Attitudes and expectations of patients with neuromuscular diseases about their participation in a clinical trial

Patient and observer reported outcome measures to evaluate health-related quality of life in inherited metabolic diseases: a scoping review

Background

Health-related Quality of Life (HrQoL) is a multidimensional measure, which has gained clinical and social relevance. Implementation of a patient-centred approach to both clinical research and care settings, has increased the recognition of patient and/or observer reported outcome measures (PROMs or ObsROMs) as informative and reliable tools for HrQoL assessment. Inherited Metabolic Diseases (IMDs) are a group of heterogeneous conditions with phenotypes ranging from mild to severe and mostly lacking effective therapies. Consequently, HrQoL evaluation is particularly relevant.

Objectives

We aimed to: (1) identify patient and/or caregiver-reported HrQoL instruments used among IMDs; (2) identify the main results of the application of each HrQoL tool and (3) evaluate the main limitations of HrQoL instruments and study design/methodology in IMDs.

Methods

A scoping review was conducted using methods outlined by Arksey and O’Malley. Additionally, we critically analysed each article to identify the HrQoL study drawbacks.

Results

Of the 1954 studies identified, 131 addressed HrQoL of IMDs patients using PROMs and/or ObsROMs, both in observational or interventional studies. In total, we identified 32 HrQoL instruments destined to self- or proxy-completion; only 2% were disease-specific. Multiple tools (both generic and disease-specific) proved to be responsive to changes in HrQoL; the SF-36 and PedsQL questionnaires were the most frequently used in the adult and pediatric populations, respectively. Furthermore, proxy data often demonstrated to be a reliable approach complementing self-reported HrQoL scores. Nevertheless, numerous limitations were identified especially due to the rarity of these conditions.

Conclusions

HrQoL is still not frequently assessed in IMDs. However, our results show successful examples of the use of patient-reported HrQoL instruments in this field. The importance of HrQoL measurement for clinical research and therapy development, incites to further research in HrQoL PROMs’ and ObsROMs’ creation and validation in IMDs.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13023-018-0953-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Cognitive profile of patients with glycogen storage disease type III: a clinical description of seven cases

BACKGROUND

Glycogen storage disease type III (GSDIII) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder due to glycogen debranching enzyme (GDE) deficiency. It results in a multisystemic disease with predominant hepatic and myopathic symptoms. While frequent social maladjustment has been observed in our clinical practice, cognitive and psychological disturbances have never been assessed. The aim of this pilot study was to examine and characterize the cognitive profile of patients with GSDIII.

METHODS

Seven patients (six women and one man, mean age: 38.7 ± 11.6 years) with GSDIII underwent a neuropsychological set of tests assessing global cognitive efficiency, executive functions, social cognition, apathy, and episodic memory.

RESULTS

All patients presented previous psychopathological history. We observed attention fluctuations for each patient, and impaired global cognitive efficiency with deficiencies in executive functions in 5/7 patients. Emotional skills (social cognition) were impaired in five patients. Memory was mostly preserved.

CONCLUSION

The impairment in social cognition (recognition of emotions and ability to attribute mental states to others) and executive functions observed could be a consequence of orbito-frontal dysfunction due to the abnormal glycogen metabolism characteristic of the underlying disease. These results are consistent with the hypothesis of a central nervous system involvement in patients with GSDIII, but need to be confirmed in future research. This could explain the social and economic difficulties, and the lack of compliance to the medical follow-up presented by these patients. It suggests that these disturbances need to be taken into account when planning the medical management of patients with GSDIII.