changes. METHODS Spouses of 30 FTD patients, 20 CBS patients, and 35 NC completed the Sexual Symptoms in Neurological Illness and Injury Questionnaire (SNIQ), which captures changes in sexual interest, inappropriate sexual behaviors, and prosocial sexual behaviors. 25 patients with FTD and 14 patients with CBS also received 18-flouorodeoxyglucose positron-emission topography (18FDG-PET) scans to determine the metabolic changes associated with these symptoms. RESULTS FTD patients showed a greater increase in inappropriate sexual behaviors than CBS patients [p = 0.009] and NC [p < 0.001] and a greater decrease in prosocial sexual behaviors than CBS patients [p = 0.026] and NC [p < 0.001]. Groups did not differ in change in sexual interest. Among both patient groups, the most common change was decreased prosocial sexual behaviors p < 0.01. Hypometabolism in Brodmann's Area 10 (BA10), within the right frontal pole, correlated with decreased prosocial sexual behaviors [p(FWE-corr) <0.05, k = 44]. No anatomical associations were found with other sexual changes. CONCLUSION Decreased prosocial sexual behavior was associated with hypometabolism in BA 10, an area tied to social knowledge and theory of mind, supporting the idea that changes reflect social-cognitive deficits due to frontal dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah E Silverman
- The Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center & Taub Institute for Research in Alzheimer's Disease and The Aging Brain, Department of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yunglin Gazes
- The Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center & Taub Institute for Research in Alzheimer's Disease and The Aging Brain, Department of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Megan S Barker
- The Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center & Taub Institute for Research in Alzheimer's Disease and The Aging Brain, Department of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Masood Manoochehri
- The Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center & Taub Institute for Research in Alzheimer's Disease and The Aging Brain, Department of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jill S Goldman
- The Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center & Taub Institute for Research in Alzheimer's Disease and The Aging Brain, Department of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric M Wassermann
- Behavioral Neurology Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Michael C Tierney
- Behavioral Neurology Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Stephanie Cosentino
- The Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center & Taub Institute for Research in Alzheimer's Disease and The Aging Brain, Department of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jordan Grafman
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.,Brain Injury Research Program, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Edward D Huey
- The Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center & Taub Institute for Research in Alzheimer's Disease and The Aging Brain, Department of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bocchetta M, Malpetti M, Todd EG, Rowe JB, Rohrer JD. Looking beneath the surface: the importance of subcortical structures in frontotemporal dementia. Brain Commun 2021; 3:fcab158. [PMID: 34458729 PMCID: PMC8390477 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Whilst initial anatomical studies of frontotemporal dementia focussed on cortical involvement, the relevance of subcortical structures to the pathophysiology of frontotemporal dementia has been increasingly recognized over recent years. Key structures affected include the caudate, putamen, nucleus accumbens, and globus pallidus within the basal ganglia, the hippocampus and amygdala within the medial temporal lobe, the basal forebrain, and the diencephalon structures of the thalamus, hypothalamus and habenula. At the most posterior aspect of the brain, focal involvement of brainstem and cerebellum has recently also been shown in certain subtypes of frontotemporal dementia. Many of the neuroimaging studies on subcortical structures in frontotemporal dementia have been performed in clinically defined sporadic cases. However, investigations of genetically- and pathologically-confirmed forms of frontotemporal dementia are increasingly common and provide molecular specificity to the changes observed. Furthermore, detailed analyses of sub-nuclei and subregions within each subcortical structure are being added to the literature, allowing refinement of the patterns of subcortical involvement. This review focuses on the existing literature on structural imaging and neuropathological studies of subcortical anatomy across the spectrum of frontotemporal dementia, along with investigations of brain–behaviour correlates that examine the cognitive sequelae of specific subcortical involvement: it aims to ‘look beneath the surface’ and summarize the patterns of subcortical involvement have been described in frontotemporal dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Bocchetta
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Maura Malpetti
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Emily G Todd
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - James B Rowe
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jonathan D Rohrer
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Alosco ML, Culhane J, Mez J. Neuroimaging Biomarkers of Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy: Targets for the Academic Memory Disorders Clinic. Neurotherapeutics 2021; 18:772-791. [PMID: 33847906 PMCID: PMC8423967 DOI: 10.1007/s13311-021-01028-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) is a neurodegenerative disease associated with exposure to repetitive head impacts, such as those from contact sports. The pathognomonic lesion for CTE is the perivascular accumulation of hyper-phosphorylated tau in neurons and other cell process at the depths of sulci. CTE cannot be diagnosed during life at this time, limiting research on risk factors, mechanisms, epidemiology, and treatment. There is an urgent need for in vivo biomarkers that can accurately detect CTE and differentiate it from other neurological disorders. Neuroimaging is an integral component of the clinical evaluation of neurodegenerative diseases and will likely aid in diagnosing CTE during life. In this qualitative review, we present the current evidence on neuroimaging biomarkers for CTE with a focus on molecular, structural, and functional modalities routinely used as part of a dementia evaluation. Supporting imaging-pathological correlation studies are also presented. We targeted neuroimaging studies of living participants at high risk for CTE (e.g., aging former elite American football players, fighters). We conclude that an optimal tau PET radiotracer with high affinity for the 3R/4R neurofibrillary tangles in CTE has not yet been identified. Amyloid PET scans have tended to be negative. Converging structural and functional imaging evidence together with neuropathological evidence show frontotemporal and medial temporal lobe neurodegeneration, and increased likelihood for a cavum septum pellucidum. The literature offers promising neuroimaging biomarker targets of CTE, but it is limited by cross-sectional studies of small samples where the presence of underlying CTE is unknown. Imaging-pathological correlation studies will be important for the development and validation of neuroimaging biomarkers of CTE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael L Alosco
- Department of Neurology, Boston University Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Boston University CTE Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 72 E Concord St, Suite B7800, MA, 02118, Boston, USA.
| | - Julia Culhane
- Department of Neurology, Boston University Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Boston University CTE Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 72 E Concord St, Suite B7800, MA, 02118, Boston, USA
| | - Jesse Mez
- Department of Neurology, Boston University Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Boston University CTE Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 72 E Concord St, Suite B7800, MA, 02118, Boston, USA
- Framingham Heart Study, Boston University School of Medicine, MA, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Peet BT, Spina S, Mundada N, La Joie R. Neuroimaging in Frontotemporal Dementia: Heterogeneity and Relationships with Underlying Neuropathology. Neurotherapeutics 2021; 18:728-752. [PMID: 34389969 PMCID: PMC8423978 DOI: 10.1007/s13311-021-01101-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Frontotemporal dementia encompasses a group of clinical syndromes defined pathologically by degeneration of the frontal and temporal lobes. Historically, these syndromes have been challenging to diagnose, with an average of about three years between the time of symptom onset and the initial evaluation and diagnosis. Research in the field of neuroimaging has revealed numerous biomarkers of the various frontotemporal dementia syndromes, which has provided clinicians with a method of narrowing the differential diagnosis and improving diagnostic accuracy. As such, neuroimaging is considered a core investigative tool in the evaluation of neurodegenerative disorders. Furthermore, patterns of neurodegeneration correlate with the underlying neuropathological substrates of the frontotemporal dementia syndromes, which can aid clinicians in determining the underlying etiology and improve prognostication. This review explores the advancements in neuroimaging and discusses the phenotypic and pathologic features of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, semantic variant primary progressive aphasia, and nonfluent variant primary progressive aphasia, as seen on structural magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley T Peet
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Salvatore Spina
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Nidhi Mundada
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Renaud La Joie
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lombardi J, Mayer B, Semler E, Anderl‐Straub S, Uttner I, Kassubek J, Diehl‐Schmid J, Danek A, Levin J, Fassbender K, Fliessbach K, Schneider A, Huppertz H, Jahn H, Volk A, Kornhuber J, Landwehrmeyer B, Lauer M, Prudlo J, Wiltfang J, Schroeter ML, Ludolph A, Otto M. Quantifying progression in primary progressive aphasia with structural neuroimaging. Alzheimers Dement 2021; 17:1595-1609. [DOI: 10.1002/alz.12323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Benjamin Mayer
- Institute for Epidemiology and Medical Biometry University of Ulm Ulm Germany
| | - Elisa Semler
- Department of Neurology University Hospital Ulm Ulm Germany
| | | | - Ingo Uttner
- Department of Neurology University Hospital Ulm Ulm Germany
| | - Jan Kassubek
- Department of Neurology University Hospital Ulm Ulm Germany
| | - Janine Diehl‐Schmid
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Technical University of Munich Munich Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy) Munich Germany
| | - Adrian Danek
- Department of Neurology Ludwig‐Maximilians‐Universität München Munich Germany
| | - Johannes Levin
- Department of Neurology Ludwig‐Maximilians‐Universität München Munich Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Munich Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy) Munich Germany
| | - Klaus Fassbender
- Department of Neurology Saarland University Hospital Homburg Germany
| | - Klaus Fliessbach
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy University Hospital Bonn Bonn Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Bonn Germany
| | - Anja Schneider
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy University Hospital Bonn Bonn Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Bonn Germany
| | | | - Holger Jahn
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
| | - Alexander Volk
- Institute for Human Genetics University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
| | - Johannes Kornhuber
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy University Hospital Erlangen Erlangen Germany
| | | | - Martin Lauer
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy University Hospital Würzburg Würzburg Germany
| | - Johannes Prudlo
- Department of Neurology University Medicine Rostock Rostock Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Rostock Germany
| | - Jens Wiltfang
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Medical University Göttingen Göttingen Germany
| | - Matthias L. Schroeter
- Max‐Planck‐Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences and Clinic for Cognitive Neurology University Hospital Leipzig Leipzig Germany
| | - Albert Ludolph
- Department of Neurology University Hospital Ulm Ulm Germany
| | - Markus Otto
- Department of Neurology University Hospital Ulm Ulm Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
Despite the fact that the diagnosis of dementia is mainly based on clinical criteria, the role of neuroimaging is still expanding. Among other imaging techniques, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a core role in assisting with the differentiation between various dementia syndromes and excluding other underlying pathologies that cause dementia, such as brain tumors and subdural hemorrhages. This article gives an overview of the standard MRI protocol and of structural radiological reporting systems in patients who suffer from dementia. Moreover, it presents characteristic MRI features of the most common dementia subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Furtner
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringerguertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Daniela Prayer
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringerguertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Patel KP, Wymer DT, Bhatia VK, Duara R, Rajadhyaksha CD. Multimodality Imaging of Dementia: Clinical Importance and Role of Integrated Anatomic and Molecular Imaging. Radiographics 2021; 40:200-222. [PMID: 31917652 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2020190070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Neurodegenerative diseases are a devastating group of disorders that can be difficult to accurately diagnose. Although these disorders are difficult to manage owing to relatively limited treatment options, an early and correct diagnosis can help with managing symptoms and coping with the later stages of these disease processes. Both anatomic structural imaging and physiologic molecular imaging have evolved to a state in which these neurodegenerative processes can be identified relatively early with high accuracy. To determine the underlying disease, the radiologist should understand the different distributions and pathophysiologic processes involved. High-spatial-resolution MRI allows detection of subtle morphologic changes, as well as potential complications and alternate diagnoses, while molecular imaging allows visualization of altered function or abnormal increased or decreased concentration of disease-specific markers. These methodologies are complementary. Appropriate workup and interpretation of diagnostic studies require an integrated, multimodality, multidisciplinary approach. This article reviews the protocols and findings at MRI and nuclear medicine imaging, including with the use of flurodeoxyglucose, amyloid tracers, and dopaminergic transporter imaging (ioflupane). The pathophysiology of some of the major neurodegenerative processes and their clinical presentations are also reviewed; this information is critical to understand how these imaging modalities work, and it aids in the integration of clinical data to help synthesize a final diagnosis. Radiologists and nuclear medicine physicians aiming to include the evaluation of neurodegenerative diseases in their practice should be aware of and familiar with the multiple imaging modalities available and how using these modalities is essential in the multidisciplinary management of patients with neurodegenerative diseases.©RSNA, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kunal P Patel
- From the Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, 4300 Alton Rd, Miami Beach, FL 33140
| | - David T Wymer
- From the Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, 4300 Alton Rd, Miami Beach, FL 33140
| | - Vinay K Bhatia
- From the Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, 4300 Alton Rd, Miami Beach, FL 33140
| | - Ranjan Duara
- From the Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, 4300 Alton Rd, Miami Beach, FL 33140
| | - Chetan D Rajadhyaksha
- From the Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, 4300 Alton Rd, Miami Beach, FL 33140
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Frontotemporal dementia, music perception and social cognition share neurobiological circuits: A meta-analysis. Brain Cogn 2021; 148:105660. [PMID: 33421942 DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Revised: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a neurodegenerative disease that presents with profound changes in social cognition. Music might be a sensitive probe for social cognition abilities, but underlying neurobiological substrates are unclear. We performed a meta-analysis of voxel-based morphometry studies in FTD patients and functional MRI studies for music perception and social cognition tasks in cognitively normal controls to identify robust patterns of atrophy (FTD) or activation (music perception or social cognition). Conjunction analyses were performed to identify overlapping brain regions. In total 303 articles were included: 53 for FTD (n = 1153 patients, 42.5% female; 1337 controls, 53.8% female), 28 for music perception (n = 540, 51.8% female) and 222 for social cognition in controls (n = 5664, 50.2% female). We observed considerable overlap in atrophy patterns associated with FTD, and functional activation associated with music perception and social cognition, mostly encompassing the ventral language network. We further observed overlap across all three modalities in mesolimbic, basal forebrain and striatal regions. The results of our meta-analysis suggest that music perception and social cognition share neurobiological circuits that are affected in FTD. This supports the idea that music might be a sensitive probe for social cognition abilities with implications for diagnosis and monitoring.
