1
|
Schmid W, Danstrom IA, Crespo Echevarria M, Adkinson J, Mattar L, Banks GP, Sheth SA, Watrous AJ, Heilbronner SR, Bijanki KR, Alabastri A, Bartoli E. A biophysically constrained brain connectivity model based on stimulation-evoked potentials. J Neurosci Methods 2024; 405:110106. [PMID: 38453060 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Single-pulse electrical stimulation (SPES) is an established technique used to map functional effective connectivity networks in treatment-refractory epilepsy patients undergoing intracranial-electroencephalography monitoring. While the connectivity path between stimulation and recording sites has been explored through the integration of structural connectivity, there are substantial gaps, such that new modeling approaches may advance our understanding of connectivity derived from SPES studies. NEW METHOD Using intracranial electrophysiology data recorded from a single patient undergoing stereo-electroencephalography (sEEG) evaluation, we employ an automated detection method to identify early response components, C1, from pulse-evoked potentials (PEPs) induced by SPES. C1 components were utilized for a novel topology optimization method, modeling 3D electrical conductivity to infer neural pathways from stimulation sites. Additionally, PEP features were compared with tractography metrics, and model results were analyzed with respect to anatomical features. RESULTS The proposed optimization model resolved conductivity paths with low error. Specific electrode contacts displaying high error correlated with anatomical complexities. The C1 component strongly correlated with additional PEP features and displayed stable, weak correlations with tractography measures. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD Existing methods for estimating neural signal pathways are imaging-based and thus rely on anatomical inferences. CONCLUSIONS These results demonstrate that informing topology optimization methods with human intracranial SPES data is a feasible method for generating 3D conductivity maps linking electrical pathways with functional neural ensembles. PEP-estimated effective connectivity is correlated with but distinguished from structural connectivity. Modeled conductivity resolves connectivity pathways in the absence of anatomical priors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Schmid
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, Houston, TX 77005, USA
| | - Isabel A Danstrom
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Maria Crespo Echevarria
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Joshua Adkinson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Layth Mattar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Garrett P Banks
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sameer A Sheth
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Andrew J Watrous
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sarah R Heilbronner
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Kelly R Bijanki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Alessandro Alabastri
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, Houston, TX 77005, USA.
| | - Eleonora Bartoli
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yang B, Zhao B, Li C, Mo J, Guo Z, Li Z, Yao Y, Fan X, Cai D, Sang L, Zheng Z, Gao D, Zhao X, Wang X, Zhang C, Hu W, Shao X, Zhang J, Zhang K. Localizing seizure onset zone by a cortico-cortical evoked potentials-based machine learning approach in focal epilepsy. Clin Neurophysiol 2024; 158:103-113. [PMID: 38218076 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2023.12.135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Revised: 12/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to develop a new approach for identifying the localization of the seizure onset zone (SOZ) based on corticocortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) and to compare the connectivity patterns in patients with different clinical phenotypes. METHODS Fifty patients who underwent stereoelectroencephalography and CCEP procedures were included. Logistic regression was used in the model, and six CCEP metrics were input as features: root mean square of the first peak (N1RMS) and second peak (N2RMS), peak latency, onset latency, width duration, and area. RESULTS The area under the curve (AUC) for localizing the SOZ ranged from 0.88 to 0.93. The N1RMS values in the hippocampus sclerosis (HS) group were greater than that of the focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) IIa group (p < 0.001), independent of the distance between the recorded and stimulated sites. The sensitivity of localization was higher in the seizure-free group than in the non-seizure-free group (p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS This new method can be used to predict the SOZ localization in various focal epilepsy phenotypes. SIGNIFICANCE This study proposed a machine-learning approach for localizing the SOZ. Moreover, we examined how clinical phenotypes impact large-scale abnormality of the epileptogenic networks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bowen Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Baotian Zhao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Chao Li
- Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jiajie Mo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhihao Guo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zilin Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yuan Yao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiuliang Fan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Du Cai
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Sang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Fengtai Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhong Zheng
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Fengtai Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Dongmei Gao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xuemin Zhao
- Department of Neurophysiology, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiu Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery Laboratory, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Chao Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery Laboratory, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Wenhan Hu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery Laboratory, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoqiu Shao
- Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jianguo Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery Laboratory, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Kai Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery Laboratory, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ezzyat Y, Kragel JE, Solomon EA, Lega BC, Aronson JP, Jobst BC, Gross RE, Sperling MR, Worrell GA, Sheth SA, Wanda PA, Rizzuto DS, Kahana MJ. Functional and anatomical connectivity predict brain stimulation's mnemonic effects. Cereb Cortex 2024; 34:bhad427. [PMID: 38041253 PMCID: PMC10793570 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhad427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Closed-loop direct brain stimulation is a promising tool for modulating neural activity and behavior. However, it remains unclear how to optimally target stimulation to modulate brain activity in particular brain networks that underlie particular cognitive functions. Here, we test the hypothesis that stimulation's behavioral and physiological effects depend on the stimulation target's anatomical and functional network properties. We delivered closed-loop stimulation as 47 neurosurgical patients studied and recalled word lists. Multivariate classifiers, trained to predict momentary lapses in memory function, triggered the stimulation of the lateral temporal cortex (LTC) during the study phase of the task. We found that LTC stimulation specifically improved memory when delivered to targets near white matter pathways. Memory improvement was largest for targets near white matter that also showed high functional connectivity to the brain's memory network. These targets also reduced low-frequency activity in this network, an established marker of successful memory encoding. These data reveal how anatomical and functional networks mediate stimulation's behavioral and physiological effects, provide further evidence that closed-loop LTC stimulation can improve episodic memory, and suggest a method for optimizing neuromodulation through improved stimulation targeting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youssef Ezzyat
