Antiparkinsonian Drug Reduction After Directional Versus Omnidirectional Bilateral Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation

Comparing Directional and Omnidirectional Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease Patients

INTRODUCTION

In 2015, directional leads have been released in Europe for deep brain stimulation (DBS) and have been particularly used for subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS for Parkinson's disease (PD). In this study, we aimed to compare an omnidirectional and directional leads cohort of PD patients when it comes to clinical effectiveness and to assess the correlation with volume of tissue activated-target overlap (VTA-target).

METHODS

A total of 60 consecutive patients were retrospectively included. Twenty-seven patients with bilateral directional leads were compared to 33 patients with bilateral omnidirectional leads. MDS-UPDRS part III scores, levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD), and VTA overlaps using both motor STN region and motor improvement sweet spot volume were compared at 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

There is a significantly higher LEDD reduction in the directional leads group (51.3% reduction vs. 42.7% reduction, p = 0.042) when compared to the omnidirectional group, with similar MDS-UPDRS III motor scores at 12 months. Omnidirectional leads patients had a significantly superior VTA-motor STN overlap volume than directional leads patients (32.01 mm3 vs. 20.38 mm3, p = 0.0226). In directional leads patients, LEDD reduction was correlated to VTA overlap with the overall motor improvement mean map sweet spot (R = 0.36, p = 0.036), which was not the case for omnidirectional leads patients (R = 0.11, p = 0.276). Forty-one percent of patients implanted with directional leads had a directional stimulation setting at 12 months, compared to 33% at 3 months follow-up. In directional leads patient's subgroup analysis, there was no significant difference in MDS UPDRS III scores, LEDD reduction, VTA overlaps with motor STN, or overall motor improvement mean map sweet spot between patients stimulated omnidirectionally and directionally at 12 months.

CONCLUSION

At 12 months, when compared to omnidirectional leads, directional leads manage with smaller VTA-target overlaps to obtain comparable MDS-UPDRS III scores with greater LEDD reduction in STN DBS for PD patients.

Directional deep brain stimulation electrodes in Parkinson's disease: meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Since their introduction in 2015, directional leads have practically replaced conventional leads for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson's disease (PD). Yet, the benefits of directional DBS (dDBS) over omnidirectional DBS (oDBS) remain unclear. This meta-analysis and systematic review compares the literature on dDBS and oDBS for PD.

METHODS

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. Database searches included Pubmed, Cochrane (CENTRAL) and EmBase, using relevant keywords such as 'directional', 'segmented', 'brain stimulation' and 'neuromodulation'. The screening was based on the title and abstract.

RESULTS

23 papers reporting on 1273 participants (1542 leads) were included. The therapeutic window was 0.70 mA wider when using dDBS (95% CI 0.13 to 1.26 mA, p=0.02), with a lower therapeutic current (0.41 mA, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.54 mA, p=0.01) and a higher side-effect threshold (0.56 mA, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.73 mA, p<0.01). However, there was no relevant difference in mean Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale III change after dDBS (45.8%, 95% CI 30.7% to 60.9%) compared with oDBS (39.0%, 95% CI 36.9% to 41.2%, p=0.39), in the medication-OFF state. Median follow-up time for dDBS and oDBS studies was 6 months and 3 months, respectively (range 3-12 for both). The use of directionality often improves dyskinesia, dysarthria, dysesthesia and pyramidal side effects. Directionality was used in 55% of directional leads at 3-6 months, remaining stable over time (56% at a mean of 14.1 months).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that stimulation parameters favour dDBS. However, these do not appear to have a significant impact on motor scores, and the availability of long-term data is limited. dDBS is widely accepted, but clinical data justifying its increased complexity and cost are currently sparse.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023438056.

Longevity of Deep Brain Stimulation in Essential Tremor: A Comparison of Omnidirectional and Directional Leads

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Patients undergoing thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus stimulation to treat essential tremor (ET) develop tolerance over time, requiring higher stimulation amplitudes that lead to more frequent battery changes and suboptimal tremor control. The study objective is to determine whether amplitude tolerance differs between patients with omnidirectional vs directional leads.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of ET patients with omnidirectional and directional leads implanted between 2005 and 2022. We compared patient demographics, tremor scores, and energy utilization for directional and omnidirectional leads. Contact impedance was used to normalize amplitude values between groups. Analyses were duplicated after reclassifying omnidirectional and directional based on the utilization of directional programming for 2 or more years.