Collapse
|
23
|
Duignan JA, Haughey A, Kinsella JA, Killeen RP. Molecular and Anatomical Imaging of Dementia With Lewy Bodies and Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration. Semin Nucl Med 2021; 51:264-274. [PMID: 33402272 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2020.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) are common causes of dementia. Early diagnosis of both conditions is challenging due to clinical and radiological overlap with other forms of dementia, particularly Alzheimer's disease (AD). Structural and functional imaging combined can aid differential diagnosis and help to discriminate DLB or FTLD from other forms of dementia. Imaging of DLB involves the use of 123I-FP-CIT SPECT and 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (123I-MIBG), both of which have an established role distinguishing DLB from AD. AD is also characterised by more pronounced atrophy of the medial temporal lobe structures when compared to DLB and these can be assessed at MR using the Medial Temporal Atrophy Scale. 18F-FDG-PET is used as a supportive biomarker for the diagnoses of DLB and can distinguish DLB from AD with high accuracy. Polysomnography and electroencephalography also have established roles in the diagnoses of DLB. FTLD is a heterogenous group of neurodegenerative disorders characterised pathologically by abnormally aggregated proteins. Clinical subtypes include behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD), primary progressive aphasia (PPA), which can be subdivided into semantic variant PPA (svPPA) or nonfluent agrammatic PPA (nfaPPA) and FTD associated with motor neuron disease (FTD-MND). Structural imaging is often the first step in making an image supported diagnoses of FTLD. Regional patterns of atrophy can be assessed on MR and graded according to the global cortical atrophy scale. FTLD is typically associated with atrophy of the frontal and temporal lobes. The patterns of atrophy are associated with the specific clinical subtypes, underlying neuropathology and genetic mutations although there is significant overlap. 18F-FDG-PET is useful for distinguishing FTLD from other forms of dementia and focal areas of hypometabolism can often precede atrophy identified on structural MR imaging. There are currently no biomarkers with which to unambiguously diagnose DLB or FTLD and both conditions demonstrate a wide range of heterogeneity. A combined approach of structural and functional imaging improves diagnostic accuracy in both conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John A Duignan
- Department of Radiology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland; UCD - SVUH PET CT Research Centre, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Aoife Haughey
- Department of Radiology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland; UCD - SVUH PET CT Research Centre, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Justin A Kinsella
- Department of Neurology, St Vincent's University Hospital, UCD, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Ronan P Killeen
- Department of Radiology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland; UCD - SVUH PET CT Research Centre, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Dev SI, Dickerson BC, Touroutoglou A. Neuroimaging in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration: Research and Clinical Utility. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2021; 1281:93-112. [PMID: 33433871 PMCID: PMC8787866 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-51140-1_7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2023]
Abstract
Frontotemporal lobar dementia (FTLD) is a clinically and pathologically complex disease. Advances in neuroimaging techniques have provided a specialized set of tools to investigate underlying pathophysiology and identify clinical biomarkers that aid in diagnosis, prognostication, monitoring, and identification of appropriate endpoints in clinical trials. In this chapter, we review data discussing the utility of neuroimaging biomarkers in sporadic FTLD, with an emphasis on current and future clinical applications. Among those modalities readily utilized in clinical settings, T1-weighted structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) are best supported in differential diagnosis and as targets for clinical trial endpoints. However, a number of nonclinical neuroimaging modalities, including diffusion tensor imaging and resting-state functional connectivity MRI, show promise as biomarkers to predict progression and as clinical trial endpoints. Other neuroimaging modalities, including amyloid PET, Tau PET, and arterial spin labeling MRI, are also discussed, though more work is required to establish their utility in FTLD in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheena I Dev
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Bradford C Dickerson
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA.
| | - Alexandra Touroutoglou
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Akhmadullina DR, Konovalov RN, Shpilyukova Y, Grishina DA, Berdnikovich ES, Fomenko SS, Fedotova EY, Illarioshkin SN. Brain atrophy patterns in patients with frontotemporal dementia: voxel-based morphometry. BULLETIN OF RUSSIAN STATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY 2020. [DOI: 10.24075/brsmu.2020.075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by language and behaviour deficits, which is considered the second most common cause of early-onset dementia. Detection of brain atrophy patterns is important for FTD diagnosis. However, the visual assessment of magnetic resonance imaging data may not be sensitive enough requiring the use of objective gray matter (GM) volume determination method. The study was aimed to assess the GM atrophy pattern in patients with FTD compared to control group patients using voxel-based morphometry (VBM). The study included 16 patients with FTD (12 patients with nonfluent agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA), three patients with behavioral variant of FTD, and one patient with logopenic variant PPA) and 10 healthy volunteers. VBM of patients with FTD and healthy controls revealed three significant (pFWE-corr < 0.05) atrophy areas in the left inferior frontal, left fusiform, and left supramarginal gyri. Taking into account the predominance of patients with nfvPPA in the group of FTD patients, the additional VBM of this group and control group was carried out, which revealed a distinct atrophy pattern: the reduced GM volume was detected in the left inferior frontal and left middle frontal gyri (pFWE-corr < 0.05). The results obtained indicate that regardless of the clinical variant, there is a certain atrophy pattern characteristic of FTD, which involves both frontotemporal areas and parietal lobe. The example of nfvPPA shows that each variant of the disease is associated with distinct localization of atrophy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - DA Grishina
- I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - SS Fomenko
- Research Center of Neurology, Moscow, Russia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Häkkinen S, Chu SA, Lee SE. Neuroimaging in genetic frontotemporal dementia and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurobiol Dis 2020; 145:105063. [PMID: 32890771 DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2020.105063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2020] [Revised: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) have a strong clinical, genetic and pathological overlap. This review focuses on the current understanding of structural, functional and molecular neuroimaging signatures of genetic FTD and ALS. We overview quantitative neuroimaging studies on the most common genes associated with FTD (MAPT, GRN), ALS (SOD1), and both (C9orf72), and summarize visual observations of images reported in the rarer genes (CHMP2B, TARDBP, FUS, OPTN, VCP, UBQLN2, SQSTM1, TREM2, CHCHD10, TBK1).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suvi Häkkinen
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Stephanie A Chu
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Suzee E Lee
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lesman-Segev OH, Edwards L, Rabinovici GD. Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy: A Comparison with Alzheimer's Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia. Semin Neurol 2020; 40:394-410. [PMID: 32820492 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1715134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The clinical diagnosis of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) is challenging due to heterogeneous clinical presentations and overlap with other neurodegenerative dementias. Depending on the clinical presentation, the differential diagnosis of CTE includes Alzheimer's disease (AD), behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), Parkinson's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, primary mood disorders, posttraumatic stress disorder, and psychotic disorders. The aim of this article is to compare the clinical aspects, genetics, fluid biomarkers, imaging, treatment, and pathology of CTE to those of AD and bvFTD. A detailed clinical evaluation, neurocognitive assessment, and structural brain imaging can inform the differential diagnosis, while molecular biomarkers can help exclude underlying AD pathology. Prospective studies that include clinicopathological correlations are needed to establish tools that can more accurately determine the cause of neuropsychiatric decline in patients at risk for CTE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orit H Lesman-Segev
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Lauren Edwards
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Gil D Rabinovici
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.,Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.,Weill Neuroscience Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Schroeter ML, Eickhoff SB, Engel A. From correlational approaches to meta-analytical symptom reading in individual patients: Bilateral lesions in the inferior frontal junction specifically cause dysexecutive syndrome. Cortex 2020; 128:73-87. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2019] [Revised: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
29
|
Schroeter ML, Albrecht F, Ballarini T, Leuthold D, Legler A, Hartwig S, Tiepolt S, Villringer A. Capgras Delusion in Posterior Cortical Atrophy-A Quantitative Multimodal Imaging Single Case Study. Front Aging Neurosci 2020; 12:133. [PMID: 32547387 PMCID: PMC7272572 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2019] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Although Alzheimer’s disease presents homogeneous histopathology, it causes several clinical phenotypes depending on brain regions involved. Beside the most abundant memory variant, several atypical variants exist. Among them posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) is associated with severe visuospatial/visuoperceptual deficits in the absence of significant primary ocular disease. Here, we report for the first time a case of Capgras delusion—a delusional misidentification syndrome, where patients think that familiar persons are replaced by identical “doubles” or an impostor—in a patient with PCA. The 57-year-old female patient was diagnosed with PCA and developed Capgras delusion 8 years after first symptoms. The patient did not recognize her husband, misidentified him as a stranger, and perceived him as a threat. Such misidentifications did not happen for other persons. Events could be interrupted by reassuring the husband’s identity by the patient’s female friend or children. We applied in-depth multimodal neuroimaging phenotyping and used single-subject voxel-based morphometry to identify atrophy changes specifically related to the development of the Capgras delusion. The latter, based on structural T1 magnetic resonance imaging, revealed progressive gray matter volume decline in occipital and temporoparietal areas, involving more the right than the left hemisphere, especially at the beginning. Correspondingly, the right fusiform gyrus was already affected by atrophy at baseline, whereas the left fusiform gyrus became involved in the further disease course. At baseline, glucose hypometabolism as measured by positron emission tomography (PET) with F18-fluorodesoxyglucose (FDG-PET) was evident in the parietooccipital cortex, more pronounced right-sided, and in the right frontotemporal cortex. Amyloid accumulation as assessed by PET with F18-florbetaben was found in the gray matter of the neocortex indicating underlying Alzheimer’s disease. Appearance of the Capgras delusion was related to atrophy in the right posterior cingulate gyrus/precuneus, as well as right middle frontal gyrus/frontal eye field, supporting right frontal areas as particularly relevant for Capgras delusion. Atrophy in these regions respectively might affect the default mode and dorsal attention networks as shown by meta-analytical co-activation and resting state functional connectivity analyses. This case elucidates the brain-behavior relationship in PCA and Capgras delusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias L Schroeter
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.,Clinic for Cognitive Neurology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Franziska Albrecht
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Tommaso Ballarini
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Angela Legler
- Clinic for Cognitive Neurology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Simone Hartwig
- Clinic for Cognitive Neurology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Solveig Tiepolt
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Arno Villringer
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.,Clinic for Cognitive Neurology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Multimodal feature binding in object memory retrieval using event-related potentials: Implications for models of semantic memory. Int J Psychophysiol 2020; 153:116-126. [PMID: 32389620 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.04.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2020] [Revised: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
To test the hypothesis that semantic processes are represented in multiple subsystems, we recorded electroencephalogram (EEG) as we elicited object memories using the modified Semantic Object Retrieval Test, during which an object feature, presented as a visual word [VW], an auditory word [AW], or a picture [Pic], was followed by a second feature always presented as a visual word. We performed both hypothesis-driven and data-driven analyses using event-related potentials (ERPs) time locked to the second stimulus. We replicated a previously reported left fronto-temporal ERP effect (750-1000 ms post-stimulus) in the VW task, and also found that this ERP component was only present during object memory retrieval in verbal (VW, AW) as opposed to non-verbal (Pic) stimulus types. We also found a right temporal ERP effect (850-1000 ms post-stimulus) that was present in auditory (AW) but not in visual (VW, Pic) stimulus types. In addition, we found an earlier left temporo-parietal ERP effect between 350 and 700 ms post-stimulus and a later midline parietal ERP effect between 700 and 1100 ms post-stimulus, present in all stimulus types, suggesting common neural mechanisms for object retrieval processes and object activation, respectively. These findings support multiple semantic subsystems that respond to varying stimulus modalities, and argue against an ultimate unitary amodal semantic analysis.
