[Anti-GAD antibodies in paraneoplastic cerebellar ataxia associated with limbic encephalitis and autonomic dysfunction]

Anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody positive neurological syndromes

A rare kind of antibody, known as anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) autoantibody, is found in some patients. The antibody works against the GAD enzyme, which is essential in the formation of gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA), an inhibitory neurotransmitter found in the brain. Patients found with this antibody present with motor and cognitive problems due to low levels or lack of GABA, because in the absence or low levels of GABA patients exhibit motor and cognitive symptoms. The anti-GAD antibody is found in some neurological syndromes, including stiff-person syndrome, paraneoplastic stiff-person syndrome, Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS), limbic encephalopathy, cerebellar ataxia, eye movement disorders, and epilepsy. Previously, excluding MFS, these conditions were calledhyperexcitability disorders. However, collectively, these syndromes should be known as "anti-GAD positive neurological syndromes." An important limitation of this study is that the literature is lacking on the subject, and why patients with the above mentioned neurological problems present with different symptoms has not been studied in detail. Therefore, it is recommended that more research is conducted on this subject to obtain a better and deeper understanding of these anti-GAD antibody induced neurological syndromes.

Autoimmune paraneoplastic syndromes associated to lung cancer: A systematic review of the literature: Part 3: Neurological paraneoplastic syndromes, involving the central nervous system

The development of new immune treatment in oncology and particularly for lung cancer may induce new complications, particularly activation or reactivation of auto-immune diseases. In this context, a systematic review on the auto-immune paraneoplastic syndromes that can complicate lung cancer appears useful. This article is the third of a series of five and deals mainly with neurological paraneoplastic syndromes involving the central nervous system.

Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes and Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase Antibodies

IMPORTANCE

Little is known of glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies (GAD-abs) in the paraneoplastic context. Clinical recognition of such cases will lead to prompt tumor diagnosis and appropriate treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To report the clinical and immunological features of patients with paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) and GAD-abs.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Retrospective case series study and immunological investigations conducted in February 2014 in a center for autoimmune neurological disorders. Fifteen cases with GAD65-abs evaluated between 1995 and 2013 who fulfilled criteria of definite or possible PNS without concomitant onconeural antibodies were included in this study.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Analysis of the clinical records of 15 patients and review of 19 previously reported cases. Indirect immunofluorescence with rat hippocampal neuronal cultures and cell-based assays with known neuronal cell-surface antigens were used. One hundred six patients with GAD65-abs and no cancer served as control individuals.

RESULTS

Eight of the 15 patients with cancer presented as classic paraneoplastic syndromes (5 limbic encephalitis, 1 paraneoplastic encephalomyelitis, 1 paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration, and 1 opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome). When compared with the 106 non-PNS cases, those with PNS were older (median age, 60 years vs 48 years; P = .03), more frequently male (60% vs 13%; P < .001), and had more often coexisting neuronal cell-surface antibodies, mainly against γ-aminobutyric acid receptors (53% vs 11%; P < .001). The tumors more frequently involved were lung (n = 6) and thymic neoplasms (n = 4). The risk for an underlying tumor was higher if the presentation was a classic PNS, if it was different from stiff-person syndrome or cerebellar ataxia (odds ratio, 10.5; 95% CI, 3.2-34.5), or if the patient had coexisting neuronal cell-surface antibodies (odds ratio, 6.8; 95% CI, 1.1-40.5). Compared with the current series, the 19 previously reported cases had more frequent stiff-person syndrome (74% vs 13%; P = .001) and better responses to treatment (79% vs 27%; P = .005). Predictors of improvement in the 34 patients (current and previously reported) included presentation with stiff-person syndrome and the presence of a thymic tumor.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Patients with GAD-abs must be screened for an underlying cancer if they have clinical presentations different from those typically associated with this autoimmunity or develop classic PNS. The risk for cancer increases with age, male sex, and the presence of coexisting neuronal cell-surface antibodies.

Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes: general treatment overview

OPINION STATEMENT

Major recent discoveries have bringing out a revised definition of paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS), bringing out the concept of antibody-mediated neurological disorders, triggered or not by cancer. Classification of these diseases is not based anymore on the clinical pattern or an underlying tumor, but on the location of the targeted antigens. Indeed, evolution, response to treatment, and pathophysiology are radically different according to the associated antibodies. In some patients with newly described antibodies targeting cell-surface antigens, humoral immunity seems to play a direct role and a dramatic improvement is observed with immunomodulator treatments. In these patients, an associated tumor is less frequent. Conversely, patients with antibodies directed against intracellular targets are, in most cases, characterized by a high degree of irreversible neuronal death mediated by cytotoxic T-cells and do not improve after immunomodulator treatments. In these patients, an associated tumor is highly frequent and must be cured as soon as possible. A third group of patients can be identified with anti-GAD65 and anti-Amphiphysin antibodies. In patients with these antibodies, the efficiency of immunomodulator treatments is less clear as well as the type of immune response that could be a mix between humoral and cellular. In this last group, the antigen is intracellular, but patients may improve with immunomodulator treatments and associated tumors are rare. Thus, identification of associated antibodies should be prompt and the treatment guided according the identified antibody. Mainstream of treatment include the quest of a tumor and its cure. Immunotherapy must be promptly initiated, targeting humoral, or cellular immune response, or both, according to the associated antibodies. Furthermore, in some situations such as Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndromes and Stiff-Person Syndromes, symptomatic drugs can be useful to control the symptoms.