Functional neuroimaging of migraine

Unsupervised physiological noise correction of functional magnetic resonance imaging data using phase and magnitude information (PREPAIR)

Of the sources of noise affecting blood oxygen level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), respiration and cardiac fluctuations are responsible for the largest part of the variance, particularly at high and ultrahigh field. Existing approaches to removing physiological noise either use external recordings, which can be unwieldy and unreliable, or attempt to identify physiological noise from the magnitude fMRI data. Data-driven approaches are limited by sensitivity, temporal aliasing, and the need for user interaction. In the light of the sensitivity of the phase of the MR signal to local changes in the field stemming from physiological processes, we have developed an unsupervised physiological noise correction method using the information carried in the phase and the magnitude of echo-planar imaging data. Our technique, Physiological Regressor Estimation from Phase and mAgnItude, sub-tR (PREPAIR) derives time series signals sampled at the slice TR from both phase and magnitude images. It allows physiological noise to be captured without aliasing, and efficiently removes other sources of signal fluctuations not related to physiology, prior to regressor estimation. We demonstrate that the physiological signal time courses identified with PREPAIR agree well with those from external devices and retrieve challenging cardiac dynamics. The removal of physiological noise was as effective as that achieved with the most used approach based on external recordings, RETROICOR. In comparison with widely used recording-free physiological noise correction tools-PESTICA and FIX, both performed in unsupervised mode-PREPAIR removed significantly more respiratory and cardiac noise than PESTICA, and achieved a larger increase in temporal signal-to-noise-ratio at both 3 and 7 T.

Improving sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of individual brainstem activation

Functional imaging of the brainstem may open new avenues for clinical diagnostics. However, for reliable assessments of brainstem activation, further efforts improving signal quality are needed. Six healthy subjects performed four repeated functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) sessions on different days with jaw clenching as a motor task to elicit activation in the trigeminal motor nucleus. Functional images were acquired with a 7 T MR scanner using an optimized multiband EPI sequence. Activation measures in the trigeminal nucleus and a control region were assessed using different physiological noise correction methods (aCompCor and RETROICOR-based approaches with variable numbers of regressors) combined with cerebrospinal fluid or brainstem masking. Receiver-operating characteristic analyses accounting for sensitivity and specificity, activation overlap analyses to estimate the reproducibility between sessions, and intraclass correlation analyses (ICC) for testing reliability between subjects and sessions were used to systematically compare the physiological noise correction approaches. Masking the brainstem led to increased activation in the target ROI and resulted in higher values for the area under the curve (AUC) as a combined measure for sensitivity and specificity. With the highest values for AUC, activation overlap, and ICC, the most favorable physiological noise correction method was to control for the cerebrospinal fluid time series (aCompCor with one regressor). Brainstem motor nuclei activation can be reliably identified using high-field fMRI with optimized acquisition and processing strategies—even on single-subject level. Applying specific physiological noise correction methods improves reproducibility and reliability of brainstem activation encouraging future clinical applications.

A lost track in ICHD 3 beta: A comprehensive review on osmophobia

Background

Osmophobia (Os) has been reported to be much more prevalent in migraine (M) than in other primary headaches, and its high specificity in the differential diagnosis between M and tension-type headache (TTH) has been reported. Os was included in the ICHD II Appendix as a diagnostic criterion of M. It disappeared in ICHD-3 beta. To understand this choice, we reviewed the literature after 2004.

Methods

This was a systematic review. We searched in PubMed, MEDLINE and Cochrane library for “osmophobia”, “odour/odorphobia AND headache”, “odour/odor hypersensitivity AND headache” and “olfactory hypersensitivity AND headache”.

Results

112 papers cited Os as an accompanying symptom of headache; 16 focused on Os in M diagnosis. With the data from 40 articles, we calculated the pooled prevalence of Os in 14,360 patients (2281 pediatric) affected by M (n = 12,496) and TTH (n = 1864). In M, the prevalence was 48.5% (CI 95% 41.4 to 55.8%) in adults and 23.4% (CI 95% 15.7 to 33.4%) in pediatric patients; in TTH, the prevalence was 8.9% (CI 95% 4.6 to 13.5%) in adults and 7.9% (CI 95% 3.3 to 18.1%) in pediatric patients. Ten of these papers allowed us to calculate the sensibility and specificity of Os in differential diagnosis between M and TTH. In adults, the value of specificity was 94.1% (CI 95% 88.9 to 96.9%), and sensitivity was 51.4% (CI 95% 38.4 to 64.2%). In pediatric patients, specificity was 92.0% (CI 95% 81.9 to 96.7%), and sensitivity was 22.1% (CI 95% 10.1 to 41.8%).

Conclusion

The literature endorses the inclusion of Os among M diagnostic criteria. On this ground, the decision to remove Os from ICHD 3 beta appears unjustified and a revision of this choice is recommended.

Migraine: multiple processes, complex pathophysiology

Migraine is a common, multifactorial, disabling, recurrent, hereditary neurovascular headache disorder. It usually strikes sufferers a few times per year in childhood and then progresses to a few times per week in adulthood, particularly in females. Attacks often begin with warning signs (prodromes) and aura (transient focal neurological symptoms) whose origin is thought to involve the hypothalamus, brainstem, and cortex. Once the headache develops, it typically throbs, intensifies with an increase in intracranial pressure, and presents itself in association with nausea, vomiting, and abnormal sensitivity to light, noise, and smell. It can also be accompanied by abnormal skin sensitivity (allodynia) and muscle tenderness. Collectively, the symptoms that accompany migraine from the prodromal stage through the headache phase suggest that multiple neuronal systems function abnormally. As a consequence of the disease itself or its genetic underpinnings, the migraine brain is altered structurally and functionally. These molecular, anatomical, and functional abnormalities provide a neuronal substrate for an extreme sensitivity to fluctuations in homeostasis, a decreased ability to adapt, and the recurrence of headache. Advances in understanding the genetic predisposition to migraine, and the discovery of multiple susceptible gene variants (many of which encode proteins that participate in the regulation of glutamate neurotransmission and proper formation of synaptic plasticity) define the most compelling hypothesis for the generalized neuronal hyperexcitability and the anatomical alterations seen in the migraine brain. Regarding the headache pain itself, attempts to understand its unique qualities point to activation of the trigeminovascular pathway as a prerequisite for explaining why the pain is restricted to the head, often affecting the periorbital area and the eye, and intensifies when intracranial pressure increases.

[A causative role of vasodilation in migraine? No]

INTRODUCTION

The hypothesis that migraine pain is caused by vasodilation has been challenged by clinical and experimental evidence.

STATE OF ART

The most convincing arguments against the vascular hypothesis come from neuroimaging data. Magnetic resonance imaging studies show that spontaneous migraine attacks are not accompanied by extracranial vasodilation, and by only slight dilation of the intracranial arteries. Pharmacologically-induced migraine attacks also provide further evidence against the role of vasodilation in migraine. Vasodilators such as sildenafil and nitroglycerine trigger attacks without dilation of the middle cerebral artery diameter, whereas VIP (vasoactive intestinal peptide) markedly dilates intra- and extracranial arteries but does not induce migraine attacks. Clinical studies also show a lack of correspondence between the subjective experience of throbbing headache and the arterial pulse. Moreover, many acute anti-migraine agents are not vasoconstrictors.

PERSPECTIVES

Further studies are necessary to clarify the mechanisms of migraine headache generation.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to a longstanding and widespread belief, vasodilatation is neither sufficient nor necessary to cause migraine headache and is probably an epiphenomenon.