Collapse
|
31
|
Murley AG, Coyle-Gilchrist I, Rouse MA, Jones PS, Li W, Wiggins J, Lansdall C, Rodríguez PV, Wilcox A, Tsvetanov KA, Patterson K, Lambon Ralph MA, Rowe JB. Redefining the multidimensional clinical phenotypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration syndromes. Brain 2020; 143:1555-1571. [PMID: 32438414 PMCID: PMC7241953 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awaa097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Revised: 01/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The syndromes caused by frontotemporal lobar degeneration have highly heterogeneous and overlapping clinical features. There has been great progress in the refinement of clinical diagnostic criteria in the past decade, but we propose that a better understanding of aetiology, pathophysiology and symptomatic treatments can arise from a transdiagnostic approach to clinical phenotype and brain morphometry. In a cross-sectional epidemiological study, we examined 310 patients with a syndrome likely to be caused by frontotemporal lobar degeneration, including behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, non-fluent, and semantic variants of primary progressive aphasia (PPA), progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal syndrome. We included patients with logopenic PPA and those who met criteria for PPA but not a specific subtype. To date, 49 patients have a neuropathological diagnosis. A principal component analysis identified symptom dimensions that broadly recapitulated the core features of the main clinical syndromes. However, the subject-specific scores on these dimensions showed considerable overlap across the diagnostic groups. Sixty-two per cent of participants had phenotypic features that met the diagnostic criteria for more than one syndrome. Behavioural disturbance was prevalent in all groups. Forty-four per cent of patients with corticobasal syndrome had progressive supranuclear palsy-like features and 30% of patients with progressive supranuclear palsy had corticobasal syndrome-like features. Many patients with progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal syndrome had language impairments consistent with non-fluent variant PPA while patients with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia often had semantic impairments. Using multivariate source-based morphometry on a subset of patients (n = 133), we identified patterns of covarying brain atrophy that were represented across the diagnostic groups. Canonical correlation analysis of clinical and imaging components found three key brain-behaviour relationships, with a continuous spectrum across the cohort rather than discrete diagnostic entities. In the 46 patients with follow-up (mean 3.6 years) syndromic overlap increased with time. Together, these results show that syndromes associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration do not form discrete mutually exclusive categories from their clinical features or structural brain changes, but instead exist in a multidimensional spectrum. Patients often manifest diagnostic features of multiple disorders while deficits in behaviour, movement and language domains are not confined to specific diagnostic groups. It is important to recognize individual differences in clinical phenotype, both for clinical management and to understand pathogenic mechanisms. We suggest that a transdiagnostic approach to the spectrum of frontotemporal lobar degeneration syndromes provides a useful framework with which to understand disease aetiology, progression, and heterogeneity and to target future treatments to a higher proportion of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander G Murley
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ian Coyle-Gilchrist
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Norfolk and Norwich NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | - Matthew A Rouse
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - P Simon Jones
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Win Li
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Julie Wiggins
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Claire Lansdall
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Alicia Wilcox
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kamen A Tsvetanov
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Karalyn Patterson
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Matthew A Lambon Ralph
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - James B Rowe
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Bachli MB, Sedeño L, Ochab JK, Piguet O, Kumfor F, Reyes P, Torralva T, Roca M, Cardona JF, Campo CG, Herrera E, Slachevsky A, Matallana D, Manes F, García AM, Ibáñez A, Chialvo DR. Evaluating the reliability of neurocognitive biomarkers of neurodegenerative diseases across countries: A machine learning approach. Neuroimage 2019; 208:116456. [PMID: 31841681 PMCID: PMC7008715 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Revised: 10/29/2019] [Accepted: 12/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Accurate early diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases represents a growing challenge for current clinical practice. Promisingly, current tools can be complemented by computational decision-support methods to objectively analyze multidimensional measures and increase diagnostic confidence. Yet, widespread application of these tools cannot be recommended unless they are proven to perform consistently and reproducibly across samples from different countries. We implemented machine-learning algorithms to evaluate the prediction power of neurocognitive biomarkers (behavioral and imaging measures) for classifying two neurodegenerative conditions –Alzheimer Disease (AD) and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD)– across three different countries (>200 participants). We use machine-learning tools integrating multimodal measures such as cognitive scores (executive functions and cognitive screening) and brain atrophy volume (voxel based morphometry from fronto-temporo-insular regions in bvFTD, and temporo-parietal regions in AD) to identify the most relevant features in predicting the incidence of the diseases. In the Country-1 cohort, predictions of AD and bvFTD became maximally improved upon inclusion of cognitive screenings outcomes combined with atrophy levels. Multimodal training data from this cohort allowed predicting both AD and bvFTD in the other two novel datasets from other countries with high accuracy (>90%), demonstrating the robustness of the approach as well as the differential specificity and reliability of behavioral and neural markers for each condition. In sum, this is the first study, across centers and countries, to validate the predictive power of cognitive signatures combined with atrophy levels for contrastive neurodegenerative conditions, validating a benchmark for future assessments of reliability and reproducibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Belen Bachli
- Center for Complex Systems & Brain Sciences (CEMSC(3)), Escuela de Ciencia y Tecnologia (ECyT), Universidad Nacional de San Martín, 25 de Mayo 1169, San Martín, (1650), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Lucas Sedeño
- Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCYyT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), Godoy Cruz 2290, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | - Jeremi K Ochab
- Marian Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Mark Kac Complex Systems Research Center Jagiellonian University, Ul. Łojasiewicza 11, PL30-348, Kraków, Poland
| | - Olivier Piguet
- ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and Its Disorders, Sydney, Australia; The University of Sydney, Brain and Mind Centre and School of Psychology, Sydney, Australia
| | - Fiona Kumfor
- ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and Its Disorders, Sydney, Australia; The University of Sydney, Brain and Mind Centre and School of Psychology, Sydney, Australia
| | - Pablo Reyes
- Radiology, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio (HUSI), Bogotá, Colombia; Medical School, Physiology Sciences, Psychiatry and Mental Health Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (PUJ) - Centro de Memoria y Cognición Intellectus, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio (HUSI), Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Teresa Torralva
- Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCYyT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - María Roca
- Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCYyT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Cecilia Gonzalez Campo
- Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCYyT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), Godoy Cruz 2290, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Eduar Herrera
- Departamento de Estudios Psicológicos, Universidad Icesi, Cali, Colombia
| | - Andrea Slachevsky
- Gerosciences Center for Brain Health and Metabolism, Santiago, Chile; Neuropsychology and Clinical Neuroscience Laboratory (LANNEC), Physiopathology Department, ICBM, Neurosciences Department, East Neuroscience Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Avenida Salvador 486, Providencia, Santiago, Chile; Memory and Neuropsychiatric Clinic (CMYN) Neurology Department- Hospital del Salvador & University of Chile, Av. Salvador 364, Providencia, Santiago, Chile; Servicio de Neurología, Departamento de Medicina, Clínica Alemana-Universidad del Desarrollo, Chile
| | - Diana Matallana
- Medical School, Aging Institute, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (PUJ) - Centro de Memoria y Cognición Intellectus. Hospital Universitario San Ignacio (HUSI), Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Facundo Manes
- Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCYyT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), Godoy Cruz 2290, Buenos Aires, Argentina; ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and Its Disorders, Sydney, Australia
| | - Adolfo M García
- Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCYyT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), Godoy Cruz 2290, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Faculty of Education, National University of Cuyo (UNCuyo), Sobremonte 74, C5500, Mendoza, Argentina
| | - Agustín Ibáñez
- Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCYyT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), Godoy Cruz 2290, Buenos Aires, Argentina; ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and Its Disorders, Sydney, Australia; Universidad Autónoma del Caribe, Calle 90, No 46-112, C2754, Barranquilla, Colombia; Center for Social and Cognitive Neuroscience (CSCN), School of Psychology, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Diagonal Las Torres, 2640, Santiago, Chile
| | - Dante R Chialvo
- Center for Complex Systems & Brain Sciences (CEMSC(3)), Escuela de Ciencia y Tecnologia (ECyT), Universidad Nacional de San Martín, 25 de Mayo 1169, San Martín, (1650), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), Godoy Cruz 2290, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mutsaerts HJMM, Mirza SS, Petr J, Thomas DL, Cash DM, Bocchetta M, de Vita E, Metcalfe AWS, Shirzadi Z, Robertson AD, Tartaglia MC, Mitchell SB, Black SE, Freedman M, Tang-Wai D, Keren R, Rogaeva E, van Swieten J, Laforce R, Tagliavini F, Borroni B, Galimberti D, Rowe JB, Graff C, Frisoni GB, Finger E, Sorbi S, de Mendonça A, Rohrer JD, MacIntosh BJ, Masellis M. Cerebral perfusion changes in presymptomatic genetic frontotemporal dementia: a GENFI study. Brain 2019; 142:1108-1120. [PMID: 30847466 PMCID: PMC6439322 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awz039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2018] [Revised: 12/14/2018] [Accepted: 01/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic forms of frontotemporal dementia are most commonly due to mutations in three genes, C9orf72, GRN or MAPT, with presymptomatic carriers from families representing those at risk. While cerebral blood flow shows differences between frontotemporal dementia and other forms of dementia, there is limited evidence of its utility in presymptomatic stages of frontotemporal dementia. This study aimed to delineate the cerebral blood flow signature of presymptomatic, genetic frontotemporal dementia using a voxel-based approach. In the multicentre GENetic Frontotemporal dementia Initiative (GENFI) study, we investigated cross-sectional differences in arterial spin labelling MRI-based cerebral blood flow between presymptomatic C9orf72, GRN or MAPT mutation carriers (n = 107) and non-carriers (n = 113), using general linear mixed-effects models and voxel-based analyses. Cerebral blood flow within regions of interest derived from this model was then explored to identify differences between individual gene carrier groups and to estimate a timeframe for the expression of these differences. The voxel-based analysis revealed a significant inverse association between cerebral blood flow and the expected age of symptom onset in carriers, but not non-carriers. Regions included the bilateral insulae/orbitofrontal cortices, anterior cingulate/paracingulate gyri, and inferior parietal cortices, as well as the left middle temporal gyrus. For all bilateral regions, associations were greater on the right side. After correction for partial volume effects in a region of interest analysis, the results were found to be largely driven by the C9orf72 genetic subgroup. These cerebral blood flow differences first appeared approximately 12.5 years before the expected symptom onset determined on an individual basis. Cerebral blood flow was lower in presymptomatic mutation carriers closer to and beyond their expected age of symptom onset in key frontotemporal dementia signature regions. These results suggest that arterial spin labelling MRI may be a promising non-invasive imaging biomarker for the presymptomatic stages of genetic frontotemporal dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henri J M M Mutsaerts
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Saira S Mirza
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jan Petr
- PET Center, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - David L Thomas
- Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - David M Cash
- Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Enrico de Vita
- Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Arron W S Metcalfe
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Zahra Shirzadi
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Andrew D Robertson
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Maria Carmela Tartaglia
- Tanz Centre for Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Memory Clinic, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sara B Mitchell
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,L.C. Campbell Cognitive Neurology Research Unit, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sandra E Black
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,L.C. Campbell Cognitive Neurology Research Unit, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Morris Freedman
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care, Toronto, Canada
| | - David Tang-Wai
- Memory Clinic, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ron Keren
- Memory Clinic, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ekaterina Rogaeva
- Tanz Centre for Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - John van Swieten
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Laforce
- Clinique Interdisciplinaire de Mémoire (CIME), Département des Sciences Neurologiques, CHU de Québec, Faculté de médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Fabrizio Tagliavini
- Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Borroni
- Department of Medical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Daniela Galimberti
- Centro Dino Ferrari, Fondazione Ca' Granda IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - James B Rowe
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Caroline Graff
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Elizabeth Finger
- Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - Sandro Sorbi
- Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | | | - Bradley J MacIntosh
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Mario Masellis
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,L.C. Campbell Cognitive Neurology Research Unit, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.,Cognitive and Movement Disorders Clinic, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Wang L, Heywood A, Stocks J, Bae J, Ma D, Popuri K, Toga AW, Kantarci K, Younes L, Mackenzie IR, Zhang F, Beg MF, Rosen H, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Grant Report on PREDICT-ADFTD: Multimodal Imaging Prediction of AD/FTD and Differential Diagnosis. JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND BRAIN SCIENCE 2019; 4:e190017. [PMID: 31754634 PMCID: PMC6868780 DOI: 10.20900/jpbs.20190017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
We report on the ongoing project "PREDICT-ADFTD: Multimodal Imaging Prediction of AD/FTD and Differential Diagnosis" describing completed and future work supported by this grant. This project is a multi-site, multi-study collaboration effort with research spanning seven sites across the US and Canada. The overall goal of the project is to study neurodegeneration within Alzheimer's Disease, Frontotemporal Dementia, and related neurodegenerative disorders, using a variety of brain imaging and computational techniques to develop methods for the early and accurate prediction of disease and its course. The overarching goal of the project is to develop the earliest and most accurate biomarker that can differentiate clinical diagnoses to inform clinical trials and patient care. In its third year, this project has already completed several projects to achieve this goal, focusing on (1) structural MRI (2) machine learning and (3) FDG-PET and multimodal imaging. Studies utilizing structural MRI have identified key features of underlying pathology by studying hippocampal deformation that is unique to clinical diagnosis and also post-mortem confirmed neuropathology. Several machine learning experiments have shown high classification accuracy in the prediction of disease based on Convolutional Neural Networks utilizing MRI images as input. In addition, we have also achieved high accuracy in predicting conversion to DAT up to five years in the future. Further, we evaluated multimodal models that combine structural and FDG-PET imaging, in order to compare the predictive power of multimodal to unimodal models. Studies utilizing FDG-PET have shown significant predictive ability in the prediction and progression of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Wang
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, 60611 IL, USA
| | - Ashley Heywood
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, 60611 IL, USA
| | - Jane Stocks
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, 60611 IL, USA
| | - Jinhyeong Bae
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, 60611 IL, USA
| | - Da Ma
- School of Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, V6A1S6 BC, Canada
| | - Karteek Popuri
- School of Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, V6A1S6 BC, Canada
