Feasibility of changing for a rechargeable constant current neurostimulator in Parkinson's disease

Motivational and cognitive predictors of apathy after subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson's disease

Postoperative apathy is a frequent symptom in Parkinson's disease patients who have undergone bilateral deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus. Two main hypotheses for postoperative apathy have been suggested: (i) dopaminergic withdrawal syndrome relative to postoperative dopaminergic drug tapering; and (ii) direct effect of chronic stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus. The primary objective of our study was to describe preoperative and 1-year postoperative apathy in Parkinson's disease patients who underwent chronic bilateral deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus. We also aimed to identify factors associated with 1-year postoperative apathy considering: (i) preoperative clinical phenotype; (ii) dopaminergic drug management; and (iii) volume of tissue activated within the subthalamic nucleus and the surrounding structures. We investigated a prospective clinical cohort of 367 patients before and 1 year after chronic bilateral deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus. We assessed apathy using the Lille Apathy Rating Scale and carried out a systematic evaluation of motor, cognitive and behavioural signs. We modelled the volume of tissue activated in 161 patients using the Lead-DBS toolbox and analysed overlaps within motor, cognitive and limbic parts of the subthalamic nucleus. Of the 367 patients, 94 (25.6%) exhibited 1-year postoperative apathy: 67 (18.2%) with 'de novo apathy' and 27 (7.4%) with 'sustained apathy'. We observed disappearance of preoperative apathy in 22 (6.0%) patients, who were classified as having 'reversed apathy'. Lastly, 251 (68.4%) patients had neither preoperative nor postoperative apathy and were classified as having 'no apathy'. We identified preoperative apathy score [odds ratio (OR) 1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10, 1.22; P < 0.001], preoperative episodic memory free recall score (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.88, 0.97; P = 0.003) and 1-year postoperative motor responsiveness (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.96, 0.99; P = 0.009) as the main factors associated with postoperative apathy. We showed that neither dopaminergic dose reduction nor subthalamic stimulation were associated with postoperative apathy. Patients with 'sustained apathy' had poorer preoperative fronto-striatal cognitive status and a higher preoperative action initiation apathy subscore. In these patients, apathy score and cognitive status worsened postoperatively despite significantly lower reduction in dopamine agonists (P = 0.023), suggesting cognitive dopa-resistant apathy. Patients with 'reversed apathy' benefited from the psychostimulant effect of chronic stimulation of the limbic part of the left subthalamic nucleus (P = 0.043), suggesting motivational apathy. Our results highlight the need for careful preoperative assessment of motivational and cognitive components of apathy as well as executive functions in order to better prevent or manage postoperative apathy.

The Safety to Switch from Constant Voltage to Constant Current with a Mixed Internal Pulse Generator in Deep Brain Stimulation

Background

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an efficient modality for the treatment of movement disorders. Differing from the constant voltage (CV)-DBS devices, constant current (CC)-DBS devices may allow more precise stimulation of the target brain regions since they are less influenced by impedance. If internal pulse generators (IPGs) of DBS devices are required to be connected with electrodes of different brands, employing proper adapters is necessary. Such connected DBS devices are called mixed or hybrid devices.

Objectives

As there is sparse information about the clinical mixed devices, we studied their safety and efficacy.

Materials and Methods

Clinical scores of 13 patients implanted with mixed DBS devices were determined with the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) in Parkinson's disease (PD) (n = 10) and with the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) in dystonia (n = 3). Patient satisfaction was assessed with the Timmerman questionnaire. The Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) Scale was also evaluated.

Results

Patients' overall satisfaction was considerably higher with mixed devices. The UPDRS and BFMDRS clinical scores did not significantly differ after switching to a mixed DBS device. Three patients before the DBS switch suffered from side effects under the CV mode. These patients got rid of the side effects in their follow-up with a reduction in pulse width values.

Discussion

Mixed devices working in CC mode are well tolerated with high patient satisfaction.

Conclusion

Besides patient satisfaction, mixed IPGs are also considered safe.

Constant current or constant voltage deep brain stimulation: short answers to a long story

PURPOSE

Recently, the feature of generating constant current output has been added to the implantable pulse generators (IPGs). The efficacy of the conventionally used constant voltage (CV) stimulation has been proved in different movement and psychiatric disorders. In this systematic review, we aimed to discuss the effect of constant current (CC) and constant voltage stimulation on patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) who had subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation implantation; we also compared these methods of stimulation with each other.

METHODS

Using the words "Deep brain stimulation", "constant current" and "constant voltage", we developed a broad search strategy and a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane electronic bibliographic databases. Studies on the Parkinson's disease patients with subthalamic deep brain stimulation, which mentioned constant current or/and constant voltage setting stimulation were included.

RESULTS

After screening of 284 articles, 10 reports were found eligible for this study. The score of unified Parkinson's disease rating scale part 3 was improved compared to the baseline, whether the stimulation was CV at baseline or CC. No significant change in non-motor outcomes was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Although CC stimulation has shown a significant improvement in both motor and non-motor symptoms of PD, switching from CV to CC did not result in a significant change in the score of these items based on UPDRS. To sum up, implantation of constant current devices is safe and significantly improves motor function; it also maintains an acceptable safety profile in patients with PD.

Endurance of Short Pulse Width Thalamic Stimulation Efficacy in Intention Tremor

The benefit of short pulse width stimulation in patients suffering from essential tremor (ET) refractory to thalamic deep brain stimulation remains controversial. Here, we add to the minimal body of evidence available by reporting the effect of this type of stimulation in 3 patients with a persistent and severe intention tremor component despite iterative DBS setting adjustments. While a reduction in pulse width to 30 μs initially showed promise in these patients by improving tremor control and mitigating cerebellar side effects arguably by widening the therapeutic window, these benefits seemed to dissipate during early follow-up. Our experience supports the need for measuring longer-term outcomes when reporting the usefulness of this mode of stimulation in ET.