- Dept. of Psychology, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT 06459, USA
| | - James E Kragel
- Dept. of Neurology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Ethan A Solomon
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Bradley C Lega
- Dept. of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Joshua P Aronson
- Dept. of Neurosurgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Barbara C Jobst
- Dept. of Neurology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA
| | - Robert E Gross
- Dept. of Neurosurgery, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Michael R Sperling
- Dept. of Neurology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | | | - Sameer A Sheth
- Dept. of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Paul A Wanda
- Dept. of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Daniel S Rizzuto
- Dept. of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Michael J Kahana
- Dept. of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Novitskaya Y, Dümpelmann M, Schulze-Bonhage A. Physiological and pathological neuronal connectivity in the living human brain based on intracranial EEG signals: the current state of research. FRONTIERS IN NETWORK PHYSIOLOGY 2023; 3:1297345. [PMID: 38107334 PMCID: PMC10723837 DOI: 10.3389/fnetp.2023.1297345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
Over the past decades, studies of human brain networks have received growing attention as the assessment and modelling of connectivity in the brain is a topic of high impact with potential application in the understanding of human brain organization under both physiological as well as various pathological conditions. Under specific diagnostic settings, human neuronal signal can be obtained from intracranial EEG (iEEG) recording in epilepsy patients that allows gaining insight into the functional organisation of living human brain. There are two approaches to assess brain connectivity in the iEEG-based signal: evaluation of spontaneous neuronal oscillations during ongoing physiological and pathological brain activity, and analysis of the electrophysiological cortico-cortical neuronal responses, evoked by single pulse electrical stimulation (SPES). Both methods have their own advantages and limitations. The paper outlines available methodological approaches and provides an overview of current findings in studies of physiological and pathological human brain networks, based on intracranial EEG recordings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yulia Novitskaya
- Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Dümpelmann
- Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Microsystems Engineering (IMTEK), University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Schulze-Bonhage
- Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Center for Basics in NeuroModulation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schmid W, Danstrom IA, Echevarria MC, Adkinson J, Mattar L, Banks GP, Sheth SA, Watrous AJ, Heilbronner SR, Bijanki KR, Alabastri A, Bartoli E. A biophysically constrained brain connectivity model based on stimulation-evoked potentials. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.11.03.565525. [PMID: 37986830 PMCID: PMC10659345 DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.03.565525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
Background Single-pulse electrical stimulation (SPES) is an established technique used to map functional effective connectivity networks in treatment-refractory epilepsy patients undergoing intracranial-electroencephalography monitoring. While the connectivity path between stimulation and recording sites has been explored through the integration of structural connectivity, there are substantial gaps, such that new modeling approaches may advance our understanding of connectivity derived from SPES studies. New Method Using intracranial electrophysiology data recorded from a single patient undergoing sEEG evaluation, we employ an automated detection method to identify early response components, C1, from pulse-evoked potentials (PEPs) induced by SPES. C1 components were utilized for a novel topology optimization method, modeling 3D conductivity propagation from stimulation sites. Additionally, PEP features were compared with tractography metrics, and model results were analyzed with respect to anatomical features. Results The proposed optimization model resolved conductivity paths with low error. Specific electrode contacts displaying high error correlated with anatomical complexities. The C1 component strongly correlates with additional PEP features and displayed stable, weak correlations with tractography measures. Comparison with existing methods Existing methods for estimating conductivity propagation are imaging-based and thus rely on anatomical inferences. Conclusions These results demonstrate that informing topology optimization methods with human intracranial SPES data is a feasible method for generating 3D conductivity maps linking electrical pathways with functional neural ensembles. PEP-estimated effective connectivity is correlated with but distinguished from structural connectivity. Modeled conductivity resolves connectivity pathways in the absence of anatomical priors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Schmid
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, Houston 77005, Texas, USA
| | - Isabel A. Danstrom
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston 77030, Texas, USA
| | - Maria Crespo Echevarria
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston 77030, Texas, USA
| | - Joshua Adkinson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston 77030, Texas, USA
| | - Layth Mattar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston 77030, Texas, USA
| | - Garrett P. Banks
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston 77030, Texas, USA
| | - Sameer A. Sheth
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston 77030, Texas, USA
| | - Andrew J. Watrous
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston 77030, Texas, USA
| | - Sarah R. Heilbronner
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston 77030, Texas, USA
| | - Kelly R. Bijanki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston 77030, Texas, USA
| | - Alessandro Alabastri
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, Houston 77005, Texas, USA
| | - Eleonora Bartoli
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston 77030, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zelmann R, Paulk AC, Tian F, Balanza Villegas GA, Dezha Peralta J, Crocker B, Cosgrove GR, Richardson RM, Williams ZM, Dougherty DD, Purdon PL, Cash SS. Differential cortical network engagement during states of un/consciousness in humans. Neuron 2023; 111:3479-3495.e6. [PMID: 37659409 PMCID: PMC10843836 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2023.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/04/2023]
Abstract
What happens in the human brain when we are unconscious? Despite substantial work, we are still unsure which brain regions are involved and how they are impacted when consciousness is disrupted. Using intracranial recordings and direct electrical stimulation, we mapped global, network, and regional involvement during wake vs. arousable unconsciousness (sleep) vs. non-arousable unconsciousness (propofol-induced general anesthesia). Information integration and complex processing we`re reduced, while variability increased in any type of unconscious state. These changes were more pronounced during anesthesia than sleep and involved different cortical engagement. During sleep, changes were mostly uniformly distributed across the brain, whereas during anesthesia, the prefrontal cortex was the most disrupted, suggesting that the lack of arousability during anesthesia results not from just altered overall physiology but from a disconnection between the prefrontal and other brain areas. These findings provide direct evidence for different neural dynamics during loss of consciousness compared with loss of arousability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rina Zelmann
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Angelique C Paulk
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Fangyun Tian