| | - Arthur W. Toga
- Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 90033 CA, USA
| | - Kejal Kantarci
- Departments of Neurology and Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, 55905 MN, USA
| | - Laurent Younes
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, 21218 MD, USA
| | - Ian R. Mackenzie
- Department of Pathology and Lab Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B6T1Z4 BC, Canada
| | - Fengqing Zhang
- Department of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, 19104 PA, USA
| | - Mirza Faisal Beg
- School of Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, V6A1S6 BC, Canada
| | - Howard Rosen
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, 94143 CA, USA
| | - Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
- Data used in preparation of this article were obtained from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database (http://adni.loni.usc.edu/). As such, the investigators within the ADNI contributed to the design and implementation of ADNI and/or provided data but did not participate in analysis or writing of this report. A complete listing of ADNI investigators can be found at: http://adni.loni.usc.edu/wp-content/uploads/how_to_apply/ADNIAcknowledgement_List.pdf
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Cajanus A, Solje E, Koikkalainen J, Lötjönen J, Suhonen NM, Hallikainen I, Vanninen R, Hartikainen P, de Marco M, Venneri A, Soininen H, Remes AM, Hall A. The Association Between Distinct Frontal Brain Volumes and Behavioral Symptoms in Mild Cognitive Impairment, Alzheimer's Disease, and Frontotemporal Dementia. Front Neurol 2019; 10:1059. [PMID: 31632342 PMCID: PMC6786130 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2019] [Accepted: 09/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Our aim was to investigate the association between behavioral symptoms of agitation, disinhibition, irritability, elation, and aberrant motor behavior to frontal brain volumes in a cohort with various neurodegenerative diseases. A total of 121 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI, n = 58), Alzheimer's disease (AD, n = 45) and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD, n = 18) were evaluated with a Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). A T1-weighted MRI scan was acquired for each participant and quantified with a multi-atlas segmentation method. The volumetric MRI measures of the frontal lobes were associated with neuropsychiatric symptom scores with a linear model. In the regression model, we included CDR score and TMT B time as covariates to account for cognitive and executive functions. The brain volumes were corrected for age, gender and head size. The total behavioral symptom score of the five symptoms of interest was negatively associated with the volume of the subcallosal area (β = −0.32, p = 0.002). High disinhibition scores were associated with reduced volume in the gyrus rectus (β = −0.30, p = 0.002), medial frontal cortex (β = −0.30, p = 0.002), superior frontal gyrus (β = −0.28, p = 0.003), inferior frontal gyrus (β = −0.28, p = 0.005) and subcallosal area (β = −0.28, p = 0.005). Elation scores were associated with reduced volumes of the medial orbital gyrus (β = −0.30, p = 0.002) and inferior frontal gyrus (β = −0.28, p = 0.004). Aberrant motor behavior was associated with atrophy of frontal pole (β = −0.29, p = 0.005) and the subcallosal area (β = −0.39, p < 0.001). No significant associations with frontal brain volumes were found for agitation and irritability. We conclude that the subcallosal area may be common neuroanatomical area for behavioral symptoms in neurodegenerative diseases, and it appears to be independent of disease etiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antti Cajanus
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Neurocenter, Neurology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Eino Solje
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Neurocenter, Neurology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | | | | | | | - Ilona Hallikainen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Ritva Vanninen
- Department of Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | | | - Matteo de Marco
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Annalena Venneri
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Hilkka Soininen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Anne M Remes
- MRC Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.,Unit of Clinical Neuroscience, Neurology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Anette Hall
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Johnen A, Bertoux M. Psychological and Cognitive Markers of Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia-A Clinical Neuropsychologist's View on Diagnostic Criteria and Beyond. Front Neurol 2019; 10:594. [PMID: 31231305 PMCID: PMC6568027 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2018] [Accepted: 05/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is the second leading cognitive disorder caused by neurodegeneration in patients under 65 years of age. Characterized by frontal, insular, and/or temporal brain atrophy, patients present with heterogeneous constellations of behavioral and psychological symptoms among which progressive changes in social conduct, lack of empathy, apathy, disinhibited behaviors, and cognitive impairments are frequently observed. Since the histopathology of the disease is heterogeneous and identified genetic mutations only account for ~30% of cases, there are no reliable biomarkers for the diagnosis of bvFTD available in clinical routine as yet. Early detection of bvFTD thus relies on correct application of clinical diagnostic criteria. Their evaluation however, requires expertise and in-depth assessments of cognitive functions, history taking, clinical observations as well as caregiver reports on behavioral and psychological symptoms and their respective changes. With this review, we aim for a critical appraisal of common methods to access the behavioral and psychological symptoms as well as the cognitive alterations presented in the diagnostic criteria for bvFTD. We highlight both, practical difficulties as well as current controversies regarding an overlap of symptoms and particularly cognitive impairments with other neurodegenerative and primary psychiatric diseases. We then review more recent developments and evidence on cognitive, behavioral and psychological symptoms of bvFTD beyond the diagnostic criteria which may prospectively enhance the early detection and differential diagnosis in clinical routine. In particular, evidence on specific impairments in social and emotional processing, praxis abilities as well as interoceptive processing in bvFTD is summarized and potential links with behavior and classic cognitive domains are discussed. We finally outline both, future opportunities and major challenges with regard to the role of clinical neuropsychology in detecting bvFTD and related neurocognitive disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Johnen
- Section for Neuropsychology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Maxime Bertoux
- Univ Lille, Inserm UMR 1171 Degenerative and Vascular Cognitive Disorders, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Bocchetta M, Iglesias JE, Russell LL, Greaves CV, Marshall CR, Scelsi MA, Cash DM, Ourselin S, Warren JD, Rohrer JD. Segmentation of medial temporal subregions reveals early right-sided involvement in semantic variant PPA. ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH & THERAPY 2019; 11:41. [PMID: 31077248 PMCID: PMC6511178 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-019-0489-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2019] [Accepted: 04/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Background Semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia (svPPA) is a subtype of frontotemporal dementia characterized by asymmetric temporal atrophy. Methods We investigated the pattern of medial temporal lobe atrophy in 24 svPPA patients compared to 72 controls using novel approaches to segment the hippocampal and amygdalar subregions on MRIs. Based on semantic knowledge scores, we split the svPPA group into 3 subgroups of early, middle and late disease stage. Results Early stage: all left amygdalar and hippocampal subregions (except the tail) were affected in svPPA (21–35% smaller than controls), together with the following amygdalar nuclei in the right hemisphere: lateral, accessory basal and superficial (15–23%). On the right, only the temporal pole was affected among the cortical regions. Middle stage: the left hippocampal tail became affected (28%), together with the other amygdalar nuclei (22–26%), and CA4 (15%) on the right, with orbitofrontal cortex and subcortical structures involvement on the left, and more posterior temporal lobe on the right. Late stage: the remaining right hippocampal regions (except the tail) (19–24%) became affected, with more posterior left cortical and right extra-temporal anterior cortical involvement. Conclusions With advanced subregions segmentation, it is possible to detect early involvement of the right medial temporal lobe in svPPA that is not detectable by measuring the amygdala or hippocampus as a whole. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13195-019-0489-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Bocchetta
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, 8-11 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Juan Eugenio Iglesias
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Lucy L Russell
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, 8-11 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Caroline V Greaves
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, 8-11 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Charles R Marshall
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, 8-11 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Marzia A Scelsi
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - David M Cash
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, 8-11 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.,Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sebastien Ourselin
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, St Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jason D Warren
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, 8-11 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Jonathan D Rohrer
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, 8-11 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Smith R, Santillo AF, Waldö ML, Strandberg O, Berron D, Vestberg S, van Westen D, van Swieten J, Honer M, Hansson O. 18F-Flortaucipir in TDP-43 associated frontotemporal dementia. Sci Rep 2019; 9:6082. [PMID: 30988363 PMCID: PMC6465310 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-42625-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2018] [Accepted: 04/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Retention of 18F-Flortaucipir is reportedly increased in the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia (svPPA), which is dominated by TDP-43 pathology. However, it is unclear if 18F-Flortaucipir is also increased in other TDP-43 diseases, such as bvFTD caused by a C9orf72 gene mutation. We therefore recruited six C9orf72 expansion carriers, six svPPA patients, and 54 healthy controls. All underwent 18F-Flortaucipir PET and MRI scanning. Data from 39 Alzheimer’s Disease patients were used for comparison. PET tracer retention was assessed both at the region-of-interest (ROI) and at the voxel-level. Further, autoradiography using 3H-Flortaucipir was performed. SvPPA patients exhibited higher 18F-Flortaucipir retention in the lateral temporal cortex bilaterally according to ROI- and voxel-based analyses. In C9orf72 patients, 18F-Flortaucipir binding was slightly increased in the inferior frontal lobes in the ROI based analysis, but these results were not replicated in the voxel-based analysis. Autoradiography did not show specific binding in svPPA cases or in C9orf72-mutation carriers. In conclusion, temporal lobe 18F-Flortaucipir retention was observed in some cases of svPPA, but the uptake was of a lower magnitude compared to AD dementia. C9orf72-mutation carriers exhibited none or limited 18F-Flortaucipir retention, indicating that 18F-Flortaucipir binding in TDP-43 proteinopathies is not a general TDP-43 related phenomenon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Smith
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. .,Department of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
| | - A F Santillo
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - M Landqvist Waldö
- Clinical Sciences Helsingborg, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - O Strandberg
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - D Berron
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - S Vestberg
- Department of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - D van Westen
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - J van Swieten
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Honer
- Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Neuroscience Translational Technologies, Roche Innovation Center, Basel, Switzerland
| | - O Hansson
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. .,Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Meyer S, Mueller K, Gruenewald C, Grundl K, Marschhauser A, Tiepolt S, Barthel H, Sabri O, Schroeter ML. Citalopram Improves Obsessive-Compulsive Crossword Puzzling in Frontotemporal Dementia. Case Rep Neurol 2019; 11:94-105. [PMID: 31011326 PMCID: PMC6465705 DOI: 10.1159/000495561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2018] [Accepted: 11/15/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is characterized by severe changes in personality/behavior. Recent studies have provided evidence that a decrease in serotonin receptors and neuronal loss in the raphe nuclei play a role in the bvFTD pathology. Serotonergic antidepressants have been reported to diminish behavioral disturbances in bvFTD, particularly repetitive behaviors, disinhibition, apathy, sexually inappropriate behaviors, and hyperorality. Here, we present the case of an 80-year-old Caucasian male patient with clinically and biomarker supported bvFTD (“probable” bvFTD; disease-specific alterations in 18F-fluorodesoxyglucose positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging). The patient exhibited behavioral disinhibition, apathy, a loss of empathy, perseverative behavior during testing, hyperorality, changes in diet, and executive deficits in neuropsychological testing. Remarkably, he failed in solving crosswords by systematically filling in the blanks by letters in alphabetical order (A, B, C, D, etc.), indicating obsessive-compulsive behavior. One year later, the patient visited the clinic again for a follow-up investigation. He had taken 20 mg of citalopram per day for 1 consecutive year. Remarkably, he had regained the ability to fill in crossword puzzles correctly, although the neuropsychiatric inventory showed overall only small improvement in behavioral impairment. A regimen of 20 mg citalopram per day over the course of 1 year led to a specific improvement in one of the bvFTD core symptoms, obsessive-compulsive behavior, most pronounced in solving crossword puzzles. This case contributes to the understanding of the neuropharmacological correlates of bvFTD and supports the treatment of bvFTD's behavioral symptoms with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Meyer
- Neurology Department, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Karsten Mueller
- Neurology Department, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Christin Gruenewald
- Clinic for Cognitive Neurology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Kristin Grundl
- Clinic for Cognitive Neurology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Anke Marschhauser
- Clinic for Cognitive Neurology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Solveig Tiepolt
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Henryk Barthel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Osama Sabri
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Matthias L Schroeter
- Neurology Department, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.,Clinic for Cognitive Neurology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.,Research Center for Civilization Diseases, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.,German Consortium for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Albrecht F, Bisenius S, Neumann J, Whitwell J, Schroeter ML. Atrophy in midbrain & cerebral/cerebellar pedunculi is characteristic for progressive supranuclear palsy - A double-validation whole-brain meta-analysis. NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL 2019; 22:101722. [PMID: 30831462 PMCID: PMC6402426 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2018] [Revised: 02/13/2019] [Accepted: 02/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is an atypical parkinsonian syndrome characterized by vertical gaze palsy and postural instability. Midbrain atrophy is suggested as a hallmark, but it has not been validated systematically in whole-brain imaging. METHODS We conducted whole-brain meta-analyses identifying disease-related atrophy in structural MRI. Eighteen studies were identified (N = 315 PSP, 393 controls) and separated into gray or white matter analyses (15/12). All patients were diagnosed according to the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and the Society for PSP (NINDS-SPSP criteria, Litvan et al. (1996a)), which are now considered as PSP-Richardson syndrome (Höglinger et al., 2017). With overlay analyses, we double-validated two meta-analytical algorithms: anatomical likelihood estimation and seed-based D mapping. Additionally, we conducted region-of-interest effect size meta-analyses on radiological biomarkers and subtraction analyses differentiating PSP from Parkinson's disease. RESULTS Whole brain meta-analyses revealed consistent gray matter atrophy in bilateral thalamus, anterior insulae, midbrain, and left caudate nucleus. White matter alterations were consistently detected in bilateral superior/middle cerebellar pedunculi, cerebral pedunculi, and midbrain atrophy. Region-of-interest meta-analyses demonstrated that midbrain metrics generally perform very well in distinguishing PSP from other parkinsonian syndromes with strong effect sizes. Subtraction analyses identified the midbrain as differentiating between PSP and Parkinson's disease. CONCLUSIONS Our meta-analyses identify gray matter atrophy of the midbrain and white matter atrophy of the cerebral/cerebellar pedunculi and midbrain as characteristic for PSP. Results support the incorporation of structural MRI data, and particularly these structures, into the revised PSP diagnostic criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Albrecht
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Sandrine Bisenius
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Jane Neumann
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig, Germany; Department of Medical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Applied Science, Jena, Germany; Leipzig University Medical Center, IFB Adiposity Diseases, Germany.
