Dronabinol use in France between 2004 and 2017

[Use of dronabinol in the treatment of resistant neuropathic pain: Feedback from patients followed in a multidisciplinary pain center]

INTRODUCTION

Dronabinol is a drug composed of synthetic delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol. In France, dronabinol requires a named Temporary Utilisation Authorisation (TUA), for the treatment of refractory neuropathic pain. Few data currently exist concerning its efficacy and tolerance. We present our feedback on its use for chronic pain patients, the multidisciplinary supervision and the monitoring set up by the clinical pharmacist.

METHOD

This retrospective monocentric study presents Patients Global Impression of Change and tolerance data from patients treated with dronabinol in a pain center between October 2020 and July 2021. We present their satisfaction towards the care process.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were treated with dronabinol during the study period. - The clinical pharmacist issued 180 advices for patients and doctors. Patients reported a positive impact of the telephone follow-up carried out by the clinical pharmacist. - 75% (n=9/12) of patients who continued treatment for more than 3 months reported improvement in their health. - 74% (n=14/19) of patients had at least one adverse event, six patients needed to discontinue the treatment.

DISCUSSION-CONCLUSION

Dronabinol represents an alternative that can improve the quality of life of some patients suffering from refractory neuropathic pain. Nevertheless, as with any medicine, its initiation requires a rigorous evaluation of the benefit-risk balance. The close collaboration between the physician and the clinical pharmacist allows a secure management patients and makes this complex drug circuit easer.

Long-term and serious harms of medical cannabis and cannabinoids for chronic pain: a systematic review of non-randomised studies

OBJECTIVE

To establish the prevalence of long-term and serious harms of medical cannabis for chronic pain.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CENTRAL from inception to 1 April 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

Non-randomised studies reporting on harms of medical cannabis or cannabinoids in adults or children living with chronic pain with ≥4 weeks of follow-up.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

A parallel guideline panel provided input on the design and interpretation of the systematic review, including selection of adverse events for consideration. Two reviewers, working independently and in duplicate, screened the search results, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We used random-effects models for all meta-analyses and the Grades of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to evaluate the certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

We identified 39 eligible studies that enrolled 12 143 adult patients with chronic pain. Very low certainty evidence suggests that adverse events are common (prevalence: 26.0%; 95% CI 13.2% to 41.2%) among users of medical cannabis for chronic pain, particularly any psychiatric adverse events (prevalence: 13.5%; 95% CI 2.6% to 30.6%). Very low certainty evidence, however, indicates serious adverse events, adverse events leading to discontinuation, cognitive adverse events, accidents and injuries, and dependence and withdrawal syndrome are less common and each typically occur in fewer than 1 in 20 patients. We compared studies with <24 weeks and ≥24 weeks of cannabis use and found more adverse events reported among studies with longer follow-up (test for interaction p<0.01). Palmitoylethanolamide was usually associated with few to no adverse events. We found insufficient evidence addressing the harms of medical cannabis compared with other pain management options, such as opioids.

CONCLUSIONS

There is very low certainty evidence that adverse events are common among people living with chronic pain who use medical cannabis or cannabinoids, but that few patients experience serious adverse events.

Cannabinoids for Pain Control During Medical Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether prophylactic dronabinol, a synthetic tetrahydrocannabinol, reduces pain during medical abortion.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of women undergoing medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol up through 70 days of gestation. All participants received 800 mg of ibuprofen and were randomized to either 5 mg of oral dronabinol or a placebo 30 minutes before misoprostol administration. Participants used a text messaging service to report pain on a numeric rating scale from 0 to 10 (0=no pain, 10=worst pain). The primary outcome was maximum pain experienced during the 24 hours after misoprostol administration. Secondary outcomes were pain scores at 0, 6, and 24 hours after misoprostol administration; maximum anxiety and nausea scores; use of additional pain medication; reported side effects; and satisfaction (yes or no). We needed 68 participants (34 per group) to have 80% power to detect a 2-point difference in maximum pain on a numeric rating scale.

RESULTS

From November 2018 to May 2019, we randomized 70 women (dronabinol=35, placebo=35). Participants in the study arms had comparable baseline characteristics. We found no difference between groups in the median maximum pain score reported (dronabinol 7 [interquartile range 6-8], placebo 7 [interquartile range 5-8], P=.82) or median pain scores at any timepoint. Groups were also no different in mean maximum anxiety (dronabinol 3.33 [SD 3.06], placebo 3.23 [SD 2.53], P=.88) or nausea scores (dronabinol 2.21 [SD 2.32], placebo 2.72 [SD 2.64], P=.41). Most women were satisfied with their pain management (76% dronabinol, 82% placebo, P=.51).

CONCLUSION

Dronabinol does not reduce the maximum level of pain experienced by women undergoing medical abortion.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03604341.