- Department of Anesthesia, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Britni Crocker
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard-MIT Health Sciences and Technology, Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - G Rees Cosgrove
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - R Mark Richardson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ziv M Williams
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Darin D Dougherty
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Patrick L Purdon
- Department of Anesthesia, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sydney S Cash
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ezzyat Y, Kragel JE, Solomon EA, Lega BC, Aronson JP, Jobst BC, Gross RE, Sperling MR, Worrell GA, Sheth SA, Wanda PA, Rizzuto DS, Kahana MJ. Functional and anatomical connectivity predict brain stimulation's mnemonic effects. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.07.27.550851. [PMID: 37609181 PMCID: PMC10441352 DOI: 10.1101/2023.07.27.550851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
Closed-loop direct brain stimulation is a promising tool for modulating neural activity and behavior. However, it remains unclear how to optimally target stimulation to modulate brain activity in particular brain networks that underlie particular cognitive functions. Here, we test the hypothesis that stimulation's behavioral and physiological effects depend on the stimulation target's anatomical and functional network properties. We delivered closed-loop stimulation as 47 neurosurgical patients studied and recalled word lists. Multivariate classifiers, trained to predict momentary lapses in memory function, triggered stimulation of the lateral temporal cortex (LTC) during the study phase of the task. We found that LTC stimulation specifically improved memory when delivered to targets near white matter pathways. Memory improvement was largest for targets near white matter that also showed high functional connectivity to the brain's memory network. These targets also reduced low-frequency activity in this network, an established marker of successful memory encoding. These data reveal how anatomical and functional networks mediate stimulation's behavioral and physiological effects, provide further evidence that closed-loop LTC stimulation can improve episodic memory, and suggest a method for optimizing neuromodulation through improved stimulation targeting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youssef Ezzyat
- Dept. of Psychology, Wesleyan University, Middletown CT 06459
| | | | - Ethan A. Solomon
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104
| | - Bradley C. Lega
- Dept. of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas TX 75390
| | - Joshua P. Aronson
- Dept. of Neurosurgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon NH 03756
| | - Barbara C. Jobst
- Dept. of Neurology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon NH 03756
| | - Robert E. Gross
- Dept. of Neurosurgery, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta GA 30322
| | - Michael R. Sperling
- Dept. of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia PA 19107
| | | | - Sameer A. Sheth
- Dept. of Neurosurgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032
| | - Paul A. Wanda
- Dept. of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104
| | - Daniel S. Rizzuto
- Dept. of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104
| | - Michael J. Kahana
- Dept. of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Soper DJ, Reich D, Ross A, Salami P, Cash SS, Basu I, Peled N, Paulk AC. Modular pipeline for reconstruction and localization of implanted intracranial ECoG and sEEG electrodes. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0287921. [PMID: 37418486 PMCID: PMC10328232 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Implantation of electrodes in the brain has been used as a clinical tool for decades to stimulate and record brain activity. As this method increasingly becomes the standard of care for several disorders and diseases, there is a growing need to quickly and accurately localize the electrodes once they are placed within the brain. We share here a protocol pipeline for localizing electrodes implanted in the brain, which we have applied to more than 260 patients, that is accessible to multiple skill levels and modular in execution. This pipeline uses multiple software packages to prioritize flexibility by permitting multiple different parallel outputs while minimizing the number of steps for each output. These outputs include co-registered imaging, electrode coordinates, 2D and 3D visualizations of the implants, automatic surface and volumetric localizations of the brain regions per electrode, and anonymization and data sharing tools. We demonstrate here some of the pipeline's visualizations and automatic localization algorithms which we have applied to determine appropriate stimulation targets, to conduct seizure dynamics analysis, and to localize neural activity from cognitive tasks in previous studies. Further, the output facilitates the extraction of information such as the probability of grey matter intersection or the nearest anatomic structure per electrode contact across all data sets that go through the pipeline. We expect that this pipeline will be a useful framework for researchers and clinicians alike to localize implanted electrodes in the human brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J. Soper
- Department of Neurology, Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Dustine Reich
- Department of Neurology, Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Alex Ross
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States of America
| | - Pariya Salami
- Department of Neurology, Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Sydney S. Cash
- Department of Neurology, Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Ishita Basu
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States of America
| | - Noam Peled
- Department of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States of America
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Angelique C. Paulk
- Department of Neurology, Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Johnson GW, Doss DJ, Morgan VL, Paulo DL, Cai LY, Shless JS, Negi AS, Gummadavelli A, Kang H, Reddy SB, Naftel RP, Bick SK, Williams Roberson S, Dawant BM, Wallace MT, Englot DJ. The Interictal Suppression Hypothesis in focal epilepsy: network-level supporting evidence. Brain 2023; 146:2828-2845. [PMID: 36722219 PMCID: PMC10316780 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awad016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Revised: 12/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Why are people with focal epilepsy not continuously having seizures? Previous neuronal signalling work has implicated gamma-aminobutyric acid balance as integral to seizure generation and termination, but is a high-level distributed brain network involved in suppressing seizures? Recent intracranial electrographic evidence has suggested that seizure-onset zones have increased inward connectivity that could be associated with interictal suppression of seizure activity. Accordingly, we hypothesize that seizure-onset zones are actively suppressed by the rest of the brain network during interictal states. Full testing of this hypothesis would require collaboration across multiple domains of neuroscience. We focused on partially testing this hypothesis at the electrographic network level within 81 individuals with drug-resistant focal epilepsy undergoing presurgical evaluation. We used intracranial electrographic resting-state and neurostimulation recordings to evaluate the network connectivity of seizure onset, early propagation and non-involved zones. We then used diffusion imaging to acquire estimates of white-matter connectivity to evaluate structure-function coupling effects on connectivity findings. Finally, we generated a resting-state classification model to assist clinicians in detecting seizure-onset and propagation zones without the need for multiple ictal recordings. Our findings indicate that seizure onset and early propagation zones demonstrate markedly increased inwards connectivity and decreased outwards connectivity using both resting-state (one-way ANOVA, P-value = 3.13 × 10-13) and neurostimulation analyses