| | | | - Matthias L Schroeter
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig, Germany; Clinic of Cognitive Neurology, University of Leipzig & FTLD Consortium Germany, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Bruun M, Koikkalainen J, Rhodius-Meester HFM, Baroni M, Gjerum L, van Gils M, Soininen H, Remes AM, Hartikainen P, Waldemar G, Mecocci P, Barkhof F, Pijnenburg Y, van der Flier WM, Hasselbalch SG, Lötjönen J, Frederiksen KS. Detecting frontotemporal dementia syndromes using MRI biomarkers. NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL 2019; 22:101711. [PMID: 30743135 PMCID: PMC6369219 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2018] [Revised: 02/01/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Background Diagnosing frontotemporal dementia may be challenging. New methods for analysis of regional brain atrophy patterns on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could add to the diagnostic assessment. Therefore, we aimed to develop automated imaging biomarkers for differentiating frontotemporal dementia subtypes from other diagnostic groups, and from one another. Methods In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, we included 1213 patients (age 67 ± 9, 48% females) from two memory clinic cohorts: 116 frontotemporal dementia, 341 Alzheimer's disease, 66 Dementia with Lewy bodies, 40 vascular dementia, 104 other dementias, 229 mild cognitive impairment, and 317 subjective cognitive decline. Three MRI atrophy biomarkers were derived from the normalized volumes of automatically segmented cortical regions: 1) the anterior vs. posterior index, 2) the asymmetry index, and 3) the temporal pole left index. We used the following performance metrics: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. To account for the low prevalence of frontotemporal dementia we pursued a high specificity of 95%. Cross-validation was used in assessing the performance. The generalizability was assessed in an independent cohort (n = 200). Results The anterior vs. posterior index performed with an AUC of 83% for differentiation of frontotemporal dementia from all other diagnostic groups (Sensitivity = 59%, Specificity = 95%, positive likelihood ratio = 11.8, negative likelihood ratio = 0.4). The asymmetry index showed highest performance for separation of primary progressive aphasia and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (AUC = 85%, Sensitivity = 79%, Specificity = 92%, positive likelihood ratio = 9.9, negative likelihood ratio = 0.2), whereas the temporal pole left index was specific for detection of semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (AUC = 85%, Sensitivity = 82%, Specificity = 80%, positive likelihood ratio = 4.1, negative likelihood ratio = 0.2). The validation cohort provided corresponding results for the anterior vs. posterior index and temporal pole left index. Conclusion This study presents three quantitative MRI biomarkers, which could provide additional information to the diagnostic assessment and assist clinicians in diagnosing frontotemporal dementia. Quantitative MRI biomarkers (API, ASI, and TPL) for detection of FTD and its subtypes. API differentiated FTD from other diagnostic groups with AUC of 83%. ASI and TPL showed highest performance for PPA subtypes. A subcortical bvFTD subtype resembling AD atrophy pattern seems undetectable for MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Bruun
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | | | - Hanneke F M Rhodius-Meester
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marta Baroni
- Institute of Gerontology and Geriatrics, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Le Gjerum
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mark van Gils
- VTT Technical Research Center of Finland Ltd, Tampere, Finland
| | - Hilkka Soininen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland; Neurocenter, neurology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Anne M Remes
- Unit of Clinical Neuroscience, Neurology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | | | - Gunhild Waldemar
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Patrizia Mecocci
- Institute of Gerontology and Geriatrics, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; UCL institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, London, UK
| | - Yolande Pijnenburg
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Steen G Hasselbalch
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Kristian S Frederiksen
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Risacher SL, Saykin AJ. Neuroimaging in aging and neurologic diseases. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2019; 167:191-227. [PMID: 31753134 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-804766-8.00012-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Neuroimaging biomarkers for neurologic diseases are important tools, both for understanding pathology associated with cognitive and clinical symptoms and for differential diagnosis. This chapter explores neuroimaging measures, including structural and functional measures from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and molecular measures primarily from positron emission tomography (PET), in healthy aging adults and in a number of neurologic diseases. The spectrum covers neuroimaging measures from normal aging to a variety of dementias: late-onset Alzheimer's disease [AD; including mild cognitive impairment (MCI)], familial and nonfamilial early-onset AD, atypical AD syndromes, posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), logopenic aphasia (lvPPA), cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), vascular dementia (VaD), sporadic and familial behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), semantic dementia (SD), progressive nonfluent aphasia (PNFA), frontotemporal dementia with motor neuron disease (FTD-MND), frontotemporal dementia with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (FTD-ALS), corticobasal degeneration (CBD), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), Parkinson's disease (PD) with and without dementia, and multiple systems atrophy (MSA). We also include a discussion of the appropriate use criteria (AUC) for amyloid imaging and conclude with a discussion of differential diagnosis of neurologic dementia disorders in the context of neuroimaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon L Risacher
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Andrew J Saykin
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Steinacker P, Anderl-Straub S, Diehl-Schmid J, Semler E, Uttner I, von Arnim CAF, Barthel H, Danek A, Fassbender K, Fliessbach K, Foerstl H, Grimmer T, Huppertz HJ, Jahn H, Kassubek J, Kornhuber J, Landwehrmeyer B, Lauer M, Maler JM, Mayer B, Oeckl P, Prudlo J, Schneider A, Volk AE, Wiltfang J, Schroeter ML, Ludolph AC, Otto M. Serum neurofilament light chain in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 2018; 91:e1390-e1401. [PMID: 30209235 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000006318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2018] [Accepted: 07/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the association of serum neurofilament light chain (NfL) with functional deterioration and brain atrophy during follow-up of patients with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). METHODS Blood NfL levels from 74 patients with bvFTD, 26 with Alzheimer disease (AD), 17 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 15 healthy controls (Con) at baseline and follow-up were determined and analyzed for the diagnostic potential in relation to functional assessment (Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes [CDR-SOB], frontotemporal lobar degeneration-related CDR-SOB, Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE]) and brain volumetry. RESULTS At baseline, serum NfL level correlated with CSF NfL (bvFTD r = 0.706, p < 0.0001; AD/MCI r = 0.666, p = 0.0003). Highest serum levels were observed in bvFTD (p <0 0.0001 vs Con and MCI, p = 0.0078 vs AD, respectively). Discrimination of bvFTD from Con/MCI/AD was possible with 91%/74%/74% sensitivity and 79%/74%/58% specificity. At follow-up, serum NfL increased in bvFTD and AD (p = 0.0039 and p = 0.0006, respectively). At baseline and follow-up, NfL correlated with functional scores of patients with bvFTD (e.g., CDR-SOB [baseline] r = 0.4157, p = 0.0006; [follow-up] r = 0.5629, p < 0.0001) and with atrophy in the gray and white matter of many brain regions including frontal and subcortical areas (e.g., frontal lobe: r = -0.5857, p < 0.0001; 95% confidence interval -0.7415 to -0.3701). For patients with AD/MCI, NfL correlated with the functional performance as well (e.g., CDR-SOB [baseline] r = 0.6624, p < 0.0001; [follow-up] r = 0.5659, p = 0.0003) but not with regional brain volumes. CONCLUSIONS As serum NfL correlates with functional impairment and brain atrophy in bvFTD at different disease stages, we propose it as marker of disease severity, paving the way for its future use as outcome measure for clinical trials. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE This study provides Class III evidence that for patients with cognitive problems, serum NfL concentration discriminates bvFTD from other forms of dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Steinacker
- From the Department of Neurology (P.S., S.A.-S., E.S., I.U., C.A.F.v.A., J. Kassubek, B.L., P.O., A.C.L., M.O.) and Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry (B.M.), University of Ulm; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.D.-S., H.F., T.G.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich; Department of Nuclear Medicine (H.B.), Leipzig University Hospital; Department of Neurology (A.D.), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich; Department of Neurology (K.F.), Saarland University, Homburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (K.F.), University of Bonn, Germany; Swiss Epilepsy Center (H.-J.H.), Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (H.J.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; AMEOS Klinikum (H.J.), Heiligenhafen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J. Kornhuber, J.M.M.), Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (M.L.), University of Würzburg; Department of Neurology (J.P.), University of Rostock; DZNE (J.P.), Rostock; Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry (A.S.), University Hospital Bonn; DZNE (A.S.), Bonn; Institute of Human Genetics (A.E.V.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.W.), University Medical Center Göttingen; DZNE (J.W.), Göttingen, Germany; iBiMED (J.W.), Medical Sciences Department, University of Aveiro, Portugal; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology (M.L.S.), University Clinic Leipzig; and Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (M.L.S.), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Sarah Anderl-Straub
- From the Department of Neurology (P.S., S.A.-S., E.S., I.U., C.A.F.v.A., J. Kassubek, B.L., P.O., A.C.L., M.O.) and Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry (B.M.), University of Ulm; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.D.-S., H.F., T.G.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich; Department of Nuclear Medicine (H.B.), Leipzig University Hospital; Department of Neurology (A.D.), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich; Department of Neurology (K.F.), Saarland University, Homburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (K.F.), University of Bonn, Germany; Swiss Epilepsy Center (H.-J.H.), Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (H.J.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; AMEOS Klinikum (H.J.), Heiligenhafen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J. Kornhuber, J.M.M.), Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (M.L.), University of Würzburg; Department of Neurology (J.P.), University of Rostock; DZNE (J.P.), Rostock; Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry (A.S.), University Hospital Bonn; DZNE (A.S.), Bonn; Institute of Human Genetics (A.E.V.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.W.), University Medical Center Göttingen; DZNE (J.W.), Göttingen, Germany; iBiMED (J.W.), Medical Sciences Department, University of Aveiro, Portugal; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology (M.L.S.), University Clinic Leipzig; and Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (M.L.S.), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Janine Diehl-Schmid
- From the Department of Neurology (P.S., S.A.-S., E.S., I.U., C.A.F.v.A., J. Kassubek, B.L., P.O., A.C.L., M.O.) and Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry (B.M.), University of Ulm; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.D.-S., H.F., T.G.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich; Department of Nuclear Medicine (H.B.), Leipzig University Hospital; Department of Neurology (A.D.), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich; Department of Neurology (K.F.), Saarland University, Homburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (K.F.), University of Bonn, Germany; Swiss Epilepsy Center (H.-J.H.), Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (H.J.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; AMEOS Klinikum (H.J.), Heiligenhafen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J. Kornhuber, J.M.M.), Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (M.L.), University of Würzburg; Department of Neurology (J.P.), University of Rostock; DZNE (J.P.), Rostock; Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry (A.S.), University Hospital Bonn; DZNE (A.S.), Bonn; Institute of Human Genetics (A.E.V.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.W.), University Medical Center Göttingen; DZNE (J.W.), Göttingen, Germany; iBiMED (J.W.), Medical Sciences Department, University of Aveiro, Portugal; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology (M.L.S.), University Clinic Leipzig; and Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (M.L.S.), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Elisa Semler
- From the Department of Neurology (P.S., S.A.-S., E.S., I.U., C.A.F.v.A., J. Kassubek, B.L., P.O., A.C.L., M.O.) and Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry (B.M.), University of Ulm; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.D.-S., H.F., T.G.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich; Department of Nuclear Medicine (H.B.), Leipzig University Hospital; Department of Neurology (A.D.), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich; Department of Neurology (K.F.), Saarland University, Homburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (K.F.), University of Bonn, Germany; Swiss Epilepsy Center (H.-J.H.), Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (H.J.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; AMEOS Klinikum (H.J.), Heiligenhafen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J. Kornhuber, J.M.M.), Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (M.L.), University of Würzburg; Department of Neurology (J.P.), University of Rostock; DZNE (J.P.), Rostock; Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry (A.S.), University Hospital Bonn; DZNE (A.S.), Bonn; Institute of Human Genetics (A.E.V.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.W.), University Medical Center Göttingen; DZNE (J.W.), Göttingen, Germany; iBiMED (J.W.), Medical Sciences Department, University of Aveiro, Portugal; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology (M.L.S.), University Clinic Leipzig; and Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (M.L.S.), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Ingo Uttner
- From the Department of Neurology (P.S., S.A.-S., E.S., I.U., C.A.F.v.A., J. Kassubek, B.L., P.O., A.C.L., M.O.) and Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry (B.M.), University of Ulm; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.D.-S., H.F., T.G.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich; Department of Nuclear Medicine (H.B.), Leipzig University Hospital; Department of Neurology (A.D.), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich; Department of Neurology (K.F.), Saarland University, Homburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (K.F.), University of Bonn, Germany; Swiss Epilepsy Center (H.-J.H.), Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (H.J.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; AMEOS Klinikum (H.J.), Heiligenhafen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J. Kornhuber, J.M.M.), Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (M.L.), University of Würzburg; Department of Neurology (J.P.), University of Rostock; DZNE (J.P.), Rostock; Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry (A.S.), University Hospital Bonn; DZNE (A.S.), Bonn; Institute of Human Genetics (A.E.V.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.W.), University Medical Center Göttingen; DZNE (J.W.), Göttingen, Germany; iBiMED (J.W.), Medical Sciences Department, University of Aveiro, Portugal; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology (M.L.S.), University Clinic Leipzig; and Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (M.L.S.), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Christine A F von Arnim
