Three-Dimensional Virtual Reality Spinal Cord Stimulator Training Improves Trainee Procedural Confidence and Performance

Current Clinical and Educational Uses of Immersive Reality in Anesthesia: Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

The concept of immersive reality (IR), an umbrella term that encompasses virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality, has been established within the health care realm as a potentially valuable tool with numerous applications in both medical education and patient care.

OBJECTIVE

This review aimed to introduce anesthesiologists to the emerging and rapidly evolving literature on IR, its use in anesthesia education, and its transferability into the clinical context.

METHODS

A review of the relevant literature was conducted using the PubMed database from inception to July 5, 2023. Additional references were identified from the reference lists of selected papers.

RESULTS

A total of 51 papers related to the use of IR in anesthesia medical education (including both technical and nontechnical skills) and 63 papers related to applications in clinical practice (eg, preprocedure planning, patient education, and pain management) were included. We present evidence supporting the use of IR in the training and clinical practice of modern anesthesiologists.

CONCLUSIONS

IR is useful for a variety of applications in anesthesia medical education and has potential advantages over existing simulation approaches. Similarly, IR has demonstrated potential improvements in patient care across several clinical contexts relevant to practicing anesthesiologists. However, many applications remain in the early stages of development, and robust trials are urgently needed to confirm clinical or educational effectiveness and to assess mechanisms, educational validity, and cost-effectiveness.

The use of extended reality in anesthesiology education: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Extended reality, an umbrella term for virtual, augmented, and mixed reality, is increasingly used in health care education as it requires fewer human and logistical resources and offers reduced costs compared with high-fidelity simulations. Nevertheless, the impact of extended reality on education and training in anesthesiology is largely unknown. We aimed to explore the existing extended reality tools and applications in anesthesiology, identify current knowledge gaps, and highlight future research needs in anesthesiology education.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review of studies published from January 2010 to December 2023 that focused on extended reality training in anesthesiology and included comparative analyses with other methods. We excluded publications investigating topics unrelated to anesthesiology or not involving interaction with extended reality.

RESULTS

After screening 5,419 studies, we included 62 manuscripts in the final analysis. The definitions and uses of extended reality in anesthesiology education were very heterogeneous. Thirty-seven studies compared extended reality with other forms of training. Neuraxial procedures, peripheral blocks, central venous catheters, and bronchoscopy were primarily investigated. Extended reality improved technical skills, knowledge retention, confidence, and student satisfaction. Six studies reported at least one negative result related to learning, sense of realism, and usefulness.

CONCLUSION

The results of this scoping review highlight the increasing interest of extended reality in anesthesiology education. Nevertheless, many studies lack objective outcome measures and relevant comparisons with existing standards. In addition, extended reality needs to be consistently defined in anesthesiology education to derive optimal benefit and impact. Future studies should also focus on defining extended reality's learning objectives and clinical assessments of trainees' performance, which are commonly missing compared with high-fidelity simulation teaching.

STUDY REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/PDT2F ); first submitted 28 June 2023.

Unleashing surgical skills: Ultra-high fidelity trauma thoracotomy training on knowledge donor platform

BACKGROUND

Resuscitative thoracotomies are a time-sensitive emergency surgical procedure with an immediate risk of mortality. We hypothesize that a high-fidelity whole-body donor simulation model, referred to as a Knowledge Donor (KD), with mechanical lung ventilation and expired human blood perfusion could increase learner confidence in performing this critical procedure.

METHODS

General surgery residents and faculty were invited to participate in KD training. Surveys were collected to track participation and confidence.

RESULTS

Simulated resuscitative thoracotomies were performed involving PGY levels I-IV. Mean confidence was highest for residents with both KD and Live Patient experience (5.6 ​± ​1.7), followed by Live Patient only (4.3 ​± ​2.5), and KD only (2.6 ​± ​1.3). The mean confidence rating for residents with neither training opportunity was 1.4 ​± ​1.0.

CONCLUSIONS

The KD platform is a hyper-realistic training modality that closely replicates live surgery. This platform allows residents to practice complex surgical procedures in a safe environment, without risking patient safety. This pilot program yielded early results in improving resident procedural confidence for high-risk surgical procedures, specifically resuscitative thoracotomies.

Boosting Confidence: Enhancing Spinal Cord Stimulator Needle and Lead Placement Through Simulation Training

Background This pilot study aims to examine the effectiveness of a spinal cord stimulator (SCS) simulator training system in improving the confidence of pain fellows in SCS placement. Methodology Five Ukrainian physicians (neurologists, neurosurgeons, and an anesthesiologist) completed a 10-item survey regarding their confidence in various aspects of SCS placement and their opinions on how effective SCS models were for educational purposes. After placing SCS leads using the SCS simulator, the physicians took the same survey again. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine if there was a significant difference in total scores pre and post-simulator training. The software PAST (PAleontological STatistics) was used for statistical analysis. Results Overall, five participants had a 38% statistically significant increase in survey scores before and after the intervention (mean: 4.2 vs. 6.2, p = 0.0055). With regards to each item of the survey, participants had a significantly increased confidence in driving leads (2.6 vs. 5.2, p = 0.008) and in overall technical skills for the SCS procedure after the training (2.8 vs. 5.2, p = 0.0188). Although the other eight survey items were not statistically significant (p > 0.05), participants had a 28% increase in confidence when inserting epidural needles, a 20% increase in interpreting simulated X-rays, a 32% increase in navigating challenging anatomical variations, a 12% increase in identifying key anatomical landmarks, a 20% increase in ensuring the correct placement of the lead, or a 53% increase in preparedness for performing an SCS procedure in a real clinical setting. The participant's perspective on how valuable the stimulator training was for enhancing procedural skills increased by 38% and how well the simulator replicated real-life SCS procedure increased by 52%, although both were statistically insignificant (p > 0.05). Conclusions This pilot study shows that the utilization of simulated neuromodulation training is a viable means of augmenting neuromodulation education by increasing physician's confidence in aspects of the SCS placement procedure. The extent to which simulator training improves procedural skills in a real-life SCS placement needs to be investigated further.