to evaluate evoked responses (one-way ANOVA, P-value = 2.5 × 10-3). When controlling for the distance between regions, the difference between inwards and outwards connectivity remained stable up to 80 mm between brain connections (two-way repeated measures ANOVA, group effect P-value of 2.6 × 10-12). Structure-function coupling analyses revealed that seizure-onset zones exhibit abnormally enhanced coupling (hypercoupling) of surrounding regions compared to presumably healthy tissue (two-way repeated measures ANOVA, interaction effect P-value of 9.76 × 10-21). Using these observations, our support vector classification models achieved a maximum held-out testing set accuracy of 92.0 ± 2.2% to classify early propagation and seizure-onset zones. These results suggest that seizure-onset zones are actively segregated and suppressed by a widespread brain network. Furthermore, this electrographically observed functional suppression is disproportionate to any observed structural connectivity alterations of the seizure-onset zones. These findings have implications for the identification of seizure-onset zones using only brief electrographic recordings to reduce patient morbidity and augment the presurgical evaluation of drug-resistant epilepsy. Further testing of the interictal suppression hypothesis can provide insight into potential new resective, ablative and neuromodulation approaches to improve surgical success rates in those suffering from drug-resistant focal epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graham W Johnson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science (VUIIS), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering (VISE), Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Derek J Doss
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science (VUIIS), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering (VISE), Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Victoria L Morgan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science (VUIIS), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering (VISE), Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Danika L Paulo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Leon Y Cai
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science (VUIIS), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering (VISE), Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Jared S Shless
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science (VUIIS), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering (VISE), Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Aarushi S Negi
- Department of Neuroscience, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Abhijeet Gummadavelli
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Hakmook Kang
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Shilpa B Reddy
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt Children’s Hospital, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Robert P Naftel
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Sarah K Bick
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | | | - Benoit M Dawant
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science (VUIIS), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering (VISE), Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Mark T Wallace
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Dario J Englot
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science (VUIIS), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering (VISE), Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bernabei JM, Li A, Revell AY, Smith RJ, Gunnarsdottir KM, Ong IZ, Davis KA, Sinha N, Sarma S, Litt B. Quantitative approaches to guide epilepsy surgery from intracranial EEG. Brain 2023; 146:2248-2258. [PMID: 36623936 PMCID: PMC10232272 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awad007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2022] [Revised: 12/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the past 10 years, the drive to improve outcomes from epilepsy surgery has stimulated widespread interest in methods to quantitatively guide epilepsy surgery from intracranial EEG (iEEG). Many patients fail to achieve seizure freedom, in part due to the challenges in subjective iEEG interpretation. To address this clinical need, quantitative iEEG analytics have been developed using a variety of approaches, spanning studies of seizures, interictal periods, and their transitions, and encompass a range of techniques including electrographic signal analysis, dynamical systems modeling, machine learning and graph theory. Unfortunately, many methods fail to generalize to new data and are sensitive to differences in pathology and electrode placement. Here, we critically review selected literature on computational methods of identifying the epileptogenic zone from iEEG. We highlight shared methodological challenges common to many studies in this field and propose ways that they can be addressed. One fundamental common pitfall is a lack of open-source, high-quality data, which we specifically address by sharing a centralized high-quality, well-annotated, multicentre dataset consisting of >100 patients to support larger and more rigorous studies. Ultimately, we provide a road map to help these tools reach clinical trials and hope to improve the lives of future patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John M Bernabei
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Center for Neuroengineering & Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Adam Li
- Department of Computer Science, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA
| | - Andrew Y Revell
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Rachel J Smith
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
- Neuroengineering Program, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Kristin M Gunnarsdottir
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
- Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Ian Z Ong
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Kathryn A Davis
- Center for Neuroengineering & Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Nishant Sinha
- Center for Neuroengineering & Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Sridevi Sarma
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
- Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Brian Litt
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Center for Neuroengineering & Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hays MA, Kamali G, Koubeissi MZ, Sarma SV, Crone NE, Smith RJ, Kang JY. Towards optimizing single pulse electrical stimulation: High current intensity, short pulse width stimulation most effectively elicits evoked potentials. Brain Stimul 2023; 16:772-782. [PMID: 37141936 PMCID: PMC10330807 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.04.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2023] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While single pulse electrical stimulation (SPES) is increasingly used to study effective connectivity, the effects of varying stimulation parameters on the resulting cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) have not been systematically explored. OBJECTIVE We sought to understand the interacting effects of stimulation pulse width, current intensity, and charge on CCEPs through an extensive testing of this parameter space and analysis of several response metrics. METHODS We conducted SPES in 11 patients undergoing intracranial EEG monitoring using five combinations of current intensity (1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 5.0, and 7.5 mA) and pulse width at each of three charges (0.750, 1.125, and 1.500 μC/phase) to study how CCEP amplitude, distribution, latency, morphology, and stimulus artifact amplitude vary with each parameter. RESULTS Stimulations with a greater charge or a greater current intensity and shorter pulse width at a given charge generally resulted in greater CCEP amplitudes and spatial distributions, shorter latencies, and increased waveform correlation. These effects interacted such that stimulations with the lowest charge and highest current intensities resulted in greater response amplitudes and spatial distributions than stimulations with the highest charge and lowest current intensities. Stimulus artifact amplitude increased with charge, but this could be mitigated by using shorter pulse widths. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that individual combinations of current intensity and pulse width, in addition to charge, are important determinants of CCEP magnitude, morphology, and spatial extent. Together, these findings suggest that high current intensity, short pulse width stimulations are optimal SPES settings for eliciting strong and consistent responses while minimizing charge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Hays