- From the Department of Neurology (P.S., S.A.-S., E.S., I.U., C.A.F.v.A., J. Kassubek, B.L., P.O., A.C.L., M.O.) and Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry (B.M.), University of Ulm; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.D.-S., H.F., T.G.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich; Department of Nuclear Medicine (H.B.), Leipzig University Hospital; Department of Neurology (A.D.), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich; Department of Neurology (K.F.), Saarland University, Homburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (K.F.), University of Bonn, Germany; Swiss Epilepsy Center (H.-J.H.), Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (H.J.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; AMEOS Klinikum (H.J.), Heiligenhafen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J. Kornhuber, J.M.M.), Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (M.L.), University of Würzburg; Department of Neurology (J.P.), University of Rostock; DZNE (J.P.), Rostock; Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry (A.S.), University Hospital Bonn; DZNE (A.S.), Bonn; Institute of Human Genetics (A.E.V.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.W.), University Medical Center Göttingen; DZNE (J.W.), Göttingen, Germany; iBiMED (J.W.), Medical Sciences Department, University of Aveiro, Portugal; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology (M.L.S.), University Clinic Leipzig; and Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (M.L.S.), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Henryk Barthel
- From the Department of Neurology (P.S., S.A.-S., E.S., I.U., C.A.F.v.A., J. Kassubek, B.L., P.O., A.C.L., M.O.) and Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry (B.M.), University of Ulm; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.D.-S., H.F., T.G.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich; Department of Nuclear Medicine (H.B.), Leipzig University Hospital; Department of Neurology (A.D.), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich; Department of Neurology (K.F.), Saarland University, Homburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (K.F.), University of Bonn, Germany; Swiss Epilepsy Center (H.-J.H.), Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (H.J.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; AMEOS Klinikum (H.J.), Heiligenhafen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J. Kornhuber, J.M.M.), Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (M.L.), University of Würzburg; Department of Neurology (J.P.), University of Rostock; DZNE (J.P.), Rostock; Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry (A.S.), University Hospital Bonn; DZNE (A.S.), Bonn; Institute of Human Genetics (A.E.V.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.W.), University Medical Center Göttingen; DZNE (J.W.), Göttingen, Germany; iBiMED (J.W.), Medical Sciences Department, University of Aveiro, Portugal; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology (M.L.S.), University Clinic Leipzig; and Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (M.L.S.), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Adrian Danek
- From the Department of Neurology (P.S., S.A.-S., E.S., I.U., C.A.F.v.A., J. Kassubek, B.L., P.O., A.C.L., M.O.) and Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry (B.M.), University of Ulm; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.D.-S., H.F., T.G.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich; Department of Nuclear Medicine (H.B.), Leipzig University Hospital; Department of Neurology (A.D.), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich; Department of Neurology (K.F.), Saarland University, Homburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (K.F.), University of Bonn, Germany; Swiss Epilepsy Center (H.-J.H.), Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (H.J.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; AMEOS Klinikum (H.J.), Heiligenhafen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J. Kornhuber, J.M.M.), Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (M.L.), University of Würzburg; Department of Neurology (J.P.), University of Rostock; DZNE (J.P.), Rostock; Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry (A.S.), University Hospital Bonn; DZNE (A.S.), Bonn; Institute of Human Genetics (A.E.V.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.W.), University Medical Center Göttingen; DZNE (J.W.), Göttingen, Germany; iBiMED (J.W.), Medical Sciences Department, University of Aveiro, Portugal; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology (M.L.S.), University Clinic Leipzig; and Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (M.L.S.), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Klaus Fassbender
- From the Department of Neurology (P.S., S.A.-S., E.S., I.U., C.A.F.v.A., J. Kassubek, B.L., P.O., A.C.L., M.O.) and Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry (B.M.), University of Ulm; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.D.-S., H.F., T.G.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich; Department of Nuclear Medicine (H.B.), Leipzig University Hospital; Department of Neurology (A.D.), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich; Department of Neurology (K.F.), Saarland University, Homburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (K.F.), University of Bonn, Germany; Swiss Epilepsy Center (H.-J.H.), Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (H.J.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; AMEOS Klinikum (H.J.), Heiligenhafen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J. Kornhuber, J.M.M.), Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (M.L.), University of Würzburg; Department of Neurology (J.P.), University of Rostock; DZNE (J.P.), Rostock; Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry (A.S.), University Hospital Bonn; DZNE (A.S.), Bonn; Institute of Human Genetics (A.E.V.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.W.), University Medical Center Göttingen; DZNE (J.W.), Göttingen, Germany; iBiMED (J.W.), Medical Sciences Department, University of Aveiro, Portugal; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology (M.L.S.), University Clinic Leipzig; and Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (M.L.S.), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Klaus Fliessbach
- From the Department of Neurology (P.S., S.A.-S., E.S., I.U., C.A.F.v.A., J. Kassubek, B.L., P.O., A.C.L., M.O.) and Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry (B.M.), University of Ulm; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.D.-S., H.F., T.G.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich; Department of Nuclear Medicine (H.B.), Leipzig University Hospital; Department of Neurology (A.D.), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich; Department of Neurology (K.F.), Saarland University, Homburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (K.F.), University of Bonn, Germany; Swiss Epilepsy Center (H.-J.H.), Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (H.J.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; AMEOS Klinikum (H.J.), Heiligenhafen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J. Kornhuber, J.M.M.), Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (M.L.), University of Würzburg; Department of Neurology (J.P.), University of Rostock; DZNE (J.P.), Rostock; Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry (A.S.), University Hospital Bonn; DZNE (A.S.), Bonn; Institute of Human Genetics (A.E.V.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.W.), University Medical Center Göttingen; DZNE (J.W.), Göttingen, Germany; iBiMED (J.W.), Medical Sciences Department, University of Aveiro, Portugal; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology (M.L.S.), University Clinic Leipzig; and Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (M.L.S.), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Hans Foerstl
- From the Department of Neurology (P.S., S.A.-S., E.S., I.U., C.A.F.v.A., J. Kassubek, B.L., P.O., A.C.L., M.O.) and Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry (B.M.), University of Ulm; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.D.-S., H.F., T.G.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich; Department of Nuclear Medicine (H.B.), Leipzig University Hospital; Department of Neurology (A.D.), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich; Department of Neurology (K.F.), Saarland University, Homburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (K.F.), University of Bonn, Germany; Swiss Epilepsy Center (H.-J.H.), Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (H.J.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; AMEOS Klinikum (H.J.), Heiligenhafen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J. Kornhuber, J.M.M.), Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (M.L.), University of Würzburg; Department of Neurology (J.P.), University of Rostock; DZNE (J.P.), Rostock; Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry (A.S.), University Hospital Bonn; DZNE (A.S.), Bonn; Institute of Human Genetics (A.E.V.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.W.), University Medical Center Göttingen; DZNE (J.W.), Göttingen, Germany; iBiMED (J.W.), Medical Sciences Department, University of Aveiro, Portugal; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology (M.L.S.), University Clinic Leipzig; and Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (M.L.S.), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Timo Grimmer
- From the Department of Neurology (P.S., S.A.-S., E.S., I.U., C.A.F.v.A., J. Kassubek, B.L., P.O., A.C.L., M.O.) and Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry (B.M.), University of Ulm; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.D.-S., H.F., T.G.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich; Department of Nuclear Medicine (H.B.), Leipzig University Hospital; Department of Neurology (A.D.), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich; Department of Neurology (K.F.), Saarland University, Homburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (K.F.), University of Bonn, Germany; Swiss Epilepsy Center (H.-J.H.), Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (H.J.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; AMEOS Klinikum (H.J.), Heiligenhafen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J. Kornhuber, J.M.M.), Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (M.L.), University of Würzburg; Department of Neurology (J.P.), University of Rostock; DZNE (J.P.), Rostock; Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry (A.S.), University Hospital Bonn; DZNE (A.S.), Bonn; Institute of Human Genetics (A.E.V.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.W.), University Medical Center Göttingen; DZNE (J.W.), Göttingen, Germany; iBiMED (J.W.), Medical Sciences Department, University of Aveiro, Portugal; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology (M.L.S.), University Clinic Leipzig; and Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (M.L.S.), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Hans-Jürgen Huppertz
- From the Department of Neurology (P.S., S.A.-S., E.S., I.U., C.A.F.v.A., J. Kassubek, B.L., P.O., A.C.L., M.O.) and Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry (B.M.), University of Ulm; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.D.-S., H.F., T.G.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich; Department of Nuclear Medicine (H.B.), Leipzig University Hospital; Department of Neurology (A.D.), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich; Department of Neurology (K.F.), Saarland University, Homburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (K.F.), University of Bonn, Germany; Swiss Epilepsy Center (H.-J.H.), Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (H.J.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; AMEOS Klinikum (H.J.), Heiligenhafen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J. Kornhuber, J.M.M.), Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (M.L.), University of Würzburg; Department of Neurology (J.P.), University of Rostock; DZNE (J.P.), Rostock; Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry (A.S.), University Hospital Bonn; DZNE (A.S.), Bonn; Institute of Human Genetics (A.E.V.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.W.), University Medical Center Göttingen; DZNE (J.W.), Göttingen, Germany; iBiMED (J.W.), Medical Sciences Department, University of Aveiro, Portugal; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology (M.L.S.), University Clinic Leipzig; and Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (M.L.S.), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Holger Jahn
- From the Department of Neurology (P.S., S.A.-S., E.S., I.U., C.A.F.v.A., J. Kassubek, B.L., P.O., A.C.L., M.O.) and Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry (B.M.), University of Ulm; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.D.-S., H.F., T.G.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich; Department of Nuclear Medicine (H.B.), Leipzig University Hospital; Department of Neurology (A.D.), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich; Department of Neurology (K.F.), Saarland University, Homburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (K.F.), University of Bonn, Germany; Swiss Epilepsy Center (H.-J.H.), Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (H.J.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; AMEOS Klinikum (H.J.), Heiligenhafen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J. Kornhuber, J.M.M.), Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (M.L.), University of Würzburg; Department of Neurology (J.P.), University of Rostock; DZNE (J.P.), Rostock; Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry (A.S.), University Hospital Bonn; DZNE (A.S.), Bonn; Institute of Human Genetics (A.E.V.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.W.), University Medical Center Göttingen; DZNE (J.W.), Göttingen, Germany; iBiMED (J.W.), Medical Sciences Department, University of Aveiro, Portugal; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology (M.L.S.), University Clinic Leipzig; and Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (M.L.S.), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jan Kassubek
- From the Department of Neurology (P.S., S.A.-S., E.S., I.U., C.A.F.v.A., J. Kassubek, B.L., P.O., A.C.L., M.O.) and Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry (B.M.), University of Ulm; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.D.-S., H.F., T.G.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich; Department of Nuclear Medicine (H.B.), Leipzig University Hospital; Department of Neurology (A.D.), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich; Department of Neurology (K.F.), Saarland University, Homburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (K.F.), University of Bonn, Germany; Swiss Epilepsy Center (H.-J.H.), Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (H.J.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; AMEOS Klinikum (H.J.), Heiligenhafen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J. Kornhuber, J.M.M.), Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (M.L.), University of Würzburg; Department of Neurology (J.P.), University of Rostock; DZNE (J.P.), Rostock; Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry (A.S.), University Hospital Bonn; DZNE (A.S.), Bonn; Institute of Human Genetics (A.E.V.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.W.), University Medical Center Göttingen; DZNE (J.W.), Göttingen, Germany; iBiMED (J.W.), Medical Sciences Department, University of Aveiro, Portugal; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology (M.L.S.), University Clinic Leipzig; and Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (M.L.S.), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Johannes Kornhuber
- From the Department of Neurology (P.S., S.A.-S., E.S., I.U., C.A.F.v.A., J. Kassubek, B.L., P.O., A.C.L., M.O.) and Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry (B.M.), University of Ulm; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.D.-S., H.F., T.G.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich; Department of Nuclear Medicine (H.B.), Leipzig University Hospital; Department of Neurology (A.D.), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich; Department of Neurology (K.F.), Saarland University, Homburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (K.F.), University of Bonn, Germany; Swiss Epilepsy Center (H.-J.H.), Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (H.J.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; AMEOS Klinikum (H.J.), Heiligenhafen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J. Kornhuber, J.M.M.), Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (M.L.), University of Würzburg; Department of Neurology (J.P.), University of Rostock; DZNE (J.P.), Rostock; Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry (A.S.), University Hospital Bonn; DZNE (A.S.), Bonn; Institute of Human Genetics (A.E.V.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.W.), University Medical Center Göttingen; DZNE (J.W.), Göttingen, Germany; iBiMED (J.W.), Medical Sciences Department, University of Aveiro, Portugal; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology (M.L.S.), University Clinic Leipzig; and Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (M.L.S.), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Bernhard Landwehrmeyer
