Supportive care in neurooncology

[Supportive care, cognition and quality of life in brain metastases]

Brain metastases impact on the survival of the patients, but on their quality of life as well. The objective of the management of these patients is then double. Currently, due to medical advances, survivals tend to improve, especially for some tumor subtypes. During the course of the disease, different neurological signs and symptoms can be observed according to the location, the number and the volume of the metastase(s). Patients and caregivers are especially worried about the loss of autonomy and cognitive impairments. A permanent dialogue, during the course of the disease, is mandatory, in order to adapt the management to the objectives determined by the patients and the medical team. These objectives may vary according to the objective response rates of the disease to anticancer therapies, according to the impact of the disease and its management in daily living. Anticancer therapies and supportive care must be appreciated according to their impact on the survival, on the preservation of the functional independence and the quality of life of the patient, on their abilities to preserve the neurological status and delay the apparition of new neurological signs and symptoms, and their adverse events. Supportive care, cognition and quality of life should be regularly evaluated and adapted according to the objectives of the management of brain metastases patients. Different approaches are described in this paper.

The end-of-life phase of high-grade glioma patients: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

High-grade gliomas (HGG) are rare and incurable; yet, these neoplasms result in a disproportionate share of cancer morbidity and mortality. Treatment of HGG patients is directed not merely towards prolonging life but also towards quality of life, which becomes the major goal in the end of life (EOL). The latter has received increasing attention over the last decade.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature related to the EOL phase of HGG patients from 1966 up to April 2012. Articles were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Cinahl, PsycINFO and Cochrane database. We then selected papers for analysis using pre-determined inclusion criteria and subtracted information on the topics of interest.

RESULTS

The search yielded 695 articles, of which 17 were classified eligible for analysis according to pre-defined inclusion criteria. Reviewed topics were symptoms and signs, quality of life and quality of dying, caregiver burden, organization and location of palliative care, supportive treatment, and EOL decision making. Nearly all identified studies were observational, with only two non-randomized intervention studies. Symptom burden is high in the EOL phase and affects the quality of life of both patient and carer. Palliative care services are more intensively used compared to other cancer patients. Cognitive deficits increase as the disease progresses, hampering communication and decision making.

CONCLUSION

The EOL phase of HGG is substantially different from other patient groups, and more clinical studies in HGG on supportive medication, advance care planning and decision making are required. The organization of care, development of guidelines and interventions to decrease caregiver burden in the EOL phase are critical as well.

[Therapeutic strategies and systemic treatment of brain melanoma metastases]

Brain metastases affect 37% of patients suffering from metastatic melanoma, and their prognosis remains poor, with an overall survival lower than six months. At the moment, there is no standard therapeutic strategy for management of melanoma brain metastases. In some cases, having recourse to a systemic treatment is justified, for example, when brain metastases are combined with a progressive peripheral disease, or with unresecable brain lesions. In France, the use of fotemustine, which received the AMM approval, for metastatic melanoma treatment, is one of the treatments recommended in the case of brain metastases as this chemotherapy, that is active on the melanoma passes the blood-brain barrier. Temozolomide also shows some activity in the brain metastases treatment of melanoma that remains modest in monotherapy but seems interesting when it is combined with radiotherapy. The place of new drugs, in particular ipilimumab and vemurafenib, in the strategy of melanoma brain metastases treatment, still has to be defined and may improve the prognosis of these patients and their quality of life. The new targeted therapies, the widespread use of stereotactic radiosurgery and the improvement in neurosurgical operations would need a prospective clinical assessment, all the more so, in most of clinical studies, the presence of metastases is an exclusion criterion.