RESULTS

A total of 24 directional leads in 22 patients and 39 omnidirectional leads in 30 patients were followed for a mean of 3.71 and 7.54 years, respectively. There was no significant difference in age or baseline tremor scores between the groups. Both lead types demonstrated increasing amplitudes over time, but directional leads had significantly less change over time, particularly in the first year (P = .0012). Patients with omnidirectional leads were more likely to experience a pulse width increase of greater than 20 µs over 1 year (41.0% vs 12.5%; P = .035). Although time to first implantable pulse generator replacement was shorter for directional leads, this was not significant (P = .062).

CONCLUSION

Both omnidirectional and directional deep brain stimulation reduces tremor severity in ET patients. However, directional leads offer more stable voltage requirements and less year-to-year voltage change, particularly in the first year. The increased likelihood of significant pulse width changes in omnidirectional leads suggests that directional leads may provide more sustainable therapeutic effects through other programming parameters. Ongoing research is needed to optimize deep brain stimulation technology and programming strategies to maximize patient benefit and device longevity.

A framework for translational therapy development in deep brain stimulation

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for motor disorders like Parkinson's disease, but its mechanisms and effects on neurons and networks are not fully understood, limiting research-driven progress. This review presents a framework that combines neurophysiological insights and translational research to enhance DBS therapy, emphasizing biomarkers, device technology, and symptom-specific neuromodulation. It also examines the role of animal research in improving DBS, while acknowledging challenges in clinical translation.

Sensing data and methodology from the Adaptive DBS Algorithm for Personalized Therapy in Parkinson's Disease (ADAPT-PD) clinical trial

Adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) is an emerging advancement in DBS technology; however, local field potential (LFP) signal rate detection sufficient for aDBS algorithms and the methods to set-up aDBS have yet to be defined. Here we summarize sensing data and aDBS programming steps associated with the ongoing Adaptive DBS Algorithm for Personalized Therapy in Parkinson's Disease (ADAPT-PD) pivotal trial (NCT04547712). Sixty-eight patients were enrolled with either subthalamic nucleus or globus pallidus internus DBS leads connected to a Medtronic PerceptTM PC neurostimulator. During the enrollment and screening procedures, a LFP (8-30 Hz, ≥1.2 µVp) control signal was identified by clinicians in 84.8% of patients on medication (65% bilateral signal), and in 92% of patients off medication (78% bilateral signal). The ADAPT-PD trial sensing data indicate a high LFP signal presence in both on and off medication states of these patients, with bilateral signal in the majority, regardless of PD phenotype.

Directional electrodes in deep brain stimulation: Results of a survey by the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS)

Introduction

Directional Leads (dLeads) represent a new technical tool in Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS), and a rapidly growing population of patients receive dLeads.

Research question

The European Association of Neurosurgical Societies(EANS) functional neurosurgery Task Force on dLeads conducted a survey of DBS specialists in Europe to evaluate their use, applications, advantages, and disadvantages.

Material and methods

EANS functional neurosurgery and European Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery (ESSFN) members were asked to complete an online survey with 50 multiple-choice and open questions on their use of dLeads in clinical practice.

Results

Forty-nine respondents from 16 countries participated in the survey (n = 38 neurosurgeons, n = 8 neurologists, n = 3 DBS nurses). Five had not used dLeads. All users reported that dLeads provided an advantage (n = 23 minor, n = 21 major). Most surgeons (n = 35) stated that trajectory planning does not differ when implanting dLeads or conventional leads. Most respondents selected dLeads for the ability to optimize stimulation parameters (n = 41). However, the majority (n = 24), regarded time-consuming programming as the main disadvantage of this technology. Innovations that were highly valued by most participants included full 3T MRI compatibility, remote programming, and closed loop technology.

Discussion and conclusion

Directional leads are widely used by European DBS specialists. Despite challenges with programming time, users report that dLeads have had a positive impact and maintain an optimistic view of future technological advances.

Directional deep brain stimulation in the management of Parkinson's disease: efficacy and constraints-an analytical appraisal