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Golnoosh Kamali
- Johns Hopkins Technology Ventures, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Sridevi V Sarma
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nathan E Crone
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Rachel J Smith
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; Department of Neuroengineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Joon Y Kang
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cornblath EJ, Lucas A, Armstrong C, Greenblatt AS, Stein JM, Hadar PN, Raghupathi R, Marsh E, Litt B, Davis KA, Conrad EC. Quantifying trial-by-trial variability during cortico-cortical evoked potential mapping of epileptogenic tissue. Epilepsia 2023; 64:1021-1034. [PMID: 36728906 PMCID: PMC10480141 DOI: 10.1111/epi.17528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Measuring cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) is a promising tool for mapping epileptic networks, but it is not known how variability in brain state and stimulation technique might impact the use of CCEPs for epilepsy localization. We test the hypotheses that (1) CCEPs demonstrate systematic variability across trials and (2) CCEP amplitudes depend on the timing of stimulation with respect to endogenous, low-frequency oscillations. METHODS We studied 11 patients who underwent CCEP mapping after stereo-electroencephalography electrode implantation for surgical evaluation of drug-resistant epilepsy. Evoked potentials were measured from all electrodes after each pulse of a 30 s, 1 Hz bipolar stimulation train. We quantified monotonic trends, phase dependence, and standard deviation (SD) of N1 (15-50 ms post-stimulation) and N2 (50-300 ms post-stimulation) amplitudes across the 30 stimulation trials for each patient. We used linear regression to quantify the relationship between measures of CCEP variability and the clinical seizure-onset zone (SOZ) or interictal spike rates. RESULTS We found that N1 and N2 waveforms exhibited both positive and negative monotonic trends in amplitude across trials. SOZ electrodes and electrodes with high interictal spike rates had lower N1 and N2 amplitudes with higher SD across trials. Monotonic trends of N1 and N2 amplitude were more positive when stimulating from an area with higher interictal spike rate. We also found intermittent synchronization of trial-level N1 amplitude with low-frequency phase in the hippocampus, which did not localize the SOZ. SIGNIFICANCE These findings suggest that standard approaches for CCEP mapping, which involve computing a trial-averaged response over a .2-1 Hz stimulation train, may be masking inter-trial variability that localizes to epileptogenic tissue. We also found that CCEP N1 amplitudes synchronize with ongoing low-frequency oscillations in the hippocampus. Further targeted experiments are needed to determine whether phase-locked stimulation could have a role in localizing epileptogenic tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eli J. Cornblath
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alfredo Lucas
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Caren Armstrong
- Pediatric Epilepsy Program, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Adam S. Greenblatt
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Joel M. Stein
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Peter N. Hadar
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ramya Raghupathi
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Eric Marsh
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Pediatric Epilepsy Program, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Brian Litt
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kathryn A. Davis
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Erin C. Conrad
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Johnson GW, Cai LY, Doss DJ, Jiang JW, Negi AS, Narasimhan S, Paulo DL, González HFJ, Roberson SW, Bick SK, Chang CE, Morgan VL, Wallace MT, Englot DJ. Localizing seizure onset zones in surgical epilepsy with neurostimulation deep learning. J Neurosurg 2023; 138:1002-1007. [PMID: 36152321 PMCID: PMC10619627 DOI: 10.3171/2022.8.jns221321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy, automated tools for seizure onset zone (SOZ) localization that use brief interictal recordings could supplement presurgical evaluations and improve care. Thus, the authors sought to localize SOZs by training a multichannel convolutional neural network on stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) cortico-cortical evoked potentials. METHODS The authors performed single-pulse electrical stimulation in 10 drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy patients implanted with SEEG. Using 500,000 unique poststimulation SEEG epochs, the authors trained a multichannel 1-dimensional convolutional neural network to determine whether an SOZ had been stimulated. RESULTS SOZs were classified with mean sensitivity of 78.1% and specificity of 74.6% according to leave-one-patient-out testing. To achieve maximum accuracy, the model required a 0- to 350-msec poststimulation time period. Post hoc analysis revealed that the model accurately classified unilateral versus bilateral mesial temporal lobe seizure onset, as well as neocortical SOZs. CONCLUSIONS This was the first demonstration, to the authors' knowledge, that a deep learning framework can be used to accurately classify SOZs with single-pulse electrical stimulation-evoked responses. These findings suggest that accurate classification of SOZs relies on a complex temporal evolution of evoked responses within 350 msec of stimulation. Validation in a larger data set could provide a practical clinical tool for the presurgical evaluation of drug-resistant epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graham W. Johnson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
| | - Leon Y. Cai
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
| | - Derek J. Doss
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
| | - Jasmine W. Jiang
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Aarushi S. Negi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Saramati Narasimhan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Danika L. Paulo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Hernán F. J. González
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
| | - Shawniqua Williams Roberson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
- Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Sarah K. Bick
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Catie E. Chang
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
| | - Victoria L. Morgan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Mark T. Wallace
- Department of Hearing & Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
- Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
- Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
| | - Dario J. Englot
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Campbell JM, Davis TS, Anderson DN, Arain A, Inman CS, Smith EH, Rolston JD. Subsets of cortico-cortical evoked potentials propagate as traveling waves. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.03.27.534002. [PMID: 37034691 PMCID: PMC10081214 DOI: 10.1101/2023.03.27.534002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
