Cerebral ischaemia with unknown onset: Outcome after recanalization procedure

Outcome of Stroke Patients with Unknown Onset and Unknown Time Last Known Well Undergoing Endovascular Therapy

PURPOSE

Endovascular treatment (ET) in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke (LVOS) with unknown onset or an extended time window can be safe and effective if patients are selected by defined clinical and imaging criteria; however, it is unclear if these criteria should also be applied to patients with unknown onset and unknown time last known well. In this study, we aimed to assess whether absent information on the time patients were last known to be well impacts outcome in patients with unknown onset LVOS.

METHODS

We analyzed patients who were enrolled in the German Stroke Registry-Endovascular Treatment between 2015 and 2019. Patients with unknown onset and unknown time last known well (LKWu) were compared to patients with known onset (KO) and to patients with unknown onset but known time last known well (LKWk) regarding clinical and imaging baseline characteristics and outcome.

RESULTS

Out of 5909 patients, 561 presented with LKWu (9.5%), 1849 with LKWk (31.3%) and 3499 with KO (59.2%). At 90 days, functional independency was less frequent in LKWu (27.0%) compared to KO (42.6%) and LKWk patients (31.8%). These differences were not significant after adjusting for confounders. A main confounder was the initial Alberta stroke program early CT score.

CONCLUSION

The LKWu patients had a similar outcome after ET as KO and LKWk patients after adjusting for confounders. Thus, ET should not be withheld if the time last known well is unknown. Instead, LKWu patients may be selected for ET using the same criteria as in LKWk patients.

CDC42 Might Be a Molecular Signature of DWI-FLAIR Mismatch in a Nonhuman Primate Stroke Model

No definitive blood markers of DWI-FLAIR mismatch, a pivotal indicator of salvageable ischemic penumbra brain tissue, are known. We previously reported that CDC42 and RHOA are associated with the ischemic penumbra. Here, we investigated whether plasma CDC42 and RHOA are surrogate markers of DWI-FLAIR mismatch. Sixteen cynomolgus macaques (3 as controls and 13 for the stroke model) were included. Guided by digital subtraction angiography (DSA), a middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) model was established by occluding the middle cerebral artery (MCA) with a balloon. MRI and neurological deficit scoring were performed to evaluate postinfarction changes. Plasma CDC42 and RHOA levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The stroke model was successfully established in eight monkeys. Based on postinfarction MRI images, experimental animals were divided into a FLAIR (-) group (N = 4) and a FLAIR (+) group (N = 4). Plasma CDC42 in the FLAIR (-) group showed a significant decrease compared with that in the FLAIR (+) group (p < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was observed for plasma RHOA. The FLAIR (-) group showed a milder neurological function deficit and a smaller infarct volume than the FLAIR (+) group (p < 0.05). Therefore, plasma CDC42 might be a new surrogate marker for DWI-FLAIR mismatch.

Safety of intravenous thrombolysis in stroke of unknown time of onset: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The safety of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) in patients with stroke of unknown time of onset (SUTO) was unclear and mostly concerned. We sought to investigate the safety in terms of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and death in SUTO patients treated with IV-tPA. We searched PubMed and EMBASE from inception to 2 December 2020 for eligible studies reporting IV-tPA in SUTO patients compared to conservative medical therapy, or to stroke of known onset time (SKOT) treated with IV-tPA within standard time window. We pooled relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (95%CI) with random-effects model. Twenty-four studies were included, enrolling 77,398 patients. SUTO patients with IV-tPA had higher incidence of sICH than that in SUTO patients without IV-tPA (3.8% versus 0.96%; RR = 3.75, 95%CI: 2.69-5.22) but comparable to that in SKOT patients with IV-tPA (3.8% versus 4.1%; RR = 1.16, 95%CI: 0.94-1.44). There was no significant difference in death risk in SUTO patients with IV-tPA versus SUTO patients without IV-tPA (RR = 1.34, 95%CI: 0.60-3.01) and versus SKOT patients with IV-tPA (RR = 1.19, 95%CI: 0.95-1.50). Compared with SUTO patients without IV-tPA, SUTO patients with IV-tPA had higher likelihood of favorable functional outcome (adjusted RR = 1.28, 95%CI: 1.03-1.60) and functional independence (adjusted RR = 1.95, 95%CI: 1.24-3.06), comparable to that in SKOT patients with IV-tPA in favorable functional outcome (adjusted RR = 0.67, 95%CI: 0.38-1.20) and functional independence (adjusted RR = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.59-1.18). SUTO patients could be treated safely and effectively with IV-tPA under the guidance of imaging evaluation.

Wake-up stroke: imaging-based diagnosis and recanalization therapy

Wake-up stroke (WUS) is a subgroup of ischemic stroke in which patients show no abnormality before sleep while wake up with neurological deficits. In addition to the uncertain onset, WUS patients have difficulty to receive prompt and effective thrombolytic or reperfusion therapy, leading to relatively poor prognosis. A number of researches have indicated that CT or MRI based thrombolysis and endovascular therapy might have benefits for WUS patients. This review article narratively discusses the pathogenesis, risk factors, imaging-based diagnosis and recanalization treatments of WUS with the purpose of expanding current treatment options for this group of stroke patients and exploring better therapeutic methods. The result showed that multimodal MRI or CT scan might be the best methods for extending the time window of WUS and, therefore, a large proportion of WUS patients could have favorable prognosis.