- From the Department of Neurology (P.S., S.A.-S., E.S., I.U., C.A.F.v.A., J. Kassubek, B.L., P.O., A.C.L., M.O.) and Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry (B.M.), University of Ulm; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.D.-S., H.F., T.G.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich; Department of Nuclear Medicine (H.B.), Leipzig University Hospital; Department of Neurology (A.D.), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich; Department of Neurology (K.F.), Saarland University, Homburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (K.F.), University of Bonn, Germany; Swiss Epilepsy Center (H.-J.H.), Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (H.J.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; AMEOS Klinikum (H.J.), Heiligenhafen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J. Kornhuber, J.M.M.), Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (M.L.), University of Würzburg; Department of Neurology (J.P.), University of Rostock; DZNE (J.P.), Rostock; Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry (A.S.), University Hospital Bonn; DZNE (A.S.), Bonn; Institute of Human Genetics (A.E.V.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.W.), University Medical Center Göttingen; DZNE (J.W.), Göttingen, Germany; iBiMED (J.W.), Medical Sciences Department, University of Aveiro, Portugal; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology (M.L.S.), University Clinic Leipzig; and Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (M.L.S.), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Martin Lauer
- From the Department of Neurology (P.S., S.A.-S., E.S., I.U., C.A.F.v.A., J. Kassubek, B.L., P.O., A.C.L., M.O.) and Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry (B.M.), University of Ulm; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.D.-S., H.F., T.G.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich; Department of Nuclear Medicine (H.B.), Leipzig University Hospital; Department of Neurology (A.D.), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich; Department of Neurology (K.F.), Saarland University, Homburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (K.F.), University of Bonn, Germany; Swiss Epilepsy Center (H.-J.H.), Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (H.J.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; AMEOS Klinikum (H.J.), Heiligenhafen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J. Kornhuber, J.M.M.), Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (M.L.), University of Würzburg; Department of Neurology (J.P.), University of Rostock; DZNE (J.P.), Rostock; Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry (A.S.), University Hospital Bonn; DZNE (A.S.), Bonn; Institute of Human Genetics (A.E.V.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.W.), University Medical Center Göttingen; DZNE (J.W.), Göttingen, Germany; iBiMED (J.W.), Medical Sciences Department, University of Aveiro, Portugal; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology (M.L.S.), University Clinic Leipzig; and Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (M.L.S.), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Juan Manuel Maler
- From the Department of Neurology (P.S., S.A.-S., E.S., I.U., C.A.F.v.A., J. Kassubek, B.L., P.O., A.C.L., M.O.) and Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry (B.M.), University of Ulm; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.D.-S., H.F., T.G.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich; Department of Nuclear Medicine (H.B.), Leipzig University Hospital; Department of Neurology (A.D.), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich; Department of Neurology (K.F.), Saarland University, Homburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (K.F.), University of Bonn, Germany; Swiss Epilepsy Center (H.-J.H.), Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (H.J.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; AMEOS Klinikum (H.J.), Heiligenhafen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J. Kornhuber, J.M.M.), Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (M.L.), University of Würzburg; Department of Neurology (J.P.), University of Rostock; DZNE (J.P.), Rostock; Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry (A.S.), University Hospital Bonn; DZNE (A.S.), Bonn; Institute of Human Genetics (A.E.V.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.W.), University Medical Center Göttingen; DZNE (J.W.), Göttingen, Germany; iBiMED (J.W.), Medical Sciences Department, University of Aveiro, Portugal; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology (M.L.S.), University Clinic Leipzig; and Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (M.L.S.), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Benjamin Mayer
- From the Department of Neurology (P.S., S.A.-S., E.S., I.U., C.A.F.v.A., J. Kassubek, B.L., P.O., A.C.L., M.O.) and Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry (B.M.), University of Ulm; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.D.-S., H.F., T.G.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich; Department of Nuclear Medicine (H.B.), Leipzig University Hospital; Department of Neurology (A.D.), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich; Department of Neurology (K.F.), Saarland University, Homburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (K.F.), University of Bonn, Germany; Swiss Epilepsy Center (H.-J.H.), Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (H.J.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; AMEOS Klinikum (H.J.), Heiligenhafen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J. Kornhuber, J.M.M.), Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (M.L.), University of Würzburg; Department of Neurology (J.P.), University of Rostock; DZNE (J.P.), Rostock; Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry (A.S.), University Hospital Bonn; DZNE (A.S.), Bonn; Institute of Human Genetics (A.E.V.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.W.), University Medical Center Göttingen; DZNE (J.W.), Göttingen, Germany; iBiMED (J.W.), Medical Sciences Department, University of Aveiro, Portugal; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology (M.L.S.), University Clinic Leipzig; and Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (M.L.S.), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Patrick Oeckl
- From the Department of Neurology (P.S., S.A.-S., E.S., I.U., C.A.F.v.A., J. Kassubek, B.L., P.O., A.C.L., M.O.) and Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry (B.M.), University of Ulm; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.D.-S., H.F., T.G.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich; Department of Nuclear Medicine (H.B.), Leipzig University Hospital; Department of Neurology (A.D.), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich; Department of Neurology (K.F.), Saarland University, Homburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (K.F.), University of Bonn, Germany; Swiss Epilepsy Center (H.-J.H.), Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (H.J.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; AMEOS Klinikum (H.J.), Heiligenhafen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J. Kornhuber, J.M.M.), Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (M.L.), University of Würzburg; Department of Neurology (J.P.), University of Rostock; DZNE (J.P.), Rostock; Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry (A.S.), University Hospital Bonn; DZNE (A.S.), Bonn; Institute of Human Genetics (A.E.V.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.W.), University Medical Center Göttingen; DZNE (J.W.), Göttingen, Germany; iBiMED (J.W.), Medical Sciences Department, University of Aveiro, Portugal; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology (M.L.S.), University Clinic Leipzig; and Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (M.L.S.), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Johannes Prudlo
- From the Department of Neurology (P.S., S.A.-S., E.S., I.U., C.A.F.v.A., J. Kassubek, B.L., P.O., A.C.L., M.O.) and Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry (B.M.), University of Ulm; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.D.-S., H.F., T.G.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich; Department of Nuclear Medicine (H.B.), Leipzig University Hospital; Department of Neurology (A.D.), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich; Department of Neurology (K.F.), Saarland University, Homburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (K.F.), University of Bonn, Germany; Swiss Epilepsy Center (H.-J.H.), Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (H.J.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; AMEOS Klinikum (H.J.), Heiligenhafen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J. Kornhuber, J.M.M.), Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (M.L.), University of Würzburg; Department of Neurology (J.P.), University of Rostock; DZNE (J.P.), Rostock; Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry (A.S.), University Hospital Bonn; DZNE (A.S.), Bonn; Institute of Human Genetics (A.E.V.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.W.), University Medical Center Göttingen; DZNE (J.W.), Göttingen, Germany; iBiMED (J.W.), Medical Sciences Department, University of Aveiro, Portugal; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology (M.L.S.), University Clinic Leipzig; and Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (M.L.S.), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Anja Schneider
- From the Department of Neurology (P.S., S.A.-S., E.S., I.U., C.A.F.v.A., J. Kassubek, B.L., P.O., A.C.L., M.O.) and Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry (B.M.), University of Ulm; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.D.-S., H.F., T.G.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich; Department of Nuclear Medicine (H.B.), Leipzig University Hospital; Department of Neurology (A.D.), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich; Department of Neurology (K.F.), Saarland University, Homburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (K.F.), University of Bonn, Germany; Swiss Epilepsy Center (H.-J.H.), Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (H.J.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; AMEOS Klinikum (H.J.), Heiligenhafen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J. Kornhuber, J.M.M.), Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (M.L.), University of Würzburg; Department of Neurology (J.P.), University of Rostock; DZNE (J.P.), Rostock; Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry (A.S.), University Hospital Bonn; DZNE (A.S.), Bonn; Institute of Human Genetics (A.E.V.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.W.), University Medical Center Göttingen; DZNE (J.W.), Göttingen, Germany; iBiMED (J.W.), Medical Sciences Department, University of Aveiro, Portugal; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology (M.L.S.), University Clinic Leipzig; and Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (M.L.S.), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Alexander E Volk
- From the Department of Neurology (P.S., S.A.-S., E.S., I.U., C.A.F.v.A., J. Kassubek, B.L., P.O., A.C.L., M.O.) and Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry (B.M.), University of Ulm; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.D.-S., H.F., T.G.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich; Department of Nuclear Medicine (H.B.), Leipzig University Hospital; Department of Neurology (A.D.), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich; Department of Neurology (K.F.), Saarland University, Homburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (K.F.), University of Bonn, Germany; Swiss Epilepsy Center (H.-J.H.), Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (H.J.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; AMEOS Klinikum (H.J.), Heiligenhafen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J. Kornhuber, J.M.M.), Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (M.L.), University of Würzburg; Department of Neurology (J.P.), University of Rostock; DZNE (J.P.), Rostock; Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry (A.S.), University Hospital Bonn; DZNE (A.S.), Bonn; Institute of Human Genetics (A.E.V.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.W.), University Medical Center Göttingen; DZNE (J.W.), Göttingen, Germany; iBiMED (J.W.), Medical Sciences Department, University of Aveiro, Portugal; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology (M.L.S.), University Clinic Leipzig; and Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (M.L.S.), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jens Wiltfang
- From the Department of Neurology (P.S., S.A.-S., E.S., I.U., C.A.F.v.A., J. Kassubek, B.L., P.O., A.C.L., M.O.) and Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry (B.M.), University of Ulm; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.D.-S., H.F., T.G.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich; Department of Nuclear Medicine (H.B.), Leipzig University Hospital; Department of Neurology (A.D.), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich; Department of Neurology (K.F.), Saarland University, Homburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (K.F.), University of Bonn, Germany; Swiss Epilepsy Center (H.-J.H.), Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (H.J.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; AMEOS Klinikum (H.J.), Heiligenhafen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J. Kornhuber, J.M.M.), Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (M.L.), University of Würzburg; Department of Neurology (J.P.), University of Rostock; DZNE (J.P.), Rostock; Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry (A.S.), University Hospital Bonn; DZNE (A.S.), Bonn; Institute of Human Genetics (A.E.V.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.W.), University Medical Center Göttingen; DZNE (J.W.), Göttingen, Germany; iBiMED (J.W.), Medical Sciences Department, University of Aveiro, Portugal; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology (M.L.S.), University Clinic Leipzig; and Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (M.L.S.), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Matthias L Schroeter
- From the Department of Neurology (P.S., S.A.-S., E.S., I.U., C.A.F.v.A., J. Kassubek, B.L., P.O., A.C.L., M.O.) and Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry (B.M.), University of Ulm; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.D.-S., H.F., T.G.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich; Department of Nuclear Medicine (H.B.), Leipzig University Hospital; Department of Neurology (A.D.), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich; Department of Neurology (K.F.), Saarland University, Homburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (K.F.), University of Bonn, Germany; Swiss Epilepsy Center (H.-J.H.), Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (H.J.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; AMEOS Klinikum (H.J.), Heiligenhafen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J. Kornhuber, J.M.M.), Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (M.L.), University of Würzburg; Department of Neurology (J.P.), University of Rostock; DZNE (J.P.), Rostock; Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry (A.S.), University Hospital Bonn; DZNE (A.S.), Bonn; Institute of Human Genetics (A.E.V.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.W.), University Medical Center Göttingen; DZNE (J.W.), Göttingen, Germany; iBiMED (J.W.), Medical Sciences Department, University of Aveiro, Portugal; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology (M.L.S.), University Clinic Leipzig; and Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (M.L.S.), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Albert C Ludolph