Emerging evidence suggests that the temporal dynamics of cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) may be used to characterize the patterns of information flow between and within brain networks. At present, however, the spatiotemporal dynamics of CCEP propagation cortically and subcortically are incompletely understood. We hypothesized that CCEPs propagate as an evoked traveling wave emanating from the site of stimulation. To elicit CCEPs, we applied single-pulse stimulation to stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) electrodes implanted in 21 adult patients with intractable epilepsy. For each robust CCEP, we measured the timing of the maximal descent in evoked local field potentials and broadband high-gamma power (70-150 Hz) envelopes relative to the distance between the recording and stimulation contacts using three different metrics (i.e., Euclidean distance, path length, geodesic distance), representing direct, subcortical, and transcortical propagation, respectively. Many evoked responses to single-pulse electrical stimulation appear to propagate as traveling waves (~17-30%), even in the sparsely sampled, three-dimensional SEEG space. These results provide new insights into the spatiotemporal dynamics of CCEP propagation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin M. Campbell
- MD-PhD Program, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Interdepartmental Program in Neuroscience, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Tyler S. Davis
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Daria Nesterovich Anderson
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Amir Arain
- Department of Neurology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Cory S. Inman
- Interdepartmental Program in Neuroscience, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Elliot H. Smith
- Interdepartmental Program in Neuroscience, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - John D. Rolston
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Webler RD, Oathes DJ, van Rooij SJH, Gewirtz JC, Nahas Z, Lissek SM, Widge AS. Causally mapping human threat extinction relevant circuits with depolarizing brain stimulation methods. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2023; 144:105005. [PMID: 36549377 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.105005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Laboratory threat extinction paradigms and exposure-based therapy both involve repeated, safe confrontation with stimuli previously experienced as threatening. This fundamental procedural overlap supports laboratory threat extinction as a compelling analogue of exposure-based therapy. Threat extinction impairments have been detected in clinical anxiety and may contribute to exposure-based therapy non-response and relapse. However, efforts to improve exposure outcomes using techniques that boost extinction - primarily rodent extinction - have largely failed to date, potentially due to fundamental differences between rodent and human neurobiology. In this review, we articulate a comprehensive pre-clinical human research agenda designed to overcome these failures. We describe how connectivity guided depolarizing brain stimulation methods (i.e., TMS and DBS) can be applied concurrently with threat extinction and dual threat reconsolidation-extinction paradigms to causally map human extinction relevant circuits and inform the optimal integration of these methods with exposure-based therapy. We highlight candidate targets including the amygdala, hippocampus, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, and mesolimbic structures, and propose hypotheses about how stimulation delivered at specific learning phases could strengthen threat extinction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan D Webler
- Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| | - Desmond J Oathes
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sanne J H van Rooij
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jonathan C Gewirtz
- Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, AZ, USA
| | - Ziad Nahas
- Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, AZ, USA
| | - Shmuel M Lissek
- Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Alik S Widge
- Department of Psychiatry and Medical Discovery Team on Addictions, University of Minnesota Medical School, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hays MA, Smith RJ, Wang Y, Coogan C, Sarma SV, Crone NE, Kang JY. Cortico-cortical evoked potentials in response to varying stimulation intensity improves seizure localization. Clin Neurophysiol 2023; 145:119-128. [PMID: 36127246 PMCID: PMC9771930 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2022.08.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE As single pulse electrical stimulation (SPES) is increasingly utilized to help localize the seizure onset zone (SOZ), it is important to understand how stimulation intensity can affect the ability to use cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) to delineate epileptogenic regions. METHODS We studied 15 drug-resistant epilepsy patients undergoing intracranial EEG monitoring and SPES with titrations of stimulation intensity. The N1 amplitude and distribution of CCEPs elicited in the SOZ and non-seizure onset zone (nSOZ) were quantified at each intensity. The separability of the SOZ and nSOZ using N1 amplitudes was compared between models using responses to titrations, responses to one maximal intensity, or both. RESULTS At 2 mA and above, the increase in N1 amplitude with current intensity was greater for responses within the SOZ, and SOZ response distribution was maximized by 4-6 mA. Models incorporating titrations achieved better separability of SOZ and nSOZ compared to those using one maximal intensity. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated that differences in CCEP amplitude over a range of current intensities can improve discriminability of SOZ regions. SIGNIFICANCE This study provides insight into the underlying excitability of the SOZ and how differences in current-dependent amplitudes of CCEPs may be used to help localize epileptogenic sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Hays
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Rachel J Smith
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Yujing Wang
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christopher Coogan
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sridevi V Sarma
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nathan E Crone
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Joon Y Kang
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mercier MR, Dubarry AS, Tadel F, Avanzini P, Axmacher N, Cellier D, Vecchio MD, Hamilton LS, Hermes D, Kahana MJ, Knight RT, Llorens A, Megevand P, Melloni L, Miller KJ, Piai V, Puce A, Ramsey NF, Schwiedrzik CM, Smith SE, Stolk A, Swann NC, Vansteensel MJ, Voytek B, Wang L, Lachaux JP, Oostenveld R. Advances in human intracranial electroencephalography research, guidelines and good practices. Neuroimage 2022; 260:119438. [PMID: 35792291 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Since the second-half of the twentieth century, intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG), including both electrocorticography (ECoG) and stereo-electroencephalography (sEEG), has provided an intimate view into the human brain. At the interface between fundamental research and the clinic, iEEG provides both high temporal resolution and high spatial specificity but comes with constraints, such as the individual's tailored sparsity of electrode sampling. Over the years, researchers in neuroscience developed their practices to make the most of the iEEG approach. Here we offer a critical review of iEEG research practices in a didactic framework for newcomers, as well addressing issues encountered by proficient researchers. The scope is threefold: (i) review common practices in iEEG research, (ii) suggest potential guidelines for working with iEEG data and answer frequently asked questions based on the most widespread practices, and (iii) based on current neurophysiological knowledge and methodologies, pave the way to good practice standards in iEEG research. The organization of this paper follows the steps of iEEG data processing. The first section contextualizes iEEG data collection. The second section focuses on localization of intracranial electrodes. The third section highlights the main pre-processing steps. The fourth section presents iEEG signal analysis methods. The fifth section discusses statistical approaches. The sixth section draws some unique perspectives on iEEG research. Finally, to ensure a consistent nomenclature throughout the manuscript and to align with other guidelines, e.g., Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) and the OHBM Committee on Best Practices in Data Analysis and Sharing (COBIDAS), we provide a glossary to disambiguate terms related to iEEG research.