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a widely employed treatment for Parkinson's disease. However, conventional DBS utilizing ring-shaped leads can often result in undesirable side effects by stimulating nearby brain structures, thus limiting its effectiveness. To address this issue, a novel DBS electrode was developed to allow for directional stimulation, avoiding neighboring structures. This literature review aims to analyze the disparities between conventional and directional DBS and discuss the benefits and limitations associated with this innovative electrode design, focusing on the stimulation-induced side effects it can or cannot mitigate. A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed, ScienceDirect, and EBSCO databases using the Boolean search criteria: "Deep brain stimulation" AND "Parkinson" AND "Directional." Following the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, the selected articles were downloaded for full-text reading. Subsequently, the results were organized and analyzed to compose this article. Numerous studies have demonstrated that directional DBS effectively reduces side effects associated with brain stimulation, prevents the stimulation of non-targeted structures, and expands the therapeutic window, among other advantages. However, it has been observed that directional DBS may be more challenging to program and requires higher energy consumption. Furthermore, there is a lack of standardization among different manufacturers of directional DBS electrodes. Various stimulation-induced side effects, including dysarthria, dyskinesia, paresthesias, and symptoms of pyramidal tract activation, have been shown to be mitigated with the use of directional DBS. Moreover, directional electrodes offer a wider therapeutic window and a reduced incidence of undesired effects, requiring the same or lower minimum current for symptom relief compared to conventional DBS. The utilization of directional leads in DBS offers numerous advantages over conventional electrodes without significant drawbacks for patients undergoing directional DBS therapy.

Premature drug reduction after subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation leading to worse depression in patients with Parkinson's disease

Background

Reduction of medication in Parkinson's disease (PD) following subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) has been recognized, but the optimal timing for medication adjustments remains unclear, posing challenges in postoperative patient management.

Objective

This study aimed to provide evidence for the timing of medication reduction post-DBS using propensity score matching (PSM).

Methods

In this study, initial programming and observation sessions were conducted over 1 week for patients 4-6 weeks postoperatively. Patients were subsequently categorized into medication reduction or non-reduction groups based on their dyskinesia evaluation using the 4.2-item score from the MDS-UPDRS-IV. PSM was employed to maintain baseline comparability. Short-term motor and neuropsychiatric symptom assessments for both groups were conducted 3-6 months postoperatively.

Results

A total of 123 PD patients were included. Baseline balance in motor and non-motor scores was achieved between the two groups based on PSM. Short-term efficacy revealed a significant reduction in depression scores within the non-reduction group compared to baseline (P < 0.001) and a significant reduction compared to the reduction group (P = 0.037). No significant differences were observed in UPDRS-III and HAMA scores between the two groups. Within-group analysis showed improvements in motor symptoms, depression, anxiety, and subdomains in the non-reduction group, while the reduction group exhibited improvements only in motor symptoms.

Conclusion

This study provides evidence for the timing of medication reduction following DBS. Our findings suggest that early maintenance of medication stability is more favorable for improving neuropsychiatric symptoms.

Real-Life Experience on Directional Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients with Advanced Parkinson’s Disease

Directional deep brain stimulation (dDBS) is preferred by patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD) and by programming neurologists. However, real-life data of dDBS use is still scarce. We reviewed the clinical data of 53 PD patients with dDBS to 18 months of follow-up. Directional stimulation was favored in 70.5% of dDBS leads, and single segment activation (SSA) was used in 60% of dDBS leads. Current with SSA was significantly lower than with other stimulation types. During the 6-month follow-up, a 44% improvement in the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-III) points and a 43% decline in the levodopa equivalent daily dosage (LEDD) was observed. After 18 months of follow-up, a 35% LEDD decrease was still noted. The Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) stages and scores on item no 30 “postural stability” in UPDRS-III remained lower throughout the follow-up compared to baseline. Additionally, dDBS relieved non-motor symptoms during the 6 months of follow-up. Patients with bilateral SSA had similar clinical outcomes to those with other stimulation types. Directional stimulation appears to effectively reduce both motor and non-motor symptoms in advanced PD with minimal adverse effects in real-life clinical care.

Advances in DBS Technology and Novel Applications: Focus on Movement Disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment in several movement disorders, including Parkinson's disease, dystonia, tremor, and Tourette syndrome. In this review, we will review and discuss the most recent findings including but not limited to clinical evidence.

RECENT FINDINGS

New DBS technologies include novel hardware design (electrodes, cables, implanted pulse generators) enabling new stimulation patterns and adaptive DBS which delivers potential stimulation tailored to moment-to-moment changes in the patient's condition. Better understanding of movement disorders pathophysiology and functional anatomy has been pivotal for studying the effects of DBS on the mesencephalic locomotor region, the nucleus basalis of Meynert, the substantia nigra, and the spinal cord. Eventually, neurosurgical practice has improved with more accurate target visualization or combined targeting. A rising research domain emphasizes bridging neuromodulation and neuroprotection. Recent advances in DBS therapy bring more possibilities to effectively treat people with movement disorders. Future research would focus on improving adaptive DBS, leading more clinical trials on novel targets, and exploring neuromodulation effects on neuroprotection.