- From the Department of Neurology (P.S., S.A.-S., E.S., I.U., C.A.F.v.A., J. Kassubek, B.L., P.O., A.C.L., M.O.) and Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry (B.M.), University of Ulm; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.D.-S., H.F., T.G.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich; Department of Nuclear Medicine (H.B.), Leipzig University Hospital; Department of Neurology (A.D.), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich; Department of Neurology (K.F.), Saarland University, Homburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (K.F.), University of Bonn, Germany; Swiss Epilepsy Center (H.-J.H.), Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (H.J.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; AMEOS Klinikum (H.J.), Heiligenhafen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J. Kornhuber, J.M.M.), Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (M.L.), University of Würzburg; Department of Neurology (J.P.), University of Rostock; DZNE (J.P.), Rostock; Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry (A.S.), University Hospital Bonn; DZNE (A.S.), Bonn; Institute of Human Genetics (A.E.V.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.W.), University Medical Center Göttingen; DZNE (J.W.), Göttingen, Germany; iBiMED (J.W.), Medical Sciences Department, University of Aveiro, Portugal; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology (M.L.S.), University Clinic Leipzig; and Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (M.L.S.), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Markus Otto
- From the Department of Neurology (P.S., S.A.-S., E.S., I.U., C.A.F.v.A., J. Kassubek, B.L., P.O., A.C.L., M.O.) and Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry (B.M.), University of Ulm; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.D.-S., H.F., T.G.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich; Department of Nuclear Medicine (H.B.), Leipzig University Hospital; Department of Neurology (A.D.), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich; Department of Neurology (K.F.), Saarland University, Homburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (K.F.), University of Bonn, Germany; Swiss Epilepsy Center (H.-J.H.), Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (H.J.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; AMEOS Klinikum (H.J.), Heiligenhafen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J. Kornhuber, J.M.M.), Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (M.L.), University of Würzburg; Department of Neurology (J.P.), University of Rostock; DZNE (J.P.), Rostock; Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry (A.S.), University Hospital Bonn; DZNE (A.S.), Bonn; Institute of Human Genetics (A.E.V.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (J.W.), University Medical Center Göttingen; DZNE (J.W.), Göttingen, Germany; iBiMED (J.W.), Medical Sciences Department, University of Aveiro, Portugal; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology (M.L.S.), University Clinic Leipzig; and Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (M.L.S.), Leipzig, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Effects of tooth loss on brain structure: a voxel-based morphometry study. J Prosthodont Res 2018; 62:337-341. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2017.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2017] [Revised: 12/24/2017] [Accepted: 12/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
45
|
Mishra BR, Sreeraj VS, Dhanashekaran S, Maiti R. Donepezil for Compulsive Behavior in Degenerative Dementia: Case Series. CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE 2018; 16:224-227. [PMID: 29739139 PMCID: PMC5953025 DOI: 10.9758/cpn.2018.16.2.224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2016] [Revised: 01/19/2017] [Accepted: 01/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Diagnosing and managing dementia, presenting with compulsions is challenging. Presented are three cases, a possible representative subset of the Donepezil responders. Selective degeneration of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex networking striatum leading to compulsions would be amenable to cholinergic modulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biswa Ranjan Mishra
- Department of Psychiatry, All India Institute of medical Sciences, Bhuvaneshwar, India
| | - Vanteemar S Sreeraj
- Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India
| | - Saranya Dhanashekaran
- Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India
| | - Rituparna Maiti
- Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of medical Sciences, Bhuvaneshwar, India
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Koenig AM, Nobuhara CK, Williams VJ, Arnold SE. Biomarkers in Alzheimer's, Frontotemporal, Lewy Body, and Vascular Dementias. FOCUS: JOURNAL OF LIFE LONG LEARNING IN PSYCHIATRY 2018; 16:164-172. [PMID: 31975911 DOI: 10.1176/appi.focus.20170048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
This article reviews the current evidence base for biomarkers of the most common causes of dementia in later life: Alzheimer's disease (AD), frontotemporal lobar degenerations, Lewy body dementias, and vascular cognitive impairment and dementia. Biomarkers are objectively measurable indicators of normal physiology, pathological processes, or response to an intervention. Ideally, they are sensitive, specific, easy to obtain, and closely reflect the underlying biological processes of interest. While such markers are well established and in broad clinical use for common disorders in general medicine (e.g., thallium stress tests for coronary artery disease or serum blood urea nitrogen and creatinine for renal failure), analogous, validated markers for AD or other common dementias are limited, although biomarkers in research settings and specialty dementia clinics are progressing toward clinical use. By way of introducing current and future biomarkers for dementias of later life, this article will benefit the practicing clinician by increasing awareness of the availability and utility of current and emerging biomarkers in dementia diagnosis and prognosis and for monitoring new disease-modifying therapeutics that arrive in the clinic over the coming decade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron M Koenig
- All authors are with the MassGeneral Institute for Neurodegenerative Disease (MIND), Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Chloe K Nobuhara
- All authors are with the MassGeneral Institute for Neurodegenerative Disease (MIND), Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Victoria J Williams
- All authors are with the MassGeneral Institute for Neurodegenerative Disease (MIND), Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Steven E Arnold
- All authors are with the MassGeneral Institute for Neurodegenerative Disease (MIND), Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Bocchetta M, Gordon E, Cardoso MJ, Modat M, Ourselin S, Warren JD, Rohrer JD. Thalamic atrophy in frontotemporal dementia - Not just a C9orf72 problem. Neuroimage Clin 2018; 18:675-681. [PMID: 29876259 PMCID: PMC5988457 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2017] [Revised: 02/07/2018] [Accepted: 02/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a heterogeneous neurodegenerative disorder associated with frontal and temporal atrophy. Subcortical involvement has been described as well, with early thalamic atrophy most commonly associated with the C9orf72 expansion. However thalamic involvement has not been comprehensively investigated across the FTD spectrum. Methods We investigated thalamic volumes in a sample of 341 FTD patients (age: mean(standard deviation) 64.2(8.5) years; disease duration: 4.6(2.7) years) compared with 99 age-matched controls (age: 61.9(11.4) years). We performed a parcellation of T1 MRIs using an atlas propagation and label fusion approach to extract left and right thalamus volumes, which were corrected for total intracranial volumes. We assessed subgroups stratified by clinical diagnosis (141 behavioural variant FTD (bvFTD), 76 semantic dementia (SD), 103 progressive nonfluent aphasia (PNFA), 7 with associated motor neurone disease (FTD-MND) and 14 primary progressive aphasia not otherwise specified (PPA-NOS), genetic diagnosis (24 with MAPT, 24 with C9orf72, and 15 with GRN mutations), and pathological diagnosis (40 tauopathy, 61 TDP-43opathy, 3 FUSopathy). We assessed the diagnostic accuracy based on thalamic volume. Results Overall, FTD patients had smaller thalami than controls (8% difference in volume, p < 0.0005, ANCOVA). Stratifying by genetics, C9orf72 group had the smallest thalami (14% difference from controls, p < 0.0005). However, the thalami were also smaller than controls in the other genetic groups: GRN and MAPT groups showed a difference of 11% and 9% respectively (p < 0.0005). ROC analysis showed a relatively poor ability to separate C9orf72 from MAPT (AUC = 0.651, p = 0.073) and from GRN cases (AUC = 0.644, p = 0.133) using thalamic volume. All clinical subtypes had significantly smaller thalami than controls (p < 0.0005), with the FTD-MND group having the smallest (15%), followed by bvFTD (9%), PNFA (8%), PPA-NOS (7%), and lastly SD (5%). In the pathological groups, the TDP-43opathies had an 11% difference from controls, and tauopathies 9%, while the FUSopathies showed only 2% of difference from controls (p < 0.0005). GRN, PPA-NOS and SD were the subgroups showing the highest asymmetry in volumes. Conclusions The thalamus was most affected in C9orf72 genetically, TDP-43opathies pathologically and FTD-MND clinically. However, thalamic atrophy is a common feature across all FTD groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Bocchetta
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elizabeth Gordon
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - M Jorge Cardoso
- Translational Imaging Group, Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Marc Modat
- Translational Imaging Group, Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sebastien Ourselin
- Translational Imaging Group, Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jason D Warren
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan D Rohrer
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Staffaroni AM, Elahi FM, McDermott D, Marton K, Karageorgiou E, Sacco S, Paoletti M, Caverzasi E, Hess CP, Rosen HJ, Geschwind MD. Neuroimaging in Dementia. Semin Neurol 2017; 37:510-537. [PMID: 29207412 PMCID: PMC5823524 DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1608808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Although the diagnosis of dementia still is primarily based on clinical criteria, neuroimaging is playing an increasingly important role. This is in large part due to advances in techniques that can assist with discriminating between different syndromes. Magnetic resonance imaging remains at the core of differential diagnosis, with specific patterns of cortical and subcortical changes having diagnostic significance. Recent developments in molecular PET imaging techniques have opened the door for not only antemortem but early, even preclinical, diagnosis of underlying pathology. This is vital, as treatment trials are underway for pharmacological agents with specific molecular targets, and numerous failed trials suggest that earlier treatment is needed. This article provides an overview of classic neuroimaging findings as well as new and cutting-edge research techniques that assist with clinical diagnosis of a range of dementia syndromes, with an emphasis on studies using pathologically proven cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam M. Staffaroni
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California
| | - Fanny M. Elahi
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California
| | - Dana McDermott
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California
| | - Kacey Marton
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California
| | - Elissaios Karageorgiou
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California
- Neurological Institute of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Simone Sacco
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California
- Institute of Radiology, Department of Clinical Surgical Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Matteo Paoletti
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California
- Institute of Radiology, Department of Clinical Surgical Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Eduardo Caverzasi
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Christopher P. Hess
- Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), California
| | - Howard J. Rosen
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California
| | - Michael D. Geschwind
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Meeter LH, Kaat LD, Rohrer JD, van Swieten JC. Imaging and fluid biomarkers in frontotemporal dementia. Nat Rev Neurol 2017. [PMID: 28621768 DOI: 10.1038/nrneurol.2017.75] [Citation(s) in RCA: 147] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Frontotemporal dementia (FTD), the second most common type of presenile dementia, is a heterogeneous neurodegenerative disease characterized by progressive behavioural and/or language problems, and includes a range of clinical, genetic and pathological subtypes. The diagnostic process is hampered by this heterogeneity, and correct diagnosis is becoming increasingly important to enable future clinical trials of disease-modifying treatments. Reliable biomarkers will enable us to better discriminate between FTD and other forms of dementia and to predict disease progression in the clinical setting. Given that different underlying pathologies probably require specific pharmacological interventions, robust biomarkers are essential for the selection of patients with specific FTD subtypes. This Review emphasizes the increasing availability and potential applications of structural and functional imaging biomarkers, and cerebrospinal fluid and blood fluid biomarkers in sporadic and genetic FTD. The relevance of new MRI modalities - such as voxel-based morphometry, diffusion tensor imaging and arterial spin labelling - in the early stages of FTD is discussed, together with the ability of these modalities to classify FTD subtypes. We highlight promising new fluid biomarkers for staging and monitoring of FTD, and underline the importance of large, multicentre studies of individuals with presymptomatic FTD. Harmonization in the collection and analysis of data across different centres is crucial for the implementation of new biomarkers in clinical practice, and will become a great challenge in the next few years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieke H Meeter
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Center, 's Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Laura Donker Kaat
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Center, 's Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Jonathan D Rohrer
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative diseases, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - John C van Swieten
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Center, 's Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Gordon E, Rohrer JD, Fox NC. Advances in neuroimaging in frontotemporal dementia. J Neurochem 2017; 138 Suppl 1:193-210. [PMID: 27502125 DOI: 10.1111/jnc.13656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2016] [Revised: 05/02/2016] [Accepted: 05/03/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a clinically and neuroanatomically heterogeneous neurodegenerative disorder with multiple underlying genetic and pathological causes. Whilst initial neuroimaging studies highlighted the presence of frontal and temporal lobe atrophy or hypometabolism as the unifying feature in patients with FTD, more detailed studies have revealed diverse patterns across individuals, with variable frontal or temporal predominance, differing degrees of asymmetry, and the involvement of other cortical areas including the insula and cingulate, as well as subcortical structures such as the basal ganglia and thalamus. Recent advances in novel imaging modalities including diffusion tensor imaging, resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging and molecular positron emission tomography imaging allow the possibility of investigating alterations in structural and functional connectivity and the visualisation of pathological protein deposition. This review will cover the major imaging modalities currently used in research and clinical practice, focusing on the key insights they have provided into FTD, including the onset and evolution of pathological changes and also importantly their utility as biomarkers for disease detection and staging, differential diagnosis and measurement of disease progression. Validating neuroimaging biomarkers that are able to accomplish these tasks will be crucial for the ultimate goal of powering upcoming clinical trials by correctly stratifying patient enrolment and providing sensitive markers for evaluating the effects and efficacy of disease-modifying therapies. This review describes the key insights provided by research into the major neuroimaging modalities currently used in research and clinical practice, including what they tell us about the onset and evolution of FTD and how they may be used as biomarkers for disease detection and staging, differential diagnosis and measurement of disease progression. This article is part of the Frontotemporal Dementia special issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Gordon
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Jonathan D Rohrer
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Nick C Fox
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|