Collapse
|
18
|
Parmigiani S, Mikulan EP, Russo S, Sarasso S, Zauli FM, Rubino A, Cattani A, Fecchio M, Giampiccolo D, Lanzone J, D'Orio P, Del Vecchio M, Avanzini P, Nobili L, Sartori I, Massimini M, Pigorini A. Simultaneous stereo-EEG and high-density scalp EEG recordings to study the effects of intracerebral stimulation parameters. Brain Stimul 2022; 15:664-675. [PMID: 35421585 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Revised: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) recorded by stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) are a valuable tool to investigate brain reactivity and effective connectivity. However, invasive recordings are spatially sparse since they depend on clinical needs. This sparsity hampers systematic comparisons across-subjects, the detection of the whole-brain effects of intracortical stimulation, as well as their relationships to the EEG responses evoked by non-invasive stimuli. OBJECTIVE To demonstrate that CCEPs recorded by high-density electroencephalography (hd-EEG) provide additional information with respect SEEG alone and to provide an open, curated dataset to allow for further exploration of their potential. METHODS The dataset encompasses SEEG and hd-EEG recordings simultaneously acquired during Single Pulse Electrical Stimulation (SPES) in drug-resistant epileptic patients (N = 36) in whom stimulations were delivered with different physical, geometrical, and topological parameters. Differences in CCEPs were assessed by amplitude, latency, and spectral measures. RESULTS While invasively and non-invasively recorded CCEPs were generally correlated, differences in pulse duration, angle and stimulated cortical area were better captured by hd-EEG. Further, intracranial stimulation evoked site-specific hd-EEG responses that reproduced the spectral features of EEG responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Notably, SPES, albeit unperceived by subjects, elicited scalp responses that were up to one order of magnitude larger than the responses typically evoked by sensory stimulation in awake humans. CONCLUSIONS CCEPs can be simultaneously recorded with SEEG and hd-EEG and the latter provides a reliable descriptor of the effects of SPES as well as a common reference to compare the whole-brain effects of intracortical stimulation to those of non-invasive transcranial or sensory stimulations in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Parmigiani
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "L. Sacco" Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - E P Mikulan
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "L. Sacco" Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - S Russo
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "L. Sacco" Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; Department of Philosophy "Piero Martinetti", Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - S Sarasso
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "L. Sacco" Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - F M Zauli
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "L. Sacco" Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; Department of Philosophy "Piero Martinetti", Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - A Rubino
- "C. Munari" Epilepsy Surgery Centre, Department of Neuroscience, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - A Cattani
- Department of Mathematics & Statistics, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - M Fecchio
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - D Giampiccolo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy; Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK; Victor Horsley Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK; Institute of Neurosciences, Cleveland Clinic London, London, UK
| | - J Lanzone
- Department of Systems Medicine, Neuroscience, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy; Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, IRCCS, Neurorehabilitation Department of Milano Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - P D'Orio
- "C. Munari" Epilepsy Surgery Centre, Department of Neuroscience, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy; Istituto di Neuroscienze, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Parma, Italy
| | - M Del Vecchio
- Istituto di Neuroscienze, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Parma, Italy
| | - P Avanzini
- Istituto di Neuroscienze, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Parma, Italy
| | - L Nobili
- Child Neuropsychiatry, IRCCS Istituto G. Gaslini, Genova, Italy
| | - I Sartori
- "C. Munari" Epilepsy Surgery Centre, Department of Neuroscience, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - M Massimini
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "L. Sacco" Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy; Azrieli Program in Brain, Mind and Consciousness, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, Canada
| | - A Pigorini
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "L. Sacco" Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical, V, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Paulk AC, Zelmann R, Crocker B, Widge AS, Dougherty DD, Eskandar EN, Weisholtz DS, Richardson RM, Cosgrove GR, Williams ZM, Cash SS. Local and distant cortical responses to single pulse intracranial stimulation in the human brain are differentially modulated by specific stimulation parameters. Brain Stimul 2022; 15:491-508. [PMID: 35247646 PMCID: PMC8985164 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electrical neuromodulation via direct electrical stimulation (DES) is an increasingly common therapy for a wide variety of neuropsychiatric diseases. Unfortunately, therapeutic efficacy is inconsistent, likely due to our limited understanding of the relationship between the massive stimulation parameter space and brain tissue responses. OBJECTIVE To better understand how different parameters induce varied neural responses, we systematically examined single pulse-induced cortico-cortico evoked potentials (CCEP) as a function of stimulation amplitude, duration, brain region, and whether grey or white matter was stimulated. METHODS We measured voltage peak amplitudes and area under the curve (AUC) of intracranially recorded stimulation responses as a function of distance from the stimulation site, pulse width, current injected, location relative to grey and white matter, and brain region stimulated (N = 52, n = 719 stimulation sites). RESULTS Increasing stimulation pulse width increased responses near the stimulation location. Increasing stimulation amplitude (current) increased both evoked amplitudes and AUC nonlinearly. Locally (<15 mm), stimulation at the boundary between grey and white matter induced larger responses. In contrast, for distant sites (>15 mm), white matter stimulation consistently produced larger responses than stimulation in or near grey matter. The stimulation location-response curves followed different trends for cingulate, lateral frontal, and lateral temporal cortical stimulation. CONCLUSION These results demonstrate that a stronger local response may require stimulation in the grey-white boundary while stimulation in the white matter could be needed for network activation. Thus, stimulation parameters tailored for a specific anatomical-functional outcome may be key to advancing neuromodulatory therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelique C Paulk
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA; Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Rina Zelmann
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA; Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Britni Crocker
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA; Harvard-MIT Health Sciences and Technology, Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
| | - Alik S Widge
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA
| | - Darin D Dougherty
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA
| | - Emad N Eskandar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Daniel S Weisholtz
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - R Mark Richardson
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - G Rees Cosgrove
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Ziv M Williams
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Sydney S Cash
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA; Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wendt K, Denison T, Foster G, Krinke L, Thomson A, Wilson S, Widge AS. Physiologically informed neuromodulation. J Neurol Sci 2021; 434:120121. [PMID: 34998239 PMCID: PMC8976285 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2021.120121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 12/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
The rapid evolution of neuromodulation techniques includes an increasing amount of research into stimulation paradigms that are guided by patients' neurophysiology, to increase efficacy and responder rates. Treatment personalisation and target engagement have shown to be effective in fields such as Parkinson's disease, and closed-loop paradigms have been successfully implemented in cardiac defibrillators. Promising avenues are being explored for physiologically informed neuromodulation in psychiatry. Matching the stimulation frequency to individual brain rhythms has shown some promise in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Matching the phase of those rhythms may further enhance neuroplasticity, for instance when combining TMS with electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings. Resting-state EEG and event-related potentials may be useful to demonstrate connectivity between stimulation sites and connected areas. These techniques are available today to the psychiatrist to diagnose underlying sleep disorders, epilepsy, or lesions as contributing factors to the cause of depression. These technologies may also be useful in assessing the patient's brain network status prior to deciding on treatment options. Ongoing research using invasive recordings may allow for future identification of mood biomarkers and network structure. A core limitation is that biomarker research may currently be limited by the internal heterogeneity of psychiatric disorders according to the current DSM-based classifications. New approaches are being developed and may soon be validated. Finally, care must be taken when incorporating closed-loop capabilities into neuromodulation systems, by ensuring the safe operation of the system and understanding the physiological dynamics. Neurophysiological tools are rapidly evolving and will likely define the next generation of neuromodulation therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Wendt
- Department of Engineering Science and MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Timothy Denison
- Department of Engineering Science and MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Gaynor Foster
- Welcony Inc., Plymouth, MN, United States of America
| | - Lothar Krinke
- Welcony Inc., Plymouth, MN, United States of America; Department of Neuroscience, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States of America
| | - Alix Thomson
- Welcony Inc., Plymouth, MN, United States of America
| | - Saydra Wilson
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
| | - Alik S Widge
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America; Medical Discovery Team on Additions, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hays MA, Smith RJ, Haridas B, Coogan C, Crone NE, Kang JY. Effects of stimulation intensity on intracranial cortico-cortical evoked potentials: A titration study. Clin Neurophysiol 2021; 132:2766-2777. [PMID: 34583119 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Revised: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the present study was to investigate the optimal stimulation parameters for eliciting cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) for mapping functional and epileptogenic networks. METHODS We studied 13 patients with refractory epilepsy undergoing intracranial EEG monitoring. We systematically titrated the intensity of single-pulse electrical stimulation at multiple sites to assess the effect of increasing current on salient features of CCEPs such as N1 potential magnitude, signal to noise ratio, waveform similarity, and spatial distribution of responses. Responses at each incremental stimulation setting were compared to each other and to a final set of responses at the maximum intensity used in each patient (3.5-10 mA, median 6 mA). RESULTS We found that with a biphasic 0.15 ms/phase pulse at least 2-4 mA is needed to differentiate between non-responsive and responsive sites, and that stimulation currents of 6-7 mA are needed to maximize amplitude and spatial distribution of N1 responses and stabilize waveform morphology. CONCLUSIONS We determined a minimum stimulation threshold necessary for eliciting CCEPs, as well as a point at which the current-dependent relationship of several response metrics all saturate. SIGNIFICANCE This titration study provides practical, immediate guidance on optimal stimulation parameters to study specific features of CCEPs, which have been increasingly used to map both functional and epileptic brain networks in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Hays
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Rachel J Smith
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Babitha Haridas
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christopher Coogan
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nathan E Crone
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Joon Y Kang
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|